Glycaemic control in type II diabetic tube-fed patients with a new enteral formula low in carbohydrates and high in monounsaturated fatty acids: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of long-term treatment with a new enteral formula low in carbohydrates and high in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), in comparison with a standard formula, on glycaemic control in tube-fed type II diabetic patients. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, controlled, multi-centre trial. SETTING: Early rehabilitation centres, primary care and nursing facilities. SUBJECTS: A total of 78 patients with insulin-treated type II diabetes with HbA(1C) > or =7.0% and/or fasting blood glucose >6.66 mmol/l, who required enteral tube feeding due to neurological dysphagia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 113 kJ (27 kcal)/kg of body weight of either test feed or an isoenergetic, isonitrogenous enteral formula (control) for 12 weeks. Glycaemic control (total daily insulin dosage (IU), fasting blood glucose, and HbA(1C)) and gastrointestinal tolerance were monitored daily. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, median values for changes from baseline were as follows (test group vs control group, 'data as available' analysis): total daily IUs -6.0 vs 0.0 (P=0.0024), fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) -1.59 vs -0.08 (P=0.0068); HbA(1C) (%) -0.8 vs 0.0 (P=0.0016). Both formulas were tolerated comparably. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that in tube-fed insulin-treated type II diabetic patients, the new low-carbohydrate, high MUFA formula results in a more effective glycaemic control than the standard diet, while being comparable in safety.

Cimicifuga racemosa dried ethanolic extract in menopausal disorders: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of the black cohosh root extract Cr 99 with placebo in women with climacteric complaints. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study was conducted in 122 menopausal women (intention-to-treat population) with > or =3 hot flashes a day, treated over 12 weeks. Two main efficacy measures - weekly weighted score of hot flashes and Kupperman Index - and secondary efficacy variables, e.g. Menopause Rating Scale, were defined. Routine safety laboratory parameters and adverse events were documented. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis showed no superiority of the tested black cohosh extract compared to placebo. However, in the subgroup of patients with a Kupperman Index> or =20 a significant superiority regarding this index could be demonstrated (P<0.018). A decrease of 47% and 21% was observed in the black cohosh and placebo group, respectively. The weekly weighted scores of hot flashes (P<0.052) and the Menopause Rating Scale (P<0.009) showed similar results. Prevalence and intensity of the adverse events did not differ in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a superiority of the tested Cimicifuga racemosa extract compared to placebo in patients with menopausal disorders of at least moderate intensity according to a Kupperman Index > or =20, but not in the intention-to-treat population as a whole.

A double blind, randomised, parallel group study on the efficacy and safety of treating acute lateral ankle sprain with oral hydrolytic enzymes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of the triple combination Phlogenzym (rutoside, bromelain, and trypsin) with double combinations, the single substances, and placebo. DESIGN: Multinational, multicentre, double blind, randomised, parallel group design with eight groups structured according to a factorial design. SETTING: Orthopaedic surgery and emergency departments in 27 European hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 721 patients aged 16-53 years presenting with acute unilateral sprain of the lateral ankle joint. PRIMARY EFFICACY CRITERIA: (a) Pain on walking one or two steps, as defined by the patient on a visual analogue scale. (b) The range of motion, as measured by the investigator and expressed as a sum of flexion and extension. (c) The volume of the injured ankle measured with a volometer. RESULTS: At the primary end point at seven days, the greatest reduction in pain was in the bromelain/trypsin group (73.7%). The Phlogenzym group showed a median reduction of 60.3%, and the placebo group showed a median reduction of 73.3%. The largest increase in range of motion (median) was in the placebo group (60% change from baseline). The Phlogenzym group showed a median increase of 42.9%. The biggest decrease in swelling was in the trypsin group (3.9% change from baseline). The Phlogenzym group showed a -2.30% change from baseline and the placebo group a -2.90% change. In the subgroup analysis of patients who did not use a Caligamed brace, Phlogenzym was superior to placebo for the summarising directional test of the primary efficacy criteria (MW = 0.621; LB-CI 0.496; p = 0.029; one sided Wei-Lachin procedure). The vast majority of doctors and patients rated the tolerability of all treatments tested as very good or at least good. CONCLUSIONS: Phlogenzym was not found to be superior to the three two-drug combinations, the three single substances, or placebo for treatment of patients with acute unilateral sprain of the lateral ankle joint. The small subgroup of patients treated without the support of a Caligamed brace showed evidence of superiority of Phlogenzym over placebo. Further research is warranted to study this effect of Phlogenzym in patients treated without ankle support.

