Pitolisant 40 mg for excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea patients treated or not by CPAP: Randomised phase 3 study.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome commonly leads to excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Pitolisant, a selective histamine-3 receptor antagonist, is efficacious at doses up to 20 mg once daily in OSA treated or not with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We assessed the efficacy and safety of pitolisant at doses up to 40 mg once daily in patients with moderate to severe OSA treated or not with CPAP therapy. In this phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with OSA were assigned 2:1 to receive pitolisant (according to an individual up-titration scheme, 10, 20 or 40 mg once daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included a change in reaction time using the Oxford Sleep Resistance test (OSleR), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and Patient's Global Opinion of the Effect (PGOE) of study treatment. Overall, 361 patients (mean age 52.4 years, 77.3% male; mean apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 27.0 events/h) were randomised to receive pitolisant (n = 242; 50% received CPAP) or placebo (n = 119; 48.7% CPAP). After the dose-adjustment phase (week 3), 88.8% of patients received pitolisant 40 mg. Compared with placebo, pitolisant produced a significant reduction in the ESS score at week 12 (least square mean difference -2.6 (95% CI: -3.4; -1.8; p < 0.001)) irrespective of CPAP use; and improved the reaction time on OSleR, CGI-C, and PGOE at week 12. Pitolisant was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. In conclusion, pitolisant up to 40 mg once daily was an effective treatment for EDS in patients with moderate to severe OSA irrespective of CPAP use.

The modified Baveno classification for obstructive sleep apnoea - Development and evaluation based on the ESADA database.

BACKGROUND: The "Baveno classification" replaced the apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) with symptoms and comorbidities for treatment indication in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). This study evaluates a modified Baveno classification which adds a validated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score and acknowledges severe breathing disturbances. METHOD: OSA patients from the European Sleep Apnoea Data Base (ESADA) were retrospectively allocated into CVD risk groups 1-3 based on SCORE-2 and the ESC guidelines. AHI ≥30 /h conferred strong treatment indication. When AHI was <30/h, symptoms and CVD risk dictated allocation to weak, intermediate or strong treatment indication group. Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at follow-up (12-24 months) under positive airway pressure (PAP) were assessed. RESULTS: 8625 patients were analysed (29% female, age 56 [49;64] years, BMI 31.9 [28.4;36.3] kg·m-2). Treatment indication was weak in 501 (6%), intermediate in 2085 (24%) and strong in 6039 (70%). There was a continuous increase in age, SBP, C-reactive protein and glycosylated haemoglobin from weak to strong (p<0.001). PAP prescription increased from 52% to 64% to 93% (weak to strong, p<0.001). The change in ESS score was -2, -4 and -5, respectively (p<0.001). Reductions of ≥3 mmHg of median SBP occurred when AHI was ≥30/h and in symptomatic patients with CVD risk levels>1 when AHI was <30/h. CONCLUSION: This analysis provides supporting evidence for the key role of CVD risk assessment and severe breathing disturbances in the identification of OSA patients most likely to benefit from treatment.

Comparative efficacy, safety and benefit/risk of alerting agents for excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a network meta-analysis.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common chronic respiratory disease associated with a high burden of disabilities related to sleepiness and reduced quality of life. Despite first-line treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, many patients experience residual excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). The aim of this study is to compare the relative efficacy and safety of medications authorised for this indication in Europe and/or the United States (modafinil/armodafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant) for OSA. Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of authorised medications for adult patients with OSA were identified by literature searches of PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (up to 12 June 2024). The primary efficacy endpoint was combined Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Oxford Sleep Resistance (OSLER)/Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) Z-scores. Quality of life (QoL), overall and specific cardiovascular safety, and benefit-risk ratios were calculated. The study was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42023434640. Findings: Of 4017 studies identified, a total of 20 RCTs involving 4015 patients were included. Analysis of combined subjective (ESS) and objective (OSLER/MWT) efficacy outcome Z-scores showed that solriamfetol (150 mg; effect size [ES] = 0.66 [95% CI: 0.36, 0.96]), pitolisant (20 mg; ES = 0.66 [95% CI: 0.44, 0.88]), and modafinil (200 mg; ES = 0.54: [95% CI: 0.33, 0.74]); 400 mg; ES = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.65]) had a clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy. P-scores ranked placebo, then pitolisant, modafinil 200 mg, modafinil 400 mg and solriamfetol for overall safety; and pitolisant, then solriamfetol, modafinil 400 mg and modafinil 200 mg for benefit-risk ratio. Interpretation: Pitolisant, solriamfetol and modafinil had comparable efficacy for maintaining wakefulness in patients with OSA. Pitolisant had a better safety profile and benefit-risk ratio compared with solriamfetol and modafinil. The overall and cardiovascular safety risk ratios suggest that pitolisant might be the best candidate for patients with OSA with multiple cardiovascular comorbidities. Funding: Bioprojet.

