Circulating dengue virus serotypes, demographics, and epidemiology in the 2023 dengue outbreak in Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Dengue is a serious epidemic for Bangladesh affecting thousands of lives. This study aimed to identify and determine the prevalence of the circulating variants of dengue virus (DENV) and their association with demographics and clinical manifestations among the dengue-infected patients. A total of 711 participants with NS1 antigen positivity were enrolled, followed by viral RNA extraction from the collected blood samples and a multiplex real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to determine the dengue virus serotypes. Of 711 dengue-infected patients, 503 (70.7%) were male. Among different age groups, most of the patients were 21-30 years old (n = 255, 35.9%). The DENV2 (n = 483, 67.9%) serotype was more prevalent than the DENV3 (n = 144, 20.3%) and DENV1 (n = 84, 11.8%). The duration of fever was highest in the DENV-1 patients (4.79 ± 1.84 days) in contrast to DENV-3 (4.48 ± 1.68 days) and DENV-2 (4.33 ± 1.45 days) (P = 0.039). Importantly, five highly populated areas were identified as dengue hotspots in Chittagong metropolitan city. Our results provide crucial insights into the patterns of dengue virus transmission and severity among southern Bangladeshi population, thereby aiding in the development of targeted public health interventions and management strategies to combat future outbreaks.

Cardiac Surgical Unit-Advanced Life Support-certified centers are associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest: A propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of Cardiac Surgical Unit-Advanced Life Support (CSU-ALS) training on failure to rescue after cardiac arrest (FTR-CA) is unknown. We hypothesized that institutional CSU-ALS certification would be associated with lower FTR-CA. METHODS: Patients undergoing Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operations from 2020 to 2023 from a regional collaborative were analyzed. Each institution was surveyed regarding its status as a CSU-ALS-certified center. Patients stratified by CSU-ALS certification were 1:1 propensity score matched with subsequent multivariable model reviewing associations with FTR-CA. RESULTS: A total of 12,209 patients were included in the study period across 15 institutions. Eight centers reported CSU-ALS certification. After propensity score matching, 2 patient cohorts were formed (n = 3557). Patients at CSU-ALS centers had greater rates of intensive care unit readmission (3.9% vs 2.3%, P < .01) and total operating room time (340 minutes vs 323 minutes, P < .01). Hospital readmission was less likely in the CSU-ALS centers (9.0% vs 10.1%, P < .01). There was no difference in the rate of postoperative cardiac arrest (1.8% vs 2.2%, P = .24) or operative mortality (2.5% vs 2.9%, P = .30). After risk adjustment, CSU-ALS centers (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.72, P < .01) and greater-volume centers (odds ratio, 0.15; confidence interval, 0.03-0.74, P = .02) had reduced odds of FTR-CA. CONCLUSIONS: Centers with CSU-ALS certification are associated with a lower risk-adjusted likelihood of FTR-CA. This highlights the importance of well-trained staff and treatment algorithms in the care of patients postcardiac surgery.

Prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation during coronary artery bypass grafting: A propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate short-term outcomes and statewide practice patterns of prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without preoperative atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (2017-2023) within a regional collaborative were identified. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, previous cardiac surgery, or nondevice-based left atrial appendage ligation were excluded. Patients were stratified by left atrial appendage ligation status and were propensity score matched. Univariable analysis was used to compare short-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 16,547 patients examined, 442 underwent prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation. The propensity score-matched cohort (439 in the prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation group, 439 in the no prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation group) was compared and had no significant differences in preoperative Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 (doubled), Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke, Transient ischemic attack or Thromboembolism (doubled), Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74, Sex category (female)(CHA2DS2-VASc) scores or operative variables. The prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation group had longer crossclamp time (82 vs 76 minutes, P = .001), intensive care unit hours (72 vs 66, P = .001), and length of stay (6.0 vs 6.0 days, P = .010); increased postoperative atrial fibrillation (35% vs 24%, P < .001); and more discharges on anticoagulation (17% vs 8.2%, P < .001). There were no significant differences in postoperative stroke (1.1% vs 2.1%, P = .423), readmission (13% vs 9.6%, P = .118), operative mortality (2.5% vs 1.6%, P = .480), or readmission for thrombotic or bleeding complications (0.7% vs 1.1%, P = .724). Hospitalization costs were significantly higher for the prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation group ($43,478 vs $40,645, P < .001). The rate of prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation during coronary artery bypass grafting increased from 1.61% (2017) to 5.65% (2023) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation, discharge on anticoagulation, and hospitalization costs in patients undergoing prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation during coronary artery bypass grafting, there was no difference in short-term clinical end points including stroke and operative mortality.

Mitral valve repair in a regional quality collaborative: Respect or resect?

Objective: Mitral valve repair is the gold standard for treatment of mitral regurgitation, but the optimal technique remains debated. By using a regional collaborative, we sought to determine the change in repair technique over time. Methods: We identified all patients undergoing isolated mitral valve repair from 2012 to 2022 for degenerative mitral disease. Those with endocarditis, transcatheter repair, or tricuspid intervention were excluded. Continuous variables were analyzed via Wilcoxon rank sum, and categorical variables were analyzed via chi-square testing. Results: We identified 1653 patients who underwent mitral valve repair, with 875 (59.2%) undergoing a no resection repair. Over the last decade, there was no significant trend in the proportion of repair techniques across the region (P = .96). Those undergoing no resection repairs were more likely to have undergone prior cardiac surgery (5.0% vs 2.2%, P = .002) or minimally invasive approaches (61.4% vs 24.7%, P < .001) with similar predicted risk of mortality (median 0.6% vs 0.6%, P = .75). Intraoperatively, no resection repairs were associated with longer bypass times (140 [117-167] minutes vs 122 [91-159] minutes, P < .001). Operative mortality was similar between both groups (1.1% vs 1.0%, P = .82), as were other postoperative outcomes. Anterior leaflet prolapse (odds ratio, 11.16 [6.34-19.65], P < .001) and minimally invasive approach (odds ratio, 6.40 [5.06-8.10], P < .001) were most predictive of no resection repair. Conclusions: Despite minor differences in operative times, statewide over the past decade there remains a diverse mix of both classic "resect" and newer "respect" strategies with comparable short-term outcomes and no major timewise trends. These data may suggest that both approaches are equivocal.

Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis. DESIGN: Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis. SETTING: Virginia hospitals performing HTx. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use). CONCLUSIONS: Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Center of Excellence recognition is associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) center of excellence (CoE) recognition on failure to rescue after cardiac surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that ELSO CoE would be associated with improved failure to rescue. METHODS: Patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. Patients were stratified by whether or not their operation was performed at an ELSO CoE. Hierarchical logistic regression analyzed the association between ELSO CoE recognition and failure to rescue. RESULTS: A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers. In total, 807 developed cardiac arrest with 444 (55%) experiencing failure to rescue after cardiac arrest. Three centers received ELSO CoE recognition, and accounted for 4238 patients (9.71%). Before adjustment, operative mortality was equivalent between ELSO CoE and non-ELSO CoE centers (2.08% vs 2.36%; P = .25), as was the rate of any complication (34.5% vs 33.8%; P = .35) and cardiac arrest (1.49% vs 1.89%; P = .07). After adjustment, patients undergoing surgery at an ELSO CoE facility were observed to have 44% decreased odds of failure to rescue after cardiac arrest, relative to patients at non-ELSO CoE facility (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.316-0.993; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: ELSO CoE status is associated with improved failure to rescue following cardiac arrest for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. These findings highlight the important role that comprehensive quality programs serve in improving perioperative outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Unplanned postoperative catheterization during admission for coronary artery bypass grafting is neither cheap nor benign, but may rescue patients.

