Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Med ; 5(8): 2091-100, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27263488

RESUMO

Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) is a serious metabolic complication whose population-based prevalence has not been quantified. Rates of HCM differ by tumor type, with highest rates reported in multiple myeloma and lowest among colorectal and prostate cancer patients. This analysis estimates HCM prevalence in the US. This retrospective study used the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) warehouse of electronic health records (EHR) including laboratory values from 569000 patients treated at 565 oncology outpatient sites. OSCER data were projected to the national level by linking EHR to claims data. Cancer patients included were ≥18 years, and had serum calcium (Ca) and albumin (for corrected serum Ca [CSC]) records. Period prevalence was estimated by HCM CTCAE grade, tumor type, and year (2009-2013). Estimates were adjusted to capture patients diagnosed with HCM outside oncology practices based on a subset of patients linkable to office and hospital data. The analysis included 68023 (2009) to 121482 (2013) cancer patients. In 2013, patients with HCM had a median of six Ca tests, 69.7% had chemotherapy, and 34% received bone modifying agents. HCM rates were highest for multiple myeloma patients (7.5% [2012]-10.2% [2010]), lowest for prostate cancer (1.4% [2012]-2.1% [2011]).The estimated adjusted annual prevalence of HCM from 2009 to 2013 was 95441, 96281, 89797, 70158, and 71744, respectively. HCM affected 2.0-2.8% of all cancer patients. EHR data from oncology clinics were critical for this study because these data contain results from laboratory studies (i.e., serum calcium values) that are routinely ordered in that setting. We estimated that the prevalence of HCM in the US in 2013 is 71744, affecting approximately 2% of cancer patients overall. This percentage differs by tumor type and appears to have decreased over the five-year study period.


Assuntos
Hipercalcemia/epidemiologia , Hipercalcemia/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/mortalidade , Hipercalcemia/fisiopatologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/patologia , Vigilância da População , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 22(6): 723-732u, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27231799

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Axitinib is approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after failure of 1 previous systemic therapy and is distributed primarily through specialty pharmacies. Although the efficacy and safety of axitinib have been established in clinical trials, information from real-world populations will help to elucidate patients' clinical profiles and utilization patterns. Prescription records alone provide limited information on patient characteristics and other treatment experiences. Expansion of these data with information from medical claims databases should yield observational real-world data that may help to optimize therapy for patients with advanced RCC. OBJECTIVE: To link information from a specialty pharmacy database with information from medical and pharmacy claims databases to characterize real-world treatment patterns of axitinib as subsequent systemic therapy in patients with RCC in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, cohort study linked de-identified patient-level data from 22 specialty pharmacies that dispense axitinib with databases of longitudinal medical and pharmacy claims. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of RCC (> 1 claim for RCC defined as ICD-9-CM code 189.0), previously received > 1 systemic therapy, had the first prescription for axitinib dispensed between May 2012 and April 2013 (index), and had consistent claims reporting by pharmacies and physicians. All treatment data were used to calculate cycle, line of therapy, and duration of therapy; prescription data were used to determine axitinib dose modifications. Multivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the effect of patient/prescriber characteristics on duration of axitinib therapy and dose modifications, respectively. RESULTS: In all, 1,175 patients met the study inclusion criteria and had data present in specialty pharmacy and claims databases. Most patients (74%) were male, and 68% were aged 55-74 years. Mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 2.7 (± 1.1); the most common comorbidity was hypertension (in 199 patients, 17%). Based on Rx-Risk-V, the most frequent concomitant conditions were pain (40%) and ischemic heart disease/hypertension (30%); the most frequent concomitant medications were antihypertensive medications (46%) and opiates (40%). Most prescribers (63%) were affiliated with an academic center, and all U.S. geographic regions were represented. In all, 847 patients (72%) had commercial insurance. Axitinib was prescribed as second-line therapy in 659 patients (56%), as third-line therapy in 326 patients (28%), and as fourth-line or later therapy in 190 patients (16%). In the overall population, mean (SD) duration of axitinib therapy was 168.6 (± 148.4) days. Axitinib treatment duration was 21 days longer in males than females (P = 0.013); 28 days longer in patients in the Northeast than in the Midwest or West (P = 0.010 and P = 0.016, respectively); and 26 days longer in patients receiving baseline hypothyroidism treatment (P = 0.004). In patients receiving second-line axitinib, the most common first-line therapy was sunitinib (56%), followed by pazopanib (16%) and everolimus (12%). Mean (SD) duration of second-line axitinib treatment was 172.3 (± 150.6) days and ranged from 127 days in patients who previously received temsirolimus to 196 days in those who previously received sorafenib. Of 1,025 patients who initiated axitinib at the standard 5 mg twice daily starting dose, 70% remained at this dose throughout treatment, whereas 10% had a dose increase. Younger age and gender (male) were associated with dose increases (OR = 0.958, 95% CI = 0.941-0.975 and OR = 0.573, 95% CI = 0.364-0.903, respectively). Baseline hypothyroidism treatment was associated with dose decreases and increases (OR = 1.662, 95% CI = 1.088-2.539 and OR = 2.149, 95% CI = 1.353-3.413, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates the feasibility and utility of linking specialty pharmacy data to other longitudinal databases to better understand patient, provider, and reimbursement characteristics. These data provide insight into routine clinical use of axitinib as subsequent RCC therapy in the United States in the period following FDA approval, as well as additional information on sequencing of targeted agents in patients with advanced RCC. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Pfizer. MacLean and Cisar are employees of and hold stock in Pfizer. At the time of this analysis, Mehle, Eremina, and Quigley were employees of IMS Health who were paid consultants to Pfizer during the conduct of this study and in connection with the development of this manuscript. MacLean and Cisar contributed to study design and manuscript development. Mehle, Eremina, and Quigley contributed to study design, analysis, and manuscript development.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Indazóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Axitinibe , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Can J Urol ; 22(4): 7858-64, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26267023