Multi-center safety and efficacy study of a negative-pressure intraoral device in obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: Intraoral devices, with or without negative oral pressure, can stabilize the oropharynx and reduce obstructive sleep apneas. We tested the hypothesis that treatment with the iNAP® Sleep Therapy System, which applies negative oral pressure through an intra-oral appliance, would reduce the severity of obstructive sleep apnea in a multi-center, prospective, first-night-randomized-order cross-over study. METHODS/PATIENTS: 130 patients fulfilled the entry criteria (age <75, AHI 15-55, BMI <33), and 63 entered the primary endpoint cohort (Total Sleep Time ≥4 h/night on the baseline polysomnogram and an oral negative vacuum time maintained by iNAP® ≥ 4 h/night and total sleep time ≥4 h/night during the first treatment study). 54 patients completed a second treatment sleep study at least 28 days after the first sleep study. RESULTS: Among the primary endpoint cohort (n = 63, age = 53.2 ± 11.3, BMI = 27.1 ± 2.8), 33 patients (52 %; 95 % confidence interval = 40%-64 %, p < 0.001) responded to iNAP treatment according to the Sher criteria (>50 % reduction in AHI and an AHI ≤20 events/hr). The average oxy-hemoglobin saturation increased by 1-2%, and the average percent oxygen desaturation decreased (was less severe) by 1 % while using the iNAP device. The incidence of adverse events, all self-limited, was low. The reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index was durable over the 28-day study. Patients used iNAP on average 5.6 h per night during the study period. CONCLUSION: The iNAP® Sleep Therapy System achieved a durable benefit in more than half the patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and may be considered in patients who object to or failed continuous positive airway pressure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698059.

ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Sleep Disordered Breathing Assembly.

The topic of sleep-related breathing disorders is always evolving, and during the European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress 2023 in Milan, Italy, the latest research and clinical topics in respiratory medicine were presented. The most interesting issues included new diagnostic tools, such as cardiovascular parameters and artificial intelligence, pathophysiological traits of sleep disordered breathing from routine polysomnography or polygraphy signals, and new biomarkers and the diagnostic approach in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness. This article summarises the most relevant studies and topics presented at the ERS International Congress 2023. Each section has been written by early career members of ERS Assembly 4.

Central sleep apnoea: not just one phenotype.

Recent scientific findings in the field of sleep disordered breathing have characterised a variety of phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnoea. These findings have prompted investigations aiming to achieve a more precise differentiation and description of the entities of central sleep apnoea (CSA). There is increasing evidence for the heterogeneity of CSA in terms of underlying aetiology, pathophysiological concepts, treatment response and outcome. Assigning patients to these phenotypes allows for the selection of individualised therapies. Major pathophysiological characteristics include loop gain, apnoeic threshold, breathing regulation and neuromuscular mechanics. Chronic heart failure is the most important underlying disease, leading to nonhypercapnic CSA based on increased loop and controller gain. Although many questions remain, this review tries to describe the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of the clinical entities. The description of prognostic aspects may guide treatment indication and the selection of pharmacotherapy and invasive options. In addition, the paper provides an update on the current understanding of adaptive servo-ventilation and its role in the treatment of CSA.

[Outpatient care in pulmonology - a scientific analysis and a position paper of the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP)]. / Ambulantisierung in der Pneumologie ­ eine wissenschaftliche Analyse und ein Positionspapier der DGP.

