Can Anorectal Stenosis be Managed With Dilations Alone? A PCPLC Review.

PURPOSE: Congenital anorectal stenosis is managed by dilations or operative repair. Recent studies now propose use of dilations as the primary treatment modality to potentially defer or eliminate the need for surgical repair. We aim to characterize the management and outcomes of these patients via a multi-institutional review using the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry. METHODS: A retrospective database review was performed using the PCPLC registry. The patients were evaluated for demographics, co-morbidities, diagnostic work-up, surgical intervention, current bowel management, and complications. RESULTS: 64 patients with anal or rectal stenosis were identified (57 anal, 7 rectal) from a total of 14 hospital centers. 59.6% (anal) and 42.9% (rectal) were male. The median age was 3.2 (anal) and 1.9 years (rectal). 11 patients with anal stenosis also had Currarino Syndrome with 10 of the 11 patients diagnosed with a presacral mass compared to only one rectal stenosis with Currarino Syndrome and a presacral mass. 13 patients (22.8%, anal) and one (14.3%, rectal) underwent surgical correction. Nine patients (8 anal, 1 rectal) underwent PSARP. Other procedures performed were cutback anoplasty and anterior anorectoplasty. The median age at repair was 8.4 months (anal) and 10 days old (rectal). One patient had a wound complication in the anal stenosis group. Bowel management at last visit showed little differences between groups or treatment approach. CONCLUSION: The PCPLC registry demonstrated that these patients can often be managed successfully with dilations alone. PSARP is the most common surgical repair chosen for those who undergo surgical repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does Delayed Diagnosis of Hirschsprung Disease Impact Post-operative and Functional Outcomes? A Multi-Center Review From the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Hirschsprung Disease (HD) is a rare cause of functional bowel obstruction in children. Patients are typically diagnosed in the neonatal period and undergo pull-through (PT) soon after diagnosis. The optimal management and post-operative outcomes of children who present in a delayed fashion are unknown. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective review of children with HD was performed at participating Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium sites. Children were stratified by age at diagnosis (neonates <29 days; infants 29 days-12 months; toddler 1 year-5 years and child >5 years). RESULTS: 679 patients with HD from 14 sites were included; Most (69%) were diagnosed in the neonatal period. Age at diagnosis was not associated with differences in 30-day complication rates or need for PT revision. Older age at diagnosis was associated with a greater likelihood of undergoing fecal diversion after PT (neonate 10%, infant 12%, toddler 26%, child 28%, P < 0.001) and a greater need for intervention for constipation or incontinence postoperatively (neonate 56%, infant 62%, toddler 78%, child 69%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Delayed diagnosis of HD does not impact 30-day post-operative outcomes or need for revision surgery but, delayed diagnosis is associated with increased need for fecal diversion after pull-through. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pushing the boundaries of ECLS: Outcomes in <34 week EGA neonates.

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is usually reserved for infants ≥34weeks estimated gestational age (EGA) owing to concerns about increased mortality and incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to characterize survival, rates of ICH, and complications in <34week EGA neonates placed on ECLS. METHODS: 752 neonates of EGA 29-34weeks were identified in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry (1976-2008). Data analyzed included birthweight, survival, pre-ECLS conditions, ventilatory parameters and complications (including ICH and other neurological outcomes). Data were compared using t-test, Chi-square and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: When compared to survival rates of 34week EGA neonates (58%), survival was statistically different for 29-33week EGA (48%, p=0.05). No significant difference in ICH incidence was seen between the 29-33week and 34week groups (21% vs. 17%, respectively), but a significant difference was seen in the incidence of cerebral infarct between groups (22% for 29-33weeks vs. 16% for 34weeks; p=0.03). ICH and survival did not correlate with EGA during logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Though rates of survival and cerebral infarction were worse at 29-33weeks EGA compared with 34weeks, these differences were modest and may be clinically acceptable. This suggests that EGA<34weeks may not be an absolute contraindication to use of ECLS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Childhood obesity: a risk factor for injuries observed at a level-1 trauma center.

PURPOSE: Obesity is an independent risk factor in trauma-related morbidity in adults. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of obesity in the pediatric trauma population. METHODS: All patients (6-20 years) between January 2004 and July 2007 were retrospectively reviewed and defined as non-obese (body mass index [BMI] <95th percentile for age) or obese (BMI > or =95th percentile for age). Groups were compared for differences in demographics, initial vital signs, mechanisms of injury, length of stay, intensive care unit stay, ventilator days, Injury Severity Score, operative procedures, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1314 patients analyzed, there were 1020 (77%) nonobese patients (mean BMI = 18.8 kg/m(2)) and 294 (23%) obese patients (mean BMI = 29.7 kg/m(2)). There was no significant difference in sex, heart rate, length of stay, intensive care unit days, ventilator days, Injury Severity Score, and mortality between the groups. The obese children were significantly younger than the nonobese children (10.9 +/- 3.3 vs 11.5 +/- 3.5 years; P = .008) and had a higher systolic blood pressure during initial evaluation (128 +/- 17 vs 124 +/- 16 mm Hg, P < .001). In addition, the obese group had a higher incidence of extremity fractures (55% vs 40%; P < .001) and orthopedic surgical intervention (42% vs 30%; P < .001) but a lower incidence of closed head injury (12% vs 18%; P = .013) and intraabdominal injuries (6% vs 11%; P = .023). Evaluation of complications showed a higher incidence of decubitus ulcers (P = .043) and deep vein thrombosis (P = .008) in the obese group. CONCLUSION: In pediatric trauma patients, obesity may be a risk factor for sustaining an extremity fracture requiring operative intervention and having a higher risk for certain complications (ie, deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and decubitus ulcers) despite having a lower incidence of intracranial and intraabdominal injuries. Results are similar to reports examining the effect(s) of obesity on the adult population.

Is the "seat belt sign" associated with serious abdominal injuries in pediatric trauma?

BACKGROUND: The "seat belt sign" (SBS) has been reported to be highly associated with intra-abdominal injury. This study defines its predictive value in identifying injuries in a large pediatric trauma population. METHODS: At a level I pediatric trauma center, we performed a retrospective review of trauma flow sheets for all motor vehicle crash victims (ages, 0-20) requiring trauma team activation during 2005 and 2006. All patients with an abdominal SBS recorded were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of 331 patients (mean age, 9.96 years), an SBS was present in 54 (16%) of these children. Abdominal injury was identified by computed tomography scan or intraoperatively in 12 (22%) of these children. Three (6%) children with SBS required operative intervention. Two had a bowel injuries and one had a negative laparoscopy. SBS and abdominal tenderness were reported in 30 (56%) patients; 8 (15%) of whom sustained abdominal injury. Of the 277 (84%) children without SBS, 36 (13%) had abdominal injuries. Four (11%) of these had a positive laparotomy with three having a bowel injuries. The relative risk of an abdominal injury given an SBS was 1.7 (CI 0.96-2.69; p = 0.078). Four (1.4%) children without SBS died of head injuries compared with zero with SBS. The SBS had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 85%. CONCLUSIONS: The SBS was not significantly associated with abdominal injury in our population. Patients without SBS had a higher Injury Severity Score and accounted for all of the deaths. SBS may not be as predictive of abdominal injury as previously reported.

Canadian C-spine Rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Low-Risk Criteria for C-spine radiography in young trauma patients.

PURPOSE: The Canadian C-spine (cervical spine) Rule (CCR) and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Low-Risk Criteria (NLC) are criteria designed to guide C-spine radiography in trauma patients. It is unclear how these 2 rules compare with young children. METHODS: This study retrospectively examined case-matched trauma patients 10 years or younger. Two cohorts were identified-cohort A where C-spine imaging was performed and cohort B where no imaging was conducted. The CCR and NLC criteria were then applied retrospectively to each cohort. RESULTS: Cohort A contained 125 cases and cohort B with 250 cases. Seven patients (3%) had significant C-spine injuries. In cohort A, NLC criteria could be applied in 108 (86.4%) of 125 and CCR in 109 (87.2%) of 125. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Low-Risk Criteria suggested that 70 (58.3%) cases required C-spine imaging compared to 93 (76.2%) by CCR. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Low-Risk Criteria missed 3 C-spine injuries, and CCR missed one. In cohort B, NLC criteria could be applied in 132 (88%) of 150 and CCR in 131 (87.3%) of 150. The NLC criteria identified 8 cases and CCR identified 13 cases that would need C-spine radiographs. Fisher's 2-sided Exact test demonstrated that CCR and NLC predictions were significantly different (P = .002) in both cohorts. The sensitivity of CCR was 86% and specificity was 94%, and the NLC had a sensitivity of 43% and a specificity of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Although CCR and NLC criteria may reduce the need for C-spine imaging in children 10 years and younger; they are not sensitive or specific enough to be used as currently designed.

Traumatic cervical spine injuries: characteristics of missed injuries.

