Biochemical disturbance in damage control resuscitation: mechanisms, management and prognostic utility.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With advances in resuscitative techniques, trauma patients are surviving increasingly severe injuries and physiological insult. Timely recognition of futility remains important in terms of patient dignity and resource preservation yet is increasingly challenging in the face of these advances. The understanding of biochemical derangement from pathophysiological processes of trauma and iatrogenic effects of resuscitation has expanded recently. RECENT FINDINGS: Acidosis and hypocalcaemia have been recognized as important contributors to mortality among trauma patients. Although less well recognized and studied, critical injury and high blood product volume resuscitation render patients vulnerable to life-threatening hyperkalaemia. The methods of correcting disruptions to acid-base and electrolyte homeostasis during damage control resuscitation have changed little recently and often rely on evidence from undifferentiated populations. Biochemical disturbances have value as ancillary predictors of futility in trauma resuscitation. SUMMARY: These findings will contribute to a greater understanding among anaesthesiologists of the causative mechanisms and effects of biochemical derangement after severe injury and aid them in the delivery of well tolerated and effective damage control resuscitation. Gaps in the evidence base are highlighted to encourage future work.

A systematic review of the timing of intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury: pre-hospital versus in-hospital intubation.

PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review was to examine current evidence on the risks versus benefit of pre-hospital intubation when compared with in-hospital intubation in adult patients with traumatic brain injuries. METHODS: We conducted electronic searches of PubMed, Medline, Embase, CIANHL and the Cochrane library up to March 2021. Data extracted compared mortality, length of hospital and intensive care stay, pneumonia and functional outcomes in traumatic brain injured patients undergoing pre-hospital intubation versus in-hospital intubation. The risk of bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Ten studies including 25,766 patients were analysed. Seven were retrospective studies, two prospective cohort studies and one randomised control study. The mean mortality rate in patients who underwent pre-hospital intubation was 44.5% and 31.98% for in-hospital intubation. The odds ratio for an effect of pre-hospital intubation on mortality ranged from 0.31 (favouring in-hospital intubation) to 3.99 (favouring pre-hospital). The overall quality of evidence is low; however, the only randomised control study showed an improved functional outcome for pre-hospital intubation at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence does not support widespread pre-hospital intubation in all traumatic brain injured patients. This does not, however, contradict the need for the intervention when there is severe airway compromise; instead, it must be assessed by experienced personnel if a time critical transfer to hospital is more advantageous. Favourable neurological outcomes highlighted by the randomised control trial favours pre-hospital intubation, but further research is required in this field.

Safe sedation practices among gastroenterology registrars: do we need more training?

Endoscopy training is a central component of gastroenterology training for the vast majority of UK trainees, and integral to this is the practice of safe sedation. The majority of endoscopic procedures are performed with the patient under conscious sedation with a benzodiazepine, often combined with an opioid. Little data exists on the practice of sedation among gastroenterology trainees, including their degree of knowledge of the common sedation agents used and their actions. Using both an online and paper-based questionnaire, we surveyed current gastroenterology speciality trainees (ST) in the UK and received 78 responses giving a response rate of 10%. Fifty-one per cent of the trainees did not receive structured training in safe sedation, despite national guidelines advising this to be an essential part of the training programme, and 92% felt a structured sedation course would be beneficial. We also identified some gaps in trainees' knowledge of the action of sedation agents. We propose that a formal training session in sedation or an e-learning module could be incorporated as part of a deanery or trust induction for gastroenterology trainees and kept under regular review.