Clinical Performance of Complete-Arch Implant- Supported Rehabilitations Using Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Restorations Bonded to CAD/CAM Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks up to 5 Years.

This clinical study evaluated the survival of monolithic lithium disilicate (ML) (IPS Emax, Ivoclar Vivadent) restorations bonded to complete-arch CAD/CAM made titanium or zirconia frameworks. Between August 2007 and December 2009, 15 patients (7 female, 8 male; mean age: 56.8 years old) received 30 implant-supported screw-retained rehabilitations with ML restorations cemented to CAD/CAM made titanium (T) (n=6) or zirconia (Z) frameworks (n=24) adhesively (Multilink Automix, RelyX Unicem) and followed up until December 2015. The evaluation protocol involved technical failures (chipping, debonding or fracture of crown/framework, screw loosening), Californian Dental Association (CDA) quality criteria (Romeo: Excellent; Sierra: Acceptable; Tango: Retrievable; Victor: Not acceptable) and biological failures (mucositis, peri-implantitis). Mean observation time was 60.3 months. No implants were lost, and all the prostheses were in situ. Four mechanical failures occurred in the form of minor chipping (n=3 in ML-Z, n=1 in ML-T) and major fracture in ML crown (n=1 in ML-Z). Romeo scores (N=370) decreased until final observation (N=347) and 23 Sierra scores were given to the restorations. Mucositis was observed in 3 patients and peri-implantitis in one patient. Complete-arch implant-borne FDPs made of monolithic lithium disilicate bonded to titanium or zirconia frameworks could be a promising alternative.

Harnessing the wisdom of crowds can improve guideline compliance of antibiotic prescribers and support antimicrobial stewardship.

Antibiotic overprescribing is a global challenge contributing to rising levels of antibiotic resistance and mortality. We test a novel approach to antibiotic stewardship. Capitalising on the concept of "wisdom of crowds", which states that a group's collective judgement often outperforms the average individual, we test whether pooling treatment durations recommended by different prescribers can improve antibiotic prescribing. Using international survey data from 787 expert antibiotic prescribers, we run computer simulations to test the performance of the wisdom of crowds by comparing three data aggregation rules across different clinical cases and group sizes. We also identify patterns of prescribing bias in recommendations about antibiotic treatment durations to quantify current levels of overprescribing. Our results suggest that pooling the treatment recommendations (using the median) could improve guideline compliance in groups of three or more prescribers. Implications for antibiotic stewardship and the general improvement of medical decision making are discussed. Clinical applicability is likely to be greatest in the context of hospital ward rounds and larger, multidisciplinary team meetings, where complex patient cases are discussed and existing guidelines provide limited guidance.

Rapid diagnostic tests for common infection syndromes: less haste, more speed.

Rapid diagnostic tests, which accurately distinguish bacterial from viral infections, are being heralded as the solution to antibiotic overuse, which is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance. We have concerns that this approach is oversimplistic. Rapid diagnostic tests are complex interventions, with clinical context, patient flow, access and timing affecting their impact. There is little robust evidence that they reduce antibiotic prescribing in real-world settings. We suggest that prior to introducing these costly tests, emphasis should be placed on optimizing the implementation of efficient evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship interventions, such as increasing the use of proven automated clinical infection syndrome prediction tools by clinicians, supporting patients to self-care by providing them with high-quality safety-netting resources, providing front-line clinicians with individual prescribing data to facilitate peer benchmarking and setting specific and purposeful antibiotic prescribing targets to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescribing. The stakes are high and time is running out; let's start by getting the basics right.

Antibiotic use and resistance: a nationwide questionnaire survey among French dentists.

