Aerobic exercise training improves nocturnal blood pressure dipping in medicated hypertensive individuals.

OBJECTIVE: The absence of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) reduction at night in hypertensive individuals is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of an aerobic training intervention on nocturnal BP dipping in medicated hypertensive individuals. METHODS: At baseline, hypertensive individuals under pharmacological treatment underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring and a morning urine sample to analyze albumin creatinine ratio (UACR). Then, participants were divided into nocturnal dippers ( N = 15; 59 ± 6 years) and nondippers ( N = 20; 58 ± 5 years) according to a day-to-night BP reduction of >10% or <10%, respectively. Next, participants underwent a 3-weekly, 4-month aerobic interval training intervention. RESULTS: Follow-up measurements revealed a reduction in daytime diastolic BP in dippers and nondippers ( Ptime < 0.001), whereas nighttime systolic BP was reduced only in nondippers ( P = 0.004). Regarding dipping pattern, nocturnal systolic BP dipping increased after training in nondippers (5 ± 3 to 9 ± 7%; P = 0.018), whereas in dippers, there was a decrease in nocturnal dipping after training (14 ± 4 to 10 ± 7%, P = 0.016). Nocturnal diastolic BP dipping did not change in nondippers (8 ± 5 to 10 ± 7%; P = 0.273) but decreased in dippers (17 ± 6 to 12 ± 8%; P = 0.004). In addition, UACR was significantly reduced in both groups after training ( Ptime = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Aerobic exercise training is associated with nocturnal BP dipping as nighttime BP was lower than before the program in medicated hypertensive individuals with an initial nondipping phenotype. The lack of improvement in individuals with a dipping phenotype warrants further investigation to discern whether dipping phenotypes influence BP responses to exercise training.

One Bout of Resistance Training Does Not Enhance Metformin Actions in Prediabetic and Diabetic Individuals.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the separated and combined effects of metformin and resistance exercise on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in overweight/obese individuals with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Fourteen adults with a body mass index of 32.1 ± 4.1 kg·m-2, insulin resistance (HOMA-2 1.6 ± 0.6), and poor glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin, 6.9% ± 0.9%; 51.9 ± 10.7 mmol·mol-1) while taking metformin (1561 ± 470 g·d-1) were recruited. Participants underwent four 72-h long experimental trials in a randomized counterbalanced order, either 1) taking metformin (MET), 2) replacing metformin by placebo pills (PLAC), 3) taking placebo and undergoing a resistance training bout (RT + PLAC), and 4) taking metformin and undergoing the same RT bout (RT + MET). Interstitial fluid glucose concentration was frequently sampled to obtain 72-h glucose area under the curve (GAUC) and the percentage hyperglycemic glucose readings (>180 mg·dL-1; GPEAKS). Insulin sensitivity (i.e., HOMA-2) and IGF-1 were also assessed. RESULTS: HOMA-2 was not affected by treatments. GAUC and GPEAKS were similarly reduced below PLAC during RT + MET and MET (all P < 0.05). In contrast, RT + PLAC did not affect glucose concentration. Metformin decreased serum IGF-1 concentrations (P = 0.006), and RT did not reverse this reduction. CONCLUSIONS: A bout of full-body RT does not interfere or aid on metformin's blood glucose-lowering actions in individuals with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Endurance Exercise Training reduces Blood Pressure according to the Wilder's Principle.

The effect of antihypertensive medicine (AHM) is larger the higher the pre-treatment blood pressure level. It is unknown whether this Wilder's principle, also applies for the exercise-training blood pressure (BP) lowering effect. One hundred seventy-eight (n=178) middle-aged individuals (55±8 y) with metabolic syndrome (MetS), underwent high intensity interval training (3 days·week-1) for 16 weeks. Participants were divided into medicated (Med; n=103) or not medicated (No Med; n=75) with AHM. Office BP was evaluated before and after the exercise-training. Correlations and stepwise regression analysis were used to determine which variable better predicted the reductions in systolic BP (SBP) with training. After training, participants with hypertension lowered SBP by a similar magnitude regardless of if they were in the Med (-15 mmHg, 95% CI-12,-19; P<0.001) or No Med group (-13 mmHg, 95% CI-9,-16; P<0.001). However, SBP did not decrease among normotensive groups (P=0.847 for Med and P=0.937 for No Med). Pre-treatment SBP levels was the best predictor of exercise-training lowering effect (r=-0.650; ß=-0.642; P<0.001). For each 10 mmHg higher pre-training SBP there were a 5 mmHg deeper SBP reduction (Wilder principle). Furthermore, AHM does not interfere with exercise-training BP-lowering effect.