PURPOSE: Computed tomographic (CT) scanning has mostly replaced x-rays as an imaging modality, but concerns exist because of excess radiation, missed injuries, and whether it is the definitive procedure for intubated patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize missed cervical spine injuries (CSIs). METHODS: All pediatric (<18) trauma patients from 2004 to 2006 were analyzed. Age, sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism, time, and missed injuries were reviewed. Flexion/extension views were used in patients with prolonged intubation. Descriptive statistics, chi(2), Student's t test, and bivariate correlation were used. RESULTS: There were 1307 pediatric trauma patients admitted with 318 imaged for potential CSI. Computed tomography was the sole imaging study in 200, x-rays in 64, and both in 54. Time to C-spine clearance was similar for all modalities (P > .05). For CT, 34 (10.7%) were initially positive for CSI with 7 false-positives (FPs) and no false-negative (FN). There were 18 patients with CSI identified by x-ray, with 5 FPs and 5 FNs (missed injuries). The 5 FNs missed by x-ray were all positive by CT scan and required no intervention. None of the flexion/extension views revealed an additional injury. Sex, intubated patients, ISS, age, type, and injury location were not predictive of a missed injury (P > .05).The sensitivity of CT scan was 1.0, specificity was 0.976, and the positive predictive value was 79.4%. The sensitivity of plain x-ray was 61.5%, the specificity was 1.6%, and the positive predictive value was 61.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that CT scans should be the primary modality to image a CSI. Flexion/extension views did not add to the decision making for C-spine clearance after CT evaluation.

Salvaging the severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia patient: is a silo the solution?

BACKGROUND: Infants with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have a high morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that placement of an abdominal wall silo and staged abdominal wall closure may reduce problems associated with decreased abdominal domain in CDH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review and identified 7 CDH patients requiring ECMO who had a silastic abdominal wall silo between 2003 and 2006. Variables analyzed included survival, ECMO duration, duration of silo, time to discharge, and long-term outcome. RESULTS: Predicted mean survival for the entire cohort using the published CDH Study Group equation was 47% (range, 9%-86%). All 7 patients (100%) survived. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration averaged 15 days (range, 5-19 days). Four of the patients (58%) were repaired with a silo on ECMO, and 3 (42%) had their repair after ECMO. The abdominal wall defect was closed at a mean of 21 days (range, 4-41 days). Hospital stay after silo placement averaged 54 days (range, 20-170 days) with no infections or wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal wall silo placement in infants with CDH requiring ECMO appears to be an effective strategy for decreased abdominal domain. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of such a strategy for these high-risk CDH patients.

Improved outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy in the pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION: The appendectomy is a common emergent surgical procedure in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to examine our institution's experience and outcomes in the appendectomy in the pediatric population early in our transition from open surgery to a predominantly laparoscopic approach. METHODS: We retrospectively studied all pediatric patients (age 20 years) that underwent an appendectomy at a tertiary care center over 2 years. The data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three consecutive patients, with a mean age of 9.5 (3.9) years, were included in the study. Forty-four laparoscopic and 179 open appendectomies were performed. Two of the laparoscopic cases were converted to open appendectomies. Significant differences were seen between the two groups, with longer operative times (P < 0.0001) and lower estimated blood loss (P = 0.007) in the laparoscopic group. Operative times improved significantly for the laparoscopic group as the surgeons became more experienced (P = 0.03). The laparoscopic group used intravenous pain medication for a shorter time (0.8 vs. 1.9 days; P = 0.0003) and had a shorter postoperative hospital length of stay (2.2 vs. 3.4 days; P = 0.004). The laparoscopic group had fewer wound infections (2.3% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.3), intra-abdominal abscesses (4.5% vs. 5.6%; P = 0.8), and postoperative ileus (0% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.3), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic appendectomy procedure is a safe alternative to open appendectomy in pediatric patients and results in shorter hospital stays with less postoperative pain.

Outcomes of right- compared with left-side colectomy.

Right colon resections are perceived as less morbid than left colon resections. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in outcomes between right-and left-side colon resections. We reviewed 420 consecutive open colectomies over 4 years. Patient demographics, surgical indications, intraoperative variables, and outcomes were collected. Two hundred twenty-three right colectomies (RCs) were compared with 197 left colectomies (LCs). RCs were more often required for cancer (111 vs 65, P < .001) and LCs for diverticular disease (10 vs 90, P < .001). LCs were more often performed emergently (36% vs 23%, P = .004) and required longer mean operative times (149 minutes vs 130 minutes, P = .004). Complications and mortality in the two groups were equal statistically. In the emergent colectomy subset, LCs were associated with greater intraoperative blood loss (315 vs 201 mL, P = .02) but fewer complications (11% vs 17%, P = .003).