Correlation between Intensity of Pain and Disability Due to Intra-articular Lesions in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Objective To correlate radiographic alterations and lesions in intra-articular structures of the acetabulum with the intensity of pain and disability of patients diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods A retrospective analysis of the preoperative data of 182 patients (190 hips) was performed. Clinical variables such as age, gender, the practice of physical activity, and radiographic variables, such as the Wiberg and alpha angles, were evaluated. Through an intraoperative video, the extent of the chondral and labial lesions was evaluated considering the clock-face method, the degree of joint involvement by the Outerbridge classification, and the presence of wave lesions. The variables were analyzed by linear regression, with the intensity of the pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional disability measured by the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Results The mean age of the patients was of 38.5 ± 9.6 years, the mean intensity of the pain was of 7.8 ± 1.6, and the mean mHHS score was of 56.3 ± 12.7. In total, 61% of the sample were classified as Outerbridge III or IV, and 12.6% had wave lesions. There was a correlation between the male gender (r = 0.497) and lower intensity of the pain, and a correlation of age (r = -0.27), the male gender (r = 8.419) and physical activity with higher functional scores on the mHHS (r = 4.729). Conclusion There was no correlation of the radiographic and arthroscopic parameters of the present study and the intensity of pain and the disability of the patients. The male gender is related to lower intensity of pain, and higher functional ability is related to the male gender, lower age, and the practice of physical activity. Level of Evidence IV.

Correlation between Intensity of Pain and Disability Due to Intra-articular Lesions in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome / Correlação entre intensidade da dor e incapacidade com as lesões intra-articulares em pacientes com síndrome do impacto femoroacetabular

Abstract Objective To correlate radiographic alterations and lesions in intra-articular structures of the acetabulum with the intensity of pain and disability of patients diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods A retrospective analysis of the preoperative data of 182 patients (190 hips) was performed. Clinical variables such as age, gender, the practice of physical activity, and radiographic variables, such as the Wiberg and alpha angles, were evaluated. Through an intraoperative video, the extent of the chondral and labial lesions was evaluated considering the clock-face method, the degree of joint involvement by the Outerbridge classification, and the presence of wave lesions. The variables were analyzed by linear regression, with the intensity of the pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional disability measured by the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Results The mean age of the patients was of 38.5 ± 9.6 years, the mean intensity of the pain was of 7.8 ± 1.6, and the mean mHHS score was of 56.3 ± 12.7. In total, 61% of the sample were classified as Outerbridge III or IV, and 12.6% had wave lesions. There was a correlation between the male gender (r = 0.497) and lower intensity of the pain, and a correlation of age (r = -0.27), the male gender (r = 8.419) and physical activity with higher functional scores on the mHHS (r = 4.729). Conclusion There was no correlation of the radiographic and arthroscopic parameters of the present study and the intensity of pain and the disability of the patients. The male gender is related to lower intensity of pain, and higher functional ability is related to the male gender, lower age, and the practice of physical activity. Level of Evidence IV.

Resumo Objetivo Correlacionar alterações radiográficas e lesões de estruturas intra-articulares do acetábulo com a intensidade da dor e a incapacidade de pacientes com diagnóstico de síndrome do impacto femoroacetabular. Métodos Realiou-se uma análise retrospectiva de dados pré-operatórios de 182 pacientes (190 quadris). Foram avaliadas variáveis clínicas como idade, sexo e prática de atividade física, e variáveis radiográficas, como ângulo de Wiberg e o ângulo alfa. Por meio do vídeo intraoperatório, foi avaliada a extensão das lesões condrais e labiais considerando-se o método clock-face, o grau de comprometimento articular pela classificação de Outerbridge, e a presença de lesão em onda. As variáveis foram analisadas por meio de regressão linear, tendo como variáveis dependentes a intensidade da dor, avaliada pela Escala Visual Analógica (EVA), e a incapacidade funcional, mensurada pelo Harris Hip Score modificado (HHSm). Resultados A média de idade dos pacientes foi de 38,5 ± 9,6 anos, a da intensidade da dor, 7,8 ± 1,6, e a do HHSm, 56,3 ± 12,7. No total, 61% da amostra apresentava Outerbridge III ou IV, e 12,6% apresentava lesão em onda. Observou-se correlação do sexo masculino (r = 0,497) com menor intensidade da dor, e correlação da idade (r = −0,27), do sexo masculino (r = 8,419) e da realização de atividade física com maior escore funcional no HHSm (r = 4,729). Conclusão Não houve correlação dos parâmetros radiográficos e artroscópicos deste estudo com a intensidade da dor e a incapacidade dos pacientes. O sexo masculino está relacionado com menor intensidade da dor, e maior capacidade funcional está relacionada com o sexo masculino, menor idade, e a prática de atividade física. Nível de Evidência IV.

