External quality monitoring facilitates improvement in already well-performing stroke units: insights from RES-Q Poland.

INTRODUCTION: The Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) is used in Poland for quality monitoring by numerous hospitals participating in the Angels Initiative. Our aim was to assess the degree of improvement in highly stroke-oriented centres that report cases to the RES-Q each year. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included Polish stroke units that from January 2017 to December 2020 contributed to the RES-Q at least 25 patients annually. RESULTS: Seventeen out of 180 Polish stroke units reported patients each year (2017, n = 1,691; 2018, n = 2,986; 2019, n = 3,750; 2020, n = 3,975). The percentage of ischaemic stroke patients treated with alteplase remained stable (26%, 29%, 30% and 28%, respectively). The door-to-needle time progressively decreased, from a median 49 minutes to 32 minutes. The percentage of patients treated ≤ 60 minutes and ≤ 45 minutes significantly increased (from 68% to 86% and from 43% to 70%, respectively), with no change observed between 2019 and 2020. Despite a general improvement in dysphagia screening (81%, 91%, 98% and 99%), screening performed within the first 24h from admission became less frequent (78%, 76%, 69% and 65%). In-hospital mortality significantly increased (11%, 11%, 13% and 15%), while the proportion of patients discharged home remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Quality-oriented projects facilitate the improvement of stroke care, even in centres demonstrating good baseline performance. Polish stroke units that consistently reported cases to the RES-Q demonstrated improvement in terms of door-to- -needle time and dysphagia screening. However, there is still a need to shorten the time to dysphagia screening, and carefully monitor stroke unit mortality following the COVID-19 pandemic.

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts poor response to intravenous thrombolysis in white Caucasian stroke patients.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate usefulness of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting poor response to intravenous rtPA in white Caucasian ischemic stroke patients treated within 4.5 hours from the onset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients (N = 344) treated with rtPA in a tertiary stroke center from 2011 to 2017. NLR was calculated from complete blood counts obtained on admission. The patients were classified into NLR terciles (T1 <1.75, T2<2.97, T3≥2.97). Significant neurological improvement was defined as an 8-point reduction in the NIHSS score or reaching the score of 0 to 1. RESULTS: Compared to NLR T1, patients from NLR T3 were significantly older, more often disabled before stroke, and had longer onset-to-needle time. They less often achieved neurological improvement at day 7 (38% vs 59% p=0.002) and had higher 90-day mortality (27% vs 13%, p=0.020), with no differences in neurological improvement at 24 hours, occurrence of sICH and 7-day mortality. Each additional 4 units of NLR decreased unadjusted and adjusted odds for achieving favorable outcome at day 7 (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92; aOR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-1.00), and increased the odds for death at 3 months (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.15-2.24; aOR 1.82, 95% CI:1.14-2.92) CONCLUSIONS: High NLR can predict poor response to intravenous rtPA in Caucasian patients with acute ischemic stroke, especially in terms of not achieving significant neurological improvement at day 7 and death at day 90. It encourages attempts to incorporate NLR in already validated scores.

Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale in clinical practice of stroke units and rehabilitation wards.

Introduction: The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the most common tool to quantify post-stroke disability in everyday practice and by certified raters in clinical trials. However, interobserver variability may affect reliability of retrospective observational studies, including clinical registries. Our aim was to assess real-life consistency between neurologists and physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians using mRS to rate post-stroke disability of patients transferred directly from stroke unit (SU) to rehabilitation ward (RW). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 132 consecutive acute stroke patients transferred from single tertiary SU to RW located in the same hospital in Poland. Patients were assessed by one rater from each department at the day of transfer. We distinguished between physicians previously certified in using mRS for clinical trials and not-certified physicians using mRS in everyday practice. Results: mRS at discharge from SU and on admission to RW was recorded for 105 of 132 patients. The overall agreement was 70.5% (kappa 0.55). Similar agreement was observed in the subset of 30 patients rated by certified physicians in both departments (70.0%, kappa 0.57) and in the subset of 61 patients rated by a pair of certified neurologist and not-certified rehabilitation physician (73.8%, kappa 0.58). Conclusions: Everyday consistency between raters from SU and RW in using mRS is modest as in previous validation studies. However, it may be considered sufficient for the purpose of observational studies or stroke registries. It emphasizes the need for easily accessible training in conventional mRS or implementation of specialized tools with predefined questions.