Prenatal Vaccination Patterns among Birthing Individuals with History of Preterm Birth in the Pre- and Post-COVID Era.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore vaccination acceptance among individuals with a history of preterm birth between March and June during the pre-COVID (2019), early-COVID (2020), and late-COVID (2021) periods. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals with a history of preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation) who initiated care of a subsequent pregnancy during pre-COVID (March-June 2019), early-COVID (March-June 2020), or late-COVID (March-June 2021). The primary outcome of interest was vaccination status for influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccines. Fisher's exact and chi-square tests were used to investigate association between vaccination status and time periods, race/ethnicity, and insurance. RESULTS: Among 293 pregnancies, influenza vaccination rate was highest in early-COVID (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in Tdap or COVID-19 vaccination between time periods. COVID-19 vaccination was highest in individuals with private insurance (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in vaccination status by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION: In this study on high-risk pregnant individuals, the majority of our cohort remained unvaccinated against COVID-19 into the late-COVID period. Additionally, their influenza vaccination rates were greater than the national average in early-COVID and substantially lower than the national average in late-COVID. This shift in influenza vaccination acceptance may have been sparked by COVID-19 vaccine distribution beginning in January 2021 leading to overall vaccination hesitancy. Standardized guidelines and counseling concerning prenatal safety in recommended immunizations may serve as important tools of reassurance and health promotion. KEY POINTS: · Maternal infections during pregnancy are a risk factor for preterm birth.. · High-risk cohort had low influenza vaccination post-COVID possibly due to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.. · Vaccination education may be a uniquely important tool among high-risk pregnant patients..

CenteringPregnancy: A Review of Implementation and Outcomes.

Importance: CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a model for group prenatal care associated with improved perinatal outcomes for preterm birth and low birthweight, increased rates of breastfeeding, and higher rates of patient and clinician satisfaction. Objective: The study aims to review the literature related to perinatal outcomes associated with CP, benefits and barriers to implementation, and utility of the model. Evidence: An electronic-based search was performed in PubMed using the search terms "CenteringPregnancy" OR "Centering Pregnancy," revealing 221 articles. Results: The CP model improves patient centeredness, efficiency, and equality in prenatal care. Challenges include administrative buy-in, limited resources, and financial support. Multisite retrospective studies of CP demonstrate improved maternal, neonatal, postpartum, and well-being outcomes, especially for participants from minority backgrounds; however, prospective studies had mixed results. CenteringPregnancy is feasibly implemented with high tenet fidelity in several low- and middle-income settings with improved perinatal outcomes compared with traditional care. Conclusions: CenteringPregnancy is feasible to implement, largely accepted by communities, and shows positive qualitative and quantitative health outcomes. This body of literature supports CP as a potential tool for decreasing racial inequalities in prenatal access, quality of care, and maternal mortality. Further investigation is necessary to inform obstetric clinicians about the potential outcome differences that exist between group and traditional prenatal care.

Factors Associated with Guideline Concordant Clinician Counseling about Low-Dose Aspirin to Prevent Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines concordant low-dose aspirin (LDA) counseling and factors associated with counseling in nulliparous birthing individuals. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous birthing individuals who delivered between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020 and received prenatal care at the Duke High Risk Obstetrical Clinics (HROB). All nulliparous patients over 18 years old who established or transferred care to HROB by 16 weeks, 6 days were included in the analysis. We excluded patients with more than two previous first-trimester pregnancy losses, multiple gestation, a known contraindication to LDA, initiation of LDA prior to their prenatal care, or documented medical history of coagulation disorder. Bivariate associations between demographic/medical characteristics and our primary outcome, receipt of counseling (yes/no), were assessed using two-sample t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Factors significantly associated with the primary outcome (p < 0.05) were entered into the multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among 391 birthing individuals included in the final analysis cohort, 51.7% of eligible patients received guideline consistent LDA counseling. Factors associated with increased odds of LDA counseling were advanced maternal age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.09), Black race compared with White race (aOR:1.75, 95% CI: 1.03-2.98), chronic hypertension (aOR: 4.17, 95% CI: 1.82-9.55), and obesity (aOR: 5.02, 95% CI: 3.12-8.08). CONCLUSION: Approximately half of all nulliparous birthing individuals had appropriately documented LDA counseling. The USPSTF guidelines on LDA for preeclampsia risk reduction are complex, which may lead to ineffective provider adherence. Efforts to simplify guidelines and improve LDA counseling are vital to ensuring this low-cost, evidence-based preeclampsia prevention is used in a consistent and equitable manner. KEY POINTS: · A total of 51.7% of eligible patients received guideline consistent LDA counseling.. · Advanced maternal age , body mass index > 30, Black race, and chronic hypertension associated with increased odds of counseling.. · Among patients most likely to be counseled, high numbers did not receive LDA counseling..

Doula Care: A Review of Outcomes and Impact on Birth Experience.

Importance: Doulas are trained professionals that provide comprehensive support during the perinatal period. Doula-supported care is associated with improved maternal and infant outcomes including decreased preterm birth, increased breastfeeding initiation, and higher patient satisfaction. In addition, research suggests that doula support is a promising strategy to mitigate racial disparities in maternal and infant health outcomes. Objective: This article reviews doulas' scope of practice, perinatal outcomes associated with doula-assisted care, and their impact on alleviating racial disparities in maternal-infant outcomes. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search using the search engine PubMed was done. The search terms included ([Doula OR doulas OR labor coach] AND [Preterm OR prenatal care OR race OR racial OR racism OR Black OR African American]). Studies had to be written in English. Results: The search resulted 90 articles of which 18 original articles and 16 review articles were reviewed. The literature demonstrates that doula support increases vaginal delivery while decreasing preterm birth and low birth weight. Studies also show that doula support is uniquely effective for Black patients and is a promising strategy to reduce health care inequities. Conclusions and Relevance: Doulas may provide significant perinatal benefit for birthing patients and their infants, with advantages also noted for Black patients. The current article provides an overview of the literature focused on doula support.

Direct-to-consumer fertility testing: utilization and perceived utility among fertility patients and reproductive endocrinologists.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the utilization of direct-to-consumer fertility tests (DTCFT) among fertility patients? How does the perceived utility of DTCFT differ between patients and reproductive endocrinologists (REI)? DESIGN: Infertility patients visiting the Duke Fertility Center between December 2020 and December 2021 were sent an electronic invitation to participate in a patient survey. Members of the Society of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility were also sent e-mail invitations to participate in the REI survey. DTCFT were defined as tests not ordered by a physician or performed at a physician's office, including calendar methods of ovulation prediction, urinary ovulation prediction kits, basal body temperature (BBT) monitoring, hormone analysis, ovarian reserve testing and semen analysis. Patients and REI were asked how likely they were to recommend a given DTCFT, on a 0-10 Likert scale. RESULTS: In total, 425 patients (response rate 50.5%) and 178 REI (response rate 21.4%) completed the surveys. Patients reported the utilization of calendar methods of ovulation prediction (83.8%), urinary ovulation prediction (78.8%), BBT monitoring (30.8%), hormone analysis (15.3%), semen analysis (10.1%) and ovarian reserve testing (9.2%). REI rated the utility of all DTCFT significantly lower than patients did (average discordance -4.2, P < 0.001), except for urinary ovulation prediction, which REI gave a significantly higher score (discordance +1.0, P < 0.001). Prior pregnancy was significantly associated with home ovulation prediction utilization among patients (adjusted odds ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.83). CONCLUSIONS: Methods of ovulation prediction are commonly used by fertility patients. Significant discordance exists in the perceived utility of DTCFT between patients and REI. Patient education and guidelines are needed to better inform individuals considering DTCFT.

A Qualitative Study Documenting Black Birthing Individuals' Perspectives on the Disproportionate Rate of Preterm Birth in the Black Community.

