Safety and Efficacy of a Once-Daily Halobetasol Propionate 0.01% Lotion in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results of Two Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are the mainstay of psoriasis treatment; long-term safety concerns limiting consecutive use of potent TCS to 2-4 weeks. OBJECTIVE: Investigate safety and efficacy of halobetasol propionate 0.01% lotion in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies (N=430). Subjects randomized (2:1) to halobetasol propionate 0.01% lotion or vehicle once-daily for 8 weeks, 4-week posttreatment follow-up. Primary efficacy assessment: treatment success (at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline in Investigator Global Assessment [IGA] score and 'clear' or 'almost clear') at week 8. Safety and treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) evaluated throughout. RESULTS: Halobetasol propionate 0.01% lotion demonstrated statistically significant superiority over vehicle as early as week 2. By week 8, 36.5% (Study 1) and 38.4% (Study 2) of subjects were treatment successes compared with 8.1% and 12.0% on vehicle (P less than 0.001). Halobetasol propionate 0.01% lotion was also superior in reducing psoriasis signs and symptoms, body surface area (BSA), and improving quality of life. Halobetasol propionate 0.01% lotion was well-tolerated with no treatment-related AEs greater than 1%. LIMITATIONS: Study did not include subjects with BSA greater than 12. CONCLUSIONS: Halobetasol propionate 0.01% lotion was associated with significant reductions in the severity of the clinical signs of psoriasis, without the safety concerns of a longer treatment course. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(10):1062-1069.

Safety and efficacy of a fixed combination of halobetasol and tazarotene in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Results of 2 phase 3 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of psoriasis treatment, with long-term safety considerations limiting their use. Combining them with tazarotene may optimize their efficacy and minimize safety and tolerability concerns. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of halobetasol propionate 0.01% plus tazarotene 0.045% (HP/TAZ) lotion in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies (N = 418) were conducted. Subjects were randomized (2:1) to HP/TAZ lotion or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks with a 4-week follow-up. The primary efficacy assessment end point was treatment success (at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment score and a score of clear or almost clear). Safety and treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated throughout. RESULTS: HP/TAZ lotion demonstrated statistically significant superiority over vehicle within as few as 2 weeks. By week 8, 35.8% (study 1) and 45.3% (study 2) of subjects were treatment successes compared with 7.0% and 12.5% of those treated with vehicle (P < .001). HP/TAZ lotion was also superior in reducing signs and symptoms of psoriasis and body surface area affected by psoriasis. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were contact dermatitis (6.3%), application site pain (2.6%), and pruritus (2.2%). LIMITATIONS: Studies did not include subjects with more than 12% of their body surface area affected by psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: HP/TAZ lotion was associated with significant reductions in the severity of the clinical signs of psoriasis, with no safety concerns.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Tramadol Hydrochloride in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple-Ascending-Dose Study.

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group multiple-ascending-dose study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of tramadol hydrochloride in healthy adults to inform dosage and design for a subsequent QT/QTc study. Healthy men and women, 18 to 45 years old (inclusive), were sequentially assigned to the tramadol 200, 400, or 600 mg/day treatment cohort and within each cohort, randomized (4:1) to either tramadol or placebo every 6 hours for 9 oral doses. Of the 24 participants randomized to tramadol (n = 8/cohort), 22 (91.7%) completed the study. The AUCtau,ss of tramadol increased approximately 2.2- and 3.6-fold for the (+) enantiomer and 2.0- and 3.5-fold for the (-) enantiomer with increasing dose from 200 to 400  and 600 mg/day, whereas the Cmax,ss increased 2.1- and 3.3-fold for the (+) enantiomer and 2.0- and 3.2-fold for the (-) enantiomer. Overall, 21 participants (87.5%) participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; most frequent were nausea (17 of 24, 70.8%) and vomiting (7 of 24, 29.2%). Vomiting (affected participants and events) increased with increasing dose from 200 to 600 mg/day but was mild (5 of 24) or moderate (2 of 24) in severity. All tested dosage regimens of tramadol showed acceptable safety and tolerability profile for further investigation in a thorough QT/QTc study.

Efinaconazole 10% solution in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis: Two phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies.

BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is a common nail infection, often resulting in nail plate damage and deformity. Topical lacquer treatments have negligible efficacy. Oral treatments, although more efficacious, are limited by drug interactions and potential hepatotoxicity. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the safety and efficacy of efinaconazole 10% solution (efinaconazole), the first triazole antifungal developed for distal lateral subungual onychomycosis. METHODS: Two identical, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies were conducted in patients with toenail distal lateral subungual onychomycosis (20%-50% clinical involvement [study 1: N = 870, study 2: N = 785]). Patients were randomized (3:1) to efinaconazole or vehicle, once daily for 48 weeks, with 4-week posttreatment follow-up. Debridement was not performed. The primary end point was complete cure rate (0% clinical involvement of target toenail, and both negative potassium hydroxide examination and fungal culture) at week 52. RESULTS: Mycologic cure rates were significantly greater with efinaconazole (study 1: 55.2%, study 2: 53.4%) compared with vehicle (P < .001). The primary end point, complete cure, was also significantly greater for efinaconazole (study 1: 17.8% vs 3.3%, study 2: 15.2% vs 5.5%, P < .001). Treatment success (percent affected target toenail [0%-≤10%]) for efinaconazole ranged from 21.3% to 44.8% in study 1 and from 17.9% to 40.2% in study 2, compared with 5.6% to 16.8% and 7.0% to 15.4%, respectively, with vehicle. Adverse events associated with efinaconazole were local site reactions (2%) and clinically similar to vehicle. LIMITATIONS: A period of 52 weeks may be too brief to evaluate a clinical cure in onychomycosis. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily topical efinaconazole appears to be a viable alternative to oral treatment options for onychomycosis.

Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone for treatment of acute opioid-induced constipation: phase 2 study in rehabilitation after orthopedic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Methylnaltrexone has been shown to be effective for treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in chronic settings, but its effects on acute OIC have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of subcutaneous methylnaltrexone in patients with acute OIC after orthopedic procedures. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, hypothesis-generating phase 2 study. SETTING: Sixteen US hospitals and rehabilitation facilities. PATIENTS: Adult patients with acute OIC after orthopedic surgical procedure, expected to require opioids for at least 7 days postrandomization. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received once-daily subcutaneous methylnaltrexone 12 mg or placebo for up to 4 or 7 days. MEASUREMENTS: All endpoints were exploratory and included the percentage of patients achieving laxation within 2 and 4 hours of first dose and time to laxation. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received at least 1 dose of study drug (methylnaltrexone, n = 18; placebo, n = 15). Within 2 and 4 hours, significantly more patients receiving methylnaltrexone achieved laxation (2 hours: 33.3% vs 0%, P = 0.021; 4 hours: 38.9% vs 6.7%, P = 0.046) compared with placebo. Time to laxation was significantly shorter with methylnaltrexone (median = 15.8 hours) versus placebo (median = 50.9 hours), P = 0.0197. The most common adverse events related to the gastrointestinal tract. Pain scores remained stable and were similar to those of placebo, and signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal did not emerge in patients receiving methylnaltrexone. CONCLUSIONS: Methylnaltrexone was generally well tolerated and was active in inducing laxation in this study of patients experiencing acute OIC following orthopedic surgery.