The first placebo-controlled trial of a special butterbur root extract for the prevention of migraine: reanalysis of efficacy criteria.

This is an independent reanalysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled parallel-group study on the efficacy and tolerability of a special butterbur root extract (Petadolex) for the prophylaxis of migraine. The original protocol and analysis had a number of major shortcomings. In order to follow regulatory requirements, an independent reanalysis of the original data was performed. Following a 4-week baseline phase, 33 patients were randomised to treatment with two capsules 25 mg butterbur twice a day and 27 to placebo. The mean attack frequency per month decreased from 3.4 at baseline to 1.8 after 3 months (p = 0.0024) in the verum group and from 2.9 to 2.6 in the placebo group (n.s.). The responder rate (improvement of migraine frequency > or =50%) was 45% in the verum group and 15% in the placebo group. Butterbur was well tolerated. This small trial indicates that butterbur may be effective in the prophylaxis of migraine.

Superiority of alfacalcidol over plain vitamin D in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Supplementation therapy with plain vitamin D plus calcium is in general regarded as effective prevention or first-step treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). The aim of our study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the D-hormone analog alfacalcidol with plain vitamin D in patients with established GIOP with or without vertebral fractures. Patients on long-term glucocorticoid (GC) therapy were included as matched pairs to receive randomly either 1 microg alfacalcidol plus 500 mg calcium per day (group A, n=103) or 1000 IU vitamin D3 plus 500 mg calcium (group B, n=101). The two groups were well matched in terms of mean age, sex ratio, mean height and weight, daily dosage, and duration of GC therapy, and the percentages of the three underlying diseases included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and polymyalgia rheumatica. The baseline mean bone mineral density (BMD) values at the lumbar spine for the two groups were -3.26 (alfacalcidol) and -3.25 (vitamin D(3)) and, at the femoral neck, -2.81 and -2.84, respectively (T scores). Rates of prevalent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures did not differ between groups. During the 3-year study, we observed a median percentage increase of BMD at the lumbar spine of 2.4% in group A and a loss of 0.8% in group B ( P<0.0001). There also was a larger median increase at the femoral neck in group A (1.2%) than in group B (0.8%) ( P<0.006). The 3-year rates of patients with at least one new vertebral fracture were 9.7% among those assigned to the alfacalcidol group and 24.8% in the vitamin D group (risk reduction 0.61, 95% CI 0.24-0.81, P=0.005). The 3-year rates of patients with at least one new nonvertebral fracture were 15% in the alfacalcidol group and 25% in the vitamin D group (risk reduction 0.41, 95% CI 0.06-0.68, P=0.081). The 3-year rates of patients with at least one new fracture of any kind were 19.4% among those treated with alfacalcidol and 40.65% with vitamin D (risk reduction 0.52, 95% CI 0.25-0.71, P=0.001). In accordance with the observed fracture rates, the alfacalcidol group showed a substantially larger decrease in back pain than the plain vitamin D group ( P<0.0001). Generally, side effects in both groups were mild, and only three patients in the alfacalcidol group and two in the vitamin D group had moderate hypercalcemia. We conclude that alfacalcidol plus calcium is highly superior to plain vitamin D3 plus calcium in the treatment of established GIOP.