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Canadian guidelines define castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) at high risk of developing metastases using PSA doubling time (PSADT) < 8 months, whereby men may be offered more frequent bone scans/imaging. We evaluated PSA data from nonmetastatic (M0) prostate cancer patients treated at urology and oncology clinics across the United States (US) to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients who met CRPC and high-risk criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified M0 prostate cancer patients aged = 18 years receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in 2011 from electronic health records (EHR), covering 129 urology and 64 oncology practices across the US. We estimated the proportion of prostate cancer patients with evidence of CRPC (consecutive rising PSAs) and subsets that may be at high risk (using several PSA and PSADT cut-points). RESULTS: Among 3121 M0 prostate cancer patients actively treated with ADT, 1188 (38%) had evidence of CRPC. Of these, 712 (60%) qualified as high risk in 2011 based on PSADT < 8 months (equivalent to = 8 months in these data). Men = 65 years were more likely to have evidence of CRPC than younger men, although younger men were more likely to have evidence of high-risk disease. CRPC was more common among men receiving ADT in the oncology setting than the urology setting (48% versus 37%). CONCLUSIONS: In this large EHR study with patient-level PSA data, 38% of men with M0 prostate cancer treated with ADT had CRPC. Approximately 60% of M0 CRPC patients may experience a PSADT of < 8 months. These findings require validation in a Canadian patient population.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Orquiectomia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/terapia , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Cancer Med ; 4(5): 713-20, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25663171

RESUMO

The renal status of patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors and their treatment with nephrotoxic agents is not well characterized. This retrospective study analyzed electronic medical records data from US-based oncology clinics to identify adult (age ≥18) solid tumor patients with first bone metastasis diagnosis and ≥1 serum creatinine recorded between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Patients with multiple myeloma, multiple primary tumor types, acute renal failure, and/or end-stage renal disease were excluded. Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula, we determined the prevalence of renal impairment (RI: single estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] value <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) ) and chronic kidney disease (CKD: ≥2 eGFR values <60, at least 90 days apart). We also examined the use of intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) and other nephrotoxic agents. Approximately half of the 11,809 patients were female. Breast (34%) and lung (28%) tumors were the most common. At bone metastasis diagnosis, mean age was 67 years and 24% of patients exhibited RI. The 5-year prevalence was 43% for RI and 71% for CKD among RI patients. Nearly half (46%) of CKD patients received IV BP in the 12 months following their confirming eGFR and 13% of these patients received at least one other nephrotoxic agent during that period. This is the first US-based study to examine the prevalence of RI among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. RI is common at bone metastases diagnosis, and a substantial proportion of patients develop RI or CKD as their disease progresses. Whenever possible, treatments that are potentially less damaging for the kidney should be considered for patients with or predisposed to RI.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/complicações , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/patologia , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 146(3): 637-46, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25053278