INTRODUCTION: The ambulantization of patient care that were previously provided as inpatient service is one of the goals of the current reform in the German healthcare system. In pulmonology, this particularly applies to endoscopic procedures. However, the real costs of endoscopic services, which form the basis for the calculation of a future so called hybrid DRG or in the AOP catalog, are unclear. METHODS: After selection of use cases including endoscopic procedures which can be performed on an outpatient basis by a committee of experts the appropriate DRGs were identified from the §â€Š21-KHEntgG data for 2022 published by the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK). The costs were calculated from the respective InEK cost matrix added by the calculated material costs. RESULTS: The use cases suitable for outpatient treatment were systematic endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) with transbronchial needle aspiration (calculated costs €â€Š2,175.60 without or €â€Š3,315.60 including PET/CT), navigation-assisted bronchoscopy for peripheral lesions (depending on the methodology €â€Š2,870.23 to €4,120.23) and diagnostic (flexible) bronchoscopy (€â€Š1,121.02). CONCLUSION: Outpatient treatment of endoscopic procedures that were previously performed inpatient is possible and necessary, and the costs calculated in this publication can form a reliable basis for appropriate reimbursement. Together with a structural quality that has been transformed to outpatient service and cross-sector cooperation, continued high-quality care for pneumological patients can be ensured.

Inspiratory Muscle Dysfunction Mediates and Predicts a Disease Continuum of Hypercapnic Failure in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with chronic hypercapnic failure. The present work aimed to comprehensively investigate inspiratory muscle function as a potential key determinant of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. METHODS: Prospective patient recruitment encompassed 61 stable subjects with COPD across different stages of respiratory failure, ranging from normocapnia to isolated nighttime hypercapnia and daytime hypercapnia. Arterialized blood gas analyses and overnight transcutaneous capnometry were used for patient stratification. Assessment of respiratory muscle function encompassed body plethysmography, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), diaphragm ultrasound, and transdiaphragmatic pressure recordings following cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves (twPdi) and a maximum sniff manoeuvre (Sniff Pdi). RESULTS: Twenty patients showed no hypercapnia, 10 had isolated nocturnal hypercapnia, and 31 had daytime hypercapnia. Body plethysmography clearly distinguished patients with and without hypercapnia but did not discriminate patients with isolated nocturnal hypercapnia from those with daytime hypercapnia. In contrast to ultrasound parameters and transdiaphragmatic pressures, only MIP reflected the extent of hypercapnia across all three stages. MIP values below -48 cmH2O predicted nocturnal hypercapnia (area under the curve = 0.733, p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: In COPD, inspiratory muscle dysfunction contributes to progressive hypercapnic failure. In contrast to invasive tests of diaphragm strength only MIP fully reflects the pathophysiological continuum of hypercapnic failure and predicts isolated nocturnal hypercapnia.

[Task Force Dyspnoe unit (DU)]. / Task Force Dyspnoe Unit (DU).

Acute dyspnoea is one of the most common internal medicine symptoms in the emergency department. It arises from an acute illness or from the exacerbation of a chronic illness. Symptom-related emergency structures and corresponding structural guidelines already exist in the stroke and chest pain units for dealing with the leading symptoms of acute stroke and acute chest pain. These are lacking in Germany for the key symptom of dyspnoea, although the benefits of these structures have already been proven in other countries. The German Society for Pneumology and Respiratory Medicine (DGP) has now set up a task force together with the Association of Pneumology Clinics (VPK), in order to deal with the topic and develop appropriate structural guidelines for such "dyspnoea units" in Germany. At the end of the process, the certification of such units at German hospitals is optional.

Medication-induced central sleep apnea: a unifying concept.

Medication-induced central sleep apnea (CSA) is one of the eight categories of causes of CSA but in the absence of awareness and careful history may be misclassified as primary CSA. While opioids are a well-known cause of respiratory depression and CSA, non-opioid medications including sodium oxybate, baclofen, valproic acid, gabapentin, and ticagrelor are less well-recognized. Opioids-induced respiratory depression and CSA are mediated primarily by µ-opioid receptors, which are abundant in the pontomedullary centers involved in breathing. The non-opioid medications, sodium oxybate, baclofen, valproic acid, and gabapentin, act upon brainstem gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors, which co-colonize with µ-opioid receptors and mediate CSA. The pattern of ataxic breathing associated with these medications is like that induced by opioids on polysomnogram. Finally, ticagrelor also causes periodic breathing and CSA by increasing central chemosensitivity and ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Given the potential consequences of CSA and the association between some of these medications with mortality, it is critical to recognize these adverse drug reactions, particularly because discontinuation of the offending agents has been shown to eliminate CSA.

