Microvessel density as a molecular marker for identifying high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia precursors to prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Existing clinical data have shown that high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is the most likely precursor to prostate cancer (CaP). Criteria to distinguish HGPIN that progress to CaP from those that do not remain poorly defined. Our objective was to evaluate microvessel density as a molecular marker for distinguishing HGPINs that have the potential of progressing to cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human prostatic tissue samples were collected randomly from 50 prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy patients. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections were used for immunohistochemical localization of rabbit anti-human von Willebrand factor VIII (vWF) IgG, mouse anti-high molecular weight cytokeratin 34BE-12 in basal cells, and mouse anti-heparan sulphate proteoglycan (HSPG) IgGs in basement membranes associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), PIN associated with some BPH (isolated PIN), and PIN associated with CaP. RESULTS: Analysis of immunostaining data showed that PINs could be categorized according to their distributions within and outside 2 standard deviations (SD) of the mean for microvessel density. The average number of microvessels was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in PINs associated with Gleason score 7 tumors than those associated with Gleason scores 4-6 (P < 0.1328) or 8 and 9 tumors (P < 0.1708). Morphologically, PINs within 2 SD were composed of low- and high-grade type, whereas those outside 2 SD of microvessel density were predominantly of high-grade type. Cytokeratin and HSPG localization patterns also showed differences in PINs found within and outside 2 SD of microvessel density. We found localization of cytokeratin 34BE-12 in basal cells of specimens with BPH alone, isolated PIN, and PIN associated with CaP within 2 SD, whereas many PINs outside 2 SD showed disruptions in cytokeratin localization. The basement membranes of PINs within 2 SD of microvessel density were relatively intact, whereas those outside 2 SD were fragmented. CONCLUSIONS: Our immunostaining data indicates that once HGPIN is found in the initial prostatic biopsy, it should be evaluated for microvessel density by localization of vWF. Our data indicate that characteristics of HGPIN can be augmented by evaluations of cytokeratin and HSPG molecular markers to assess the potential of HGPIN progression to malignancy. When biopsy samples show HGPIN with increased microvessel density and disrupted cytokeratin and HSPG markers, the patient may be a candidate for repeat biopsy. Since our study is limited to 50 prostate tissue samples, we emphasize that our conclusion is tentative and ought to be confirmed in a study with a larger sample size. This is the first report to show that microvessel density may distinguish HGPIN that is a precursor to prostate cancer.

Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis by the ratio of cathepsin B to stefin A in patients with prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic grade and/or histologic score, extraprostatic extension indicated by invasion of the prostatic capsule, margin, and/or seminal vesicles by prostate cancer cells, serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, complexed PSA levels and/or their ratios, regional pelvic lymph node metastases, and clinical staging have been used to diagnose and monitor the treatment of prostate carcinoma (PC) patients. The Gleason grading system is also used to grade/score a patient's stage of disease, with lower to higher scores indicating progression of PC. However, Gleason's system cannot be used to distinguish biologically aggressive PCs within a single Gleason score. Our objective was to identify subpopulations (or clones) of aggressive prostate cancers within an individual Gleason score by utilizing biological molecule(s) that also facilitate cancer cell invasion to prostatic stroma and metastasis to the lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens were collected from 97 patients with PC and from 8 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. These patients had not been treated with hormonal and/or chemotherapeutic agents before undergoing a prostatectomy at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Formalin-fixed, paraffin or paraplast-embedded prostate tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for pathologic diagnosis and adjacent sections were stained for for immunohistochemical study. We also collected data on age, race, extraprostatic extension, margin status, seminal vesicle, and lymph node invasion by cancer cells, clinical stage at prostatectomy, and mortality/survival data, including the available presurgery and postsurgery serum total PSA and prostatic acid phosphatase concentrations in patients. Immunohistochemical localization of mouse or rabbit anti-cathepsin B (CB) antibody IgG and mouse antihuman stefin (cystatin) A IgG was quantified using a computer-based image analysis system equipped with Metamorph software. RESULTS: CB and stefin A identified aggressive and less aggressive clones of PCs within an individual Gleason score. Tumors with a Gleason Score of 6 that are similar histologically and morphologically were heterogeneous with respect to the ratios of CB to stefin A (CB > stefin A, CB = stefin A, and CB < stefin A). We also found a significant positive association (P = 0.0066) between ratios of CB and stefin A (CB > stefin A) and the incidence of pelvic lymph node metastases, but not with ratios of CB less than stefin A and/or ratios of CB equal to stefin A. Patients with Gleason 7 PCs had a higher incidence of positive lymph nodes than those with Gleason Score 6 tumors. Our data indicated that mortality rates increased in patients when the ratios of CB were greater than stefin A. CONCLUSIONS: PC within an individual Gleason score is a heterogeneous tumor that contains clones or subpopulations of aggressive and less aggressive tumors that can be defined by the ratios of CB to stefin A. PC with an aggressive clone can be identified when the ratio of CB is greater than that of stefin A. Less aggressive clones are identified when the ratio of CB is less than that of stefin A or when the ratio of CB is equal to that of stefin A. The ratios of CB to stefin A can be used in the differential diagnosis and treatment of patients with PC. This is the first report to identify phenotypes of aggressive and less aggressive PCs within a Gleason score.