Effectiveness of statins vs. exercise on reducing postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in dyslipidemic population: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals at risk of suffering cardiovascular disease (CVD) present with larger increases in blood triglyceride (TG) concentration after a high-fat meal than do healthy individuals. These postprandial hypertriglyceride levels are an independent risk factor for CVD. Prescription of statins and a bout of prolonged exercise are both effective in lowering postprandial hypertriglyceride levels. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of statins vs. a bout of aerobic exercise in reducing fasting and postprandial TG (PPTG) concentrations in individuals at high risk of developing CVD. METHODS: Thirty-seven studies from a systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were included in this review. The selected studies conducted trials involving statin therapy (n = 20) or a bout of aerobic exercise (n = 19) and measured their impact on PPTG levels as the outcome. Two studies analyzed both treatments and were included in duplicate. The meta-analysis was constructed using a random-effects model to calculate the mean difference (MD). The Student t test was used to compare the data sets for statins vs. exercise. RESULTS: Overall, statin and exercise interventions showed similar reductions in PPTG levels, with an MD of -0.65 mmol/L for statins (95% confidence interval (95%CI): -0.54 to -0.77; p < 0.001) and -0.46 mmol/L for exercise (95%CI: -0.21 to -0.71; p < 0.01). However, statins lowered fasting TG levels more than exercise (MD = -1.54 mmol/L, 95%CI: -2.25 to -0.83; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Although aerobic exercise is effective in lowering blood TG levels, statins seem to be more efficient, especially in the fasted state. A combination of exercise and statins might reveal a valuable approach to the treatment and prevention of CVD. More studies are required to determine the underlying mechanisms and the possible additive effects of these interventions.

Validations of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices Using Recognized Protocols.

Preventing, diagnosing, and controlling high blood pressure is a global health priority. The self-measurement of blood pressure is therefore fundamental and should be done with devices validated by recognized protocols, although most are not. The most widely used and current protocols are the 2010 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) revision and the 2018 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI)/ ESH/ the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) universal standard, respectively. The aim of this study was to find out which blood pressure measuring devices have been adequately validated by the above protocols. A narrative review of blood pressure device validations was conducted by searching the PubMed database. From 52 records identified, 37 studies were included. Most validations follow the 2010 revision and only six follow the 2018 protocol, which is more demanding. Almost all validated sphygmomanometers are automated oscillometric sphygmomanometers in the general population. Wrist devices and devices combining new technologies are also validated, as well as in specific populations, such as the obese, pregnant women, or children. There is sufficient evidence to confirm that the universal AAMI/ ESH/ISO standard is considered the protocol of the century. However, it is necessary to increase the number of validations following it and, above all, validations of the new technologies that are invading the current market.

Acute Aerobic Exercise Induces Short-Term Reductions in Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

[Figure: see text].

Concurrent endurance and resistance training enhances muscular adaptations in individuals with metabolic syndrome.

The purpose of the study was to determine if concurrent training (endurance and resistance in a single session) elicits leg muscular adaptations beyond the ones obtained by endurance training alone in sedentary individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Sixty-six MetS individuals (37% women, age 56 ± 7 years, BMI 32 ± 5 kg m-2 and 3.8 ± 0.8 MetS factors) were randomized to undergo one of the following 16-week isocaloric exercise programs: (i) 4 + 1 bouts of 4 min at 90% of HRMAX of intense aerobic cycling (IAC + IAC group; n = 33), (ii) 4 IAC bouts followed by 3 sets of 12 repetitions of 3 lower-limb free-weight exercises (IAC + RT group; n = 33). We measured the effects of training on maximal cycling power, leg press maximum strength (1RM), countermovement jump height (CMJ), and mean propulsive velocity (MPV) at workloads ranging from 10% to 100% of baseline 1RM leg press. After intervention, MetS components (Z-score) improved similarly in both groups (p = 0.002). Likewise, maximal cycling power during a ramp test improved similarly in both groups (time effect p < 0.001). However, leg press 1RM improved more in IAC + RT than in IAC + IAC (47 ± 5 vs 13 ± 5 kg, respectively, interaction p < 0.001). CMJ only improved with IAC + RT (0.8 ± 0.2 cm, p = 0.001). Leg press MPV at heavy loads (ie, 80%-100% 1RM) improved more with concurrent training (0.12 ± 0.01 vs 0.06 ± 0.02 m s-1 , interaction p = 0.013). In conclusion, in unconditioned MetS individuals, intense aerobic cycling alone improves leg muscle performance. However, substituting 20% of intense aerobic cycling by resistance training further improves 1RM leg press, MPV at high loads, and jumping ability while providing similar improvement in MetS components.