The aim of this survey was to describe the attitudes and self-reported practices of French dentists towards antibiotic use and resistance and to compare practices with national guidelines. A nationwide cross-sectional internet-based survey was conducted among the 41,800 French dentists. The online questionnaire was distributed through professional networks from April 2017 to April 2018. Seven-hundred seventy-five dentists participated but only 455 questionnaires were complete enough to be included in the analyses. Amoxicillin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic (65.8%, 1783/2711), followed by spiramycin + metronidazole fixed-dose combination (11.6%, 312/2711) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (10.3%, 279/2711). The main indications for use were abscess (349/423, 82.5%), cervicofacial cellulitis (74.2%, 314/423), and pericoronitis (58.6%, 239/408). Most dentists (90.5%, 381/421) considered that antibiotic resistance is of concern but only half of them (56.3%, 238/423) felt adequately informed about antibiotic use. Many dentists did not comply with the national guidelines: the majority of them declared inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for 11/17 clinical situations. They did not prescribe antibiotics for 5/6 clinical situations requiring prophylaxis. They reported that the publication of clinical guidelines is the main factor influencing their prescriptions (71.0%, 299/421). They wished to receive regular updates of national guidelines in the form of practical sheets (93.0%, 172/185). French dentists should urgently be targeted by antibiotic stewardship initiatives.

Antibiotic therapy in case of positive cultures of kidney transplant preservation fluid: a nationwide survey of prescribing practices.

Our survey aimed to describe current prescribing practices for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in French kidney transplant centers. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional clinical vignette-based survey that we sent via email to hospital practitioners involved in perioperative management of kidney transplant patients (KTR). Nearly half of practitioners contacted (182/427, 42.6%) were respondents. A total of 167 getting enough kidney transplant activity were eligible for the survey. The response rate was 50.7% (68/134) among interns and 33.8% (99/293) among seniors. Positive perfusion fluids (PF) cultures for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus were associated with antibiotic prescribing in 35% of cases, with no difference in prescribing in patients with diabetes, obesity, or delayed graft function. Antibiotic prescribing was most frequent with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (67%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended spectrum ß-lactamases (57%). About 77%, 16%, and 13% of respondents, respectively, reported the existence of local practice guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, a standardized approach for antibiotic prescribing in case of positive kidney transplant PF cultures, and local practice guidelines for systematical antibiotic prophylaxis in the early post-transplant period. In France, antibiotic prophylaxis practices in the perioperative kidney transplant period are very heterogeneous. To prevent unnecessary prescribing and bacterial resistance, evidence-based practice guidelines should be developed.

Proxy indicators to estimate the appropriateness of medications prescribed by paediatricians in infectious diseases: a cross-sectional observational study based on reimbursement data.

BACKGROUND: We previously developed proxy indicators (PIs) that can be used to estimate the appropriateness of medications used for infectious diseases (in particular antibiotics) in primary care, based on routine reimbursement data that do not include clinical indications. OBJECTIVES: To: (i) select the PIs that are relevant for children and estimate current appropriateness of medications used for infectious diseases by French paediatricians and its variability while using these PIs; (ii) assess the clinimetric properties of these PIs using a large regional reimbursement database; and (iii) compare performance scores for each PI between paediatricians and GPs in the paediatric population. METHODS: For all individuals living in north-eastern France, a cross-sectional observational study was performed analysing National Health Insurance data (available at prescriber and patient levels) regarding antibiotics prescribed by their paediatricians in 2017. We measured performance scores of the PIs, and we tested their clinimetric properties, i.e. measurability, applicability and room for improvement. RESULTS: We included 116 paediatricians who prescribed a total of 44 146 antibiotic treatments in 2017. For all four selected PIs (seasonal variation of total antibiotic use, amoxicillin/second-line antibiotics ratio, co-prescription of anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics), we found large variations between paediatricians. Regarding clinimetric properties, all PIs were measurable and applicable, and showed high improvement potential. Performance scores did not differ between these 116 paediatricians and 3087 GPs. CONCLUSIONS: This set of four proxy indicators might be used to estimate appropriateness of prescribing in children in an automated way within antibiotic stewardship programmes.

