Pretransplant Desensitization of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies with Plasmapheresis and Immunoglobulin Produces Equivalent Outcomes to Patients with No Donor Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

In patients requiring haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant (haplo-HCT), the presence of donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) is associated with high rates of primary graft failure and poor overall survival (OS). There is limited data regarding the effect of desensitization. Adult patients undergoing haplo-HCT at Washington University School of Medicine from 2009-2021 were identified. Patients were divided into three cohorts: no DSA, untreated DSA or treated DSA. DSA testing was performed. Desensitization therapy using plasmapheresis and IVIg (immunoglobulin) was performed. We retrospectively identified 304 patients for study inclusion. 14 of 30 patients with DSAs underwent desensitization. By day +2, 57% of patients cleared all DSAs. OS was expectedly worse in patients with untreated DSAs. There were similar results between treated DSA and patients without DSA (OS median: control: 352 days vs. treated: 1331 days vs. untreated: 137 days, p = 0.02). RFS was also significantly different between the groups however with similar RFS in treated DSA and control groups (RFS median: control: 248 vs. treated: 322 v. untreated: 119, p = 0.03). Desensitization before haplo-HCT produces similar outcomes to patients without DSAs. While the optimal desensitization protocol has not been established, all patients received a backbone of plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin.

Dark Blood Contrast-Enhanced Brain MRI Using Echo-uT1 RESS.

BACKGROUND: The widely used magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence makes enhancing lesions and blood vessels appear bright after gadolinium administration. However, dark blood imaging using T1-weighted Sampling Perfection with Application optimized Contrast using different flip angle Evolution (T1 SPACE) can be advantageous since it improves the conspicuity of small metastases and leptomeningeal disease. As a potential alternative to T1 SPACE, we evaluated a new dark blood sequence called echo-uT1 RESS (unbalanced T1 Relaxation-Enhanced Steady-State). PURPOSE: We compared the performance of echo-uT1 RESS with Dixon fid-uT1 RESS, MPRAGE, and T1 SPACE. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, IRB approved. SUBJECTS/PHANTOM: Phantom to assess flow properties of echo-uT1 RESS. Twenty-one patients (14 female, age range 35-82 years) with primary and secondary brain tumors. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: 3 Tesla/MPRAGE, T1 SPACE, Dixon fid-uT1 RESS, echo-uT1 RESS. ASSESSMENT: Flow phantom signal vs. velocity as a function of flip angle and sequence. Qualitative image assessment on 4-point scale. Quantitative evaluation of tumor-to-brain contrast, apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR), and vessel-to-brain aCNR. STATISTICAL TESTS: Friedman and Mann-Whitney U tests. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the phantom, echo-uT1 RESS showed greater flow-dependent signal loss than fid-uT1 RESS. In patients, blood vessels appeared bright with MPRAGE, gray with fid-uT1 RESS, and dark with T1 SPACE and echo-uT1 RESS. For MPRAGE, Dixon fid-uT1 RESS, echo-uT1 RESS, and T1 SPACE, respective tumor-to-brain contrast values were 0.6 ± 0.3, 1.3 ± 0.5, 1.0 ± 0.4, and 0.6 ± 0.4, while normalized aCNR values were 68.9 ± 50.9, 128.4 ± 59.2, 74.2 ± 42.1, and 99.4 ± 73.9. DATA CONCLUSION: Volumetric dark blood contrast-enhanced brain MRI is feasible using echo-uT1 RESS. The dark blood effect was improved vs. fid-uT1 RESS, while both uT1 RESS versions provided better tumor-to-brain contrast than MPRAGE. Whereas T1 SPACE provided better tumor aSNR, echo-uT1 RESS provided better Weber contrast, lesion sharpness and a more consistent dark blood effect. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Impact of donor age and relationship on outcomes of peripheral blood haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Here we describe a retrospective analysis of outcomes in 299 patients who underwent peripheral blood haplo-HCT with PTCy from July 2009 through May 2021 and their association with donor characteristics. Patients had mostly acute leukemias and high or very high DRI. Multivariate analyses were conducted examining OS, NRM, relapse, cytokine release syndrome, acute and chronic GVHD. Donor characteristics included age, sex, relationship, ABO status, CMV status, and HLA match grade. Our analysis revealed increasing donor age was associated with higher NRM (compared to age <30; age 30-44 HR, 1.65; P = 0.110, age >44 HR, 1.80; P = 0.056) but lower relapse risk (compared to age <30; age 30-44 HR, 0.61; P = 0.034, age > 44 HR, 0.71; P = 0.132). There were no differences in CRS, aGVHD or cGVHD. We found no difference in outcomes based on the donor-recipient relationship. No differences were found based on HLA match grade or DRB1 match status. Increasing donor age was associated with lower relapse risk but higher NRM, resulting in no difference in OS based on donor age. Other donor factors including relationship (parent/sibling/child/ maternal), CMV status, donor sex, HLA match grade, and DRB1 status were not associated with outcomes.

