Concordance in Oncogenic Alterations Between the Primary Tumor and Advanced Disease: Insights Into the Heterogeneity of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is characterized by significant phenotypic and clinical heterogeneities and poor response to systemic therapy, potentially related to underlying heterogeneity in oncogenic alterations. We aimed to characterize the genomic heterogeneity between primary tumors and advanced disease in patients with ICCA. METHODS: Biopsy-proven CCA specimens (primary tumor and paired advanced disease [metastatic disease, progressive disease on systemic therapy, or postoperative recurrence]) from two institutions were subjected to targeted next-generation sequencing. Overall concordance (oncogenic driver mutations, copy number alterations, and fusion events) and mutational concordance (only oncogenic mutations) were compared across paired samples. A subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of exposure to systemic therapy. Patients with extrahepatic CCA (ECCA) were included as a comparison group. RESULTS: Sample pairs from 65 patients with ICCA (n = 54) and ECCA (n = 11) were analyzed. The median time between sample collection was 19.6 months (range, 2.7-122.9). For the entire cohort, the overall oncogenic concordance was 49% and the mutational concordance was 62% between primary and advanced disease samples. Subgroup analyses of ICCA and ECCA revealed overall/mutational concordance rates of 47%/58% and 60%/84%, respectively. Oncogenic concordance was similarly low for pairs exposed to systemic therapy between sample collections (n = 50, 53% overall, 68% mutational). In patients treated with targeted therapy for IDH1/2 alterations (n = 6) or FGFR2 fusions (n = 3), there was 100% concordance between the primary and advanced disease specimens. In two patients, FGFR2 (n = 1) and IDH1 (n = 1) alterations were detected de novo in the advanced disease specimens. CONCLUSION: The results reflect a high degree of heterogeneity in ICCA and argue for reassessment of the dominant driver mutations with change in disease status.

A propensity score matched analysis of liver transplantation outcomes in the setting of preservation solution shortage.

The recent shortage of the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution prompted increased utilization of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution for liver graft preservation. This contemporary study analyzed deceased donor liver transplant outcomes following preservation with HTK vs UW. Patients receiving deceased donor liver transplantations between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022, were retrospectively identified utilizing the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database, stratified by preservation with HTK vs UW, and a propensity score matching analysis was performed. Outcomes assessed included rates of primary nonfunction, graft survival, and patient survival. There were 4447 patients in each cohort. Primary nonfunction occurred in 60 (1.35%) patients in the HTK group vs 25 (0.54%) in the UW group (P < .001). HTK was associated with lower 90-day graft survival (94.39% vs 96.09%; P < .001) and 90-day patient survival (95.97% vs 97.38%; P = .001). Unmatched donation after cardiac death-specific analysis of HTK vs UW demonstrated respective rates of primary nonfunction of 1.63% vs 0.82% (P = .20), 90-day graft survival of 92.50% vs 95.29% (P = .069), and 90-day patient survival of 93.90% vs 96.35% (P = .077). These results suggest that HTK may not be an equivalent preservation solution for deceased donor liver transplantation.

Assessing Kidney Transplantation Using ECMO-Supported Donors Within a KDPI-Based Allocation System.

Background: Organ donors supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have historically been considered high-risk and are judiciously utilized. This study examines transplant outcomes using renal allografts from donors supported on ECMO for nondonation purposes. Methods: Retrospective review of the Gift of Life (Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware) organ procurement organization database, cross-referenced to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, assessed kidney transplants using donors supported on venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) ECMO for nondonation purposes. Transplants using VA- and VV-ECMO donors were compared with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI)-stratified non-ECMO donors. Regression modeling of the entire ECMO and non-ECMO populations assessed ECMO as predictive of graft survival. Additional regression of the ECMO population alone assessed for donor features associated with graft survival. Results: Seventy-eight ECMO donors yielded 128 kidney transplants (VA: 80, VV: 48). Comparing outcomes using these donors to kidney transplants using organs from KDPI-stratified non-ECMO donors, VA- and VV-ECMO donor grafts conferred similar rates of delayed graft function and posttransplant renal function to KDPI-matched non-ECMO counterparts. VA-ECMO kidneys demonstrated superior graft survival compared with the lowest-quality (KDPI 86%-100%) non-ECMO kidneys and similar graft survival to KDPI <85% non-ECMO kidneys. VV-ECMO showed inferior graft survival to all but the lowest-quality (KDPI 86%-100%) non-ECMO kidneys. VV-ECMO, but not VA-ECMO, was associated with increased risk of graft loss on multivariable regression (hazard ratios-VA: 1.02, VV: 2.18). Higher KDPI, advanced age, increased body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes were identified as high-risk features of ECMO donors. Conclusions: Kidney transplantation using appropriately selected ECMO donors can safely expand the donor pool. Ongoing studies are necessary to determine best practice patterns using kidneys from these donors.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiopulmonary failure in organ donation: Assessing liver transplant outcomes.

Liver transplantation continues to face significant organ shortages and efficient utilization of marginal donors is paramount. This study evaluates the practice patterns and outcomes in liver transplantation when utilizing allografts from marginal donors who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We performed a retrospective review of the Gift of Life (PA, NJ, DE) organ-procuring organization database for transplants performed using donors supported on ECMO for nondonation purposes. These were cross-referenced to the transplant recipients within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, and the outcomes of liver transplants using donors on ECMO support were compared with those not requiring ECMO. Organ use and nonuse patterns were then evaluated in ECMO-supported donors, identifying the factors associated with nonuse compared with the factors associated with graft failure. Thirty-nine of the 84 ECMO-supported donors contributing at least one intra-abdominal organ for transplant donated a liver. Graft survival and patient survival up to 5 years were comparable between transplants from ECMO and non-ECMO-supported donors, and no cases of primary nonfunction were seen in the ECMO group. ECMO support was not associated with 1-year graft failure on regression modeling. Additional regression analyses within the ECMO donor population identified bacteremia (HR: 19.81) and elevated total bilirubin at donation (HR: 2.44) as predictive of post-transplant graft failure. Livers from donors supported on ECMO before donation appear safe to use in select transplant settings. Better understanding of the impact of predonation ECMO on liver allograft function will help guide the optimal use of these scarcely used donors.