Optimizing design of research to evaluate antibiotic stewardship interventions: consensus recommendations of a multinational working group.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship interventions and programmes aim to ensure effective treatment while minimizing antimicrobial-associated harms including resistance. Practice in this vital area is undermined by the poor quality of research addressing both what specific antimicrobial use interventions are effective and how antimicrobial use improvement strategies can be implemented into practice. In 2016 we established a working party to identify the key design features that limit translation of existing research into practice and then to make recommendations for how future studies in this field should be optimally designed. The first part of this work has been published as a systematic review. Here we present the working group's final recommendations. METHODS: An international working group for design of antimicrobial stewardship intervention evaluations was convened in response to the fourth call for leading expert network proposals by the Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance (JPIAMR). The group comprised clinical and academic specialists in antimicrobial stewardship and clinical trial design from six European countries. Group members completed a structured questionnaire to establish the scope of work and key issues to develop ahead of a first face-to-face meeting that (a) identified the need for a comprehensive systematic review of study designs in the literature and (b) prioritized key areas where research design considerations restrict translation of findings into practice. The working group's initial outputs were reviewed by independent advisors and additional expertise was sought in specific clinical areas. At a second face-to-face meeting the working group developed a theoretical framework and specific recommendations to support optimal study design. These were finalized by the working group co-ordinators and agreed by all working group members. RESULTS: We propose a theoretical framework in which consideration of the intervention rationale the intervention setting, intervention features and the intervention aims inform selection and prioritization of outcome measures, whether the research sets out to determine superiority or non-inferiority of the intervention measured by its primary outcome(s), the most appropriate study design (e.g. experimental or quasi- experimental) and the detailed design features. We make 18 specific recommendation in three domains: outcomes, objectives and study design. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers, funders and practitioners will be able to draw on our recommendations to most efficiently evaluate antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

Microbiological epidemiology of preservation fluids in transplanted kidney: a nationwide retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Kidney transplant recipients are at high-risk for donor-derived infections in the early post-transplant period. Transplant preservation fluid (PF) samples are collected for microbiological analysis. In case of positive PF cultures, the risk for the recipient is unknown and there is no consensus for prescribing prophylactic antibiotics. This nationwide observational study aimed to determine the epidemiology of bacterial and fungal agents in kidney transplant PF cultures and identify risk factors associated with positive PF cultures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study on the following data collected from a national database between October 2015 and December 2016: characteristics of donor, recipient, transplantation, infection in donor and PF microbiological data. RESULTS: Of 4487 kidney transplant procedures, including 725 (16.2%, 725/4487) from living donors, 20.5% had positive PF cultures (living donors: 1.8%, 13/725; deceased donors: 24.1%, 907/3762). Polymicrobial contamination was found in 59.9% (485/810) of positive PF cultures. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (65.8%, 533/810) and Enterobacteriaceae (28.0%, 227/810) were the most common microorganisms. Factors associated with an increased risk of positive PF cultures in multivariable analysis were (for deceased-donor kidney transplants): intestinal perforation during procurement (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.1-9.1), multiorgan procurement (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7) and en bloc transplantation (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.9). Use of perfusion pump and donor antibiotic therapy were associated with a lower risk of positive PF cultures (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.5 and OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7, respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 24% of deceased-donor PF cultures were positive, and PF contamination during procurement seemed to be the major cause.

How to start an antimicrobial stewardship programme in a hospital.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) describes a coherent set of actions that ensure optimal use of antimicrobials to improve patient outcomes, while limiting the risk of adverse events (including antimicrobial resistance (AMR)). Introduction of AMS programmes in hospitals is part of most national action plans to mitigate AMR, yet the optimal components and actions of such a programme remain undetermined. OBJECTIVES: To describe how health-care professionals can start an AMS programme in their hospital, the components of such a programme and the evidence base for its implementation. SOURCES: National and society-led guidelines on AMS, peer-reviewed publications and experience of AMS experts conducting AMS programmes. CONTENT: We provide a step-by-step pragmatic guide to setting up and implementing a hospital AMS programme in high-income or low-and-middle-income countries. IMPLICATIONS: Antimicrobial stewardship programmes in hospitals are a vital component of national action plans for AMR, and have been shown to significantly reduce AMR, particularly when coupled with infection prevention and control interventions. This step-by-step guide of 'how to' set up an AMS programme will help health-care professionals involved in AMS to optimally design and implement their actions.

