Optimization of the Diagnostic Capacity of Traditional Biomarkers in Muscle Damage and Its Use in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.

BACKGROUND-AIM: Creatine kinase (CK) and aldolase are markers traditionally used in the study of muscle damage (MD). As CK determination is more specific to muscle damage, the demand for both determinations in routine laboratory tests would entail an extra cost. METHODS: Retrospective observational study conducted between 2019-2020. CK and aldolase concentrations from 218 patients were studied.ROC curves were analyzed for CK and aldolase for muscle damage detection. Cut-off values were selected for both strategies. Specifity of CK and aldolase for dermatomyositis or polymyositis diagnosis in our population was studied using the McNemar's test. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for total CK was 0.716 (95%CI: 0.651-0.775), for CK in males it was 0.703 (95%CI: 0.592-0.799), and for CK in females was 0.719 (95%CI: 0.636-0.793). For aldolase, AUC was 0.505 (95%CI: 0.437-0.573). Optimized cut-off points for each determination were: 112 U/L for CK in men, with a sensitivity of 73.9% (95%CI: 51.6-89.8) and a specificity of 49.2% (95%CI: 35.9-62.5); 88 U/L for CK in women, with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95%CI: 57.8-87.9) and specificity of 50.5% (95%CI: 40.4-60.6); and 5.6 U/L for aldolase, with a sensitivity of 61.0% (95%CI: 53.2-68.8) and a specificity of 38.8% (95%CI: 26.5-52.6).Regarding the individuals diagnosed with dermatomyositis or polymyositis, 66.7% and 44.4% of them were correctly classified as pathological by CK and aldolase results, respectively. McNemar's test did not reveal significant differences. CONCLUSION: The determination of CK offers a better diagnostic performance of MD and, in addition, does not present significant differences regarding the determination of aldolase in cases of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Therefore, the single determination of CK would be sufficient for MD screening.

Urine biomarkers for the prediction of mortality in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

Risk factors associated with severity and mortality attributable to COVID-19 have been reported in different cohorts, highlighting the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in 25% of them. Among other, SARS-CoV-2 targets renal tubular cells and can cause acute renal damage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of urinary parameters in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality and development of AKI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Retrospective observational study, in a tertiary care hospital, between March 1st and April 19th, 2020. We recruited adult patients admitted consecutively and positive for SARS-CoV-2. Urinary and serum biomarkers were correlated with clinical outcomes (AKI, ICU admission, hospital discharge and in-hospital mortality) and evaluated using a logistic regression model and ROC curves. A total of 199 COVID-19 hospitalized patients were included. In AKI, the logistic regression model with a highest area under the curve (AUC) was reached by the combination of urine blood and previous chronic kidney disease, with an AUC of 0.676 (95%CI 0.512-0.840; p = 0.023); urine specific weight, sodium and albumin in serum, with an AUC of 0.837 (95% CI 0.766-0.909; p < 0.001) for ICU admission; and age, urine blood and lactate dehydrogenase levels in serum, with an AUC of 0.923 (95%CI 0.866-0.979; p < 0.001) for mortality prediction. For hospitalized patients with COVID-19, renal involvement and early alterations of urinary and serum parameters are useful as prognostic factors of AKI, the need for ICU admission and death.

Optimization of the thyroid panel for diagnostic purposes: Thyrotropin cut-off values for the reflex addition of free thyroxine.

BACKGROUND-AIM: Measurement of serum thyrotropin is currently the recommended test for the screening of thyroid dysfunction, while serum free thyroxine is kept as a reflex test. In our laboratory, the strategy followed in adult individuals from Primary Care includes a 'safety margin' for requests with a thyrotropin ≤1.0 or ≥4.0 mIU/L (normal: 0.35-4.95 mIU/L). Our aim was to optimize the thyrotropin cut-off values for the addition of free thyroxine and, based on these cut-offs, to retrospectively analyze avoidable free thyroxine measurements and possible adverse clinical consequences. METHODS: Retrospective observational study performed in a tertiary care hospital between 2013 and 2018. We considered all laboratory requests for screening of thyroid dysfunction (TD) in adult patients from Primary Care. Requests from patients with a previous diagnosis of thyroid disease or pregnant women were excluded. Different receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed and the obtained thyrotropin cut-off values were compared. Economic savings were assessed considering the current cost of free thyroxin assays in our laboratory. RESULTS: From a total of 554,529 TD protocols included, 119,504 requests had free thyroxine added. From the ROC curve that enables ≥95% of abnormal free thyroxine results to be detected, the thyrotropin values obtained were ≥4.58 mIU/L and ≤0.94 mIU/L. These thyrotropin cut-off values would lead to a saving of 22.7% of annual free thyroxine measurements without adverse clinical consequences. DISCUSSION: Setting optimized thyrotropin cutoffs for reflex testing of free thyroxine would reduce the need for this test. Clinical laboratories need to offer not only true results, but also become the cornerstone in the optimization of resources.