Physiological investigation of a unique extract of black cohosh (Cimicifugae racemosae rhizoma): a 6-month clinical study demonstrates no systemic estrogenic effect.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to confirm the efficacy and safety of the currently recognized dose of Cimicifugae racemosae rhizoma (40 mg/day) and to evaluate a higher dose and its associated physiological effects. METHODS: We conducted a controlled, randomized, double-blinded parallel group study of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women treated with two different doses (39 mg and 127.3 mg) of a unique C. racemosa preparation over a 24-week period. Efficacy and tolerability were determined by the Kupperman Menopause Index, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), a global assessment of tolerability, adverse events, routine hematology, and biochemical tests. To determine if the unique C. racemosa preparation exerts its effect through an estrogen-identical mode of action, we investigated vaginal cytology and gynecologically relevant hormones. RESULTS: Both perimenopausal and postmenopausal patients tolerated the treatment well, and menopausal symptoms decreased regardless of dose (responder rate 70% and 72%, respectively). The lack of change in vaginal cytology measures indicates a nonestrogenic effect of the tested extract in this critical organ. Likewise, the lack of significant changes in the levels of gynecologically relevant hormones does not indicate an overall estrogenic effect. CONCLUSIONS: The higher dose did not exert a significantly greater effect on any end point. Thus, the currently recognized standard dose of the isopropanolic aqueous C. racemosa extract should be preferred over the higher dose. Despite the absence of a placebo group, this study suggests that C. racemosa extract is associated with improvement in menopause symptoms without evidence of estrogenlike effects.

Comparative efficacy and safety of azelastine and levocabastine nasal sprays in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

The aim of the present investigation was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of azelastine (CAS 58581-89-8) (1.12 mg/day) and levocabastine (CAS 79547-78-7) (0.4 mg/day) nasal spray administered twice daily to patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. A total of 180 patients participated in a 4-week, double-blind, parallel group (n = 90 each) study. Symptom severity of nasal, ocular and other symptoms were recorded, out of which a total symptom score (TSS) was calculated. Physicians assessed symptoms at baseline and at days 7, 14, and 28, patients and physicians evaluated the efficacy and tolerability. After 4 weeks of treatment with azelastine the mean overall TSS was reduced from a baseline score of 18.7 to 4.2, after levocabastine from 17.8 to 5.9. Patients morning scores for treatment days 1 to 28 gave a mean total score of 212.4 for the azelastine group and 230.6 for the levocabastine group; the equivalent evening scores yielded a mean total score of 115.5 and 175.6 respectively. Global efficacy was judged by physicians as either 'very good' or 'good' for 90% of azelastine patients and for 74% of the levocabastine group; 92% of azelastine patients and 76% of levocabastine patients judged treatment to be either 'very good' or 'good'. No serious adverse events were reported, all adverse events were related to nasal symptoms. Both azelastine and levocabastine administered twice daily as a nasal spray provide effective and well tolerated symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Azelastine, however, was statistically superior in efficacy as well as in safety (PWei-Lachin < 0.0001, combined results).

Immunostimulation by bacterial components: II. Efficacy studies and meta-analysis of the bacterial extract OM-89.

The bacterial extract OM-89 (Uro-Vaxom) consisting of immunostimulating components derived from 18 Escherichia coli strains is used for the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections. We investigated in the mouse the immunogenicity of the bacterial extract after oral administration. After repeated administration of OM-89, a specific serum IgG and IgA response against a number of bacterial strains was obtained. Supernatants of cell cultures prepared from the urogenital tract of immunized mice also contained increased levels of strain specific IgG and IgA. We could show a bias towards a Th1 type immune response as indicated by increased IgG2a levels in sera, and increased IFNgamma levels in supernatants of spleen cells. These findings may contribute to an understanding of the therapeutic effect of Uro-Vaxom: the metaanalysis of several clinical studies confirmed that Uro-Vaxom constitutes an effective prophylaxis for urinary tract infections.

Comparative efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs nimesulide and diclofenac in patients with acute subdeltoid bursitis and bicipital tendinitis.

The efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) 100 mg twice daily were compared with diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d. in short term treatment of acute shoulder (acute subdeltoid bursitis and bicipital tendinitis) in adult patients. In this double-blind (double-dummy), randomised, parallel group study over two weeks, 122 patients were included. The Mann-Whitney statistics revealed therapeutic equivalence of both treatments with a slight superiority for nimesulide. The tolerability of nimesulide, judged by investigators and patients and analysed statistically, was superior to that of diclofenac. Thus, the benefit-risk relationship was better for the test drug than for the reference drug.

Reevaluation of some double-blind, randomized studies of dexibuprofen (Seractil): a state-of-the-art overview. Studies in patients with lumbar vertebral column syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, distortion of the ankle joint, gonarthrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, and activated coxarthrosis.

This article presents a reevaluation of studies previously performed regarding the efficacy and safety of dexibuprofen (Seractil; S(+)-ibuprofen) for use in patients with inflammatory or degenerative diseases. Using appropriate standardized measures (univariate and multivariate analysis with the Mann-Whitney statistic with confidence intervals), the authors were able to compare the effects of treatment in different diseases. For the primary criterion and for the combined analysis of all efficacy criteria, one-sided equivalence was proved in all six studies reviewed.

Conventional statistics and useful statistics.

Differences between conventional statistical methods and more useful, modern methods are demonstrated using a statistical analysis of data from therapeutic research in rheumatology. The conventional methods, t-test and graphs of mean values and the boxplot, detect almost no differences between treatment groups. A more recent procedure for analysing group differences is the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. The associated graphs are based on the cumulative distribution function of the two treatment groups and the synthetic Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC). Special differences, namely baseline dependencies, can be visualized in this way.

[Systemic therapy of diffuse effluvium and hair structure damage]. / Systemische Therapie von diffusem Effluvium und Haarstrukturschäden.

A controlled randomized double-blind study was carried out in 72 female patients to compare tolerance and efficacy of two therapeutic agents containing vitamins of the B-group and L-cystine in different compositions versus a placebo in diffuse effluvia and hair structure lesions. Hair swelling as a criterion of hair quality and frontal and parietal anagen rates in trichograms as criteria of hair growth were determined before and after 4 months of therapy. Treatment with active medication 1 was statistically significantly superior to treatment with the placebo according to these criteria. Treatment with active medication 2 was superior to treatment with the placebo but inferior to treatment with active medication 1. The overall evaluation of efficacy by investigator and patient was in good agreement with these results. The additional active ingredients contained in active medication 1 but not contained in active medication 2 contribute to the efficacy of the medication. They cannot be compensated by the higher amounts of L-cystine contained in active medication 2. Given their good tolerance, no adverse effects were observed with the two active medications.

Variations of skin sensitivity to intracutaneous histamine provocations with regard to provocation time.

Dermal provocation tests with histamine and other mediators of allergy are widely used as diagnostic tools and as clinical pharmacological models. Diurnal variations of skin reactivity e.g. flare reactions have been postulated earlier. Potential differences in skin reactivity using histamine provoked flare areas as model were investigated by means of five different placebo formulations (i.v. solution; p.o. solution; p.o. solid forms). Flare reactions have been provoked every 3rd hour within a time span of 29 h using a cross-over design with an H1-antagonist positive control. No provocation was provided between 0:00 and 7:00 a.m. There was no statistically significant variation of skin reactivity with respect to provocation times under placebo treatment conditions. No dependence on plasmacortisol levels was observed. Interindividual differences in skin reactivity are more pronounced than the intraindividual variations.

[Proof of bioequivalence of two nifedipine preparations]. / Zum Nachweis der Bioäquivalenz von zwei Nifedipin-Präparaten.

A crossover-study was performed with 20 volunteers in order to demonstrate the bioequivalence of two nifedipine preparations after single dose application. Methods for demonstrating bioequivalence were according to the APV (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik)- and FDA-guidelines; in addition some new but less well-known biometric procedures were used. Bioequivalence could be proved for the criteria AUC, Cmax and tmax as stated in the nifedipine monograph of Zentrallaboratorium Deutscher Apotheker.