Effects of antihypertensive medication and high-intensity interval training in hypertensive metabolic syndrome individuals.

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies are simultaneously prescribed when treating hypertensive individuals with elevated cardiovascular risk (ie, metabolic syndrome individuals). However, it is unknown if the interactions between antihypertensive medication (AHM) and lifestyle interventions (ie, exercise training) may result in a better ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) control. To test this hypothesis, 36 hypertensive individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS) under long-term prescription with AHM targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) were recruited. Before and after 4 months of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), participants completed two trials in a double-blind, randomized order: (a) placebo trial consisting of AHM withdrawal for 3 days and (b) AHM trial where individuals held their habitual dose of AHM. In each trial, 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP) was monitored and considered the primary study outcome. Secondary outcomes included plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone concentration to confirm withdrawal effects on RAAS, along with the analysis of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) to assess kidney function. The results showed main effects from AHM and HIIT reducing 24-h MAP (-5.7 mmHg, p < 0.001 and -2.3 mmHg, p = 0.007, respectively). However, there was not interaction between AHM and HIIT on 24-h MAP (p = 0.240). There was a main effect of AHM increasing PRA (p < 0.001) but no effect on plasma aldosterone concentration (p = 0.368). HIIT did not significantly improve RAAS hormones or the UACR. In conclusion, AHM and HIIT have independent and additive effects in lowering ABP. These findings support the combination of habitual AHM with exercise training with the goal to reduce ABP in hypertensive MetS individuals.

Exercise Reduces Medication for Metabolic Syndrome Management: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effects of a 5-yr exercise intervention on metabolic syndrome (MetS) and health-related variables and medication use for MetS management. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to an exercise intervention (n = 25, 54 ± 2 yr, 20% women) or control group (n = 26, 54 ± 2 yr, 38% women). The intervention lasted 4 months per year and consisted of high-intensity interval training on a cycloergometer thrice a week. Outcomes were MetS z-score and medication use score, MetS-related variables (including blood pressure, blood glucose homeostasis, and lipid profile), and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF, as determined by maximal oxygen uptake). RESULTS: MetS z-score was similarly reduced over time in both groups (P = 0.244 for group-time interaction). A quasi-significant and significant group-time interaction was found for MetS number of factors (P = 0.004) and CRF (P < 0.001), respectively. Thus, MetS factors tended to decrease over time only in the exercise group with no change in the control group, whereas CRF increased from baseline to 5-yr assessment in the exercise group (by 1.1 MET, P < 0.001) but decreased in the control group (-0.5 MET, P = 0.025). Medicine use score increased twofold from baseline to 5-yr follow-up in the control group (P < 0.001) but did not significantly change (10%, P = 0.52) in the exercise group (P < 0.001 for group-time interaction). The proportion of medicated patients who had to increase antihypertensive (P < 0.001), glucose-lowering (P = 0.036), or total medication (P < 0.0001) over the 5-yr period was lower in the exercise than that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise training can attenuate the increase in medication that would be otherwise required to manage MetS over a 5-yr period.

Effects of statins and exercise on postprandial lipoproteins in metabolic syndrome vs metabolically healthy individuals.

AIMS: To determine if the combination of exercise and statin could normalize postprandial triglyceridaemia (PPTG) in hypercholesteraemic individuals. METHODS: Eight hypercholesteraemic (blood cholesterol 182 ± 38 mg dL-1 ; low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-c] 102 ± 32 mg dL-1 ) overweight (body mass index 30 ± 4 kg m-2 ) individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS) were compared to a group of 8 metabolically healthy (MetH) controls (blood cholesterol 149 ± 23 mg dL-1 ; LDL-c 77 ± 23 mg dL-1 , and body mass index 23 ± 2 kg m-2 ). Each group underwent 2 PPTG tests, either 14 hours after a bout of intense exercise or without previous exercise. Additionally, MetS individuals were tested 96 hours after withdrawal of their habitual statin medication to study medication effects. RESULTS: A bout of exercise before the test meal did not reduce PPTG in MetS (P = .347), but reduced PPTG by 46% in MetH (413 ± 267 to 224 ± 142 mg dL-1 for 5 h incremental area under the curve; P = .02). In both trials (i.e., either after a bout of intense exercise or without previous exercise), statin withdrawal in MetS greatly increased PPTG (average 65%; P < .01), mean LDL-c (average 25%; P < .01), total cholesterol (average 16%; P < .01) and apolipoprotein (Apo) B48 (24%; P < .01), without interference from exercise. However, Apo B100 was not affected by statin withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Hypercholesteraemic MetS individuals (compared to MetH controls) fail to show an effect of exercise on reducing PPTG. However, chronic statin medication blunts the elevations in triglyceride after a fat meal (i.e., incremental area under the curve of PPTG) reducing their cardiovascular risk associated with their atherogenic dyslipidaemia. Statin decreases PPTG by reducing the secretion or accelerating the catabolism of intestinal Apo B48.

Substitution of parts of aerobic training by resistance training lowers fasting hyperglycemia in individuals with metabolic syndrome.

We sought to determine the effects of substituting parts of aerobic training (AT) by resistance training (RT) on metabolic syndrome (MetS) factors. MetS patients (aged 56 ± 7 years; body mass index 33 ± 5 kg·m-2 and 3.9 ± 0.8 MetS factors) were randomized to undergo 1 of the following isocaloric, 16-week long exercise programs: (i) cycling 4 bouts of 4-min at 90% of maximal heart rate (HRmax) followed by 3 sets of 12 repetitions of 3 lower limb free-weight exercises (high-intensity interval training (HIIT)+RT group; n = 33), (ii) cycling 5 bouts of 4 min at 90% of HRmax (HIIT+HIIT group; n = 33), or (iii) no exercise control group (n = 21). We measured the evolution of all 5 MetS components (z score), cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen uptake), leg strength and power (leg press 1-repetition maximum (1RM) and countermovement jump (CMJ)), fasting blood glucose (FG), fasting insulin, and insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment 2). Both training groups improved maximal oxygen uptake similarly (170 ± 310 and 190 ± 210 mL O2·min-1; P < 0.001) and z score (-0.12 ± 0.29 and -0.12 ± 0.31 for HIIT+RT and HIIT+HIIT, respectively; P < 0.02). However, only HIIT+RT improved CMJ (P = 0.002) and leg press 1RM above the HIIT+HIIT group (21% vs 6%; P < 0.001). Furthermore, FG only decreased in the HIIT+RT group (5%; P = 0.026, time × group). Our findings suggest that substitution of part of HIIT by leg RT improves glucose control in MetS individuals. Novelty Most studies addressing the efficacy of endurance versus resistance training are not matched by energy expenditure. We found that substituting 20% of AT with RT reduces hyperglycemia in MetS individuals. Training recommendations to regain glycemic control in MetS individuals should include resistance training.

The use of a graded exercise test may be insufficient to quantify true changes in V̇o2max following exercise training in unfit individuals with metabolic syndrome.