Nationwide survey of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs in France.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the current state of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) in French public and private acute care hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online questionnaire survey. The selection of participating hospitals was performed through a stratified random sampling procedure among all French public and private hospitals with acute care beds. RESULTS: 97/215 (45%) hospitals participated. A formal ABS program was implemented in 84% (80/95) of hospitals. A person officially in charge of this program (i.e., ABS program leader) was present in almost all participating hospitals (99%, 95/96) and s/he coordinated a multidisciplinary ABS team in 42% (40/96) of cases. The median time spent on ABS activities was 1.7, 1.6, and 0.8hours/week/100 acute care beds for infectious disease (ID) specialists, pharmacists, and microbiologists respectively; 27% (7/26) of ID specialists/other clinicians, 58% (15/26) of pharmacists, and 80% (16/20) of microbiologists received no salary support for the stewardship activities conducted as part of the team. Local guidelines (94%, 88/94), electronic medical records (85%, 80/94), and an antibiotic restriction policy (92%, 82/89) were implemented in almost all hospitals. Reports on antibiotic consumption and local resistance rates were available in 100% (91/91) and 84% (76/91) of hospitals, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the existence of national requirements, hospital ABS programs are not fully implemented in France, mainly because of inadequate institutional support and funding.

Awareness among French healthcare workers of the transmission of multidrug resistant organisms: a large cross-sectional survey.

Background: Much effort has been made over the last two decades to educate and train healthcare professionals working on antimicrobial resistance in French hospitals. However, little has been done in France to assess perceptions, attitudes and knowledge regarding multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) and, more globally, these have never been evaluated in a large-scale population of medical and non-medical healthcare workers (HCWs). Our aim was to explore awareness among HCWs by evaluating their knowledge of MDROs and the associated control measures, by comparing perceptions between professional categories and by studying the impact of training and health beliefs. Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted in 58 randomly selected French healthcare facilities with questionnaires including professional and demographic characteristics, and knowledge and perception of MDRO transmission and control. A knowledge score was calculated and used in a logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with higher knowledge of MDROs, and the association between knowledge and perception. Results: Between June 2014 and March 2016, 8716/11,753 (participation rate, 74%) questionnaires were completed. The mean knowledge score was 4.7/8 (SD: 1.3) and 3.6/8 (SD: 1.4) in medical and non-medical HCWs, respectively. Five variables were positively associated with higher knowledge: working in a university hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.70); age classes 26-35 years (1.43, 1.23-1.6) and 36-45 years (1.19, 1.01-1.40); medical professional status (3.7, 3.09-4.44), working in an intensive care unit (1.28, 1.06-1.55), and having been trained on control of antimicrobial resistance (1.31, 1.16-1.48). After adjustment for these variables, greater knowledge was significantly associated with four cognitive factors: perceived susceptibility, attitude toward hand hygiene, self-efficacy, and motivation. Conclusions: We found a low level of MDRO awareness and knowledge of associated control measures among French HCWs. Training on hand hygiene and measures to control MDRO spread may be helpful in shaping beliefs and perceptions on MDRO control among other possible associated factors. Messages should be tailored to professional status and their perception. Other approaches should be designed, with more effective methods of training and cognitive interventions. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT02265471. Registered 16 October 2014 - Retrospectively registered.

