Outcomes After Double-Layer Repair Versus En Masse Repair for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Delamination of rotator cuff tears during arthroscopic shoulder surgery has an incidence of 38% to 92%. Double-layer (DL) repair and en masse (EM) repair are most commonly used in this situation. Purpose: To compare the clinical results of the DL versus EM repair techniques for delaminated rotator cuff tears using a meta-analysis. Study Design: Systematic review; level of evidence, 3. Methods: We identified relevant studies comparing the clinical results of DL and EM repair for delaminated rotator cuff injuries in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases after the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The primary outcomes were the Constant score and retear rate. Additionally, we compared other postoperative shoulder functional scores, shoulder range of motion, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores between the 2 suture methods using a meta-analysis. The mean difference (MD) was compared for continuous outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) were compared for categorical outcomes. Results: Of the 197 studies initially identified, 6 studies were included in this analysis. There were significant differences in the Constant score (MD, 8.64 [95% CI, 4.47 to 12.8]; P < .05) and external rotation (MD, 5.10 [95% CI, 2.63 to 7.56]; P < .05) between the 2 techniques, with DL repair having superior outcomes. No significant differences were observed between the 2 techniques in forward flexion (MD, 0.62 [95% CI, -1.18 to 2.43]; P = .50), VAS pain (MD, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.34 to 0.27]; P = .84), or retear rate (OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.37 to 1.41]; P = .35). Conclusion: Results of this review and meta-analysis suggest that DL repair was more beneficial than EM repair in terms of the Constant score and shoulder external rotation in patients with delaminated rotator cuff injuries.

A comparison between knotted and knotless medial row of suture bridge technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The shoulder arthroscopic suture bridge technique is currently very popular, but scientific evidence relating to the clinical outcomes of the medial row with or without knots has not been systematic reviewed. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of knotted versus knotless double-row suture bridges for rotator cuff repairs. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHOD: Five databases that contain literature in English were searched (Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library), with a focus on works published between 2011 and 2022. Clinical data relating to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture bridge approach was examined and the outcomes of medial row knotting contrasted with that of the knotless technique. The search phrase used was: (double row) AND (rotator cuff) AND (repair), and the search method is subject term plus free word search. Literature quality evaluation was performed using the Cochrane "risk of bias" tool 1.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment instrument. RESULTS: One randomized controlled trial, four prospective cohort studies, and five retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Data pertaining to 1146 patients was drawn from these ten original papers and analyzed. Meta-analyses that were performed on 11 postoperative outcomes revealed that none of the differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05) and that the publications were unbiased (P > 0.05). Postoperative retear rate and postoperative retear categorization were the outcomes assessed. Scores on postoperative pain, forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation mobility were collated and evaluated. The University of California, Los Angeles scoring systems in the first year following surgery, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Constant scales in the first and second years after surgery were the secondary outcomes spotlighted in this study. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture bridge technique with or without a knotted medial row was proven to be equivalent. These outcomes are about postoperative retear, postoperative retear classification, postoperative shoulder function score, postoperative shoulder mobility, and postoperative pain, respectively. It should be noted that the conclusions are based on short-term clinical follow-up data.

Deletion of DYRK1A Accelerates Osteoarthritis Progression Through Suppression of EGFR-ERK Signaling.

Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) signaling is involved in the dynamic balance of catabolism and anabolism in articular chondrocytes. This study aimed to investigate the roles and mechanism of DYRK1A in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). The expressions of DYRK1A and its downstream signal epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were detected in the cartilage of adult wild-type mice with destabilized medial meniscus (DMM) and articular cartilage of patients with OA. We measured the progression of osteoarthritis in chondrocyte-specific knockout DYRK1A(DYRK1A-cKO) mice after DMM surgery. Knee cartilage was histologically scored and assessed the effects of DYRK1A deletion on chondrocyte catabolism and anabolism. The effect of inhibiting EGFR signaling in chondrocytes from DYRK1A-cKO mice was analyzed. Trauma-induced OA mice and OA patients showed downregulation of DYRK1A and EGFR signaling pathways. Conditional DYRK1A deletion aggravates DMM-induced cartilage degeneration, reduces the thickness of the superficial cartilage, and increases the number of hypertrophic chondrocytes. The expression of collagen type II, p-ERK, and aggrecan was also downregulated, and the expression of collagen type X was upregulated in the articular cartilage of these mice. Our findings suggest that DYRK1A delays the progression of knee osteoarthritis in mice, at least in part, by maintaining EGFR-ERK signaling in articular chondrocytes.