[Prognostic factors in an individualised approach to non-pharmacological therapy of COVID-19: from oxygen and mechanical ventilation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation]. / Prognostische Faktoren bei einem schrittweisen Ansatz zur nicht-pharmakologischen Therapie von Sauerstoff und mechanischer Beatmung bis hin zur extrakorporalen Membranoxygenierung bei COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Our centre followed a stepwise approach in the nonpharmacological treatment of respiratory failure in COVID-19 in accordance with German national guidelines, escalating non-invasive measures before invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this study was to analyse this individualized approach to non-pharmacologic therapy in terms of patient characteristics and clinical features that may help predict more severe disease, particularly the need for intensive care. METHOD: This retrospective single-centre study of COVID-19 inpatients between March 2020 and December 2021 analysed anthropometric data, non-pharmacological maximum therapy and survival status via a manual medical file review. RESULTS: Of 1052 COVID-19-related admissions, 835 patients were included in the analysis cohort (54% male, median 58 years); 34% (n=284) received no therapy, 40% (n=337) conventional oxygen therapy (COT), 3% (n=22) high flow nasal cannula (NHFC), 9% (n=73) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), 7% (n=56) non-invasive ventilation (NIV), 4% (n=34) intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV), and 3% (n=29) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Of 551 patients treated with at least COT, 12.3% required intubation. A total of 183 patients required ICU treatment, and 106 (13%) died. 25 (74%) IMV patients and 23 (79%) ECMO patients died. Arterial hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia was more prevalent in non-survivors. Binary logistic analysis revealed the following risk factors for increased mortality: an oxygen supplementation of ≥2 L/min at baseline (OR 6.96 [4.01-12.08]), age (OR 1.09 [1.05-1.14]), and male sex (OR 2.23 [0.79-6.31]). CONCLUSION: The physician's immediate clinical decision to provide oxygen therapy, along with other recognized risk factors, plays an important role in predicting the severity of the disease course and thus aiding in the management of COVID-19.

Role of sleep in neurodegeneration: the consensus report of the 5th Think Tank World Sleep Forum.

Sleep abnormalities may represent an independent risk factor for neurodegeneration. An international expert group convened in 2021 to discuss the state-of-the-science in this domain. The present article summarizes the presentations and discussions concerning the importance of a strategy for studying sleep- and circadian-related interventions for early detection and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. An international expert group considered the current state of knowledge based on the most relevant publications in the previous 5 years; discussed the current challenges in the field of relationships among sleep, sleep disorders, and neurodegeneration; and identified future priorities. Sleep efficiency and slow wave activity during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep are decreased in cognitively normal middle-aged and older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Sleep deprivation increases amyloid-ß (Aß) concentrations in the interstitial fluid of experimental animal models and in cerebrospinal fluid in humans, while increased sleep decreases Aß. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for dementia. Studies indicate that positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment should be started in patients with mild cognitive impairment or AD and comorbid OSA. Identification of other measures of nocturnal hypoxia and sleep fragmentation could better clarify the role of OSA as a risk factor for neurodegeneration. Concerning REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), it will be crucial to identify the subset of RBD patients who will convert to a specific neurodegenerative disorder. Circadian sleep-wake rhythm disorders (CSWRD) are strong predictors of caregiver stress and institutionalization, but the absence of recommendations or consensus statements must be considered. Future priorities include to develop and validate existing and novel comprehensive assessments of CSWRD in patients with/at risk for dementia. Strategies for studying sleep-circadian-related interventions for early detection/prevention of neurodegenerative diseases are required. CSWRD evaluation may help to identify additional biomarkers for phenotyping and personalizing treatment of neurodegeneration.

TTF-1 status in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma is an independent predictor of relapse and survival superior to tumor grading.