Impact of the French Infectious Diseases Society's (SPILF) proposals for shorter antibiotic therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the practices of French infection specialists related to antibiotic therapy duration between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: We conducted two identical surveys (in 2016 and 2018) targeting hospital-based infection specialists (medical physicians, pharmacists) who gave at least weekly advice on antibiotic prescriptions. The questionnaire included 15 clinical vignettes. Part A asked about the durations of antibiotic therapies they would usually advise to prescribers, and part B asked about the shortest duration they would be willing to advise for the same clinical situations. RESULTS: We included 325 specialists (165 in 2016 and 160 in 2018), mostly infectious disease specialists (82.4%, 268/325), members of antibiotic stewardship teams in 72% (234/325) of cases. Shorter antibiotic treatments (as compared with the literature) were advised to prescribers in more than half of the vignettes by 71% (105/147) of respondents in 2018, versus 46% (69/150) in 2016 (P<0.001). Guidelines used by participants displayed fixed durations for 77% (123/160) of cases in 2018 versus 21% (35/165) in 2016. Almost all respondents (89%, 131/160) declared they were aware of the 2017 SPILF's proposal. CONCLUSION: The release of guidelines promoting shorter durations of antibiotic therapy seems to have had a favourable impact on practices of specialists giving advice on antibiotic prescriptions.

Comparison of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in acute-care hospitals in four European countries: A cross-sectional survey.

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are designed to improve antibiotic use. A survey was systematically developed to assess ASP prerequisites, objectives and improvement strategies in hospitals. This study assessed the current state of ASPs in acute-care hospitals throughout Europe. A survey containing 46 questions was disseminated to acute-care hospitals: all Dutch (n = 80) and Slovenian (n = 29), 215 French (25%, random stratified sampling) and 62 Italian (49% of hospitals with an infectious diseases department, convenience sampling) acute-care hospitals, for a Europe-wide assessment. Response rates for the Netherlands (Nl), Slovenia (Slo), France (Fr) and Italy (It) were 80%, 86%, 45% and 66%. There was variation between countries in the prerequisites met and the objectives and improvement strategies chosen. A formal ASP was present mainly in the Netherlands (90%) and France (84%) compared with Slovenia (60%) and Italy (60%). Presence of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team ranged from 42% (Fr) to 94% (Nl). Salary support for AMS teams was provided in 68% (Fr), 51% (Nl), 33% (Slo) and 12% (It) of surveyed hospitals. Quantity of antibiotic use was monitored in the majority of hospitals, ranging from 72% (Nl) to 100% (Slo and Fr) of acute-care hospitals. Participating countries varied substantially in the use of 'prospective monitoring and advice' as a strategy to improve AMS objectives. ASP prerequisites, objectives and improvement activities vary considerably across Europe, with room for improvement. Stimulating appropriate system prerequisites throughout Europe, e.g. by introducing staffing standards and financial support for ASPs, seems a first priority.

Implementation of antibiotic stewardship programmes in French ICUs in 2018: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic stewardship programmes have a pivotal role in ICUs, but the level of implementation of these programmes at the regional or national level is not well known. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the level of implementation of antibiotic stewardship programmes in French ICUs. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey from January to March 2018 using an online questionnaire sent as an E-mail link to ICU specialists (one questionnaire per ICU). RESULTS: Overall, 113 out of 206 (55%) ICUs participated. Access to local epidemiology regarding bacterial resistance and antibiotic consumption data was reported in 84% and 65% of ICUs, respectively. Local guidelines for antibiotic use were available in 54% of ICUs. The duration of empirical antibiotic therapy was limited in 46% of cases, following the recommendation of an external expert in 33%. An antibiotic stewardship programme leader was reported at the hospital level by 94% of respondents, being an infectious disease physician in 80%. His/her role in the ICU was mostly to discuss specific cases (50%) and to provide advice on antibiotic prescriptions (26%). Regarding microbiological diagnosis, blood cultures were not processed at night or during weekends in 57%. Molecular biology and MS techniques were available in 62% and 59% of cases, respectively. Therapeutic drug monitoring of ß-lactams was available in 46% of cases. Forty-three percent of respondents knew the expression 'antimicrobial/antibiotic stewardship'. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic stewardship programmes are not optimally implemented in French ICUs. Improvement efforts and regular monitoring of the level of implementation are needed.

Developing core elements and checklist items for global hospital antimicrobial stewardship programmes: a consensus approach.

