How self-regulated learning influences undergraduate medical students to conduct student-centred learning: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Self-regulated learning is one of the influencing factors in successful learning. There is a need to understand the factors influencing self-regulated learning in undergraduate medical students in implementing a student-centred learning curriculum. This scoping review aims to systematically identify and map undergraduate medical students' self-regulated learning during student-centred learning implementation and to learn the tools used to measure it. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will use Arksey and O'Malley's proposed five-stage framework guideline. A search for published literature between 2012 and 2022 in the five electronic databases of EBSCOHost, Science Direct, Scopus, ProQuest and PubMed will be conducted using keywords to identify relevant studies. Articles will be limited to the English language. Mendeley software will eliminate duplicates, and results will be exported into abstracts for two stages of the screening process: title and abstract reviews and full-text reviews. The selection process of eligible literature will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist recommendations. Studies using qualitative and quantitative data from all world regions will be considered. To be included, studies should examine medical students' self-regulated learning in a student-centred learning approach curriculum. A data chart will capture relevant information from all the included studies. As a scoping review, no assessment of the studies' quality and risk of bias will be made. Results will be presented in tabular form and a narrative report. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No Ethics Committee or Institutional Board approval is required. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and professional networks.

Opportunity Amid Crisis in Medical Education: Teaching During the Pandemic of COVID-19.

Purpose: The pandemic of COVID-19 had reinforced adaptations in medical education. It was challenging, especially for developing countries where resources were scarce. This study examined the implementation of teaching and learning adaptation during the pandemic in a low-resource country as perceived by teachers. We also present the opportunities that arise from the adaptation process. Participants and Methods: The participants of this study (n=24) were teachers in an undergraduate medical program. This study employed a qualitative approach using focus group discussions (FGDs) to collect the teachers' perceptions. Thematic analysis was performed to analyse the data. Results: Teachers' perceptions were categorized into 19 subthemes and were accentuated into four general themes; learning facilitation, assessment during the pandemic, learning resources, and competence achievement. We discovered both challenges as well as opportunities in each theme due to the shifting of learning from offline to online learning. Flexibility and innovation were regarded as the most important opportunities and were perceived to hold potential for medical education in the future. Knowledge acquisition was most benefited from this adaptation. Facilitating skill acquisition and burnout were the major challenges. Conclusion: Despite the challenges, including burnout, skills acquisition, and risk in academic integrity, innovations in medical education were strengthened during the pandemic of COVID-19. They also provided a positive influence regarding achievement in the cognitive aspect. Faculty development programs need to be encouraged to improve teachers' capacity in the future.

Predicting medical graduates' clinical performance using national competency examination results in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Indonesia has applied a national competency exit-examination for medical graduates since 2014, called The Indonesia Medical Doctor National Competency Examination (IMDNCE). This examination is administered to ensure the competence of medical graduates from at present 83 medical schools in Indonesia. Although many studies reported their evaluation on medical licensing examinations, there are not many studies performed to evaluate the correlation of a national licensing examination to the graduates' clinical practice. AIMS: This research aimed to evaluate the performance of new medical doctors in Indonesia in their internship period after the IMDNCE completion, and whether it might become a predictive indicator for the new medical doctors' clinical performance. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was performed in November-December 2017 on 209 doctors who were new medical graduates. Thirty-one senior doctors from a range of regions in Indonesia who were recruited and trained previously participated in the observation. The Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI) tool was developed as an evaluation tool of the new doctors' clinical competence to be observed for three weeks. The obtained data were analysed using descriptive statistics and correlated to the IMDNCE scores. RESULTS: The mean (95% CI) of the CPI for all participants was 83.0 (80.8-85.2), with no correlation of CPI score with IMDNCE results in domains of communication, professionalism and patient safety (p > 0.05). However, the mean total of the CPI observation scores from doctors who graduated from public medical schools was higher than those graduating from private medical schools. Also, there were differences in scores related to the institution's accreditation grade (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is no difference between CPI and national competency examination results. There was no statistical correlation between the clinical performance of new medical doctors during their internship to CBT and OSCE scores in the national competency examination. New doctors' performance during internship is affected by more complex factors, not only their level of competencies.

Stakeholders' Views and Confidence Towards Indonesian Medical Doctor National Competency Examination: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Indonesia is a huge country consisting of 33 provinces with different characteristics. There are 83 medical schools across Indonesia with different accreditation statuses. The Indonesia Medical Doctor National Competency Examination (IMDNCE) has been established to control the quality of medical school graduates. The implementation of IMDNCE needed to be evaluated to determine its impact. To date, there has not been any research in Indonesia that explores the stakeholders' perceptions toward IMDNCE. This study aimed to explore how the stakeholders in Indonesia perceived the impact of IMDNCE towards performances of medical school graduates in clinical practice. METHODS AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A qualitative study with phenomenological approach was conducted to investigate perceptions of stakeholders including representatives from consumer organizations, the National Health Coverage, the Ministry of Health, the Indonesian Medical Association, employers (hospital and health center directors), clinical supervisors as well as patients across Indonesia. Data were obtained through focus group discussions (FGDs) and interviews. The study used thematic analysis methods to obtain the results. RESULTS: A total of 90 study participants participated in the study including 10 representatives of consumer watchdog organizations, the National Health Coverage, the Ministry of Health, the Indonesian Medical Association, 31 employers, 32 professionals, and 17 patients. The study found three general themes which represent the perceptions of the stakeholders towards performances of medical school graduates in clinical practice: IMDNCE as an effort to standardize doctor graduates in Indonesia, the results of IMDNCE as a mean to reflect the quality of medical education in Indonesia, and IMDNCE as an effort to improve health services in Indonesia through the quality of graduates. CONCLUSION: In general, the stakeholders perceived that the IMDNCE was able to standardize medical school graduates from various medical schools across Indonesia. However, the IMDNCE needs to be further developed to maximize its potential in improving the competences of Indonesian medical students.

Developing Personal Resilience Questionnaire for rural doctors: an indigenous approach study in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Resilience is recognized as a critical component of well-being and is an essential factor in coping with stress. There are issues of using a standardized resilience scale developed for one cultural population to be used in the different cultural populations. This study aimed to create a specific measurement scale for measuring doctors' resilience levels in the rural Indonesian context. METHOD: A total of 527 rural doctors and health professional educators joined this study (37 and 490 participants in the pilot studies and the survey, respectively). An indigenous psychological approach was implemented in linguistic and cultural adaptation and validation of an existing instrument into the local Indonesian rural health context. A combined method of back-translation, committee approach, communication with the original author, and exploratory qualitative study in the local context was conducted. The indigenous psychological approach was implemented in exploring the local context and writing additional local items. RESULT: The final questionnaire consisted of six dimensions and 30 items with good internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranged 0.809-0.960 for each dimension). Ten locally developed items were added to the final questionnaire as a result of the indigenous psychological approach. CONCLUSION: An indigenous psychological approach may enrich the linguistic and cultural adaptation and validation process of an existing scale.

Defining a "Healthy Role-Model" for Medical Schools: Learning Components That Count.

INTRODUCTION: Producing healthy physicians who act as a "healthy role-model" in their environment must be one of the concerns of medical schools today in response to the global movement of "health-promoting university" by the WHO (1995). However, no publications explained the "healthy role-model" in medical school. This study aimed to fill this gap by exploring the definition and characteristics of a "healthy role-model" for medical teachers. METHODS: We used a grounded theory approach with in-depth interviews and e-mail communications to 48 medical teachers from various backgrounds of "health professions education," "health education and behavior"/'health education and promoter,' "general practitioners/family medicine," "adolescent health," "internal medicine," and "cardiology-vascular medicine." The medical teachers were from Indonesia, one other developing country (Bangladesh), and five developed countries (United States of America, Canada, Netherlands, Australia, and United Kingdom). We also invited 19 medical students from Indonesia for three focus group discussions. RESULTS: We identified four categories to define a "healthy role-model" for medical schools as persons who are seen: 1) "physically," "socially," "mentally", and "spiritually" healthy; 2) internalized healthy behaviors; 3) willing to promote healthy lifestyles; and, 4) a life-long learner. In each category, there are several characteristics discussed. CONCLUSION: Our study provides some insights to define a "healthy role-model" of medical teachers by using the characteristics of healthy people and adult learners. The first category describes the characteristics of healthy people, but cultural issues influence the perspectives of medical teachers to define a "healthy role-model" for medical schools.

Identifying motivations and personality of rural doctors: A study in Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia.

Background: One of the health issues faced worldwide is the misdistribution of health practitioners resulting in a lack of physicians working in rural and remote areas. We identified the motivations of rural doctors and the personality that contribute to motivation to stay in rural communities. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological approach was used for which 35 rural general practitioners were interviewed in focus group discussion and one-to-one in-depth interview using a list of structured open-ended questions. Results: Family relationships and self-actualization play important roles in choosing a rural career. Personality also contributes to the decision to work as a rural doctor. We identified nine types of rural doctors, of which it is proposed that five could be encouraged and further developed in medical training. Discussion: The study results suggest that more attention should be devoted to developing certain characteristic in medical students. This would hopefully result in rural doctors gaining increased job satisfaction and being more likely to be retained for a longer duration in rural locations.

How does feedback in mini-CEX affect students' learning response?

