Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 9(1): e86643, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24475162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple microarray analyses of multiple sclerosis (MS) and its experimental models have been published in the last years. OBJECTIVE: Meta-analyses integrate the information from multiple studies and are suggested to be a powerful approach in detecting highly relevant and commonly affected pathways. DATA SOURCES: ArrayExpress, Gene Expression Omnibus and PubMed databases were screened for microarray gene expression profiling studies of MS and its experimental animal models. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies comparing central nervous system (CNS) samples of diseased versus healthy individuals with n >1 per group and publically available raw data were selected. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Included conditions for re-analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were MS, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in rats, proteolipid protein-induced EAE in mice, Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced demyelinating disease (TMEV-IDD), and a transgenic tumor necrosis factor-overexpressing mouse model (TNFtg). Since solely a single MS raw data set fulfilled the inclusion criteria, a merged list containing the DEGs from two MS-studies was additionally included. Cross-study analysis was performed employing list comparisons of DEGs and alternatively Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). RESULTS: The intersection of DEGs in MS, EAE, TMEV-IDD, and TNFtg contained 12 genes related to macrophage functions. The intersection of EAE, TMEV-IDD and TNFtg comprised 40 DEGs, functionally related to positive regulation of immune response. Over and above, GSEA identified substantially more differentially regulated pathways including coagulation and JAK/STAT-signaling. CONCLUSION: A meta-analysis based on a simple comparison of DEGs is over-conservative. In contrast, the more experimental GSEA approach identified both, a priori anticipated as well as promising new candidate pathways.


Assuntos
Sistema Nervoso Central/metabolismo , Doenças Desmielinizantes/metabolismo , Encefalomielite Autoimune Experimental/metabolismo , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Esclerose Múltipla/metabolismo , Animais , Doenças Desmielinizantes/genética , Encefalomielite Autoimune Experimental/genética , Humanos , Camundongos , Análise em Microsséries , Esclerose Múltipla/genética , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito/efeitos adversos , Proteolipídeos/efeitos adversos , Ratos , Especificidade da Espécie , Theilovirus , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/genética , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA