Implementation leadership and implementation climate in context: A single organization intrinsic case study for implementation of digital measurement-based care.

Background: Although studies have demonstrated that implementation leadership and climate are important constructs in predicting evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation, concrete descriptions of how they operate during organizational implementation efforts are lacking. This case study fills that gap through an in-depth description of an organization with effective implementation leadership that successfully built a strong implementation climate. This case study provides an illustration of implementation leadership and climate in tangible, replicable terms to assist managers, practitioners, and researchers in addressing the organizational context in their own implementation projects. Method: A single organization, intrinsic case study was employed to paint a multifaceted picture of how one organization leveraged implementation leadership to strengthen a climate for the successful implementation of digital measurement-based care. The case was drawn from a cluster-randomized trial designed to test the effects of a leadership-focused implementation strategy on youth-level fidelity and clinical outcomes of digital measurement-based care. Following the completion of the trial, case study activities commenced. Descriptive summaries of multiple data sources (including quantitative data on implementation leadership and climate, coaching call and organizational alignment meeting recordings and notes, and development plans) were produced and revised iteratively until consensus was reached. Leadership actions were analyzed for corresponding dimensions of implementation leadership and climate. Results: Specific actions organizational leaders took, as well as the timing specific strategies were enacted, to create a climate for implementation are presented, along with lessons learned from this experience. Conclusion: This case study offers concrete steps organizational leaders took to create a consistent and aligned message that the implementation of a specific EBP was a top priority in the agency. The general approach taken to create an implementation climate provides several lessons for leaders, especially for EBPs that have broad implications across an organization.

Using treatments with known positive impact in community-based mental health programs is challenging. Many studies suggest leaders of these programs can help. Similarly, certain features of community-based programs can also be helpful. This case study of an outpatient mental health clinic provides rich descriptions of actions leaders took that shaped the environment in their program and helped improve the use of a treatment with known positive impact. This case study can serve as a practical guide for leaders to reference when aiming to improve the use of treatments with known impact in their own programs.

Psychometric evaluation of a pragmatic measure of clinical supervision as an implementation strategy.

BACKGROUND: Valid and reliable measurement of implementation strategies is essential to advancing implementation science; however, this area lags behind the measurement of implementation outcomes and determinants. Clinical supervision is a promising and highly feasible implementation strategy in behavioral healthcare for which pragmatic measures are lacking. This research aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate a pragmatic measure of clinical supervision conceptualized in terms of two broadly applicable, discrete clinical supervision techniques shown to improve providers' implementation of evidence-based psychosocial interventions-(1) audit and feedback and (2) active learning. METHODS: Items were generated based on a systematic review of the literature and administered to a sample of 154 outpatient mental health clinicians serving youth and 181 community-based mental health providers serving adults. Scores were evaluated for evidence of reliability, structural validity, construct-related validity, and measurement invariance across the two samples. RESULTS: In sample 1, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the hypothesized two-factor structure of scores on the Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision Strategies (EBCSS) scale (χ2=5.89, df=4, p=0.208; RMSEA=0.055, CFI=0.988, SRMR=0.033). In sample 2, CFA replicated the EBCSS factor structure and provided discriminant validity evidence relative to an established supervisory alliance measure (χ2=36.12, df=30, p=0.204; RMSEA=0.034; CFI=0.990; SRMR=0.031). Construct-related validity evidence was provided by theoretically concordant associations between EBCSS subscale scores and agency climate for evidence-based practice implementation in sample 1 (d= .47 and .55) as well as measures of the supervision process in sample 2. Multiple group CFA supported the configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance of scores on the EBCSS across the two samples. CONCLUSIONS: Scores on the EBCSS provide a valid basis for inferences regarding the extent to which behavioral health providers experience audit and feedback and active learning as part of their clinical supervision in both clinic- and community-based behavioral health settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04096274 . Registered on 19 September 2019.

Organization-level variation in therapists' attitudes toward and use of measurement-based care.

PURPOSE: Despite significant interest in improving behavioral health therapists' implementation of measurement-based care (MBC)-and widespread acknowledgment of the potential importance of organization-level determinants-little is known about the extent to which therapists' use of, and attitudes toward, MBC vary across and within provider organizations or the multilevel factors that predict this variation. METHODS: Data were collected from 177 therapists delivering psychotherapy to youth in 21 specialty outpatient clinics in the USA. Primary outcomes were use of MBC for progress monitoring and treatment modification, measured by the nationally-normed Current Assessment of Practice Evaluation-Revised. Secondary outcomes were therapist attitudes towards MBC. Linear multilevel regression models tested the association of theory-informed clinic and therapist characteristics with these outcomes. RESULTS: Use of MBC varied significantly across clinics, with means on progress monitoring ranging from values at the 25th to 93rd percentiles and means on treatment modification ranging from the 18th to 71st percentiles. At the clinic level, the most robust predictor of both outcomes was clinic climate for evidence-based practice implementation; at the therapist level, the most robust predictors were: attitudes regarding practicality, exposure to MBC in graduate training, and prior experience with MBC. Attitudes were most consistently related to clinic climate for evidence-based practice implementation, exposure to MBC in graduate training, and prior experience with MBC. CONCLUSIONS: There is important variation in therapists' attitudes toward and use of MBC across clinics. Implementation strategies that target clinic climate for evidence-based practice implementation, graduate training, and practicality may enhance MBC implementation in behavioral health.