Circulating tumor cell detection: A prospective comparison between CellSearch® and RareCyte® platforms in patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic in patients with breast cancer. Several technical platforms exist for their enumeration and characterization. Comparative studies between these platforms are scarce. The RareCyte CTC detection is theoretically more sensitive than the established CellSearch platform, which identifies only CTCs that express EpCAM and cytokeratin. This study prospectively compares CTC enumeration in patients with breast cancer in a paired analysis using these two platforms. It investigates survival outcomes in groups defined by a CTC count threshold. DESIGN: CTC enumeration was performed on 100 samples obtained from 86 patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in two independent laboratories each blinded to the clinical data and the results from the other platform. RESULTS: One hundred paired samples were collected and CTC counts were determined using the CellSearch and RareCyte CTC platforms. In total, 65% and 75% of samples had at least one detectable CTC in 7.5 mL blood with the CellSearch and the RareCyte systems, respectively. CTC counts with the CellSearch system ranged from 0 to 2289 with a median of 3 CTCs, the RareCyte CTC counts ranged from 0 to 1676 with a median of 3 CTCs. The number of samples with 5 or more CTCs in 7.5 mL of blood (the poor prognosis cut-off validated with the CellSearch system) blood was 45% with the CellSearch test and 48% with the RareCyte test. CTC counts quantified with the CellSearch and the RareCyte systems were strongly correlated (Spearman's r = 0.8235 (0.7450-0.8795) p < 0.001). 86 patients were included for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. An increased mortality risk in patients with CellSearch of 5 CTCs or more per 7.5 mL blood, with a log-rank hazard ratio of 5.164 (2.579-10.34) (p < 0.001) was confirmed. The survival analysis with RareCyte CTC counts with the identical cut-off showed a significantly impaired survival with a hazard ratio of 4.213 (2.153-8.244) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the analytical and prognostic equivalence of CellSearch and RareCyte CTC enumeration platforms in patients with MBC using the CellSearch cut-off. This is the first demonstration of prognostic significance using the RareCyte platform.

Coagulation/fibrinolysis and circulating tumor cells in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and standard coagulation tests in both a discovery and a validation cohort of patients with advanced breast cancer. METHODS: In a retrospective (n = 77) and a prospective (n = 92) study of patients with progressive advanced breast cancer, CTC count, platelet number, fibrinogen level, D-dimers, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time were measured. The association between these coagulation studies and CTC count was analyzed. The impact of these measurements on overall survival (OS) was assessed. RESULTS: In both cohorts, results were similar; absolute CTC count was significantly associated to D-dimer level and inversely with platelet count. In the prospective cohort, quantification of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (tdEVs) was associated with CTC count, and with coagulation abnormalities (low platelet count and increased D-dimers). tdEVs did not add to CTC count in predicting changes in platelets or D-dimers. In multivariate analysis only CTC ≥ 5 CTC/7.5 mL, ER status, HER2 status and lines of chemotherapy were associated with OS. In patients with terminally metastatic breast cancer, very high CTC counts are prevalent. CONCLUSION: A significant association exists between increasing CTC number and increased D-dimers and decreased platelet counts, suggesting a potential role for CTCs as a direct contributor of intravascular coagulation activation. In patients with advanced and progressive breast cancer, abnormalities in routine coagulation tests is the rule. In patients with terminally advanced breast cancer a "leukemic" phase with high CTC count is prevalent.

Neratinib for the treatment of breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Neratinib is an orally available, pan-HER inhibitor with clinical activity in patients with HER2-amplified and HER2-mutated breast cancer. Areas covered: A summary of publically available and relevant clinical data on neratinib. Expert opinion: Neratinib (N) is clearly distinct from lapatinib (L), a difference based on its broad anti-HER effect, its covalent target binding and its toxicity profile. The main toxicity of neratinib is gastro-intestinal and is essentially limited to diarrhea. Although not directly compared with single agent lapatinib, skin toxicity is much less pronounced with N. The direct clinical comparison of N-capecitabine versus L-capecitabine is the subject of the ongoing NALA-trial. In patients with advanced disease, neratinib has clinically relevant activity in patients with trastuzumab(T)-pretreated and unpretreated disease. In patients having completed one year of adjuvant trastuzumab, an additional year of neratinib further reduces the risk of recurrence of invasive disease. The activity of neratinib in HER2-mutated advanced disease is subject of ongoing clinical trials but preclinical and early clinical results are promising. Neratinib is a usefull drug and a valuable addition to the different anti-HER2-drugs avalaible for patients with HER2-overexpressing and HER2-mutated breast cancer.

Phase I/II pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed and epirubicin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed and epirubicin are each active in patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase I/II study evaluated these drugs as a combination regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with locally advanced or MBC were enrolled. Pemetrexed 400-600 mg/m2 and epirubicin 60-90 mg/m2 were administered on day 1 every 21 days. The recommended phase II dose was evaluated in a 2-stage design. RESULTS: Phase I enrolled 34 patients and evaluated 5 dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Patients received a median of 7.5 cycles (range, 1-8 cycles), and promising efficacy (partial response [PR], 32%; stable disease [SD], 50%) was observed. Pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed was unchanged when combined with epirubicin. Selected phase II regimen (pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 and epirubicin 75 mg/m2) was administered to 22 patients (median, 4.5 cycles; range 1-13 cycles). Five patients experienced a PR (23%), and 10 experienced SD (46%). This response was below the predefined efficacy requirements for subsequent enrollment, and accrual was stopped. Median time to progression was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-8.9 months), and median time to treatment failure was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.9 months). CONCLUSION: The regimen is safe but cannot be recommended as first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer because of the low response rate.

Inflammatory breast cancer: current understanding.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Inflammatory breast cancer is a highly aggressive variant of locally advanced breast cancer that carries a significantly worse prognosis. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advances in the molecular modus operandi of this particular form of breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies on tumor cell emboli, E-cadherin, chemokine receptors, steroid hormone receptor, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and gene expression all suggest significant differences with noninflammatory breast cancer and are clearly in line with a different pathogenesis of the condition. SUMMARY: This comprehensive review will hopefully allow for better treatment modalities with targeted approaches as suggested by the early data on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in inflammatory breast cancer.