Is There Any Difference Between a Spherical Marker and a Simple Coin for Hip Replacement Digital Planning?

Objective To evaluate the accuracy and differences between 2 types of metallic markers, sphere, and coin, for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty. Methods Four spherical metallic markers and four coins, both 25 mm in diameter, were placed on the greater trochanter, pubic symphysis, between the thighs, and on the table of the exam, for radiographic examination of the hip in 33 patients with hip prosthesis. The prosthesis head was used for calibration and two examiners measured the markers' image diameters, and the results were analyzed statistically. Results In the greater trochanter, the sphere and the coin were not visualized in 19 radiographs (57.6%). Between the thighs, the coin marker was not visualized in 13 radiographs (39.4%). In the greater trochanter, the 25-mm accuracy of the coin and the sphere was, respectively, between 57.1 and 63.3% and between 64.3 and 92.9%. The coin between the thighs reached 25-mm accuracy in between 50 and 60% of cases. Over the exam table, the coin and sphere markers reached, respectively, the mean diameters of 22.91 mm and 23 mm, the lowest coefficient of variation, the lowest confidence interval, and the easiest positioning. There was statistical difference between the evaluations of the markers (coin vs. sphere) in all positions ( p < 0.032), except for the exam table position ( p = 0.083). Conclusions The coin between the thighs is the best marker for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty, and we suggest the use of another coin on the exam table for comparison, considering the 8% reduction in relation to its real size.

Is There Any Difference Between a Spherical Marker and a Simple Coin for Hip Replacement Digital Planning? / Existe alguma diferença entre um marcador esférico e uma moeda simples para planejamento digital de substituição de quadril?

Abstract Objective To evaluate the accuracy and differences between 2 types of metallic markers, sphere, and coin, for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty. Methods Four spherical metallic markers and four coins, both 25 mm in diameter, were placed on the greater trochanter, pubic symphysis, between the thighs, and on the table of the exam, for radiographic examination of the hip in 33 patients with hip prosthesis. The prosthesis head was used for calibration and two examiners measured the markers' image diameters, and the results were analyzed statistically. Results In the greater trochanter, the sphere and the coin were not visualized in 19 radiographs (57.6%). Between the thighs, the coin marker was not visualized in 13 radiographs (39.4%). In the greater trochanter, the 25-mm accuracy of the coin and the sphere was, respectively, between 57.1 and 63.3% and between 64.3 and 92.9%. The coin between the thighs reached 25-mm accuracy in between 50 and 60% of cases. Over the exam table, the coin and sphere markers reached, respectively, the mean diameters of 22.91 mm and 23 mm, the lowest coefficient of variation, the lowest confidence interval, and the easiest positioning. There was statistical difference between the evaluations of the markers (coin vs. sphere) in all positions (p< 0.032), except for the exam table position (p= 0.083). Conclusions The coin between the thighs is the best marker for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty, and we suggest the use of another coin on the exam table for comparison, considering the 8% reduction in relation to its real size.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a precisão e as diferenças entre 2 tipos de marcadores metálicos, esfera e moeda, para calibração radiográfica no planejamento pré-operatório da artroplastia de quadril. Métodos Quatro marcadores metálicos esféricos e quatro moedas, ambas de 25 mm de diâmetro, foram colocadas em trocânter maior, sínfise púbica, entre as coxas e a mesa do exame, para exame radiográfico do quadril em 33 pacientes com prótese de quadril. A cabeça da prótese foi utilizada para calibração e dois examinadores mediram os diâmetros da imagem dos marcadores, e os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente. Resultados No trocânter maior, a esfera e a moeda não foram visualizadas em 19 radiografias (57,6%). Entre as coxas, o marcador de moeda não foi visualizado em 13 radiografias (39,4%). No trocânter maior, a precisão de 25 mm da moeda e da esfera foi, respectivamente, entre 57,1 e 63,3% e entre 64,3 e 92,9%. A moeda entre as coxas atingiu 25 mm de precisão entre 50 e 60%. Sobre a mesa de exame, os marcadores de moeda e esfera atingiram, respectivamente, diâmetros médios de 22,91 mm e 23 mm, o menor coeficiente de variação, o menor intervalo de confiança e o posicionamento mais fácil. Houve diferença estatística entre as avaliações dos marcadores (moeda vs. esfera) em todas as posições (p< 0,032), com exceção da posição na mesa de exame (p= 0,083). Conclusões A moeda entre as coxas é o melhor marcador para calibração radiográfica no planejamento pré-operatório da artroplastia de quadril, e sugerimos o uso de outra moeda na mesa de exame para comparação, considerando os 8% de redução em relação ao seu tamanho real.

Patient Education in Orthopedics: the Role of Information Design and User Experience.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This narrative review will focus on concepts and methods of Information Design and User Experience for patient education in orthopedics, with osteoarthritis as an application example. RECENT FINDINGS: Information design can make complex health information clear according to the needs of the patients. Digital health presents new opportunities to design scalable educational interventions and may be improved with User Experience Design. Human-centered design methods such as user research, co-design, and prototype testing are being applied in orthopedics to achieve patient-centered care. Current international guidelines on osteoarthritis put patient education as one of the key care strategies. Educational interventions target preoperative education and osteoarthritis self-management, but current models could be enhanced. Patient education and health literacy are fundamental to face the burden of musculoskeletal pain. The collaboration between design and health is essential to deal with the demand for education, behavioral, and social change.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 1: Pathophysiology and Biomechanics.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an important cause of hip pain, and the main etiology of hip osteoarthritis in the young population. Femoroacetabular impingement is characterized by subtle alterations in the anatomy of the acetabulum and proximal femur, which can lead to labrum tearing. The acetabular labrum is essential to the stability of the hip joint. Three types of FAI were described: cam (anespherical femoral head), pincer (acetabular overcoverage) and mixed (characteristics of both cam and pincer). The etiology of FAI is related to genetic and environmental characteristics. Knowledge of this condition is essential to adequately treat patients presenting with hip pain.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 1: Pathophysiology and Biomechanics / Impacto femoroacetabular e lesão do lábio acetabular - Parte 1: Fisiopatologia e biomecânica

Abstract Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an important cause of hip pain, and the main etiology of hip osteoarthritis in the young population. Femoroacetabular impingement is characterized by subtle alterations in the anatomy of the acetabulum and proximal femur, which can lead to labrum tearing. The acetabular labrum is essential to the stability of the hip joint. Three types of FAI were described: cam (anespherical femoral head), pincer (acetabular overcoverage) and mixed (characteristics of both cam and pincer). The etiology of FAI is related to genetic and environmental characteristics. Knowledge of this condition is essential to adequately treat patients presenting with hip pain.

Resumo O impacto femoroacetabular (IFA) é uma importante causa de dor no quadril, e a principal etiologia da osteoartrose do quadril no jovem. O IFA é caracterizado por alterações sutis da anatomia do acetábulo e do fêmur proximal que podem causar lesões do complexo condrolabial. O lábio é uma estrutura fibrocartilaginosa essencial na estabilidade articular. Três tipos de IFA são descritos: came (onde há uma anesfericidade da cabeça femoral), pincer (onde há uma sobrecobertura acetabular) e misto (que apresenta características de ambos). A etiologia do IFA está relacionada com características genéticas e ambientais. O conhecimento desta doença e sua fisiopatologia é essencial para o tratamento de pacientes que apresentam dor no quadril.

Errata - Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning??

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693052.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693052.].

Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning?

Objective The present paper aims to evaluate the influences of individual characteristics in radiographic magnification and to identify the most accurate method for radiographic calibration. Methods During radiographical exam of 50 patients with hip prosthesis, anthropometric data was collected and 4 spherical metal markers with 25 mm diameters were positioned: at the greater trochanter level and lateral to it, over the pubic symphysis, between the thighs at the greater trochanter level, and over the exam table. Since the prosthesis head is the best internal radiographic marker for hip arthroplasty, it was our calibration parameter. Two examiners measured the markers' image for further analysis. Results The sample consisted of 50 participants, 19 of whom were male. A difference in pubic symphysis magnification was found. Other individual characteristics (weight, height and body mass index) had weak correlation. The higher accuracy of the markers was at the greater trochanter, between 68.4 and 78.9%, visualized in only19 radiographs. The marker positioned between the thighs was visualized in all radiographs, with an accuracy ranging from 30 to 46%. Conclusions Of all individual characteristics, only gender influences magnification at the pubic symphysis. We suggest the use of two spherical markers: at the greater trochanter, due the best accuracy, and between the thighs, considered the best positioning for better visibility.

Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning? / É importante saber onde posicionar o marcador esférico para o planejamento digital de artroplastia de quadril?

Abstract Objective The present paper aims to evaluate the influences of individual characteristics in radiographic magnification and to identify the most accurate method for radiographic calibration. Methods During radiographical exam of 50 patients with hip prosthesis, anthropometric data was collected and 4 spherical metal markers with 25 mm diameters were positioned: at the greater trochanter level and lateral to it, over the pubic symphysis, between the thighs at the greater trochanter level, and over the exam table. Since the prosthesis head is the best internal radiographic marker for hip arthroplasty, it was our calibration parameter. Two examiners measured the markers' image for further analysis. Results The sample consisted of 50 participants, 19 of whom were male. A difference in pubic symphysis magnification was found. Other individual characteristics (weight, height and body mass index) had weak correlation. The higher accuracy of the markers was at the greater trochanter, between 68.4 and 78.9%, visualized in only19 radiographs. The marker positioned between the thighs was visualized in all radiographs, with an accuracy ranging from 30 to 46%. Conclusions Of all individual characteristics, only gender influences magnification at the pubic symphysis. We suggest the use of two spherical markers: at the greater trochanter, due the best accuracy, and between the thighs, considered the best positioning for better visibility.

Resumo Objetivo Os objetivos desse artigo são avaliar as influências das características pessoais na magnificação radiográfica e identificar o método de maior acurácia e o mais adequado. Métodos Durante o exame radiográfico em 50 pacientes com prótese de quadril, foram coletados dados antropométricos e posicionados quatro marcadores metálicos esféricos: ao nível e lateral ao trocânter maior, na sínfise púbica, ao nível do trocânter maior entre as coxas, sobre a mesa do exame. A cabeça da prótese é o melhor marcador radiográfico interno e foi o nosso parâmetro de calibragem. Dois avaliadores mediram as imagens desses marcadores para análise de resultados. Resultados Foram selecionados 50 participantes, sendo 19 do sexo masculino. Houve diferença de magnificação entre os sexos na posição sínfise púbica. As outras características pessoais avaliadas (peso, altura e índice de massa corpórea) tiveram correlação fraca. A maior acurácia do marcador foi no trocânter maior, entre 68,4 e 78,9%, visualizado em apenas 19 radiografias. O marcador entre as coxas obteve acurácia entre 30 e 46% e foi visualizado em todas as radiografias. Conclusão Das características pessoais, apenas o sexo influencia a magnificação e somente na posição da sínfise púbica. Sugerimos padronizar o uso de duas esferas: no trocanter maior, pela maior acurácia, e entre as coxas, por ser o mais adequado e com melhor visibilidade em todas radiografias.

Post-Treatment Classification for Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy / Classificação pós-tratamento para lesões condrais acetabulares na artroscopia de quadril

Abstract Objective To describe a postarthroscopic treatment classification system for acetabular chondral damage in the hip and to report the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of such classification. Methods This is a retrospective review of ninety-nine digital video recordings made during arthroscopic surgery. Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and evaluated at the hip arthroscopy outpatient clinic between March 2015 and March 2016 were included in the study. Patients with a history of previous hip surgery, radiologic evidence of advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade > 2), who underwent labral resection, or whose digital recordings were incomplete or of insufficient quality for adequate review were excluded. Two orthopedic surgeons, who did not participate in the surgery, independently reviewed the video recordings and classified the remaining acetabular cartilage using the post-treatment classification system. Intraobserver and interobserver analysis was then conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.790; p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.882; p < 0.001) were observed. Both ICC values were statistically significant. Conclusion The posttreatment classification of the remaining acetabular cartilage has excellent intra and interobserver reliability.

Resumo Objetivo Descrever um sistema de classificação de tratamento pós-artroscópico para as lesões condrais acetabulares no quadril e relatar as confiabilidades intra e interobservador deste sistema. Métodos Esta é uma revisão retrospectiva de 99 gravações de vídeo digital realizadas durante artroscopia. Os pacientes submetidos a tratamento artroscópico para impacto femoroacetabular e avaliados no ambulatório de quadril entre março de 2015 e março de 2016 foram incluídos no estudo. Os pacientes com histórico de cirurgia anterior do quadril, evidência radiológica de osteoartrose avançada (Tönnis > 2), pacientes submetidos à ressecção labral ou cujas gravações digitais estavam incompletas ou de qualidade insuficiente para avaliação adequada foram excluídos. Dois ortopedistas, que não participaram da cirurgia, revisaram de forma independente as gravações de vídeo e classificaram a cartilagem acetabular remanescente usando o sistema de classificação pós-tratamento. A análise intra e interobservador foi então realizada utilizando o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). Resultados Excelente confiabilidade intraobservador (CCI = 0,790; p < 0,001) e confiabilidade interobservador (CCI = 0,882; p < 0,001). Ambos os valores de CCI foram estatisticamente significativos. Conclusão a classificação pós-tratamento da cartilagem acetabular remanescente possui excelente confiabilidade intra e interobservador.

Does Computed Tomography Improve Reproducibility in the Classification of Transtrochanteric Fractures?

With the aging of the population, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of hip fractures, with high mortality rates, sequelae and expenses. Understanding the fracture profile and classifying it correctly is critical to define the appropriate treatment. Several radiographic classifications have been developed for transtrochanteric fractures, such as Tronzo, Evans-Jensen, AO and Boyd-Griffin, but their reproducibility is not always satisfactory. The present review aimed to elucidate whether the addition of computed tomography (CT) implies a greater reproducibility than simple radiography in the classification of transtrochanteric fractures, and whether this is a better examination to identify the fracture trait. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane databases between July 2016 and June 2017, limited to the last 15 years. All retrospective, prospective and systematic reviews articles published in the English language, with evaluation of men and/or women, were considered for review. We have excluded case reports, studies that evaluated tomography or radiographs in isolation, and duplicate studies. The research presented 112 articles, of which 5 contemplated the proposed criteria. Reproducibility for the classification of transtrochanteric fractures presented variable results and was influenced by factors such as the type of classification, the use of the simplified or complete classification, the specialty of the evaluator, his experience, and the methodology proposed by the works. There are indications that there is benefit for the use of CT, especially for fractures considered unstable, but its use as a tool to ensure better reproducibility (intra- and interobserver) remains controversial and needs further studies.

Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle.

Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were taken with 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet views was standardized with the patient in the supine position, with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle was measured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation and another 4 weeks afterwards. The t Student test was used and calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. Conclusion In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view.

Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle / Avaliação comparativa das incidências radiográficas cross-table e Ducroquet para a medição do ângulo alfa do quadril

Abstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were takenwith 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet viewswas standardizedwith the patient in the supine position,with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle wasmeasured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation andanother 4weeks afterwards. The t Student test was usedand calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. Conclusion In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view.

Resumo Objetivo O objetivo do presente trabalho é comparar a equivalência da medida do ângulo alfa do quadril usando as incidências laterais de Ducroquet e de cross-table. Método Estudamos 90 pacientes, com um total de 95 quadris, e padronizamos a realização das radiografias conhecidas como "Ducroquet" e "cross-table." A incidência de perfil de cross-table foi realizada em 15° de rotação interna com o paciente em posição supina, e a incidência de perfil de Ducroquet foi padronizada com o paciente posicionado em decúbito dorsal, em 90° de flexão e 45° de abdução do quadril. O ângulo alfa foi medido em ambas as radiografias de perfil, por dois radiologistas especializados em afecções musculoesqueléticas. As medidas foram realizadas em 2 épocas diferentes: uma avaliação inicial e outra após 4 semanas. O teste t de Student foi utilizado e calculou o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). Resultados Encontramos boa correlação intraobservador para ambas as incidências radiográficas em diferentes momentos. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre as medidas feitas pelas duas visualizações. No entanto, a correlação interobservadores foi baixa. Conclusão A incidência radiográfica de perfil de Ducroquet é uma boa opção para a medida do ângulo alfa e pode ser usada ao invés da incidência radiográfica de perfil cross-table.

Does Computed Tomography Improve Reproducibility in the Classification of Transtrochanteric Fractures? / A tomografia computadorizada melhora a reprodutibilidade na classificação das fraturas transtrocanterianas?

