Intussuscepted Metachronous small bowel tumor after treatment for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Small Bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignant neoplasm without specific signs or symptoms. It's been associated with late stage disease presentations. Midterm outcomes have suggested that after successful removal of colorectal carcinoma, there is higher risk for developing a further primary (metachronous) colorectal tumor. However when it comes to small bowel, metachronous carcinomas are unusual. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old female who underwent an emergency Hartmann's procedure two years previously and treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon at stage IIB with loco-regional recurrence. The patient presented with bowel obstruction secondary to a small bowel intussusception, confirmed by computed tomography. An emergent exploratory laparotomy was performed and confirmed of an ileal tumor as the cause of small bowel intussusception and clinical bowel obstruction. Histopathology confirmed a primary small bowel mucinous adenocarcinoma with node metastasis (T3N1M0, stage IIIB). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Patients who develop a small or large bowel adenocarcinoma have high risk of presenting a second tumor at both sites. Since data available to guide therapeutic decisions for patients presenting with small bowel metachronic tumors are scarce, the role of adjuvant therapy in patients who undergo curative resection remains unclear. The aim of this manuscript is present a case report of a patient admitted for a rare obstructive small bowel intussusception therefore underwent surgery for metachronic small bowel carcinoma from colorectal primary witch previously treated by surgery and adjuvant chemiotherapy. Studies about strategies for detection at an earlier stage, optimal treatment and prognosis are mandatory for this disease.

[Descriptive study of the results of nursing interventions applied to surgical patients]. / Pacientes quirúrgicos e intervenciones enfermeras estandarizadas. Estudio descriptivo sobre resultados.

OBJECTIVES: Knowing the evolution of health outcomes of surgical patients during their hospital stay, evaluating NOC outcome criteria at admission and discharge. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted in the surgical hospital wards of the Hospital General de Vic, with patients who required surgical intervention of any specialty, of 18 or more years old and anesthetic risk levels I, II or III. The main outcome variables were indicators associates with each NOC of a standard of care based on the "patient type" concept. RESULTS: Four hundred and six patients participated. Of these, 69 (15%) were operated of the musculoskeletal system and 391 (85%) were operated on the digestive or urinary systems, male/ female genitalia, skin, integuments, and endocrine system. NOC scores high of all patients were maintained or improved, never worse and in all patients the number of falls and recurrent infections was constant, virtually no patient fell or became infected. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surgical patients at the time of hospital discharge improves or maintain their conditions of admission and patients who never worse substantially.

[The concept of "patient type": utility for the care of surgical patients]. / Concepto <>: utilidad para el cuidado de los pacientes quirúrgicos.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a model of surgical "patient type" by identifying the needs and characteristics of surgical patients. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional study of surgical patients with one or more diseases and similar needs and/or characteristics admitted to the surgical wards of a general hospital over a 10-month period. The variables analyzed were sociodemographic and clinical data, degree of autonomy, and Virginia Henderson's needs, which were identified through an interview performed in the postoperative period. Univariate analysis, stratified descriptive statistics and multiple correspondence analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 270 medium- or low-complexity patients from different surgical specialties took part in the analysis. During the surgical process (pre- and post-operative), almost a half of the patients suffered from hypotension, heart rate showed no significant changes and the risk of developing a pressure ulcer was unmodified according to Norton's scale. The first statistical analysis classified the surgical patients into five groups and showed the relationship between the degree of autonomy (measured through Barthel's index) and the number of personal problems (assessed according to the Henderson model). A subsequent statistical analysis classified the patients into four groups or types, explaining 70% of the total variance. CONCLUSIONS: Through the use of Virginia Henderson's model, a surgical patient type composed of four different groups was identified. The results of this study may be useful in the care of low- and medium-complexity patients in distinct surgical specialties.