Microbial Spectrum of Intra-Abdominal Abscesses in Perforating Crohn's Disease: Results from a Prospective German Registry.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal abscesses [IAAs] are common life-threatening complications in patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. In addition to interventional drainage and surgical therapy, empirical antibiotic therapy represents a cornerstone of treatment, but contemporary data on microbial spectra and antimicrobial resistance are scarce. METHODS: We recruited 105 patients with CD and IAAs from nine German centres for a prospective registry in order to characterize the microbiological spectrum, resistance profiles, antibiotic therapy and outcome. RESULTS: In 92 of 105 patients, microbial investigations of abscess material revealed pathogenic microorganisms. A total of 174 pathogens were isolated, with a median of 2 pathogens per culture [range: 1-6]. Most frequently isolated pathogens were E. coli [45 patients], Streptococcus spp. [28 patients], Enterococci [27 patients], Candida [13 patients] and anaerobes [12 patients]. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors and quinolones were observed in 51, 36 and 35 patients, respectively. Seven patients had multiple-drug-resistant bacteria. Thirty patients received inadequate empirical treatment, and this was more frequent in patients receiving steroids or immunosuppression [37%] than in patients without immunosuppression [10%: p = 0.001] and was associated with a longer hospital stay [21 days vs 13 days, p = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: Based on antimicrobial resistance profiles, we herein report a high rate of inadequate empirical first-line therapy for IAAs in CD, especially in patients receiving immunosuppression, and this is associated with prolonged hospitalization.

Vedolizumab provides clinical benefit over 1 year in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease - a prospective multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the α4ß7-integrin, is effective in inducing and maintaining clinical remission in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis according to randomised clinical trials. AIM: To determine the long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: This observational registry assessed the clinical outcome in patients treated with vedolizumab for clinically active Crohn's disease (n = 67) or ulcerative colitis (n = 60). Primary endpoint was clinical remission (HBI ≤ 4/pMayo ≤ 1) at week 54. Secondary endpoints included clinical response rates (HBI/pMayo score drop ≥3) and steroid-free clinical remission at weeks 30 and 54. RESULTS: Vedolizumab was stopped in 69/127 (56%) patients after a median time of 18 weeks (range 2-49) predominantly owing to lack or loss of response. Using nonresponder imputation analysis, clinical remission and steroid-free remission rates were 21% and 15% in Crohn's disease and 25% and 22% in ulcerative colitis, respectively. Lack of clinical remission was associated with prior treatment with anti-TNF or with steroids for more than 3 months in the last 6 months in ulcerative colitis. At week 14, the absence of remission in Crohn's disease or nonresponse in ulcerative colitis indicated a low likelihood of clinical remission at week 54 [2/31 (7%) in Crohn's disease, 4/41 (10%) in ulcerative colitis]. Accordingly, declining C-reactive protein in inflammatory bowel disease and/or lower faecal calprotectin in ulcerative colitis at week 14 predicted remission at week 54. CONCLUSION: Among patients who started vedolizumab for active inflammatory bowel disease, clinical remission rates are 21-25% after 54 weeks.

[Pain management in chronic pancreatitis and chronic inflammatory bowel diseases]. / Schmerztherapie bei chronischer Pankreatitis und chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen.

Apart from local inflammation and defects in secretion, central mechanisms are important for pain etiology in chronic pancreatitis. Therefore, centrally acting co-analgetic agents can be used in addition to classical pain medications. Endoscopic interventions are preferred in patients with obvious dilation of the pancreatic duct. Surgical interventions are generally more effective although they are usually reserved for patients with prior failure of conservative treatment. Diverse surgical options with different efficacies and morbidities are used in individual patients.One of the main problems in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases is abdominal pain. Primarily the underlying disease needs to be adequately treated. Symptomatic pain management will most likely include treatment with acetaminophen and tramadol as well as occasionally principles of a multimodal pain regimen. For the treatment of arthralgia as well as enteropathy-associated arthritis the same treatment options are available as for other spondyloarthritic disorders.

[Pharmacotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis]. / Medikamentöse Versorgung von Patienten mit Colitis ulcerosa.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis experience various impairments. The pharmacological treatment of the disease comprises 5-aminosalicylic acid, corticosteroids as well as immunomodulatory and biological agents. Little self-reported data exist on the prescription of these drugs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2005 as a postal survey in different regions of Germany [Kiel/Lübeck, Halle (Saale), Minden, Regensburg]. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were recruited from specialised gastroenterological practices, university outpatient clinics, and the member registry of a prominent patient organisation (DCCV). Participants returned a questionnaire including established items and scales on physical and psychosocial well-being as well as the self-reported current medication. RESULTS: A total of 444 patients with ulcerative colitis returned the questionnaires. Most of the participants were female, had a high level of school education and were currently employed. Twenty-eight percent of the participants reported to receive corticosteroids and 71 % reported a current treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid. Approximately one quarter of our study population reported a treatment with immunomodulatory agents. Analgesics were reported to be prescribed only in 15 % of the patients, primarily in patients with depressive symptoms. Patients recruited from specialised gastroenterological practices and university outpatient clinics were more likely to report the prescription of 5-aminosalicylic acid and immunomodulatory drugs than members of the patient organisation. Only 7 % of our patients received loperamide, however, probiotics (12 %) and complementary agents (36 %) seem to have an important role with regard to prevalence of intake. About 40 % of women but only 28 % of the men reported to use complementary agents. Persons with a duration of illness of less than 11 years (median split) were almost twice as likely to take corticosteroids than persons with a longer duration of ulcerative colitis. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest an estimation of prescription rates in ulcerative colitis. However, they raise new questions, for example, concerning a potential underuse of immunomodulatory agents in this patient population. With regard to the identified differences in prescription rates according to psychosocial characteristics further studies are needed to examine these relationships.

[What has been confirmed in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease?]. / Was ist gesichert in der Therapie chronisch entzündlicher Darmerkrankungen?

The therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases is currently guided by clinical variables. An escalation of immunosuppressive therapy is required in case of treatment failure. However, clinical remission does not necessarily imply mucosal healing. In parallel to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis a novel concept is emerging suggesting that an early anti-inflammatory treatment can reduce structural changes in inflammatory bowel diseases. The studies supporting this novel therapeutic strategy that mucosal healing might build the future therapeutic goal will be discussed. In order to adjust the therapy, risk factors indicating a complicated disease course will be identified, resulting in the development of an individual disease course. The benefit of these strategies will be discussed together with therapy-associated complications.

Use of methotrexate in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the immunosuppressants commonly used in inflammatory bowel diseases. There is very good evidence for its use in patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory Crohn's disease for induction as well as maintenance of remission. Optimal dose as well as mode of application is still a matter of debate. The only large randomised controlled trials used 25 mg/wk for induction and 15 to 25 mg/wk for maintenance of remission, both applied intramuscularly. Current guidelines recommend methotrexate in patients with extensive disease, steroid-refractory, and steroid-dependent disease. They even suggest MTX for patients with infrequent relapses in the need of repetitive corticosteroid therapy. In clinical practice it is mainly used in patients who failed treatment with thiopurines (azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine) or who are intolerant to these drugs. MTX can also be used in paediatric patients, whereas the evidence for its effectiveness in fistulising disease is very weak. Two small studies did not prove that MTX is efficacious in ulcerative colitis. Even though case series suggest otherwise, its use is not recommended by current guidelines for patients with ulcerative colitis.

[Updated German S3-guideline regarding the diagnosis of Crohn's disease--implementation of radiological modalities]. / Aktualisierte S 3-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik des Morbus Crohn--radiologische Untersuchungstechniken.

The recently updated German S 3-guideline regarding the diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's disease incorporates several changes concerning the radiological approach compared to the former guideline. This article focuses on guideline-based radiological imaging techniques for patients with Crohn's disease. The new guideline is also compared to former European and German guidelines in the context of recently published radiological literature.

[S3-guideline "Helicobacter pylori and gastroduodenal ulcer disease"]. / S3-Leitlinie "Helicobacter pylori und gastroduodenale Ulkuskrankheit" der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS).

This guideline updates a prior concensus recommendation of the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) from 1996. It was developed by an interdisciplinary cooperation with representatives of the German Society for Microbiology, the Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (GPGE) and the German Society for Rheumatology. The guideline is methodologically based on recommendations of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) for providing a systematic evidence-based consensus guideline of S 3 level and has also implemented grading criteria according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Clinical applicability of study results as well as specifics for Germany in terms of epidemiology, antibiotic resistance status, diagnostics and therapy were taken into account.

[Nodular regenerative hyperplasia as a side effect of azathioprine in a patient with Crohn's disease]. / Noduläre regenerative Hyperplasie als Nebenwirkung von Azathioprin bei Morbus Crohn.

HISTORY: A 48-year-old patient with Crohn's disease was admitted to our hospital with fatigue, icterus, hepatosplenomegaly and ascites. INVESTIGARTIOS: The whole blood count revealed a pancytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia and slightly elevated transaminases. Examination of the liver histology showed areas of enlarged hyperplastic hepatocytes adjacent to areas of atrophic hepatocytes and dilated sinusoids. DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND COURSE: Pancytopenia was most likely azathioprine-related. Analysis of the liver histology was highly suggestive of an azathioprine-related, nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH). After discontinuation of azathioprine the patient's condition improved substantially. CONCLUSIONS: NRH is a rare but potentially serious complication of azathioprine therapy. Other causes include various rheumatological, vascular and myeloproliferative diseases. When azathioprine is prescribed it must be borne in mind that it can cause NRH as a potential adverse effect, and liver enzymes should be measured at regular follow-up examinations.