Abstract With the aging of the population, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of hip fractures, with high mortality rates, sequelae and expenses. Understanding the fracture profile and classifying it correctly is critical to define the appropriate treatment. Several radiographic classifications have been developed for transtrochanteric fractures, such as Tronzo, Evans-Jensen, AO and Boyd-Griffin, but their reproducibility is not always satisfactory. The present review aimedto elucidatewhether the addition of computed tomography (CT) implies a greater reproducibility than simple radiography in the classification of transtrochanteric fractures, andwhether this is a better examination to identify the fracture trait. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane databases between July 2016 and June 2017, limited to the last 15 years. All retrospective, prospective and systematic reviews articles published in the English language, with evaluation of men and/or women, were considered for review. We have excluded case reports, studies that evaluated tomography or radiographs in isolation, and duplicate studies. The research presented 112 articles, of which 5 contemplated the proposed criteria. Reproducibility for the classification of transtrochanteric fractures presented variable results and was influenced by factors such as the type of classification, the use of the simplified or complete classification, the specialty of the evaluator, his experience, and themethodology proposed by the works. There are indications that there is benefit for the use of CT, especially for fractures considered unstable, but its use as a tool to ensure better reproducibility (intraand interobserver) remains controversial and needs further studies.

Resumo Com o envelhecimento populacional, houve um aumento significante da prevalência das fraturas do quadril, com alto índice de mortalidade, de sequelas, e alto custo. Compreender o perfil da fratura e classificá-la de forma correta é fundamental para definir o tratamento adequado. Diversas classificações radiográficas foram desenvolvidas para as fraturas transtrocanterianas, tais como as de Tronzo, de Evans-Jensen, de Boyd-Griffin e AO, porém sua reprodutibilidade nem sempr é satisfatória. O presente trabalho objetivou analisar se o acréscimo da tomografia computadorizada (TC)implica em maior reprodutibilidade do que a radiografia simples na classificação das fraturas transtrocanterianas e se esta é melhor para a identificação do traço de fratura. Foi realizada uma pesquisa nas bases de dados PubMed, Lilacs, Scielo e Cochrane entre julho de 2016 e junho de 2017, limitada aos últimos 15 anos. Todos os trabalhos retrospectivos, prospectivos e revisões sistemáticas publicados na língua inglesa, com avaliação de homens e/ou de mulheres, foram considerados para a revisão. Foram excluídos relatos de casos, estudos que avaliaram de forma isolada a TC ou radiografias e estudos duplicados. A pesquisa apresentou 112 artigos, dos quais 5 preencheram os critérios propostos. A reprodutibilidade para a classificação das fraturas transtrocanterianas apresentou resultados variáveis e influenciados por fatores como o tipo de classificação, o uso da classificação simplificada ou completa, a especialidade do avaliador, a experiência e a metodologia proposta pelos trabalhos. Há indícios de que há algum benefício para o uso da TC, sobretudo para fraturas consideradas instáveis,

Post-Treatment Classification for Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy.

Objective To describe a postarthroscopic treatment classification system for acetabular chondral damage in the hip and to report the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of such classification. Methods This is a retrospective review of ninety-nine digital video recordings made during arthroscopic surgery. Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and evaluated at the hip arthroscopy outpatient clinic between March 2015 and March 2016 were included in the study. Patients with a history of previous hip surgery, radiologic evidence of advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade > 2), who underwent labral resection, or whose digital recordings were incomplete or of insufficient quality for adequate review were excluded. Two orthopedic surgeons, who did not participate in the surgery, independently reviewed the video recordings and classified the remaining acetabular cartilage using the post-treatment classification system. Intraobserver and interobserver analysis was then conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.790; p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.882; p < 0.001) were observed. Both ICC values were statistically significant. Conclusion The posttreatment classification of the remaining acetabular cartilage has excellent intra and interobserver reliability.

Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency and type of intra-operative periprosthetic fractures and to describe risk factors in a single tertiary, public hospital, so that these events could be prevented, even among less experienced surgeons. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study, based on medical records and imaging exams from the archives of a public, tertiary hospital, from April 1998 to October 2013. All consecutive patients submitted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the study period were evaluated, excluding unipolar or bipolar arthroplasty, surgery for the osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures, surgical procedure to clean infection site without component substitution and not arthroplastic surgery. Data were analyzed with chi-squared test and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: In the study period, 1,872 THA (1,728 patients) were performed and analyzed, with 144 bilateral cases. In 173 cases, patients had undergone surgical procedures other than THA previously, and in only 260 the surgery consisted of revision THA. There were only two cases of resection THA. Among all patients 101 intra-operative periprosthetic fractures occurred. The univariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of intra-operative fractures in female patients, aged more than 65 years, with indication of primary THA and the presence of a previous hip surgery. It indicated also that revision surgeries were associated with a 2.8-fold higher risk of intra-operative fracture, 2.18-fold risk in a previously operated hip and 3.9-fold in cases of resection THA or revision surgery in two stages. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture is a rare event, and it is associated with revision type surgery and THA in a previously operated hip.

