Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthopedics ; 44(3): 160-165, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33416898

RESUMO

Current practice allows early weight bearing of unstable ankle fractures after fixation. This study offers a unique comparison of early weight bearing (EWB) vs late weight bearing (LWB) in operatively stabilized trimalleolar ankle fractures. The goal of this study was to evaluate union rates, clinical outcomes, and complications for patients who were managed with EWB vs LWB. The authors performed a retrospective review of 185 patients who underwent surgical stabilization for trimalleolar ankle fracture. Fixation of the posterior malleolus and weight bearing status were determined by surgeon preference. For this study, EWB was defined as 3 weeks or less and LWB was defined as greater than 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for fracture union and implant failure. Complications and clinical outcomes included ambulatory status, infection rate, and return to surgery. The EWB group included 47 (25.4%) patients, and the LWB group included 138 (74.6%) patients. Of the 7 nonunions, 1 (14.3%) occurred in the EWB group and 6 (85.7%) in the LWB group. A total of 72 (38.9%) posterior malleolar fractures were operatively stabilized, and stabilization did not affect union rates. Syndesmotic fixation was required for 12.5% of patients, despite posterior malleolar stabilization. Syndesmotic fixation increased the union rate 2.5 times. Deep infection and open fracture decreased union. No difference was seen between groups in implant failure, union rate, infection, or return to the operating room. No deleterious effect of EWB in operatively treated trimalleolar ankle fractures was found for union, implant failure, infection, or reoperation. Syndesmotic fixation may offer an advantage over posterior malleolar fixation, with improved union rates. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):160-165.].


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Redução Aberta , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Suporte de Carga
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(4): 1280-1284, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27876465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an important cause of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Irrigation and debridement including liner exchange (I&D/L) success rates have varied for acute PJI. The purpose of this study is to present results of a specific protocol for I&D/L with retention of total knee arthroplasty components. METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive I&D/L patients were retrospectively evaluated. Inclusion criteria for I&D/L were as follows: fewer than 3 weeks of symptoms, no immunologic compromise, intact soft tissue sleeve, and well-fixed components. I&D/L consisted of extensive synovectomy; irrigation with 3 L each of betadine, Dakin's, bacitracin, and normal saline solutions; and exchange of the polyethylene component. Postoperatively, all patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics. Infection was considered eradicated if the wound healed without persistent drainage, there was no residual pain or evidence of infection. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (68.66%) had successful infection eradication regardless of bacterial strain. Those with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) had an 80% failure rate and those with Pseudomonas aeruginosa had a 66.67% failure rate. The success rate for bacteria other than MRSA and Pseudomonas was 85.25%. CONCLUSION: Our protocol for I&D/L was successful in the majority of patients who met strict criteria. We recommend that PJI patients with MRSA or P aeruginosa not undergo I&D/L and be treated with 2-stage revision. For nearly all other patients, our protocol avoids the cost and patient morbidity of a 2-stage revision.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Desbridamento/métodos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Desbridamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietileno , Período Pós-Operatório , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sinovectomia , Irrigação Terapêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Acta Crystallogr C ; 66(Pt 7): i75-8, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20603545

RESUMO

The title compounds, namely hexacaesium tetraniobium docosaselenide and dodecapotassium hexaniobium pentatriacontaselenide, were formed from their respective alkali chalcogenide reactive flux and niobium metal. Both compounds fall into the larger family of solid-state compounds that contain the M(2)Q(11) building block (M = Nb, Ta; Q = Se, S), where the metal chalcogenide forms dimers of face-shared pentagonal bipyramids. Cs(6)Nb(4)Se(22) contains two Nb(2)Se(11) building blocks linked by an Se-Se bond to form isolated Nb(4)Se(22) tetrameric building blocks surrounded by caesium ions. K(12)Nb(6)Se(35.3) contains similar Nb(4)Se(22) tetramers that are linked by an Se-Se-Se unit to an Nb(2)Se(11) dimer to form one-dimensional anionic chains surrounded by potassium ions. Further crystallographic studies of K(12)Nb(6)Se(35.3) demonstrate a new M(2)Se(12) building block because of disorder between an Se(2-) site (85%) and an (Se-Se)(2-) unit (15%). The subtle differences between the structures are discussed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA