On the Track of New Endoscopic Alternatives for the Treatment of Selected Gastric GISTs-A Pilot Study.

Background and Objectives: GISTs (Gastrointestinal stromal tumors) are the most common mesenchymal gastrointestinal tract tumours and are mainly located in the stomach. Their malignant potential depends on size, location, and type. Endoscopic techniques are a less invasive modality for patients not eligible for surgery. ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection) is mainly used for the removal of smaller GISTs, with intraluminal growth and a more superficial location. Thus, R0 resection capability in some cases may be not sufficient, limited by tumour size, location in the gastric wall, and its connection level with the muscularis propria. In such cases, an endoscopic full-thickness resection can become a new alternative. In this retrospective pilot study, we evaluated ESD and hybrid resection techniques in terms of safety, efficacy, and disease recurrence for selected types of gastric GISTs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective comparison was conducted in a group of patients who underwent ESD or a hybrid technique combining endoscopic resection with endoscopic suturing using the OverStitch system (HT) for type II or III gastric GISTs. A total of 21 patients aged 70 ± 8 years underwent endoscopic resection. Seventeen lesions were treated with ESD and four with the HT. Results: R0 resection was achieved in all patients treated using HT (type III lesions) and in 53% of those treated with ESD (p = 0.08). None of the type III lesions treated with ESD were excised with R0. Lesions treated with R0 ESD resections were significantly smaller (1.76 ± 0.35 cm) than those with R1 ESD resections (2.39 ± 0.40 cm) (p < 0.01). The mean lesion size treated with the HT was 2.88 ± 0.85 cm. Conclusions: HT may be a new resection modality for large gastric GISTs with high muscularis propria connection grades. Further studies are required to evaluate its safety and efficacy and to form precise inclusion criteria for endoscopic resection techniques.

Optimal Endoscopic Resection Technique for Selected Gastric GISTs. The Endoscopic Suturing System Combined with ESD-a New Alternative?

Background and Study Aim: In terms of therapeutic management, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) seem to be the most difficult group of subepithelial gastrointestinal lesions (SELs). Despite various treatment option, choice of optimal management remains a dilemma in daily practice. Our aim was to evaluate a new hybrid resection technique of gastric GISTs type III as a modality of endoscopic full-thickness resection. Methods: Three males and one female (mean age of 68) were qualified for the procedure. Endoscopic full-thickness resections consisted of the endoscopic resection combined with suturing by Apollo OverStitch System. The main inclusion criterium was a complete diagnosis of GISTs (computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), fine-needle biopsy (FNB)) with the evaluation of the tumor features, especially, the location in the gastric wall. All of the tumors were type III with a diameter between 20-40 mm. The lesions were located in the corpus (1), antrum (1) and between gastric body and fundus (2). All procedures were performed in 2019. Results: The technical and therapeutic success rate was 100% and the mean resection time 107.5 min. Neither intra- nor postprocedural complications were observed. In all four cases, R0 resection was achieved. Histopathologic assessment confirmed GIST with <5mitose/50HPF in all of the tumors, with very low risk. Conclusion: Based on our outcomes, endoscopic resection combined with the sewing by Apollo OverStitch of gastric GISTs type III, with the diameter between 20-40 mm, seems to be an effective therapeutic option with a good safety profile, however further studies with a larger treatment group are needed.

The influence of blood transfusion on survival in operated non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that allogeneic transfusions have immunosuppressive effects that can promote tumor growth and metastasis formation. Despite the variety of publications on this controversial topic, the influence of blood transfusion on survival is not yet clearly identified. The impact of autologous blood transfusion on survival has only occasionally been analyzed in cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of perioperative allogeneic and autologous blood transfusions on survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with curative pulmonary resection. METHODS: Of 493 consecutive patients, 185 (37.5%) received allogeneic blood products and 145 (29.4%) received autologous blood products, whereas 163 patients (33.1%) received no blood products. Survival analysis included univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: Three-year survival probabilities in allogeneic, autologous, and nontransfused groups were 40%, 48%, and 61%, respectively, and the estimated 5-year survival probabilities were 34%, 38%, and 48%, respectively. In the univariate analysis there was a reduced survival in allogeneic versus nontransfused group (P <.01). In the multivariate analysis stage (P <.01), initial hemoglobin level (P =.01) and sedimentation rate (P =.03) remained significant factors, whereas the type of blood transfusion (allogeneic versus autologous) was no longer significant. There was no significant impact of transfusion in the multivariate analysis when patients in stage III or patients who underwent pneumonectomy were excluded. CONCLUSION: Neither allogeneic nor autologous blood transfusion has independent, adverse survival impact in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with radical pulmonary resection.