OBJECTIVE: Literature describing outcomes of myocardial ischemia after coronary artery bypass grafting is sparse. We hypothesized these patients had more complications and incurred higher costs of care. METHODS: Using adult cardiac surgery data and cardiac catheterization (CathPCI) data from the Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative, we identified patients who underwent unplanned cardiac catheterization after coronary artery bypass grafting from 2018 to 2021. Adult cardiac surgery data were matched to CathPCI data examining earliest in-hospital catheterization. Patients not requiring catheterization served as the control group. RESULTS: We identified 10,597 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, of whom 41 of 10,597 underwent unplanned cardiac catheterization. A total of 21 of 41 patients (51%) received percutaneous coronary intervention, most commonly for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n = 7, 33%) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n = 6, 29%). Postoperative cardiac arrest occurred in 14 patients (40%). In patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, 14 (67%) had a single lesion, 4 (19%) had 2 lesions, and 3 (14%) had 3 lesions. The left anterior descending artery (38%) was the most frequently intervened upon vessel. Patients who underwent catheterization were more likely to require balloon pump support (26% vs 11%), to have prolonged ventilation (57% vs 20%), to have renal failure (17% vs 7.1%), and to undergo reintubation (37% vs 3.8%, all P < .04). There was no statistical difference in operative mortality (4.9% vs 2.3%, P = .2) or failure to rescue (4.9% vs 1.6%, P = .14). Total costs were higher in patients who underwent unplanned catheterization ($81,293 vs $37,011, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned catheterization after coronary artery bypass grafting is infrequent but associated with more complications and a higher cost of care. Therefore, determination of an association with operative mortality in patients with suspected ischemia after coronary artery bypass grafting requires additional study.

Thoracic Aortic Injuries Following Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Placement: A Retrospective Case Series.

Thoracic aortic injuries from intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are rare, and no publications exist in the context of patients awaiting heart transplantation. We present a single-institution case series involving five patients out of 107 who sustained thoracic aortic injuries following IABP placement awaiting heart transplantation. The goal of this study is to describe the characteristics of patients, presenting symptoms, treatment and the impact of these injuries on their suitability for transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-institution study through chart review of five patients with known thoracic aortic injuries following IABP placement awaiting heart transplant. SETTING: Tertiary care academic teaching hospital with all patients requiring cardiac ICU admission. PATIENTS: All five patients were diagnosed with advanced heart failure awaiting heart transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient had an IABP placed while awaiting transplant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Five patients (4.6%) out of a total of 107 supported with IABP awaiting heart transplantation were identified with thoracic aortic injury. Three underwent transplantation and subsequently received thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and they are doing well with a mean follow-up of 6 months. One patient died acutely and the other did not require intervention. CONCLUSIONS: IABP-related aortic injuries may be more common in patients awaiting transplantation and that endovascular therapy is a suitable treatment modality with no immediate impact on transplantation outcomes. Pooled data from multiple centers may help identify patients risk profile to potentially design an algorithm that can more quickly identify these injuries.

Infarct Size With Incremental Global Myocardial Ischemia Times: Cyclosporine A in Donation After Circulatory Death Rat Hearts.

BACKGROUND: We quantified the myocardial infarct size with varying global ischemia durations and studied the benefits of Cyclosporine A (CyA) in reducing cardiac injury in ex vivo and transplanted rat hearts. METHODS: Infarct size was measured after 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 minutes of in vivo global ischemia (n = 34) and compared with control beating-heart donor (CBD) hearts (n = 10). For heart function assessment, donation after circulatory death (DCD) rat hearts (n = 20) were procured after 25 minutes of in vivo ischemia and reanimated ex vivo for 90 minutes. Half of the DCD hearts received CyA (0.5 mM) at reanimation. The CBD hearts (n = 10) served as controls. A separate group of CBD and DCD (with or without CyA treatment) hearts underwent heterotopic heart transplantation; heart function was measured at 48 hours. RESULTS: Infarct size was 25% with 25 minutes of ischemia and increased significantly with 30 and 35 minutes to 32% and 41%, respectively. CyA treatment decreased infarct size in DCD hearts (15% vs 25%). Heart function in the transplanted DCD hearts was significantly better with CyA treatment and was comparable to CBD hearts. CONCLUSIONS: CyA administered at reperfusion limited infarct size in DCD hearts and improved their function in transplanted hearts.

Transplantation Outcomes with Donor Hearts after Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND: Data showing the efficacy and safety of the transplantation of hearts obtained from donors after circulatory death as compared with hearts obtained from donors after brain death are limited. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, noninferiority trial in which adult candidates for heart transplantation were assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive a heart after the circulatory death of the donor or a heart from a donor after brain death if that heart was available first (circulatory-death group) or to receive only a heart that had been preserved with the use of traditional cold storage after the brain death of the donor (brain-death group). The primary end point was the risk-adjusted survival at 6 months in the as-treated circulatory-death group as compared with the brain-death group. The primary safety end point was serious adverse events associated with the heart graft at 30 days after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients underwent transplantation; 90 (assigned to the circulatory-death group) received a heart donated after circulatory death and 90 (regardless of group assignment) received a heart donated after brain death. A total of 166 transplant recipients were included in the as-treated primary analysis (80 who received a heart from a circulatory-death donor and 86 who received a heart from a brain-death donor). The risk-adjusted 6-month survival in the as-treated population was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88 to 99) among recipients of a heart from a circulatory-death donor, as compared with 90% (95% CI, 84 to 97) among recipients of a heart from a brain-death donor (least-squares mean difference, -3 percentage points; 90% CI, -10 to 3; P<0.001 for noninferiority [margin, 20 percentage points]). There were no substantial between-group differences in the mean per-patient number of serious adverse events associated with the heart graft at 30 days after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, risk-adjusted survival at 6 months after transplantation with a donor heart that had been reanimated and assessed with the use of extracorporeal nonischemic perfusion after circulatory death was not inferior to that after standard-care transplantation with a donor heart that had been preserved with the use of cold storage after brain death. (Funded by TransMedics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03831048.).

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Definition of Failure to Rescue Should Consider Including Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) is a new quality measure in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. The STS defines FTR as death after permanent stroke, renal failure, reoperation, or prolonged ventilation. Our objective was to assess whether cardiac arrest should be included in this definition. METHODS: Patients undergoing an STS index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. The performance of the STS definition of FTR was compared with a definition that included the STS complications plus cardiac arrest (STS+). Centers were grouped into FTR rate terciles using the STS and STS+ definitions of FTR, and changes in their relative performance rating were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers. Cardiac arrest was the most lethal complication: 55.0% of patients who experienced cardiac arrest died. FTR after any complication (13 total) occurred among 884 patients. The STS definition of FTR accounted for 83% (735 of 884) of all FTR. The addition of cardiac arrest to the STS definition significantly increased the proportion of overall FTR accounted for (92.2% [815 of 884]; P < .001). Choice of FTR definition led to substantial differences in center-level relative performance rating by FTR rate. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after cardiac arrest is not completely captured by the STS definition of FTR and represents an important source of potentially preventable death after cardiac surgery. Future quality improvement efforts using the STS definition of FTR should account for this.

Center case volume is associated with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined failure to rescue in cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Our understanding of the impact of a center's case volume on failure to rescue (FTR) after cardiac surgery is incomplete. We hypothesized that increasing center case volume would be associated with lower FTR. METHODS: Patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. After we excluded patients with missing Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores, patients were stratified by mean annual center case volume. The lowest quartile of case volume was compared with all other patients. Logistic regression analyzed the association between center case volume and FTR, adjusting for patient demographics, race, insurance, comorbidities, procedure type, and year. RESULTS: A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers during the study period. Of these, 5315 (12.2%) developed an FTR complication, and 735 (13.8% of those who developed an FTR complication) experienced FTR. Median annual case volume was 226, with 25th and 75th percentile cutoffs of 136 and 284 cases, respectively. Increasing center-level case volume was associated with significantly greater center-level major complication rates but lower mortality and FTR rates (all P values < .01). Observed-to-expected FTR was significantly associated with case volume (P = .040). Increasing case volume was independently associated with decreasing FTR rate in the final multivariable model (odds ratio, 0.87 per quartile; confidence interval, 0.799-0.946, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing center case volume is significantly associated with improved FTR rates. Assessment of low-volume centers' FTR performance represents an opportunity for quality improvement.

Influence of heart transplant allocation changes on hospital resource utilization.

Objectives: The 2018 change in the heart transplant allocation system resulted in greater use of temporary mechanical circulatory support. We hypothesized that the allocation change has increased hospital resource utilization, including length of stay and cost. Methods: All heart transplant patients within a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database were included (2012-2020). Patients were stratified before and after the transplant allocation changes into early (January 2012-September 2018) and late eras (November 2018-June 2020). Costs were adjusted for inflation and presented in 2020 dollars. Results: Of 535 heart transplants, there were 410 early and 125 late era patients. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for greater lung and valvular disease in the late era. Fewer patients in the late era were bridged with durable left ventricular assist devices (69% vs 31%; P < .0001), biventricular devices (5% vs 1%; P = .047), and more with temporary mechanical circulatory support (4% vs 46%; P < .0001). There was no difference in early mortality (6% vs 4%; P = .33) or major morbidity (57% vs 61%; P = .40). Length of stay was longer preoperatively (1 vs 9 days; P < .0001), but not different postoperatively. There was no difference in median total hospital cost ($132,465 vs $128,996; P = .15), although there was high variability. On multivariable regression, preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization was the main driver of resource utilization. Conclusions: The new heart transplant allocation system has resulted in different bridging techniques, with greater reliance on temporary mechanical circulatory support. Although this is associated with an increase in preoperative length of stay, it did not translate into increased hospital cost.

Electron Transport Chain Inhibition to Decrease Injury in Transplanted Donation After Circulatory Death Rat Hearts.

ABSTRACT: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor hearts sustain ischemic damage and are not routinely used for heart transplantation. DCD heart injury, particularly reperfusion injury, is primarily mediated by releasing reactive oxygen species from the damaged mitochondria (complex I of the electron transport chain). Amobarbital (AMO) is a transient inhibitor of complex I and is known to reduce releasing reactive oxygen species generation. We studied the beneficial effects of AMO in transplanted DCD hearts. Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to 4 groups-DCD or DCD + AMO donors and control beating-heart donors (CBD) or CBD + AMO donors (n = 6-8 each). Anesthetized rats were connected to a ventilator. The right carotid artery was cannulated, heparin and vecuronium were administered. The DCD process started by disconnecting the ventilator. DCD hearts were procured after 25 minutes of in-vivo ischemia, whereas CBD hearts were procured without ischemia. At procurement, all donor hearts received 10 mL of University of Wisconsin cardioplegia solution. The CBD + AMO and DCD + AMO groups received AMO (2 mM) dissolved in cardioplegia. Heterotopic heart transplantation was performed by anastomosing the donor aorta and pulmonary artery to the recipient's abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. After 14 days, transplanted heart function was measured with a balloon tip catheter placed in the left ventricle. Compared with CBD hearts, DCD hearts had significantly lower developed pressure. AMO treatment significantly improved cardiac function in DCD hearts. Treatment of DCD hearts at the time of reperfusion with AMO resulted in an improvement of transplanted heart function that was comparable with the CBD hearts.

Pulmonary Hypertension and Operative Risk in Mitral Valve and Coronary Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is a known risk factor for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), though less well understood for valve operations. We hypothesized PHT is associated with lower risk during mitral valve operations compared to CABG. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated mitral valve or CABG operations (2011-2019) in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database were stratified by pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). The association of PASP by procedure type was assessed by hierarchical regression modeling, adjusting for STS predicted risk scores. RESULTS: Of the 2542 mitral and 11,059 CABG patients, the mitral population had higher mean STS risk of mortality (3.6% versus 2.4%, P < 0.0001) and median PASP (42 mmHg versus 32 mmHg, P < 0.0001). PASP was independently associated with operative mortality and major morbidity in both mitral and CABG patients. However, for mitral patients a 10-mmHg increase in PASP was associated with lower odds of morbidity (odds ratio: 1.06 versus 1.13), mortality (odds ratio: 1.11 versus 1.18) and intensive care unit time (4.3 versus 7.6 h) compared with CABG patients (interaction terms P < 0.0001). Among mitral patients, median PASP was higher in stenotic versus regurgitant disease (57 mmHg versus 40 mmHg, P < 0.0001). However, there was no differential association of PASP on morbidity or mortality (interaction terms P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although mitral surgery patients tend to have higher preoperative pulmonary artery pressures, PHT was associated with a lower risk for mitral outcomes compared with CABG. Further research on the management and optimization of patients with PHT perioperatively is needed to improve care for these patients.