Background: Compared with all other racial and ethnic groups, the rate of preterm birth (PTB) is 50% higher among non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB). There are limited published data focused on the etiology of the racial disparity in PTB from the perspective of Black birthing individuals who have had a lived experience with PTB. Methods: To gain insights into the etiology of the race disparity in PTB from the NHB patient's perspective, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study with NHBs who have a history of PTB. We conducted both focus group discussions (FGDs), in-depth interviews (IDIs), and used applied thematic analysis to analyze the data. Results: Seven individuals participated in 3 FGDs and 15 individuals participated in an IDI. The majority of participants named stress as a contributor to PTB among NHBs. Participants described that stress becomes an ongoing cycle with a cumulative effect on health. Three primary sources of stress were identified: (1) individual including stress from lack of personal wellness, (2) relational stress from intimate partner and familial relationships, and (3) community-level stress from occupations and societal expectations. Conclusion: Uncovering NHB patient's perspectives on the etiology of PTB is a critical step to develop interventions that mitigate the disparity impacting the Black community. Our findings suggest that multilevel interventions targeting individual-, relational-, and community-level stress may be necessary to reduce rates of PTB among NHB individuals.

Symptomatic versus asymptomatic COVID-19: does it impact placental vasculopathy?

This study sought to assess the impact of COVID-19 on placental vasculature in the context of maternal symptomatology - comparing asymptomatic to symptomatic pregnant patients - and disease severity - comparing pregnant patients with mild, moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19 infection. PCR-confirmed COVID-19 positive pregnant patients in a single health system who delivered between 3/2020-5/2021 included. All patients had positive COVID test and delivered during the study period. Primary outcome was incidence of any vascular malperfusion on placental pathology. Secondary outcomes were FVM and MVM on placental pathology. Placental pathology compared between symptomatic (sCOVID) and asymptomatic (aCOVID) patients. Secondary analysis of symptomatic patients, comparing placental pathology between mild disease(mCOVID) and worse disease(moderate, severe, or critical-defined by 2020 NIH guidelines) (dCOVID), also performed. Of 112 patients, 53 (47%) had symptoms. Twenty-seven (24.1%) patients had evidence of vascular malperfusion; 26 (23.2%) had MVM. When comparing aCOVID and sCOVID patients, no difference in rate of vascular malperfusion identified, nor any differences in rates of FVM or MVM. Among sCOVID patients (n = 53), 39 (74%) had mCOVID and 14 (26%) had dCOVID (moderate n = 4, severe n = 9, critical n = 1). Patients with dCOVID had earlier median delivery GA (37.4wks vs 39.2wks, p = .03). No difference in latency from diagnosis to delivery seen between mCOVID and dCOVID groups (4.4 vs 3.0wks, p = .96). Twelve (30.8%) patients had vascular malperfusion on pathology, all had mCOVID (p = .02). Eleven (28.2%) mCOVID patients had MVM; no dCOVID patients had evidence of vascular malperfusion (p = .03). No difference in FVM was found between cohorts. Symptomatic COVID-19 infection did not impact placental vasculature differently than asymptomatic infection, even when stratifying by trimester of infection. Among pregnant patients with symptomatic COVID-19, mild disease was associated with placental vascular changes on the maternal side while severe disease was not. Further studies are needed to understand the implications of these findings.

EngagINg the COmmunity to Reduce Preterm birth via Adherence To an Individualized Prematurity Prevention Plan (INCORPorATe IP3): intervention development and future pilot study design.

OBJECTIVE: Non-Hispanic Black birthing individuals are at increased risk of preterm birth compared to other racial and ethnic groups. In our clinical setting, we offer a tailored package of recommendations to reduce the risk of preterm birth known as an individualized prematurity prevention plan (IP3). Patient-centered, community engaged interventions that address patient-perceived barriers to preterm birth prevention are urgently needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We engaged a group of stakeholders to develop a mutli-level (patient-centered and community-involved) intervention that will increase adherence to an individualized prematurity prevention plan (IP3) by addressing barriers identified during our prior qualitative studies. RESULTS: The intervention includes trained doulas from a community-led, Black owned doula group. The doulas will moderate group prenatal social support sessions. In between the group sessions, participants will be encouraged to continue interacting with one another and the doulas using a private Facebook™ group page. We will pilot test the intervention in a cohort of pregnant, self-identified non-Hispanic Black patients with a history of prior preterm birth. CONCLUSION: We present a novel, patient-centered, community engaged intervention to reduce preterm birth in high-risk non-Hispanic Black birthing individuals. If the intervention is feasible based on the pilot study findings, we anticipate conducting an appropriately powered study to determine whether the intervention achieves our goal of reducing preterm birth.