Translation and cultural adaptation of the Hip Outcome Score to the Portuguese language / Tradução e adaptação cultural do Hip Outcome Score para a língua portuguesa

OBJECTIVE: to translate the Hip Outcome Score clinical evaluation questionnaire into Portuguese and culturally adapt it for Brazil. METHODS: the Hip Outcome Score questionnaire was translated into Portuguese following the methodology consisting of the steps of translation, back-translation, pretesting and final translation. RESULTS: the pretesting was applied to 30 patients with hip pain without arthrosis. In the domain relating to activities of daily living, there were no difficulties in comprehending the translated questionnaire. In presenting the final translation of the questionnaire, all the questions were understood by more than 85% of the individuals. CONCLUSION: the Hip Outcome Score questionnaire was translated and adapted to the Portuguese language and can be used in clinical evaluation on the hip. Additional studies are underway with the objective of evaluating the reproducibility and validity of the Brazilian translation...

OBJETIVO: traduzir para o português e adaptar culturalmente para o Brasil o questionário de avaliação clínica Hip Outcome Score (HOS). MÉTODOS: o questionário HOS foi traduzido para o português com metodologia constituída pelas etapas de tradução, retrotradução, pré-teste e tradução final. RESULTADOS: o pré-teste foi aplicado a 30 pacientes com dor no quadril sem artrose. No domínio relacionado a atividades de vida diária, não houve dificuldades de compreensão do questionário traduzido. Na apresentação da tradução final do questionário, todas as questões foram compreendidas por mais de 85% dos pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: o questionário HOP foi traduzido e adaptado culturalmente para a língua portuguesa e pode ser usado na avaliação clínica do quadril. Estudos adicionais estão em andamento com o objetivo de avaliar a reprodutibilidade e validade da tradução brasileira...

Current possibilities for hip arthroplasty / Possibilidades atuais da artroscopia do quadril

Hip arthroscopy has been popularized over the last decade and, with technical advances regarding imaging diagnostics, understanding of the physiopathology or surgical techniques, several applications have been described. Both arthroscopy for intra-articular conditions and endoscopy for extra-articular procedures can be used in diagnosing or treating different conditions. This updated article has the objective of presenting the various current possibilities for hip arthroscopy...

A artroscopia de quadril tem sido popularizada na última década e com o avanço técnico, seja no diagnóstico por imagem, no entendimento da fisiopatologia ou na técnica cirúrgica, diversas aplicações foram descritas. Tanto a artroscopia, para afecções intra-articulares, como a endoscopia, para procedimentos extra-articulares, podem ser usadas no diagnóstico ou no tratamento de diferentes afecções. Este artigo de atualização tem como objetivo apresentar diversas possibilidades atuais da artroscopia de quadril...

Anatomical variation of piriformis muscle as a cause of deep gluteal pain: diagnosis using MR neurography and treatment / Variação anatômica do músculo piriforme como causa de dor glútea profunda: diagnóstico por neurografia RM e seu tratamento

Female patient, 42 years old with a history of low back pain on the left for seventeen years in which the definitive diagnosis of the etiology of pain was evident after the completion of neurography magnetic resonance imaging of the sciatic nerve. In this test it was identified the presence of an anatomical variation in the relationship between the piriformis muscle and sciatic nerve. We discuss details of this imaging technique and its importance in the frames of refractory low back pain. We also describe the treatment given to the case. .

Paciente do sexo feminino, 42 anos, com histórico de lombociatalgia à esquerda havia 17 anos. O diagnóstico definitivo da etiologia da dor só foi evidenciado após a neurografia por ressonância magnética do ciático. Nesse exame identificou-se a presença de variação anatômica entre o músculo piriforme e o nervo ciático. Descrevemos detalhes sobre a técnica de imagem e sua importância nos quadros de lombociatalgia refratária, como também o tratamento instituído para o caso.