We studied the accuracy of graded exercise testing (GXT) to assess improvements in maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o2max) with exercise training in unfit individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Forty-four adults with MetS (58 ± 7 yr, 36% women, BMI 31.8 ± 4.8 kg/m-2) underwent 4 mo of supervised high-intensity interval exercise training. V̇o2max was assessed using GXT, followed by a constant-load verification test (VerT) at 110% of the maximal work rate achieved during GXT. V̇o2 data from GXT and VerT were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. The mean improvement in V̇o2max following exercise training was similar when using GXT only or VerT. However, before training, 18 subjects achieved a higher V̇o2max during the verification test that was (+159 mLO2/min) higher than the GXT (P < 0.001). After training, the underestimation of V̇o2max by GXT was reduced but still present (+64 mLO2/min). As a result, improvements in V̇o2max following exercise training as assessed using GXT only almost doubled the "real" increase in V̇o2max as measured by VerT in these 18 individuals. In the remaining 26 subjects, GXT scored below VerT only after training (+54 mLO2/min, P = 0.046). As a consequence, GXT underestimated the actual V̇o2max increases (-49 mLO2/min, P = 0.013) in these individuals. Assessment of changes in V̇o2max following exercise training using only GXT over- or underestimates V̇o2max gains in unfit individuals with MetS. Thus, a verification test may be required to 1) identify the highest V̇o2max during a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and 2) accurately quantify the true changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following exercise training in unfit individuals with MetS.NEW & NOTEWORTHY It is unclear whether the traditional GXT is suitable to assess V̇o2max changes in unfit individuals with metabolic syndrome. Mean changes in V̇o2max following exercise training were similar using GXT or VerT. However, we showed that the GXT overestimated V̇o2max improvements in 41% and underestimated V̇o2max improvements in 59% of subjects. Our data suggest the need for a verification test to appropriately determine training-induced improvements in V̇o2max in unfit individuals with metabolic syndrome.

Effects of Exercise Training during Christmas on Body Weight and Cardiometabolic Health in Overweight Individuals.

: Individuals with abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have augmented risk of all-cause mortality. Lifestyle interventions are effective to treat MetS, however, there are periods during the year in which exercise programs are discontinued and improper dietary habits reappear (e.g., Christmas holidays). We aimed to analyze if exercise-training during Christmas holidays would avoid body-weight gains and cardiometabolic deterioration in MetS individuals, using a randomized control trial. Thirty-eight men with MetS undergoing exercise training were randomly allocated to either continue (TRAIN group, n = 16) or discontinue (HOLID group, n = 22) training, during the three weeks of Christmas. Anthropometrics (body weight, fat, and waist circumference), fasting blood metabolites (glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and cholesterol concentrations) and exercise maximal fat oxidation (FOMAX) and oxygen uptake (VO2PEAK) were determined before and after Christmas. Both groups were similar at baseline in all parameters (p > 0.05). HOLID group increased body weight (91.3 ± 13.0 to 92.0 ± 13.4 kg, p = 0.004), mean arterial pressure (94.0 ± 10.6 to 97.1 ± 8.9 mmHg, p = 0.026), blood insulin (10.2 ± 3.8 to 12.5 ± 5.4 µIU·mL-1, p = 0.003) and HOMA (3.2 ± 1.3 to 4.1 ± 2.3, p = 0.003). In contrast, TRAIN prevented those disarrangements and reduced total (170.6 ± 30.6 to 161.3 ± 31.3 mg·dL-1, p = 0.026) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (i.e., LDL-C, 104.8 ± 26.1 to 95.6 ± 21.7 mg·dL-1, p = 0.013). TRAIN also prevented the reductions in exercise FOMAX and VO2PEAK that was observed in the HOLID group (p = 0.002). In conclusion, exercise training during Christmas, prevents body weight gains and the associated cardiovascular (increase in blood pressure and LDL-C) and metabolic (reduced insulin sensitivity) health risks are an optimal non-pharmacological therapy for that period of the year.

Effects of statin therapy and exercise on postprandial triglycerides in overweight individuals with hypercholesterolaemia.

AIMS: To determine the effects of statins on postprandial lipaemia (PPL) and to study if exercise could enhance statin actions. METHODS: Ten hypercholesteraemic (blood cholesterol 204 ± 36 mg dL-1 ; low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 129 ± 32 36 mg dL-1 ) overweight (body mass index 30 ± 4 kg m-2 ), metabolic syndrome individuals chronically medicated with statins (>6 months) underwent 5-hour PPL tests in 4 occasions in a randomized order: (i) substituting their habitual statin medication by placebo for 96 hours (PLAC trial); (ii) taking their habitual statin medicine (STA trial); (iii) placebo combined with a bout of intense aerobic exercise (EXER+PLAC trial); and (iv) combining exercise and statin medicine (EXER+STA trial). RESULTS: Before the fat meal, statin withdrawal (i.e. PLAC and EXER+PLAC) increased blood triglycerides (TG; 24%), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (31%) and total cholesterol (19%; all P < .05) evidencing treatment compliance. After the meal, statin withdrawal increased 5-hour postprandial TG (PPTG) compared to its matched trials (94% higher PLAC vs STA and 45% higher EXER+PLAC vs EXER+STA; P < .05). EXER+PLAC trial did not lower PPTG below PLAC (i.e. incremental AUC of 609 ± 152 vs 826 ± 190 mg dL-1 5 h; P = .09). Adding exercise to statin did not result in larger reductions in PPTG (i.e. EXER+STA vs STA incremental area under the curve of 421 ± 87 vs 421 ± 84 mg dL-1 5 h; P = .99). CONCLUSION: In hypercholesteraemic metabolic syndrome individuals, chronic statin therapy blunts the elevations in TG after a fat meal (i.e. incremental area under the curve of PPTG) reducing the cardiovascular risk associated to their atherogenic dyslipidaemia. However, a single bout of intense aerobic exercise before the high fat meal, does not reduce PPTG but also does not interfere with the effects of statin treatment.

Exercise Training Adaptations in Metabolic Syndrome Individuals on Chronic Statin Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Statins reduce atherogenic dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in metabolic syndrome (MetS) individuals. Exercise training could also contribute to reduce CVD by improving cardiorespiratory fitness and fat oxidation. However, statin use could interfere with training adaptations. METHODS: A total of 106 MetS individuals were divided into statin users (statin group, n = 46) and statin-naïve (control group, n = 60). Groups were matched by age, weight, and MetS components. Subjects completed 16 weeks of high intensity interval training (HIIT). Before and after HIIT, muscle biopsies were collected to assess mitochondrial content (citrate synthase [CS] activity) and the activity of the rate limiting ß-oxidation enzyme (3-hydroxyacyl-CoA-dehydrogenase [HAD]). Fasting plasma glucose, insulin, TG, HDL-c, and LDL-c concentrations were measured. Exercise maximal fat oxidation (FOMAX) and oxygen uptake (VO2PEAK) were determined. RESULTS: Training improved MetS similarly in both groups (MetS z-score -0.26 ± 0.38 vs. -0.22 ± 0.31; P < 0.001 for time and P = 0.60 for time x group). Before training, the statin group had reduced muscle HAD activity and whole body FOMAX compared to the control group. However, 16 weeks of HIIT increased HAD and FOMAX in both groups (P < 0.03, time-effect). The statin group did not prevent the increases in CS with HIIT observed in the control group (38% vs 64%, respectively; P < 0.001, time-effect). Conversely, with training VO2PEAK improved less in the statin than in the control group (12% vs. 19%, respectively; P = 0.013, time × group effect). CONCLUSION: Chronic statin use in MetS does not interfere with exercise training improvements in MetS components, FOMAX, or mitochondrial muscle enzymes (ie, CS and HAD). However, the statin group attenuated the improvements in VO2PEAK with training. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT03019796, January 13, 2017.

Importance of a verification test to accurately assess V̇O2 max in unfit individuals with obesity.

BACKGROUND: To determine the trustworthiness of graded exercise test to exhaustion (GXT) to assess maximal oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 max ) in metabolic syndrome individuals with obesity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS: V ˙ O 2 max was assessed in 100 metabolic syndrome adults (57 ± 8 years; 34% women), with obesity (BMI 32 ± 5 kg·m-2 ) using GXT followed by supramaximal constant-load verification test (VerT) at 110% of maximal GXT work rate. V ˙ O 2 data from GXT and VerT were compared using paired t test and plotted for Bland-Altman analysis. GXT sensitivity and specificity to detect V ˙ O 2 max were also calculated. RESULTS: Seventy individuals did not achieve V ˙ O 2 plateau during GXT. GXT underestimated V ˙ O 2 max in 40 subjects. In these subjects, the magnitude of V ˙ O 2 max underestimation with GXT was 9% (167 mLO2 ·min-1 ; P < .001). In the whole sample (n = 100), bias error differences between GXT and VerT was 63 mLO2 ·min-1 (3% underestimation). This error was constant regardless of differences in fitness levels among individuals (R = -0.07; homoscedasticity). GXT results were unreliable in 62% of the sample with 16% of false-positive and 46% of false-negative results. Sensitivity and specificity of GTX to assess V ˙ O 2 max were low (ie, 23% and 60%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the magnitude (3%-9%) and prevalence (40% of subjects) of V ˙ O 2 max underestimation with the use of a GXT alone is high in a large sample of unfit metabolic syndrome individuals with obesity. Our data advocate for the need of using VerT after GXT to avoid significant cardiorespiratory fitness underestimation in metabolic syndrome individuals with obesity and low fitness level.

Women with metabolic syndrome show similar health benefits from high-intensity interval training than men.

High-intensity interval training (HIIT), is effective to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) components in adults. However, it is unclear if CRF and MetS components respond similarly in men and women after HIIT. For 16 weeks, 63 women (53±7 years) and 56 men (55±8 years) with MetS underwent a three day/week HIIT program. Bodyweight and composition, VO2MAX, surrogate parameters of CRF (Ventilatory threshold (VT), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) and VE/VCO2 slope), maximal rate of fat oxidation (MFO), and MetS components were assessed before and after training. All reported variables were analyzed by split-plot ANOVA looking for time by sex interactions. Before training men had higher absolute values of VO2MAX (58.6%), and MFO (24.6%), while lower body fat mass (10.5%) than women (all P<0.05). After normalization by fat-free mass (FFM), VO2MAX remained 16.6% higher in men (P<0.05), whereas differences in MFO disappeared (P = 0.292). After intervention VO2MAX (P<0.001), VO2 at VT (P<0.001), OUES (P<0.001), and VE/VCO2 slope (P<0.001) increased without differences by sex (P>0.05). After training MetS Z-score (P<0.001) improved without differences between men and women (P>0.05). From the MetS components, only blood pressure (P<0.001) and waist circumference (P<0.001) improved across time, without differences by sex. In both, women and men, changes in OUES (r = 0.685 and r = 0.445, respectively), and VO2 at VT (r = 0.378, and r = 0.445, respectively), correlated with VO2MAX. While only bodyweight changes correlated with MetS Z-score changes (r = 0.372, and = 0.300, respectively). Despite baseline differences, 16-weeks of HIIT similarly improved MetS, cardiorespiratory and metabolic fitness in women and men with MetS. This suggests that there are no restrictions due to sex on the benefits derived from an intense exercise program in the health of MetS participants. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03019796.

Post-exercise Hypotension Produced by Supramaximal Interval Exercise is Potentiated by Angiotensin Receptor Blockers.

We studied the effects of supramaximal interval exercise (SIE) with or without antihypertensive medication (AHM) on 21-hr blood pressure (BP) response. Twelve hypertensive patients chronically medicated with AHM, underwent three trials in a randomized order: a) control trial without exercise and substituting their AHM with a placebo (PLAC); b) placebo medicine and a morning bout of SIE (PLAC+SIE), and c) combining AHM and exercise (AHM+SIE). Acute and ambulatory blood pressure responses were measured for 21-hr after treatment. 20 min after treatment, systolic blood pressure (SBP) readings were reduced, similar to readings after PLAC+SIE (-9.7±6.0 mmHg, P<0.001) and AHM+SIE (-10.4±7.9 mmHg, P=0.001). 21 h after treatment, SBP remained reduced after PLAC+SIE (125±12 mmHg, P=0.022) and AHM+SIE (122±12 mmHg, P=0.013) compared to PLAC (132±16 mmHg). The BP reduction in PLAC+SIE faded out at 4 a.m., while in AHM+SIE it continued overnight. At night, BP reduction was larger in AHM+SIE than PLAC+SIE (-5.6±4.0 mmHg, P=0.006). Our data shows that a bout of supramaximal aerobic interval exercise in combination with ARB medication in the morning elicits a sustained blood pressure reduction lasting at least 21-h. Thus, the combination of exercise and angiotensin receptor blocker medication seems superior to exercise alone for acutely decreasing blood pressure.