Factors Associated With a Higher Risk of Undiagnosed Prediabetes in a Community-Dwelling Medicare Population.

OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics in an ambulatory Medicare population that are significantly more likely to be associated with a high risk of undiagnosed prediabetes.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Fourteen health clinics targeting Medicare beneficiaries were held throughout northern and central California during the fall of 2017.
PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Noninstitutionalized Medicare beneficiaries receiving medication therapy management services without self-reported diabetes.
INTERVENTIONS: Beneficiaries were screened for their risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through the use of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk assessment (score of ≥ 5 indicates increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes) by pharmacy students. For this study, patients with a score of ≥ 5 were considered to be at high risk for undiagnosed prediabetes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Characteristics significantly more likely to be identified in patients at high risk for undiagnosed prediabetes.
RESULTS: A total of 683 Medicare beneficiaries without self-reported diabetes completed the ADA risk assessment, with 457 (66.9%) receiving a score of 5 or more. In those, the presence of hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity, coronary heart disease, and use of aspirin were all characteristics researchers identified as significantly more likely to be found in this group. In contrast, those of Asian race or who took dietary supplements were significantly less likely to score 5 or higher in the questionnaire.
CONCLUSION: Identification of older adults at higher risk for undiagnosed prediabetes through the use of appropriate screening tools allows for targeted preventive interventions, potentially lowering risk of developing T2DM for selected patients.

Factors associated with medication-related problems in an ambulatory medicare population and the case for medication therapy management.

BACKGROUND: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are a major healthcare burden. The rate of MRPs in those ≥65 years old is ∼50 events per 1000 person-years, and contributes to a four-fold higher hospitalization rate when compared to younger patients. Medication therapy management (MTM) can identify MRPs in high-risk patients. However, in 2015, only 12.9% of Medicare patients qualified for MTM services through their Part D plan. OBJECTIVE: To examine the type and frequency of MRPs in community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries and which patient factors are associated with having ≥1 MRP. METHODS: Fourteen health clinics targeting Medicare beneficiaries were held in 10 Northern/Central California cities during Fall 2017. Trained student pharmacists, supervised by licensed pharmacists, conducted comprehensive medication reviews. Sociodemographic, chronic condition, medication, and MRP data were collected via standardized surveys. RESULTS: MTM services were provided to 910 patients, of which 633 (69.6%) had at least 1 MRP. The most common MRPs were severe drug-drug interaction [n = 297(33.4%)] and untreated condition [n = 134 (14.7%). Individuals with MRPs took significantly more prescription and over-the-counter medications. Additionally, those with MRPs were more likely to be subsidy recipients and in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan. A total of 120 (13%) individuals were found to have had an MRP severe enough to warrant prescriber follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although only a fraction of Medicare beneficiaries qualify for MTM services through their Part D plan, many can benefit from such services. Understanding the type, frequency, and factors contributing to MRPs is imperative to identify and avoid negative sequelae. Reduction of MRPs can potentially improve patient clinical outcomes, increase quality-of-life, and decrease overall cost of care.

Exploring the Valley of Savings: Minimizing Part D Costs and Optimizing Drug Therapy Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries With Developmental Disability.

Nonelderly disabled Medicare beneficiaries have a higher prevalence of chronic conditions, higher utilization of prescription medications, and increased demand for clinical services when compared to beneficiaries 65 years of age and older who are not disabled. Out-of-pocket costs and medication-related problems are major barriers to medication compliance and achievement of therapeutic goals. A school of pharmacy partnered with a nonprofit organization that provides care to individuals with developmental disabilities. The present study highlights outcomes resulting from (a) providing Medicare Part D plan optimization services to lower prescription drug costs and (b) Medication Therapy Management services to evaluate safe and effective medication use in this beneficiary population. Provided interventions were shown to reduce overall medication costs and identify significant medication-related problems.

Use of 2015 Beers Criteria Medications by Older Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries based on the updated 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Thirteen mobile Medicare clinics were held throughout Northern and Central California during the fall of 2015. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Noninstitutionalized Medicare beneficiaries 65 years of age and older taking one or more medications. INTERVENTIONS: Pharmacy students under direct supervision of licensed pharmacists performed medication therapy management (MTM). Drug and disease state data were collected and used to identify PIMs based on the 2015 Beers criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of beneficiaries who are taking a PIM, have a potential drug-drug or drug-disease interaction, and common factors associated with receiving a PIM. RESULTS: MTM services were provided to 703 beneficiaries 65 years of age or older taking 1 or more medications. In total, 204 (29%) beneficiaries were taking 1 or more PIM. Drug-drug interactions were found in 54 beneficiaries, and 12 beneficiaries were found to have a significant drug-disease interaction. PIM prescribing was associated with certain chronic conditions (e.g., pain and insomnia). The prevalence of PIM use was significantly higher in women compared with men, whites compared with non-whites, and low-income beneficiaries compared with high income. CONCLUSION: Prescribers and pharmacists should work in concert to minimize PIM use in older adults. Practitioners knowledgeable about the updated 2015 Beers criteria may monitor drug use more closely, hopefully minimizing potentially harmful drug and/or disease-state problems, and preventing avoidable health-related sequelae.

An overview and study of beneficiaries' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the medicare part d benefit.

PURPOSE: Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions (KAP) of the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit have been under evaluation since the 2006 inception of the Part D benefit. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine beneficiaries' satisfaction with their Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, knowledge of the coverage gap, attitudes about the relative importance of certain insurance parameters, and overall perceptions of the Part D benefit. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study design. SETTING: Thirteen outreach events targeting Medicare beneficiaries in northern California during the 2012 open-enrollment period. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 576 Medicare beneficiaries. INTERVENTIONS: Beneficiaries were asked questions related to their KAP of the Part D benefit as part of a plan to evaluate their need for assistance. Sociodemographic data were collected via a standardized survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identify variances in KAP related to beneficiary sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of beneficiaries claimed to be "very" or "extremely" satisfied with Part D, yet only 40.3% of those with a prescription drug plan (PDP) rated their plan as "very good" or "excellent." Those automatically enrolled into their plan by Medicare were significantly less satisfied with their plan (P = 0.048). Almost three in four recipients not receiving Medicare subsidies have heard of the gap in prescription drug coverage, i.e., the "donut hole." Additionally, there were significant racial disparities in knowledge of the gap. Only 62.7% of beneficiaries indicated that "total out-of-pocket cost during the year" was the most important plan characteristic for them. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of beneficiaries' attitudes may help explain suboptimal Part D plan selection. Moreover, evaluating beneficiaries' knowledge of the Part D benefit can assist advocacy groups in creating educational materials to better assist this vulnerable population in choosing an appropriate plan.