Molecular labels for analysis of amines and diols by spray based ionization-mass spectrometry.

A family of imidazolium and pyridinium salts was synthesized for the purpose of labeling amines and 1,2-diols for highly sensitivite analysis by mass spectrometry. The chosen mass labels are shown to serve as effective reporters when bound to particles functionalized with amines or 1,2-diols and the binding is reversible. The straightforward synthetic route allows analogous internal standards to be generated quickly. Solvents amenable to electrospray ionization facilitate the rapid liberation of imidazolium and pyridinium mass labels from particles by hydrolysis in aqueous acid, while the acetal bond remains stable in anhydrous or buffered aqueous solution. Detection of the labels is demonstrated at 1 nM and quantitation of mass labels released from particles is also demonstrated.

Multisite evaluation of a new dipstick for albumin, protein, and creatinine.

The goal of our study was to perform a multisite evaluation of a new urine dipstick called Multistix PROtrade mark (Bayer, Elkhart, IN), which has reagent pads for the simultaneous assay of urinary albumin, protein, and creatinine. Patients' urine specimens were assayed at four sites with these dipsticks and with the familiar Bayer Multistix 10SG dipsticks for protein. The new dipstick pads for albumin are impregnated with bis (3',3"-diiodo-4',4"-dihydroxy-5',5"-dinitrophenyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-sulfonephthalein (DIDNTB) dye. These dipsticks also have a novel pad that estimates urinary creatinine using the peroxidase activity of the copper-creatinine complex. We determined the interlaboratory agreement of these dipsticks by comparing dipstick results to values obtained by quantitative analytical methods. We found that dividing the dipsticks' albumin or protein results by the creatinine concentration reduced the number of false-positive albumin or protein values observed in concentrated urines, and reduced the number of false negatives in dilute urines. The ratio of albumin to creatinine, or protein to creatinine gives a better measure of albumin or protein excretion. Compared to reading by eye, the dipstick results agreed better with the quantitative assays when they were read by a reflectometer (Bayer Clinitek).

Albuminuria and proteinuria in hospitalized patients as measured by quantitative and dipstick methods.

We tested patients' urines for albumin, protein, and creatinine by quantitative and dipstick methods. The concentrations of these analytes were established by quantitative, cuvet-based chemistry methods that we assumed gave the "correct" values. There was good to excellent agreement of the dipstick results with the quantitative methods for the above three analytes. We found many patients who excreted pathological amounts of albumin and/or protein who did not have a diagnosis of kidney disease or other likely causes of proteinuria, suggesting that albuminuria and/or proteinuria were underdiagnosed in our group of patients. Those with cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, or diabetes showed the greatest predictive value of a positive test for albumin or protein by dipstick. Dipstick testing for albumin, protein, and creatinine had good or excellent agreement with quantitative methods. The dipstick tests were easy to use, simple, and low in cost, and can serve well for point-of-care testing.

Comparison of acute swelling and function in subjects with lateral ankle injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective correlational study involving a convenience sample. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationships among figure-of-eight girth measurements and functional level in patients with acute lateral ankle sprains to determine the appropriate use of these clinical measures. BACKGROUND: Research has shown that subjective scales of perceived athletic ability and measurements of swelling are useful in assessing clinical improvement following an acute ankle sprain; however, the relationship between ankle swelling and level of function is not known. METHODS AND MEASURES: Twenty-nine subjects (20 men, 9 women) varying in age from 18-59 years of age (mean age, 30.8 +/- 11.37) with acute lateral ankle sprains were included in this study. Each subject was evaluated by 1 of 3 raters for ankle girth, weight-bearing status, and functional level as determined by a modified Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Index (FAAI). This study also investigated the relationship between these measures and the sport subscale of the FAAI (FAAI sport). This is an 8-item subscale which includes questions on running, jumping, landing, quick starts and stops, cutting or lateral movements, low impact activities, ability to perform an activity with normal technique, and ability to participate in desired sports. RESULTS: No significant correlations were found between figure-of-eight girth measurements and functional level. However, we did find moderate to good correlations between the FAAI vs. weight-bearing (rho = 0.73), FAAI vs. AOS (rho = -0.79), FAAI sport vs. weight-bearing (rho = 0.68), FAAI vs. FAAI Sport (rho = 0.73), weight-bearing vs. AOS (rho = -0.57), and FAAI Sport vs. AOS (rho = -0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The figure-of-eight method is highly reliable and is appropriate for measuring ankle swelling; however, it does not correlate with functional level as determined by the modified AOS, FAAI, or observed weight-bearing status during gait. Therefore, clinicians should refrain from making assumptions about function based on ankle swelling.