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of women receiving treatment or active surveillance for stage I-III breast cancer in the United States from 2009 to 2012, stratified by patient age and tumor characteristics. In each study year, electronic medical records were used to identify women aged ≥18 years with stage I-III breast cancer and treated or under active surveillance (≥4 visits) at an oncology clinic that contributes data to the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records database. Prevalence was projected to the national level overall and within strata (by tumor characteristics, year of breast cancer diagnosis, and age). We identified 5,219 female breast cancer patients (18 %

Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptores de Estrogênio/genética , Receptores de Progesterona/genética , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/terapia , Estados Unidos
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 22(10): 2697-705, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24789499

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Three bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are approved in the USA for prevention of bone complications among solid tumor patients with bone metastases: two intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) (pamidronate and zoledronic acid), and one subcutaneous receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand inhibitor (denosumab). Using electronic medical record data from outpatient community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics, we examined the characteristics of patients who initiated treatment with a BTA in 2011 and followed them for a maximum of 12 months. METHODS: Adult patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumors newly treated with a BTA during 2011 were identified from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. We examined patient characteristics at BTA initiation, treatment patterns, and compliance during a 12-month period. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a subgroup of patients who had confirmed 12 months of follow-up data. RESULTS: Denosumab patients (N = 1,594) were older (65 % ≥65 years vs. 60 % ≥65 years), further along in their disease progression (time since bone metastasis diagnosis: 16 % ≥2 years vs. 10 % ≥2 years), less likely to switch BTA (overall: 6 vs. 14 %; subgroup: 8 vs. 19 %), and more compliant with treatment (overall: median doses of 7 vs. 4; subgroup: 11 vs. 8) compared to IV BP patients (N = 1,975). Findings were consistent across gender, age, tumor type, naïve, and transition strata. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving denosumab and IV BPs may differ. Despite higher age and more advanced disease, patients treated with denosumab are more likely to stay on treatment and have better compliance.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Ligante RANK/antagonistas & inibidores , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(4): 987-92, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23096072

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the rate and timing of hemoglobin decline from <10 g/dL to <9 g/dL in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: Pooled data from the placebo arms of six randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of darbepoetin alfa and data from an aggregated US community oncology clinic electronic medical records (EMR) database were analyzed. Patients had baseline hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL (RCTs) or baseline hemoglobin between ≥10 g/dL and <11 g/dL (EMR episodes) that declined to <10 g/dL at least once during the study period. The proportion of patients/episodes with hemoglobin decline to <9 g/dL by 3, 6, and 9 weeks without erythropoiesis-stimulating agents was estimated from data in each of the data sources, as was the rate of transfusions in the RCTs. RESULTS: Data from 411 patients receiving placebo in the RCTs and 10,523 patients (10,942 episodes) in the EMR database were analyzed. Forty percent and 35 % of RCT patients and EMR episodes, respectively, had a hemoglobin decline from <10 g/dL to <9 g/dL at week 3, 54 % and 43 % at week 6, and 58 % and 46 % at week 9. Of patients in the RCTs, 43 % required an RBC transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Hemoglobin can rapidly decline in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with hemoglobin levels around 10 g/dL, particularly in patients ≥65 years of age. The rapid rate of hemoglobin decline in these patients should be considered for optimal anemia management.


Assuntos
Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Eritropoese/efeitos dos fármacos , Eritropoetina/análogos & derivados , Hematínicos/farmacologia , Hemoglobina A/deficiência , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anemia/sangue , Intervalos de Confiança , Darbepoetina alfa , Bases de Dados Factuais , Eritropoetina/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/sangue , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estados Unidos
8.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 9 Suppl 3: S10-2, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21357662

RESUMO

Collecting data is time-consuming and expensive. Electronic transactions, including electronic medical records and the unification of many billing procedures, have transformed the rate at which data are able to be extracted. Although obstacles remain, the rate at which data are de-identified, collected, and aggregated will help improve safety and standards of care for oncology patients. Everyone participating in the care of oncology patients must understand how important data are as the quality initiatives and performance metrics are numerous and growing; these initiatives cannot be successful without timely, accurate, and quantifiable data that address the continuum of oncology care.


Assuntos
Coleta de Dados , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Privacidade , Confidencialidade , Atenção à Saúde , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Humanos , Oncologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Oncologia/normas , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA