Phosphatidylserine exposure in platelet concentrates during the storage period: differences between the platelets collected with different cell separators.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Platelet alterations occur during the production and storage of platelet concentrates, the so called "storage lesion". We studied the platelet alterations during the storage period in apheresis concentrates, employing flow cytometry for phosphatidylserine (PS) detection on platelets during the five days of storage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven single donor platelet concentrates harvested with the Cobe Trima, Baxter Amicus, or Haemonetics MCS+ were analyzed for PS exposure by flow cytometry on the day of production (day 1) and on days 3 and 5 of storage. Furthermore PS expression was analyzed in platelet donors' blood samples withdrawn before plateletpheresis. RESULTS: PS expression on platelets gave the following median values: in blood donors before apheresis it was 1.12% (0.13-1.78) in platelets concentrates on the first day (2 h after apheresis) 2.06% (0.66-15.2), the third day 6.57% (1.98-51.13) and the fifth day 23.04% (3.86-80.23). All differences between median values of PS expression in blood samples before apheresis, and platelets concentrates on days 1, 3 and 5 of storage, are statistically significant. The expression of PS in platelet concentrates was analyzed in relation to the blood cell separator used for the collection procedure and showed the following results: on day 1 the median values of PS in platelet concentrates collected with the three different blood cell separators, Trima, Cobe and MCS, did not show statistically significant differences. On day 3, the platelets concentrates collected with the Trima and with the MCS showed differences that were statistically significant. Those were respectively 10.59% (4.56-51.13) and 3.53% (1.98-12.61), p = 0.005. The PS expression in platelet concentrates collected with the Trima and MCS showed differences that are also statistically significant on day 5 at respectively 32.4% (9.61-80.23) and 8.57% (3.86-48.42), p = 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: PS exposure in platelet concentrates on days 3 and 5 rise to levels that could compromise the quality of the platelet units. Improvements in standardized platelet quality controls, and in platelet collection systems are required to reduce the storage lesions in platelets concentrates.

Induction of CD69 antigen on normal CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subsets and its relationship with the phenotype of responding T-cells.

We evaluated phenotype and apoptotic status of normal CD4+CD69+ and CD8+CD69+ peripheral blood T-lymphocytes after short-term challenge with escalating concentrations of phytohemagglutinin (PHA). The frequency of CD69-coexpressing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and CD69 staining intensity increased following T-cell mitogenic stimulation; these changes were proportional to PHA concentration in culture medium. A considerable fraction of lymphocytes underwent blast transformation, displaying increased forward and side scatter signals. Interestingly enough, PHA-responsive T-cells exhibited a predominantly CD25negCD38negTCRalphabetapos phenotype; APO-1/Fas antigen (CD95) could be detected on a minority of activated CD69+ T-cells. A considerable proportion of CD69+ lymphocytes expressed intracellular perforin; in addition, an average 16+/-6% CD69+ T-lymphocytes were apoptotic after 4 h of stimulation, as evaluated by 7-amino-actinomycin-D staining and by annexin-V binding. CD69+ activated lymphocytes comprise phenotypically heterogeneous cell subpopulations potentially devoted to diverse immunological functions, i.e., proliferation, apoptosis, or cell cytotoxicity; moreover, our findings indicate that CD69 expression is proportional to the intensity of the activating stimulus and that the capacity to upregulate CD69 antigen following short-term mitogenic challenge may be restricted to unactivated CD38negCD25negTCRalphabetapos T-lymphocytes.

Further investigations on the expression of HLA-DR, CD33 and CD13 surface antigens in purified bone marrow and peripheral blood CD34+ haematopoietic progenitor cells.

We evaluated the HLA-DR, CD33 and CD13 antigen expression on CD34+ haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) isolated from the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) of normal donors. The majority of both BM and PB CD34+ HPC expressed CD13 and HLA-DR. The coexpression of CD34 and CD33 was found in a minor CD34+ subset. After 7 d of culture in the presence of interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, CD33 expression was detected in about 50% of HPC. At this point CD34 antigen expression was lost and CD13 and HLA-DR expression was partially lost. After 14 d of culture, the majority of HPC were CD33+. HPC maintained the capacity to generate colony forming unit granulocyte-macrophage but they lost the capacity to generate burst forming unit-erythroid. A correlation was found between the percentage of CD34+/HLA-DR+ cells and the total number of colony forming cells in unfractionated samples from BM and PB of patients with malignancies. These studies demonstrate that, in normal conditions, only a minor subset of CD34+ cells coexpress CD33 antigen either in BM or in PB and CD33 antigen is a lineage marker which is coexpressed with HLA-DR and CD13 on a progenitor committed to the granulocytic-macrophagic lineage.

Lymphocyte subset counting by immunoperoxidase using an automated routine hematologic analyzer.

Using monoclonal antibodies against CD2, CD4, CD8 and CD19 antigens and an automated biotin-avidin immunoperoxidase technique on whole blood samples, we evaluated the technical performance and clinical usefulness of lymphocyte subset counting by the routine hematology analyzer Technicon H*1. Statistical evaluation demonstrated excellent precision and very good correlation with the immunofluorimetric flow cytometer Ortho Spectrum III. Correlation between manual immunofluorescence at the microscope and the H*1 method was much poorer, owing to the high intrinsic imprecision of the manual method. Reference ranges obtained with the H*1 immunoperoxidase method in 44 healthy subjects closely matched those obtained with the Spectrum III. In 46 subjects with or at risk for HIV infection, we found with the H*1 method a significant decrease in CD4+ cells and in the CD4+/CD8+ cell ratio, which was progressively more marked in HIV- negative patients with lymphadenopathic syndrome, AIDS-related complex, and in patients with full-blown AIDS.