OBJECTIVES: With increasing global interest in hospital antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes, there is a strong demand for core elements of AMS to be clearly defined on the basis of principles of effectiveness and affordability. To date, efforts to identify such core elements have been limited to Europe, Australia, and North America. The aim of this study was to develop a set of core elements and their related checklist items for AMS programmes that should be present in all hospitals worldwide, regardless of resource availability. METHODS: A literature review was performed by searching Medline and relevant websites to retrieve a list of core elements and items that could have global relevance. These core elements and items were evaluated by an international group of AMS experts using a structured modified Delphi consensus procedure, using two-phased online in-depth questionnaires. RESULTS: The literature review identified seven core elements and their related 29 checklist items from 48 references. Fifteen experts from 13 countries in six continents participated in the consensus procedure. Ultimately, all seven core elements were retained, as well as 28 of the initial checklist items plus one that was newly suggested, all with ≥80% agreement; 20 elements and items were rephrased. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus on core elements for hospital AMS programmes is relevant to both high- and low-to-middle-income countries and could facilitate the development of national AMS stewardship guidelines and adoption by healthcare settings worldwide.

Views and experiences with regard to antibiotic use of hospitalized patients in five European countries: a qualitative descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore inpatients experiences and views with regard to antibiotics in five European hospitals. METHODS: Qualitative study where a patient-centred framework was used to explore inpatients' experiences concerning antibiotic treatment. A purposeful sample of inpatients treated with antibiotics in five hospitals participated in interviews (all centres) and focus groups (Switzerland only). RESULTS: A total of 31 interviews (five in Belgium, ten in Croatia, nine in France, five in the Netherlands and two in Switzerland) and three focus groups (in Switzerland, 11 participants) were performed. The median age of participants was 61 years (range 33-86 years). The following main themes emerged: (a) patients trust doctors to take the best decisions for them even though communication concerning different antibiotic-related aspects is often insufficient, (b) patients feel that doctors do not prioritize communication due to time constraints and do not seem to adapt information based on patients' preferences, (c) patients differ in their wish to be informed but overall want to be informed on the main aspects in an understandable way, (d) patients often find reassurance in sharing information about their antibiotic treatment with close family, (e) professionals should explore patients' preferences to be involved or not in shared decision making for antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSION: Inpatients often doubt their ability to understand medical information and trust their physicians to take the best decisions for them. Tailored strategies that inform hospitalized patients, acknowledging their concerns and preferences, may be useful to promote patient involvement and to improve communication regarding antibiotic use.

Patient-related determinants of antibiotic use: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess patient-related determinants potentially influencing antibiotic use. METHODS: Studies published in MEDLINE until 30 September 2015 were searched. We included: qualitative studies describing patients' self-reported determinants of antibiotic use; and quantitative studies on either self-reported or objectively assessed determinants associated with antibiotic use. Whenever possible, reported determinants were categorized as 'barriers' or 'facilitators' of responsible antibiotic use. RESULTS: A total of 87 studies from 33 countries were included. Seventy-five (86.2%) were quantitative and described self-reported (45/75, 60.0%), objectively assessed (20/75, 26.7%) or self-reported and objectively assessed (10/75, 13.3%) patient-related determinants. Twelve (12/87, 13.8%) were qualitative studies or had a qualitative and quantitative component. Eighty-six of the studies (98.8%) concerned the outpatient setting. We identified seven broad categories of determinants having an impact on different aspects of antibiotic use (in descending order of frequency): demographic and socio-economic characteristics, patient-doctor interactions (e.g. counselling), treatment characteristics (e.g. administration frequency), attitudes (e.g. expecting antibiotics), access to treatment (e.g. patients' direct costs), characteristics of the condition for which the antibiotic was prescribed (e.g. duration of symptoms), knowledge (e.g. regarding indications for treatment). Most determinants were classified as 'barriers' to responsible antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: A large variety of patient-related determinants impact antibiotic use. The most easily 'modifiable' determinants concern patient-doctor interactions, treatment characteristics and knowledge. Data from the inpatient setting and low- and middle-income countries were underrepresented. Further studies should develop and test interventions that take these determinants into account with the ultimate aim of improving responsible use of antibiotics.