Decreasing the variability observed in urine analysis.

Urine analysis is affected significantly by biological variability. The objective of this study was to study the feasibility of reducing the biological variability of excretion of various analytes in urine, especially albumin in children with diabetes, by mixing small volumes of early morning samples. Twenty-two male children with type 1 diabetes collected early morning aliquots of approximately 10 ml of urine on 3 consecutive days and kept them refrigerated in sealed containers. The urine collection was repeated every 4-6 months in the diabetic children. Ten normal children and 10 normal adults participated as controls. The specimens were analyzed individually and as mixed samples for each subject. Mixing the 3 urine samples before analysis decreased the biological variability of all urine assays (albumin, glucose, creatinine, total protein, potassium). The diabetic children had 3 times higher variability of urine albumin (as a ratio to creatinine) compared to normal children, when the urine samples were collected individually (61% vs 19%, respectively). The variability in the diabetic children decreased when the 3 specimens were analyzed as a single sample after mixing, especially when urine albumin was expressed as a ratio to creatinine. Blood glycated hemoglobin levels correlated better with urine glucose levels when 3 urine samples were mixed before analysis.

Urinary protein and albumin excretion corrected by creatinine and specific gravity.

Timed urine collections are difficult to use in clinical practice owing to inaccurate collections making calculations of the 24-h albumin or protein excretion questionable. One of our goals was to assess the 'correction' of urinary albumin and (or) protein excretion by dividing these by either the creatinine concentration or the term, (specific gravity-1)x100(1). The 24-h creatinine excretion can be estimated based on the patients' gender, age and weight. We studied the influence of physiological extremes of hydration and exercise, and protein and creatinine excretion in patients with or suspected kidney disorders. Specimens were collected from healthy volunteers every 4 h during one 24-h period. We assayed the collections individually to give us an assessment of the variability of the analytes with time, and then reassayed them after combining them to give a 24-h urine. For all volunteers, the mean intra-individual CVs based on the 4-h collections expressed in mg/24 h were 80.0% for albumin and 96.5% for total protein (P0.2). The CVs were reduced by dividing the albumin or protein concentration by the creatinine concentration or by the term, (SG-1)x100. This gave a CV for mg albumin/g creatinine of 52% (P<0.1 vs. albumin mg/g creatinine); mg protein/g creatinine of 39% (P<0.05 vs. mg protein/g creatinine); mg albumin/[(SG-1)x100] of 49% (P<0.1 vs. albumin)/[(SG-1)x100]; and mg protein/[(SG-1)x100] of 37% (P<0. 05 vs. mg protein)/[(SG-1)x100]. For the 68 subjects in the study, the strongest correlation was between the creatinine concentrations and the 24-h urine volume: r=0.786, P<0.001. The correlation of (SG-1)x100 vs. the 24-h urine volume was: r=0.606, P<0.001; for (SG-1)x100 and the creatinine concentration, the correlation was: r=0.666, P<0.001. Compared to the volunteers, the albumin and protein excretion in mg/24 h were more variable in the patients. The same was true if the albumin or protein concentrations were divided by the creatinine concentration or by (SG-1)x100. Protein and albumin concentrations were lower in dilute urines. Dividing the albumin or protein concentrations by the creatinine concentration reduced the number of false negative protein and albumin results. Dividing the albumin or protein values in mg/24 h by (SG-1)x100 eliminated fewer false negatives. Albumin concentrations increased significantly after vigorous exercise. The increase was almost eliminated when the albumin result was divided by the creatinine concentration suggesting that a decreased urine flow and not increased glomerular permeability causes an increase of post-exercise albuminuria. The same was true for proteinuria. A dipstick test plus an optical strip reader that can measure urine protein, albumin, and creatinine and calculate the appropriate ratios provides a better screening test for albuminuria or proteinuria than one measuring only albumin or protein.

Assay of creatinine using the peroxidase activity of copper-creatinine complexes.