Kidney Recovery in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Treated in Outpatient Hemodialysis or Rehabilitation Facilities.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Since January 2017, patients with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI-D) can be discharged to outpatient dialysis centers for continued hemodialysis (HD) support. We aimed to examine the rate of kidney recovery, time to recovery, and hospitalization-related clinical parameters associated with kidney recovery in patients with AKI-D. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 111 adult patients who were admitted to the University of Kentucky Hospital, experienced AKI-D, and were discharged with need of outpatient HD. EXPOSURE: Hospitalization-related clinical parameters were evaluated. OUTCOME: Kidney recovery as a composite of being alive and no longer requiring HD or other form of kidney replacement therapy. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Discrete-time survival analysis and logistic regression were used to determine adjusted probabilities of kidney recovery at prespecified time points and to evaluate clinical parameters associated with recovery. RESULTS: 45 (41%) patients recovered kidney function, 25 (55.5%) within the first 30 days following discharge, 16 (35.5%) within 30 to 60 days, and 4 (9%) within 60 to 90 days. Adjusted probabilities of recovery were 36.7%, 27.4%, and 6.3%, respectively. Of the remaining patients, 49 (44%) developed kidney failure requiring chronic kidney replacement therapy and 17 (15%) died or went to hospice. Patients who did not recover kidney function were older, had more comorbid conditions, had lower estimated glomerular filtration rates at baseline, and received more blood transfusions during hospitalization when compared with those who recovered kidney function. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias given that patients included in the study were all eligible for AKI management with outpatient HD as part of Medicare/Medicaid services. CONCLUSIONS: At least one-third of AKI-D survivors discharged from an acute care hospital dependent on HD recovered kidney function within the first 90 days of discharge, more commonly in the first 30 days postdischarge. Future studies should elucidate clinical parameters that can inform risk classification and interventions to promote kidney recovery in this vulnerable and growing population.

Fully self-gated whole-heart 4D flow imaging from a 5-minute scan.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate an acquisition and processing technique that enables fully self-gated 4D flow imaging with whole-heart coverage in a fixed 5-minute scan. THEORY AND METHODS: The data are acquired continuously using Cartesian sampling and sorted into respiratory and cardiac bins using the self-gating signal. The reconstruction is performed using a recently proposed Bayesian method called ReVEAL4D. ReVEAL4D is validated using data from 8 healthy volunteers and 2 patients and compared with compressed sensing technique, L1-SENSE. RESULTS: Healthy subjects-Compared with 2D phase-contrast MRI (2D-PC), flow quantification from ReVEAL4D shows no significant bias. In contrast, the peak velocity and peak flow rate for L1-SENSE are significantly underestimated. Compared with traditional parallel MRI-based 4D flow imaging, ReVEAL4D demonstrates small but significant biases in net flow and peak flow rate, with no significant bias in peak velocity. All 3 indices are significantly and more markedly underestimated by L1-SENSE. Patients-Flow quantification from ReVEAL4D agrees well with the 2D-PC reference. In contrast, L1-SENSE markedly underestimated peak velocity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of highly accelerated 5-minute Cartesian acquisition, self-gating, and ReVEAL4D enables whole-heart 4D flow imaging with accurate flow quantification.

A method to correct background phase offset for phase-contrast MRI in the presence of steady flow and spatial wrap-around artifact.

PURPOSE: Background phase offsets in phase-contrast MRI are often corrected using polynomial regression; however, correction performance degrades when temporally invariant outliers such as steady flow or spatial wrap-around artifact are present. We describe and validate an iterative method called automatic rejection of temporally invariant outliers (ARTO), which excludes these outliers from the fitting process. METHODS: The ARTO method iteratively removes pixels with large polynomial regression errors analyzed by a Gaussian mixture model fitting of the residual distribution. A total of 150 trials of a simulated phantom (75 with wrap-around artifact) and 125 phase-contrast MRI cines from 22 healthy subjects (48 with wrap-around artifact) were used for validation. Background phase offsets were corrected using second-order weighted regularized least squares (WRLS) with and without ARTO. Flow volumes after WRLS and WRLS+ARTO corrections were compared with the known truth (phantom) and stationary phantom reference (in vivo) using Bland-Altman analysis. The ratio between the pulmonary flow and the systemic flow was also computed in a subset of 6 subjects. RESULTS: In the simulated phantom, compared with WRLS and no correction, correction with WRLS+ARTO produced superior agreement in volumetric flow quantification with the known truth. In vivo, WRLS+ARTO also produced superior agreement with stationary phantom-corrected volumetric flow compared with WRLS and no correction. In data sets with wrap-around artifact, WRLS produced significantly larger variance in the pulmonary flow and systemic flow ratio than stationary phantom correction (P = .0008). CONCLUSION: The proposed method provides automatic exclusion of temporally invariant outliers and produces flow quantification results comparable to stationary phantom correction.