Prolonged dialysis during ex vivo lung perfusion promotes inflammatory responses.

Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has extended the number of transplantable lungs by reconditioning marginal organs. However, EVLP is performed at 37°C without homeostatic regulation leading to metabolic wastes' accumulation in the perfusate and, as a corrective measure, the costly perfusate is repeatedly replaced during the standard of care procedure. As an interesting alternative, a hemodialyzer could be placed on the EVLP circuit, which was previously shown to rebalance the perfusate composition and to maintain lung function and viability without appearing to impact the global gene expression in the lung. Here, we assessed the biological effects of a hemodialyzer during EVLP by performing biochemical and refined functional genomic analyses over a 12h procedure in a pig model. We found that dialysis stabilized electrolytic and metabolic parameters of the perfusate but enhanced the gene expression and protein accumulation of several inflammatory cytokines and promoted a genomic profile predicting higher endothelial activation already at 6h and higher immune cytokine signaling at 12h. Therefore, epuration of EVLP with a dialyzer, while correcting features of the perfusate composition and maintaining the respiratory function, promotes inflammatory responses in the tissue. This finding suggests that modifying the metabolite composition of the perfusate by dialysis during EVLP can have detrimental effects on the tissue response and that this strategy should not be transferred as such to the clinic.

Antibiotics in anesthesia and critical care.

Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to an underlying acute infection. Sepsis is a major worldwide healthcare problem. An annual estimated 48.9 million incident cases of sepsis is reported, with 11 million (20%) sepsis-related deaths. Administration of appropriate antimicrobials is one of the most effective therapeutic interventions to reduce mortality. The severity of illness informs the urgency of antimicrobial administration. Nevertheless, even used properly, they cause adverse effects and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. Both inadequate and unnecessarily broad empiric antibiotics are associated with higher mortality and also select for antibiotic-resistant germs. In this narrative review, we will first discuss important factors and potential confounders which may influence the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) and which should be considered in the provision of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP). Then, we will summarize recent advances and perspectives to optimize antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Finally, the major role of the microbiota and the impact of antimicrobials on it will be discussed. While expert recommendations help guide daily practice in the operating theatre and ICU, a thorough knowledge of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) rules is critical to optimize the management of complex patients and minimize the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Erector spinae plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block for the prevention of acute postsurgical pain in breast cancer surgery: A prospective observational study compared with a propensity score-matched historical cohort.

BACKGROUND: Preventing acute postsurgical pain (PSP) following breast cancer surgery is a major issue. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has been widely studied for this indication. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been assumed to be effective. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ESPB over TPVB in preventing acute PSP. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 120 patients admitted for unilateral major oncologic breast surgery received T2/T3 ESPB (ropivacaine 0.75%, 0.35 ml.kg-1), and 102 were analysed. Then, the ESPB cohort was compared to a TPVB cohort from the experimental arm of a randomized controlled study with the same protocol (NCT02408393) using propensity score matching analysis. The primary outcome was the need for morphine consumption in the PACU. Secondary outcomes were the morphine total dose, the incidence of ESPB and TPVB complications, and discontinuous visual analogue scale measurement trends at rest and at mobilization in the 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients completed the study between December 2018 and August 2019. Propensity score matching formed 94 matched pairs. The proportion of morphine titration in the PACU was higher in the ESPB group than in the TPVB group (74.5% vs. 41.5%, p<0.001), with a between-group difference of 33.0% (95% CI [19.3%, 46.7%]). No ESPB-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: ESPB is less effective in preventing morphine consumption in the PACU than TPVB. Our findings do not support the use of ESPB as the first-line regional anaesthesia for major breast cancer surgery. Randomized trials comparing ESPB and TPVB are needed.