OBJECTIVES: It was our goal to develop a urine dipstick that could measure creatinine with a peroxidase reaction. The simultaneous measurement of albumin and creatinine permits the estimation of the 24-h albumin excretion, an important value in judging existing or likely development of renal failure. A highly sensitive dye-binding dipstick method for albumin exists, and a suitable dipstick for the assay for urine creatinine is described here. METHODS: Copper-creatinine and iron-creatinine complexes have peroxidase activity. With 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and diisopropyl benzene dihydroperoxide (DBDH); the peroxidase activity of copper-creatinine and iron-creatinine complexes can be demonstrated. This reaction was used in the assay of urine creatinine either in solution or by a suitably impregnated urine dipstick. RESULTS: Our method based on the peroxidase activity of the copper-creatinine complex has an analytical range for creatinine of 100 mg/L (0.884 mmol/L) to 3000 mg/L (26.52 mmol/L). The creatinine assay is free from most interfering compounds that may be present in urine. Hemoglobin is an interferent, and its effects can be reduced but not eliminated by the addition of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl quinoline. We do not recommend using the dipsticks when visible blood is present or if the dipstick blood test is positive. The copper-creatinine complex oxidizes ascorbic acid; however, we were able to modify the reaction conditions so that ascorbic acid at < 4.4 g/L does not interfere. We found good agreement on fresh urines between the creatinine dipstick results and those by a standard rate-Jaffe cuvet method for creatinine. DISCUSSION: With the simultaneous measurement of creatinine and albumin in urine, the albumin/creatinine ratio can be determined effectively reducing or eliminating the occasional false-negative and false-positive result in those with dilute or concentrated urines, respectively. The dipstick test for these analytes permits the simple identification of individuals with possible albuminuria and could serve well in a point-of-care setting.

Screening for proteinuria in Japanese schoolchildren: a new approach.

By governmental mandate, Japanese school children are screened annually for proteinuria, hematuria, and glucosuria to identify children with possible renal disorders. We added urine dipstick tests for albumin and creatinine to the Japanese screening protocol, and used their dipstick results for blood, glucose and protein. The sulfosalicylic acid precipitation test was used to confirm "trace" positive protein dipsticks. The Japanese and our screening protocol have in common the same data for glucosuria and proteinuria. Their scheme has an algorithm for repeat testing of children with abnormal results, and further testing and medical evaluation for those showing persistently abnormal values. Out of the 23,121 students, we found seven with likely nephritis, one with confirmed nephritis, one with nephrotic syndrome, 170 with persistent unexplained hematuria, 19 with persistent unexplained proteinuria, 14 cases of urinary tract infection, and 20 cases of likely diabetes mellitus. We conclude that dipstick testing for albumin, protein, creatinine, glucose and occult blood has significant value in a multilevel testing scheme for identifying children with urinary tract abnormalities or diabetes. The assay of albumin increases the sensitivity of the screening, and dividing the albumin by the creatinine concentration reduces the potential errors arising from concentrated or dilute urines.

Measurement of the albumin content of urinary protein using dipsticks.

An albumin selective urine strip based on bis (3',3''-diiodo-4', 4''-dihydroxy-5',5''-dinitrophenyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo sulfonphthalein dye (DIDNTB) dye was examined in populations with clinical proteinuria. The relationship of albumin to the sum concentration of all protein in urine was found to vary widely even though the albumin concentration generally increased with the total protein concentration. The albumin reagent strips correlated well with immuno-nephrometric assays for albumin on specimens from hypertensives, diabetics, and renal disease which tended to have albumin contents of >/= 50.0%. High proteinuria concentrations of > 250 mg/l, with low albumin contents of

High-sensitivity dye binding assay for albumin in urine.

