RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) may develop patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJOA). Limited data exist regarding an absolute association between PFP and PFJOA. Understanding this relationship will support the need for early interventions to manage PFP. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine if females with PFP have a patella position and cartilage biomarkers similar to individuals with PFJOA. It was hypothesized that females with PFP and excessive patella lateralization would have higher cartilage biomarker levels than controls. It also was hypothesized that a significant association would exist between pain and cartilage biomarker levels in subjects with excessive patella lateralization. STUDY DESIGN: Single-occasion, cross-sectional, observational. METHODS: Pain was assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) for activity pain over the previous week. Patella offset position (RAB angle) was measured using diagnostic ultrasound. Urine was collected and cartilage biomarkers quantified by analyzing C-telopeptide fragments of type II collagen (uCTX-II). Independent t-tests were used to determine between-group differences for RAB angle and uCTX-II. Bivariate correlations were used to determine associations between VAS and uCTX-II for females with PFP. RESULTS: Subjects (age range 20 to 30 years) had similar RAB angles (p = 0.21) and uCTX-II (p = 0.91). A significant association only existed between VAS scores and uCTX-II for females with PFP who had a RAB angle > 13 ° (r = 0.86; p = 0.003). Comparison of uCTX-II in the 25-to-30-year-old females with PFP and excessive patella lateralization in the current study to published normative data showed that this cohort had elevated biomarkers. CONCLUSION: These findings support that a certain cohort of individuals with PFP have features similar to individuals with confirmed PFJOA (patella lateralization and elevated biomarkers). Additional studies are needed to determine if interventions can reverse not only pain but biomarker levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b (diagnosis).
RESUMO
Several studies worldwide have demonstrated significant relationships between meteorological parameters and stroke events. However, authors often reported discordant effects of both barometric pressure and air temperature on stroke occurrence. The present study investigated whether there was an association between weather parameters (barometric pressure and temperature) and ischemic stroke hospitalization. The aim of the study was to find out whether daily barometric pressure may be used as a prognostic variable to evaluate the workload change of a neurological intensive care unit. We conducted a retrospective review study in which we collected the independent (barometric pressure and temperature) and dependent variables (stroke hospitalization) every 24 h for the periods 10/1/2016-4/30/2017 at Augusta University Medical Center of Augusta, GA. We analyzed the data with zero-inflated Poisson model to assess the relationship between the barometric pressure, temperature, and daily stroke hospitalization. The results showed that there was a significantly correlation between daily barometric pressure variation and daily stroke hospitalization, especially on elder male patients (≥ 65). Stroke events were more likely to occur in the patients with risk factors than in those without risk factors when exposed to barometric pressure and temperature changes. Decreased barometric pressure and increased temperature were associated with increased daily stroke hospitalization. Furthermore, there was a potential delayed effect of increased stroke events after cold temperature exposure. Barometric pressure and temperature changes over the preceding 24 h are associated with daily stroke hospitalization. These findings may enhance our understanding of relationship between stroke and weather and maybe used in the development of public health strategies to minimize the weather-related stroke risk.
RESUMO
The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.