Paclitaxel 175 or 225 mg per meters squared with carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of different doses of paclitaxel with fixed doses of carboplatin in the treatment of ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIB to IV, were eligible for this randomized, multicenter study. Women were randomly assigned to treatment with (1) carboplatin at the dose (in milligrams) corresponding to the following formula: target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) = 6 x (glomerular filtration rate + 25) mg/m(2) (AUC6) plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) for six cycles every 21 days or (2) carboplatin AUC6 plus paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) for six cycles every 21 days. A total of 502 women entered the study. RESULTS: Pathologic complete response was documented in 132 patients (63.8%) in the 175 mg/m(2) group and in 127 cases (55.7%) in the 225 mg/m(2) group (chi(2) P =.090). The 4-year progression-free survival rate was 41.5% (SE = 3.5) in the 175-mg group and 39.2% (SE = 3.5) in the 225-mg group. The corresponding 4-year survival rates were 46.2% (based on 115 deaths) and 47.3% (based on 113 deaths), respectively. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial suggests that paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin AUC6 is the schedule with a more favorable profile than paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin AUC6.

Impact of topotecan-based chemotherapy on the immune system of advanced ovarian cancer patients: an immunophenotypic study.

The effects of topotecan-based chemotherapy (CT) on peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) subsets were evaluated in ovarian cancer patients. Fourteen patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, at the diagnosis or relapsed after platinum-based CT, were treated with: a) topotecan in association with carboplatin and taxanes as first line CT; b) topotecan alone or c) topotecan in association with carboplatin both as second line of treatment after platinum. The phenotype of PBL was determined before starting treatment and immediately before each CT course by flow cytometric analysis. Before starting CT, the absolute number of lymphocytes and the CD2+, CD3+, CD4+ subsets were significantly lower in pre-treated patients and not significantly altered in CT-naive patients with respect to a cohort of 20 healthy donors utilized as control. Lymphocytes co-expressing CD4+/CD8+ were significantly higher in both subgroups of patients than in normal donors. CD4+/CD45RA+ and CD4+/CD45RO+ subsets were significantly decreased in pre-treated patients and normal in CT-naive patients. CD3+/HLA-DR+ T cell population significantly increased in CT-naive patients at baseline. During CT and after its discontinuation, no relevant changes were recorded for both subgroups of patients with respect to the baseline in lymphocyte absolute count, CD2+, CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD45RO+ subsets, while CD4+/CD45RA+ subpopulation was significantly decreased in CT-naive patients. CD8+, CD19+, CD20+, CD16+, CD56+, CD2+/CD25+ subsets did not differ statistically comparing to normal donors both at baseline and during CT. The treatment was well tolerated and no patient developed non-neutropenic infection. Topotecan-based therapy does not have a negative impact on PBL in either CT-naive or in pretreated ovarian cancer patients. This information should be considered when utilizing topotecan with other anticancer drugs in the adjuvant setting as well as when dose-intensification of topotecan with stem cell support is planned.