Albumin determined by bromocresol green leads to erroneous results in routine evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVES: Measurement of plasma albumin is pivotal for clinical decision-making in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Routinely used methods as bromocresol green (BCG) and bromocresol purple (BCP) can suffer from aselectivity, but the impact of aselectivity on the accuracy of plasma albumin results of CKD-patients is still unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of BCG-, BCP- and JCTLM-endorsed immunological methods in patients with various stages of CKD. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of commonly used albumin methods in patients with CKD stages G1 through G5, the latter divided in two groups based on whether they received hemodialysis treatment. In total, 163 patient plasma samples were measured at 14 laboratories, on six different BCG and BCP-platforms, and four different immunological platforms. The results were compared with an ERM-DA-470k-corrected nephelometric assay. The implications on outcome is evaluated by the proportion of patient results <38 g/L for the diagnosis of protein energy wasting. RESULTS: Albumin results determined with BCP- and immunological methods showed the best agreement with the target value (92.7 and 86.2 %, respectively vs. 66.7 % for BCG, namely due to overestimation). The relative agreement of each method with the target value was platform-dependent, with larger variability in agreement between platforms noted for BCG and immunological methods (3.2-4.6 and 2.6-5.3 %) as opposed to BCP (0.7-1.5 %). The stage of CKD had similar effects on the variability in agreement for the three method-groups (0.6-1.8 % vs. 0.7-1.5 % vs. 0.4-1.6 %). The differences between methods cause discrepancies in clinical decision-making, as structurally fewer patients were diagnosed with protein energy wasting upon using BCG-based albumin results. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that BCP is fit for the intended use to measure plasma albumin levels in CKD patients from all stages, including patients on hemodialysis. In contrast, most BCG-based platforms falsely overestimate the plasma albumin concentration.

The bias between different albumin assays may affect clinical decision-making.

Differences between laboratory assays can have important clinical implications. For creatinine assays this became apparent soon after the introduction of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula and resulted in international efforts towards standardization. Albumin in blood is measured by different assays, either chromogenic using Bromocresol green (BCG) or Bromocresol purple (BCP), or by an immunoassay. Since differences between these assays have received limited attention we evaluated bias and imprecision of BCG and BCP assays in comparison to the immunoassay using blood samples from patients with membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome. For the BCG assay, the mean bias was high (6.2 g/l, with a standard deviation of 2.4 g/l) compared to a bias of 0.3 g/l (standard deviation 1.5 g/l) for the BCP assay. Importantly, we questioned clinical relevance by evaluating the accuracy of the decision toward the use of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy. Notably, nephrologists may reach inappropriate treatment decisions using the BGC assay in up to 59% of patients. Thus, our study should stimulate efforts towards standardization of the albumin assays.