We developed a dye-binding method for albumin in urine based on bis (3',3"-diiodo4'4"-dihydroxy-5'5"-dinitrophenyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabr omosulfonphthalein (DIDNTB), a dye that has a higher chemical sensitivity and specificity for albumin when compared to two other commonly used dyes. We prepared urine dipsticks with DIDNTB and certain other compounds to prevent "nonspecific" binding to the dipstick matrix. The detection limit for albumin with DIDNTB as the dye is about 10 mg/L. The extent of dye binding to proteins and other compounds was studied using ultracentrifugation and a selectively permeable membrane that permitted the passage of free but not bound dye; we believe this method is superior to photometric titration. The affinity of the dyes for albumin was found to be pH dependent with stronger binding at pH 1.8 than at pH 7.0. At pH 1.8, DIDNTB had a ca.10-fold greater binding coefficient to albumin when compared to the widely used dyes, tetrabromophenol blue (CI 4430-25-5) or bromophenol blue (CI 115-39-9). We developed a system that minimized nonspecific binding by the dye through the use of polymethyl vinyl ethers and bis-(heptapropylene glycol) carbonate. DIDNTB showed a greater chemical specificity for albumin when compared to most other proteins. The new albumin dipsticks are resistant to many potential interferences at substantial concentrations, making the dipsticks suitable to screen for albuminuria.

Performance of a reagent strip device for quantitation of the urine albumin: creatinine ratio in a point of care setting.

AIM: We have evaluated the performance of a reagent strip (Clinitek, Bayer plc, Newbury) incorporating a novel dip and read device for the quantitation of the albumin: creatinine ratio together with their individual concentrations in urine. METHODS: The performance was compared with that of a lateral flow device for the semi-quantitation of albumin (Micral II, Roche Diagnostics, Lewes) and also a laboratory based procedure. The device employs novel methods for both analytes, using a sulphonephthalein dye binding at pH 1.5 for albumin and the peroxidase-like activity of copper creatinine complexes. The color yields of the separate reaction pads are monitored with the Clinitek 50TM bench top urine chemistry analyzer and compared to a pre-programmed calibration algorithm. RESULTS: The imprecision of the device was assessed by observing the discrepancy between duplicates in a total of 144 urine samples collected from patients with diabetes and/or renal disease; there were 10 discrepancies in the case of the albumin estimation (6.9%), 12 in the case of the creatinine estimation (12.5%) and 23 in the case of the albumin: creatinine ratio (16.0%). In the case of the Micral II, where 96 of the urines were analyzed there were 12 discrepancies (12.5%). When considered as a two-class test for albumin with a cut off of 20 mg/L the Clinitek gave a sensitivity of 95.4% with specificity of 78.9% and a positive predictive value of 87.4%. When analyzing four urines (two controls, two patient pools) with replicate analysis on the Clinitek system we found 100% agreement for the albumin estimation, 95% for creatinine and 96.7% for the albumin: creatinine for 60 analysis within a day and 100, 95 and 97.5% on single analyses each day for 20 days for the two urine controls. The discrepant results were always within one color block. When considering the albumin: creatinine ratio with a cut off of < 30 mg/g the Clinitek gave a sensitivity of 76.3% with a specificity of 89.1% and a positive predictive value of 89.7%. CONCLUSION: The Clinitek system provides a reliable means to screen for microalbuminuria with the opportunity of a semi-quantitative assessment when microalbuminuria is found.

Screening school children for albuminuria, proteinuria and occult blood with dipsticks.

Beginning in 1974, the Japanese Ministry of Health Welfare directed the screening of schoolchildren for proteinuria. We studied their procedure and methods in 6197 school children and also evaluated a new urine dipstick that measures albumin concentrations down to about 10 mg/l and creatinine down to about 300 mg/l. We used specimens from adult in- and outpatients to test the accuracy of the dipsticks. Based on the quantitative results, we set as cutoffs < 150 mg/l for protein and < 30 mg/l for albumin as the concentrations representing "low risk." The quantitative values were assumed to be correct, and the dipstick results were judged accordingly, i.e., a dipstick protein of > or = "150" mg/l or an albumin of I "30" mg/l indicated increased risk of developing or having a genitourinary disorder. The sensitivity/specificity of the protein dipstick was 95.1%/95.5%, and the same for the albumin dipstick was 83.8%/93.8%. The cut-off for the albumin dipsticks probably should be set somewhat lower to reduce the number of false negatives and increase the sensitivity of the dipstick. When we compared the quantitative albumin to the protein dipsticks with the above cut-offs, we found the sensitivity/specificity to be 79.3%/94.4%, i.e., much like the albumin dipstick results. The many reports on the association of albuminuria and risk of renal disease recommend that screening should be done for albumin rather than protein. Based on the data from the school children, we estimate that a dipstick albumin of "30" mg/l is borderline increased risk, and that a protein dipstick of "150" mg/l is the same. If we call the dipstick "10" mg/l albumin, "30" mg/l albumin and the "150" mg/l protein results "low risk," then we estimate the prevalence of albuminuria in the school children to be about 2.1% and proteinuria to be about 4.3%. Children with these values should have a quantitative test for albumin and protein. We also tested a dipstick for creatinine and found increasing values with increasing age in both genders; the older boys had significantly higher creatinine values than the older girls and younger boys. For the albumin/creatinine ratio, we found 6028 children with a ratio of < 30 mg/g indicating low risk and 159 children with a ratio of > or = 30 mg/g indicating increased risk. The ratio may be more useful owing to the likely reduction of the number of false negatives and false positives.

