Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair of Intact Descending Thoracic Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy of endovascular thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) versus open surgical repair for chronic aortic pathology in patients with connective tissue disorders are limited. In particular, few studies have examined outcomes of TEVAR versus open repair for intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAA) in this subset of patients beyond index hospitalization. Therefore, we investigate 5-year outcomes of TEVAR and open surgical repair of intact DTAAs in patients with known connective tissue disorders. METHODS: Using the TriNetX Data Network, a global federated database of over 75 million patients, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with connective tissue disorders and intact DTAAs, treated initially with either TEVAR or open surgery. Eligible patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched for several preoperative co-variates including demographics, surgical history, and comorbidities. We calculated and compared 5-year cumulative incidence and hazards of death, re-intervention, aortic dissection, renal failure, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, paraplegia, and limb ischemia using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We identified 55 patients treated with TEVAR and 200 treated with open surgery. After matching, we compared 46 patients in each cohort. After matching, only incidence of re-intervention via endovascular approach was significantly higher among patients in the TEVAR cohort (27.1% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.009). Rates and hazards of other outcomes were higher in the TEVAR group, however, differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with TEVAR had numerically higher rates of adverse outcomes compared to open surgical patients, however only the difference in re-intervention rate was statistically significant. Given the evolving landscape of endovascular intervention, greater-powered studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for intact DTAAs in a select subset of connective tissue disorder patients.

Shockwave lithotripsy facilitates large-bore vascular access through calcified arteries.

BACKGROUND: Our objective is to explore the Peripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System in the treatment of calcific access vessels during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and transcatheter aortic valve intervention. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing TEVAR, EVAR, or transcatheter aortic valve intervention with severe calcific arterial disease between July 2018 and August 2019. Maximum circumferential calcification, length of calcification, and inner/outer diameter measurements were collected with curved planar reformation by medical imaging software (Aquarius APS, TeraRecon, Foster City, Calif). Effective luminal gain was calculated using the minimal inner diameter and the largest bore passed within the vessel lumen. End points included technical success, mortality, adverse events, and requirement for bail out maneuvers. Technical success was defined as successful delivery and deployment of device or endograft. RESULTS: Nine patients were included (mean age, 79.3 ± 9.79 years; range, 59-97 years]). four transcatheter aortic valve replacement, one TEVAR, one EVAR, and three fenestrated EVAR. Six patients (66.7%) had more than one artery treated; the segments treated included common iliac artery (seven patients [77.8%]), the external iliac artery (seven patients [77.8%]), and the common femoral artery (one patient [11.1%]). The average inner iliac vessel diameter was 3.38 ± 0.99 mm (range, 1.87-4.72 mm). The average outside diameter of device introduced was 7.2 ± 0.94 (range, 6.3-8.8 mm) with 229% effective luminal gain. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases with a 0% mortality. Adjunctive measures were needed in five cases (55.6%). One vessel perforation was controlled with covered stent (Viabahn; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) deployment. Dissection was identified in two cases requiring stent placement. Two cases required the use of the Terumo International Systems SOLOPATH Balloon Expandable TransFemoral System (Terumo Interventional Systems, Somerset, NJ). One case deployed a Viabahn stent applying the "crack and pave" technique. CONCLUSIONS: As the population of the United States ages, calcified arterial disease will become an everyday clinical conundrum. Furthermore, the procedures for which the IVL system is geared toward facilitating will likely also increase in use. The IVL system is an additional tool in the vascular surgeon's armamentarium to obtain large-bore access in these calcified vessels. Further studies are needed to better assess the clinical effectiveness of the IVL system.

Atheroembolism to the Breast.

We report the case of a woman presenting with livedo reticularis of the breast who was found to have atheroembolism to the breast following upper extremity percutaneous access. Atheroembolism is the embolization of cholesterol crystals off an atherosclerotic plaque that can occur spontaneously or as a result of vascular intervention. This is a unique presentation of an otherwise well-described complication of vascular catheterization, and we propose that livedo reticularis of the breast can be interpreted as a sign of atheroembolism in the appropriate clinical context.

Transradial renal salvage after complex endovascular aneurysm repair complicated by left renal artery thrombosis.

Transradial access has been used for percutaneous coronary interventions with success; however, there is limited literature on its use for visceral stenting in the setting of complex endovascular aneurysm repair. We present a case of transradial left renal salvage after renal artery thrombosis in the setting of complex endovascular aneurysm repair.

The Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Novel Treatment of Calcific Arterial Disease.

Endovascular treatment of arterial diseases has become first-line in most cases due to improved technology. However, until recently, excessive atherosclerotic calcification has been a major limiting factor in the endovascular management of peripheral arterial disease, as well as vascular access for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Peripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System (Shockwave Medical, Inc., Fremont California) applies pulsatile mechanical energy under fluoroscopic guidance to disrupt calcified lesions. The purpose of this paper is to introduce IVL in the treatment of calcific access vessels in preparation for EVAR and TAVR, as well as peripheral arterial disease applications to enhance luminal gain. Using the IVL System, angioplasty can be performed with lower pressures, which may minimize arterial dissection. Further, the lithotripsy effect on calcium will enhance vessel compliance. We describe several cases where IVL was applied successfully and present additional cases that may have benefitted from the use of this technology.