Influence of sex on global myocardial ischemia tolerance and mitochondrial function in circulatory death donor hearts.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor hearts are not routinely used for heart transplantation (HTx) because of ischemic damage, which is inherent to the DCD process. HTx outcomes are suboptimal in males who received female donor hearts. The exact mechanism for suboptimal outcomes from female donor hearts has not been defined. Differential susceptibility to ischemia tolerance, which would play a significant role in DCD donation, could be a reason but has not been studied. We studied the influence of sex on global myocardial ischemia tolerance and mitochondrial function. Sprague-Dawley rats of both sexes were assigned to DCD (n = 32) or control beating-heart donor (CBD, n = 28) groups. DCD hearts underwent 25 min of in vivo global myocardial ischemia and 90 min of ex vivo Krebs-Henseleit buffer perfusion at 37°C. CBD hearts were procured without ischemia. Infarct size was determined in hearts following 90 min of reperfusion, and in another set of hearts, mitochondrial function (oxidative-phosphorylation) was studied following 60 min of reperfusion. Infarct size was increased 3.3-fold in male and 3.1-fold in female DCD hearts compared with CBD hearts. However, infarct size (%) was comparable in female and male DCD hearts (male: 25.4 ± 3.7 vs. female 19.0 ± 3.3, P = NS). Oxidative phosphorylation was similarly decreased in male and female DCD hearts' mitochondria compared with CBD hearts' mitochondria. Thus, neither infarct size nor mitochondrial dysfunction was higher in female DCD hearts. These results suggest that the susceptibility to ischemia is not the reason for suboptimal HTx outcomes with female donor hearts.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The current study shows cardiac injury is not increased in female DCD hearts following global ischemia-reperfusion compared with male DCD hearts. In addition, mitochondrial dysfunction with DCD ischemia-reperfusion is comparable in both sexes. Sex-specific immune responses and hormone receptor modulation may contribute to suboptimal outcomes in male HTx recipients with female donor hearts.

Socioeconomic Distress Associated With Increased Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Over Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: The influence of socioeconomic determinants of health on choice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for coronary artery disease is unknown. We hypothesized that higher Distressed Communities Index (DCI) scores, a comprehensive socioeconomic ranking by zip code, would be associated with more frequent PCI. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated CABG or PCI in a regional American College of Cardiology CathPCI registry and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database (2018-2021) were assigned DCI scores (0 = no distress, 100 = severe distress) based on education level, poverty, unemployment, housing vacancies, median income, and business growth. Patients who presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or emergent procedures were excluded. The most distressed quintile (DCI ≥80) was compared with all other patients. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association between DCI and procedure type. RESULTS: A total of 23 223 patients underwent either PCI (n = 16 079) or CABG (n = 7144) for coronary artery disease across 28 centers during the study period. Before adjustment, high socioeconomic distress occurred more frequently among CABG patients (DCI ≥80, 12.4% vs 8.42%; P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, high socioeconomic distress was associated with greater odds of receiving PCI, relative to CABG (odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49; P = .007). High socioeconomic distress was significantly associated with postprocedural mortality (odds ratio 1.52; 95% CI, 1.02-2.26; P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: High socioeconomic distress is associated with greater risk-adjusted odds of receiving PCI, relative to CABG, as well as higher postprocedural mortality. Targeted resource allocation in high DCI areas may help eliminate barriers to CABG.