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to explore students' learning response toward feedback during mini-CEX encounter. METHODS: This study used a phenomenological approach to identify the students' experiences toward feedback during mini-CEX encounter. Data was collected using Focus Group Discussion (FGD) for all students who were in their final week of clerkship in the internal medicine rotation. There were 4 FGD groups (6 students for each group). All FGD were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. The FGD transcripts were analyzed thematically and managed using Atlas-ti (version 7.0). RESULTS: Feedback content and the way of providing feedback on mini-CEX stimulated students' internal process, including self-reflection, emotional response, and motivation. These internal processes encouraged the students to take action or do a follow-up on the feedback to improve their learning process. In addition, there was also an external factor, namely consequences, which also influenced the students' reaction to the follow-up on feedback. In the end, this action caused several learning effects that resulted in the students' increased self-efficacy, attitude, knowledge and clinical skill. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback content and the way of providing feedback on mini-CEX stimulates the students' internal processes to do a follow-up on feedback. However, another external factor also affects the students' decision on the follow-up actions. The follow-ups result in various learning effects on the students. Feedback given along with summative assessment enhances learning effects on students, as well. It is suggested that supervisors of clinical education are prepared to comprehend every factor influencing feedback on mini CEX to improve the students' learning response.

Large-scale multi-site OSCEs for national competency examination of medical doctors in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Implementing large-scale multi-site objective structured clinical examination (OSCEs) for national competency examination in a low resource country is challenging. AIMS: To describe the first national OSCE for national competency examination of medical doctors in Indonesia and evaluate the reliability, validity, feasibility, acceptability, and educational impact. METHODS: We collected electronically the OSCE scores from 49 out of 73 medical schools that participated to assess reliability and validity. We conducted electronic survey to examiners, examinees, SP trainers, and OSCE coordinators to assess feasibility, acceptability, and educational impact. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient across station was 0.79. There was strong correlation between rubric and global rating scores in each station (coefficient correlation ranges from 0.705 to 0.82). The content validity ratio was 0.97. The coefficient correlation between OSCE and MCQ was 0.335 (p = 0.00). All 49 medical schools were able to conduct OSCE simultaneously. Examiners, examinees, SP trainers, and OSCE coordinators had good perception regarding feasibility and acceptability of OSCE. Both examiners and examinees indicated good educational impact of OSCE application. The cutting score based on the borderline regression method was 61.96%. There were 67.39% of the examinees achieved similar or above the cutting score. CONCLUSION: With 12 stations 15 min each, the reliability coefficient across station is intermediate. Content validity is good. It is feasible and acceptable to implement large-scale multi-site OSCEs in Indonesia. Examiners and examinees perceive good educational impact on OSCE implementation.

Educational environment and approaches to learning of undergraduate nursing students in an Indonesian school of nursing.

The aims of this study were to assess students' perceptions of their educational environment and approaches to learning, and determine if perceptions of learning environment associates with approaches to learning. A survey was conducted to collect data from a regional private university in Indonesia. A total of 232 nursing students completed two questionnaires that measured their perceptions of educational environment and approaches to learning. The measurement was based on Dundee Ready Education Environment Measurement (DREEM) and Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Five learning environments dimensions and three learning approaches dimensions from two measures were measured. The overall score of DREEM was 131.03/200 (SD 17.04), it was in the range considered to be favourable. The overall score is different significantly between years of study (p value = 0.01). This study indicated that the majority of undergraduate nursing students' adopt strategic approach (n = 139. 59.9%). The finding showed that perceived educational environment significantly associated with approaches to learning. This study implicated the need to maintain conducive learning environment. There is also a need to improve the management of learning activities that reflect the use of student-centered learning.

Meeting international standards: a cultural approach in implementing the mini-CEX effectively in Indonesian clerkships.

UNLABELLED: Abstract Background: Medical schools all over the world try to adapt their programs to meet international standards. However, local culture might hamper innovation attempts. AIMS: To describe challenges in implementing the mini-CEX in Indonesia and investigate its effect on students' clinical competence. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Internal Medicine and Neurology departments of the Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. Implementing the mini-CEX into the existing curriculum, while taking the Indonesian culture into account, implied a shift from group to individual feedback. We compared students' final clinical competence before (Internal Medicine n = 122, Neurology n = 183) and after (n = 183 and 186, respectively) the implementation of the mini-CEX, using a modified Objective Structured Long Examination Record (OSLER). The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: We took power distance and individualism into account to facilitate the implementation process. After implementing the mini-CEX, the OSLER results were significant higher in Internal Medicine (p < 0.05). However, no differences were found in Neurology. CONCLUSION: By managing the innovation process carefully and taking culture and local context into account, the mini-CEX can be implemented without changing the underlying concept. The shift from group to individual feedback seems to have a positive effect on student learning.