[Effects of rapid drug sensitivity testing for multidrug-resistant bacteria on the prognosis of patients with severe intra-abdominal infection].

Objective: To examine the clinical value of rapid detection of drug-resistant bacteria by immunochromatography and the effects of rapid detection on the prognosis of patients with severe intra-abdominal infection complicated by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) bloodstream infection. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed clinical data of 73 patients with severe abdominal infections with sepsis or septic shock complicated by CRE bloodstream infection admitted to the general surgery department of Jinling Hospital between February 2022 and February 2023. Patients were divided into a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA) group (17 patients) and conventional testing group (56 patients) based on whether a GICA for CRE had been performed on the patients' first blood culture sample during the diagnosis and treatment process. There were no statistically significant differences between the GICA and conventional testing groups in age ([55.9±17.3] vs. [47.6±16.4] years), sex ([16 men vs. one woman ] vs. [41 men vs. 15 women]), median Charlson comorbidity index (3.0[2.0,4.0] vs. 3.0[2.0, 4.8]), septic shock (10 vs. 39), or acute kidney injury (8 vs. 40) (all P>0.05). Both groups routinely underwent traditional bacterial identification and drug susceptibility testing. Additionally, patients in the GICA group were tested directly for positive blood cultures using a GICA carbapenemase test kit. The main outcomes were mortality rates on Days 28 and 90 after the first identification of CRE bloodstream infection in both groups. We also compared the microbial clearance rate, duration of hospitalization and intensive care unit stay, and time from onset of CRE bloodstream infection to initiation of targeted and appropriate antibiotics between the two groups. Results: The rate of microbial clearance of bloodstream infection was significantly greater in the GICA group than in the conventional testing group (15/17 vs. 34/56 [60.7%], χ2=4.476, P=0.034), whereas the 28-day mortality tended to be lower in the GICA than conventional testing group [5/17 vs. 44.6% [25/56], χ2=1.250, P=0.264). The 90-day mortality (8/17 vs. 53.6% [30/56], χ2=0.222, P=0.638), median duration of hospitalization (37.0 [18.0, 46.5] days vs. 45.5 [32.2, 64.8] days, Z=-1.867, P=0.062), and median duration of intensive care unit stay (18.0 [6.5, 35.0] days vs. 32.0 [5.0, 51.8] days, Z=-1.251, P=0.209). The median time between the onset of bloodstream infection and administration of antibiotics was 49.0 (38.0, 69.0) hours in the GICA group, which is significantly shorter than the 163.0 (111.8, 190.0) hours in the conventional testing group (Z=-5.731, P<0.001). The median time between the onset of bloodstream infection and administration of appropriate antibiotics was 40.0 (34.0, 80.0) hours in the GICA group, which is shorter than in the conventional testing group (68.0 [38.2, 118.8]) hours; however, this difference is not statistically significant (Z=-1.686, P=0.093). Conclusions: GICA can provide information on carbapenemase- producing pathogens faster than traditional drug sensitivity testing, enabling early administration of the optimal antibiotics. The strategy of 'carbapenemase detection first' for managing bacterial infection has the potential to improve prognosis of patients and reduce mortality rate.

The curative effects of LPN combined LCA in treating with middle and advanced renal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the curative effects of laparoscopy partial nephrectomy (LPN) combined with laparoscopy cryoablation (LCA) in treating renal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 58 patients that were diagnosed with phase III-IV renal cancer in the Hospital from February 2013 to October 2014 were enrolled in this study. After obtaining the approval of Ethics Committee of the Hospital as well as the informed consent of the patients and their relatives, the patients were randomly divide into two groups: control group consisted of 24 patients, who were treated with LPN + chemo radiotherapy and the observation group consisted of 34 patients, who were treated with LPN in combination of LCA + chemo radiotherapy. RESULTS: The rate of successful operation was significantly higher in the observation group than in control group and the prevalence of per procedural complications in observation group was significantly lower than that of control group, and these differences had statistical significance (p < 0.05). Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after operation and 6-month follow-up in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group, and the level of serum creatinine (sCr) was significantly lower compared to the control group and the differences had statistical significance (p < 0.05). Follow-up survival rate of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that of control group, recurrence rate and recurrence time of patients in the observation group was significantly lower than those of control group and the difference had statistical significance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LPN combined LCA therapy was quite effective in treating with middle and advanced renal cancer. Compared with pure LPN therapy, LPN combined LCA therapy could significantly improve the surgical effects, retain the functions of the renal unit and improve the patients' prognosis.