Comparison of instrument-read dipsticks for albumin and creatinine in urine with visual results and quantitative methods.

Three hospital sites evaluated the Bayer two-pad urine dipstick as a screening test for microalbuminuria. One pad estimates albumin concentrations between 10 and 150 mg/L, and the second estimates creatinine values between 300 and 3,000 mg/L. The Boehringer Mannheim (BMD) Micral dipstick was also compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the dipsticks was judged by comparison with cuvet-based immunonephelometry for albumin and to standard rate-Jaffe methods for creatinine; these assays were well standardized and controlled and were assumed to give accurate values. Precision of these methods and that of the dipsticks was determined by multiple assays of control materials. Visual or instrument (Clinitek 50 or 100) evaluation of the Bayer or visual checks of the BMD albumin dipstick pad with patients' urines gave clinically acceptable accuracy. The albumin/creatinine ratio from the Bayer dipsticks gave better accuracy for albumin excretion than the albumin pads alone from either manufacturer. This ratio should permit making a good estimate of the 24-hr albumin excretion in a randomly collected urine.

Comparison of urine dipsticks with quantitative methods for microalbuminuria.

We describe a new dip- and read dipstick that detects urine albumin at concentrations of 10 mg/l and above and urine creatinine at concentrations of 300 mg/l and above. The albumin assay is based on a high-affinity, dye-binding technique while the creatinine assay is based on the peroxidase-like activity of copper creatinine complexes. With these two-test dipsticks, urines from normal adults supplemented with albumin and creatinine were correctly identified to within +/- 15% of the expected value for both analytes; the between-day coefficients of variation ranged from 7.1% to 16.1%. We tested 275 patients' unmodified urines by the Bayer and Boehringer Mannheim Micral-Test albumin dipsticks and for albumin with the Beckman Array on the same specimens. We also analyzed 42 selected urines from the group of 275 for albumin by another quantitative immunochemical method and by electrophoresis plus a total protein method to estimate the albumin concentration. The quantitative immunochemical methods appear to underestimate the urine albumin concentrations; in these 42 urines measured as negative, i.e., < ca. 16-20 mg/l, by one of the quantitative method but positive by the Bayer dipstick, 33 of these were positive by the electrophoresis/total protein assay combination. The Bayer albumin dipstick correctly identified urines as having < 16 mg/l or > or = 16 mg/l at an 80% rate. At a cutoff of 20 mg/l, the rate increased to 87%. We also determined the urinary albumin/creatinine ratios on the 275 patients using the Bayer two-pad dipstick and found agreement 84% of the time with the same ratio obtained from a quantitative immunochemical method for albumin and a rate-Jaffe method for creatinine; an albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/g) of 30 was used as the discrimination point. Albumin stability studies performed on the Beckman Array patients with six fresh urines showed small but consistent decreases at -20 degrees C but not at 4 degrees C after one month of storage. The albumin in contrived urines, as estimated by electrophoreses/total protein and by the dipsticks did not change at these storage conditions. Boric acid at 1 g/l as a urine preservative had no effect on the measurement of albumin by any of the methods described here nor of the assay of creatinine. Other urinary proteins present at abnormal excretion rates did not interfere with the Bayer albumin dipstick. Abnormal concentrations of bilirubin, citrate, creatine, ascorbic acid, albumin, hemoglobin and myoglobin in urine did not interfere with the creatinine dipstick measurements. The first four of the above did not affect the Bayer dipstick results for albumin.