OBJECTIVES: Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) is a well-established independent prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), irrespective of stage. This study aims to determine if TTF-1's prognostic impact is solely based on histomorphological differentiation (tumor grading) or if it independently relates to a biologically more aggressive phenotype. We analyzed a large bi-centric LUAD cohort to accurately assess TTF-1's prognostic value in relation to tumor grade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 447 patients with resected LUAD from major German lung cancer centers (Berlin and Cologne), correlating TTF-1 status and grading with clinical, pathologic, and molecular data, alongside patient outcomes. TTF-1's impact was evaluated through univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Causal graph analysis was used to identify and account for potential confounders, improving the statistical estimation of TTF-1's predictive power for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed TTF-1 positivity associated with significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) (median log HR -0.83; p = 0.018). Higher tumor grade showed a non-significant association with shorter DFS (median log HR 0.30; p = 0,62 for G1 to G2 and 0.68; p = 0,34 for G2 to G3). In multivariate analysis, TTF-1 positivity resulted in a significantly longer DFS (median log HR -0.65; p = 0.05) independent of all other parameters, including grading. Adjusting for potential confounders as indicated by the causal graph confirmed the superiority of TTF-1 over tumor grading in prognostics power. CONCLUSIONS: TTF-1 status predicts relapse and survival in LUAD independently of tumor grading. The prognostic power of tumor grading is limited to TTF-1-positive patients, and the effect size of TTF-1 surpasses that of tumor grading. We recommend including TTF1 status as a prognostic factor in the diagnostic guidelines of LUAD.

Sleep and Breathing Conference highlights 2023: a summary by ERS Assembly 4.

This paper presents some of the highlights of the Sleep and Breathing Conference 2023 https://bit.ly/46MxJml.

Recommendations for clinical management of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea - A Delphi consensus study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Excessive daytime sleepiness is common with obstructive sleep apnoea and can persist despite efforts to optimise primary airway therapy. The literature lacks recommendations regarding differential diagnosis and management of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea. This study sought to develop expert consensus statements to bridge the gap between existing literature/guidelines and clinical practice. METHODS: A panel of 10 international experts was convened to undertake a modified Delphi process. Statements were developed based on available evidence identified through a scoping literature review, and expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through 3 rounds of iterative, blinded survey voting and revision to statements until a predetermined level of agreement was met (≥80 % voting "strongly agree" or "agree with reservation"). RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 32 final statements. The panel agreed excessive daytime sleepiness is a patient-reported symptom. The importance of subjective/objective evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness in the initial evaluation and serial management of obstructive sleep apnoea was recognised. The differential diagnosis of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea was discussed. Optimizing airway therapy (eg, troubleshooting issues affecting effectiveness) was addressed. The panel recognised occurrence of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea despite optimal airway therapy and the need to evaluate patients for underlying causes. CONCLUSIONS: Excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea is a public health issue requiring increased awareness, recognition, and attention. Implementation of these statements may improve patient care, long-term management, and clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Interaction of panic and episodic breathlessness among patients with life-limiting diseases: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Episodic breathlessness is often accompanied by panic. A vicious cycle of breathlessness-panic-breathlessness leads to emergencies with severe breathlessness and/or fear of dying. However, the interaction between episodic breathlessness and panic is poorly understood. Thus, the aim is a better understanding of the interaction between panic and episodic breathlessness to develop appropriate support for patients suffering from this symptom. METHODS: Patients suffering from episodic breathlessness due to life-limiting diseases answered questions on the characteristics of episodic breathlessness and panic-spectrum psychopathology, including underlying mechanisms. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Diagnoses (SCID), patients were screened for panic disorder. An open-ended question captured the patients' descriptions of panic during breathlessness episodes. RESULTS: Forty-six patients [52% women, mean age =66 years; standard deviation (SD) 7.3 years] provided information: 61% suffered from panic during the entire breathlessness episode, 39% experienced panic in every episode, and 25% were diagnosed with panic disorder. Exploratory data analysis was conducted. Patients with high scores in breathlessness catastrophizing thoughts experienced more panic in a breathlessness episode (P<0.001) and considered themselves more panic than low-scorers (P=0.024). There was a significant indirect effect of episodic breathlessness intensity on the panic experienced in an episode, and this effect was mediated by catastrophizing thoughts regarding breathlessness (b=0.164; 95% CI: 0.105, 0.222). Patients described in the open-ended question experiencing only panic or breathlessness, or a combination of both. Some patients managed to differentiate panic from episodic breathlessness, and used strategies to avoid panic in an episode. CONCLUSIONS: Research on treatment options for episodic breathlessness should not only focus on panic in breathlessness episodes, but also on underlying mechanisms such as catastrophizing thoughts, as they aggravate the burden.