The Effect of Smartphone Video on Lead Time to Diagnosis of Infantile Spasms.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether access to smartphone video capture of infantile spasms at initial presentation is associated with improved time to diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We conducted a collaborative retrospective cohort study of 80 consecutive infants with confirmed infantile epileptic spasms syndrome initially presenting from 2015 to 2021 at 2 US pediatric centers. Statistical methods used included Mann-Whitney U test to assess the difference in lead times to electroencephalogram (EEG), diagnosis, and treatment between groups with and without video capture. A χ2 analysis was used to assess differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes between groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to account for etiology types and infantile spasms capture on EEG. RESULTS: Patients with smartphone video infantile spasms capture initially presented a median of 9 days earlier (P = .02), had their first EEG 16 days earlier (P = .007), and were diagnosed and started treatment 17 days earlier (P = .006 and P = .008, respectively) compared with the nonvideo group. The video group had a 25% greater response to initial standard treatment (P = .02) and a 21% greater freedom from infantile spasms at long-term follow-up (P = .03), although this long-term outcome lost statistical significance after adjustment for etiology type (P = .07) and EEG capture of infantile spasms (P = .059). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a benefit of smartphone video capture of infantile spasms in reduced time to diagnosis and initial standard treatment, which are associated with improved treatment response rates. Substantial differences in lead times and treatment response highlight the clinical importance of pediatricians recommending caregivers to obtain smartphone video of events concerning for infantile spasms.

A Novel Mutation in Lafora Disease and Update on Pathophysiology and Future Treatments.

Lafora disease is a rare refractory epilepsy that results in death. This report highlights two cases of lafora disease and introduces a novel mutation in the patients. A review of the pathophysiology and future therapies is reviewed.

Super-refractory status epilepticus during blinatumomab initiation for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Seizures have been reported as an adverse effect of blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager monoclonal antibody, which is mainly used for the treatment of pediatric relapsed/refractory leukemia. Here, we present the first reported case of super-refractory status epilepticus in an 11-year-old boy with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) while receiving blinatumomab. Our patient had a complete return to baseline despite enduring encephalopathy, refractory subclinical seizures requiring prolonged therapeutic burst suppression and MRI signal changes. This case demonstrates that super-refractory status epilepticus is a possible neurotoxic adverse effect of blinatumomab treatment, which responds well to conventional protocols for acute refractory seizures.

Seizures are a known side effect of blinatumomab, a relatively new immunotherapy drug, which is mainly used for the treatment of relapsed leukemia in children. Here, we present the first reported case of seizure continuing for more than 24 h despite appropriate antiseizure treatment while also receiving blinatumomab. Despite an extended period of altered mental status, new abnormalities on imaging of the brain and a medication-induced coma to treat unrelenting seizures, our patient returned completely to his healthy brain function. This case demonstrates that seizures, which are especially difficult to treat, can be associated with blinatumomab immunotherapy for pediatric refractory B-ALL; however, standard-tiered seizure treatments can be effective.

Post-COVID-19 Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis in a 17-Month-Old.

Neurologic manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pediatric patients have been reported in the acute and postinfectious stages of coronavirus disease 2019. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) typically presents in children after a viral illness at a mean age of 3 to 7 years. A total of 60% to 90% of literature-reported pediatric patients with ADEM have minimal to no neurologic deficits at long-term follow-up. We present a 17-month-old developmentally typical girl with parental complaints of irritability, upper extremity weakness, and gait disturbance. She presented to the hospital afebrile and irritable with right-sided nasolabial fold flattening, neck stiffness, left upper extremity rigidity, right upper extremity paresis, bilateral lower extremity hyperreflexia, and truncal ataxia. During her hospital course, she became somnolent with autonomic instability and was transferred to intensive care. Contrasted brain MRI revealed diffuse patchy T2 hyperintensities without contrast enhancement. Nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction and serum antibody testing results were positive. Cerebral spinal fluid analysis was unremarkable. Respiratory viral panel and autoimmune encephalitis and demyelinating disorders panel results were negative. She was started on high-dose methylprednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin, with improvement in mental status, focal deficits, and ambulation. After hospital discharge, she received inpatient rehabilitation for 2 weeks and at 2 month follow-up had a full neurologic recovery. We report the youngest case of postinfectious ADEM due to SARS-CoV-2 in a toddler. Early recognition of autoimmune and inflammatory complications of SARS-CoV-2 is vital for early aggressive immunomodulatory treatment and, consequently, improved morbidity in these patients.

Injection of prophylactic lorazepam versus antiseizure drugs on the localization value of ictal SPECT studies and treatment-emergent adverse events: A single-center prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the impact of resumption of home antiseizure drugs alone (ASD-) compared with adjunct administration of scheduled intravenous (IV) lorazepam 2 mg every 6 h (ASD+) following ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) injection on the localization value of SPECT studies and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study at Mayo Clinic inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) between January 2018 and May 2020 in Jacksonville, Florida. The ASD- and ASD+ groups were compared for concordance of SPECT studies with the epilepsy surgical conference (ESC) consensus or intracranial electroencephalography (icEEG) findings as reference. Treatment-emergent adverse events, obtained from surveys at 24 h and one week postictal SPECT injection, were also compared between both groups. RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with temporal (eight patients, 36%) and extratemporal (14 patients, 64%) epilepsy were included: 12 ASD+ and 10 ASD-. The two groups were well matched with regard to clinical and ictal SPECT injection characteristics including the occurrence of seizure between ictal and interictal SPECT injections. The localization value of SPECT studies was similar in the two groups. Patients in the ASD+ group reported higher rates of dizziness and excessive sedation at 24 h (p-value = 0.008). Fourteen patients (64%) underwent icEEG monitoring. For the entire cohort, the localization concordance of SPECT analysis by statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was superior to raw ictal SPECT (p-value = 0.003) and subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (SISCOM; p-value = 0.021). Eventually, seven patients (31.8%) underwent resective brain surgery of whom four (57.1%) became seizure-free (median follow-up = 22 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that resuming home ASDs without the addition of scheduled IV lorazepam following inpatient ictal SPECT injection is equally efficacious for seizure onset zone (SOZ) localization on SPECT studies, especially SPM. This approach is also associated with fewer transient TEAEs and lower financial cost with no difference in preventing seizure between ictal and interictal SPECT injections.

Expression of c-FLIP in pulmonary metastases in osteosarcoma patients and human xenografts.

OBJECTIVE(S): We have previously shown that Fas expression inversely correlates with the metastatic potential of osteosarcoma (OS) to the lung. FasL is constitutively expressed in the lung microenvironment and eliminates Fas(+) OS cells leaving Fas(-) cells to form metastases. Absence of FasL in the lung epithelium or blocking the Fas-signaling pathway interfered with this clearance mechanism allowing Fas(+) cells to remain and form lung metastases. We also demonstrated that while the majority of patient OS lung metastases were Fas(-), 10-20% of the lesions contained Fas(+) cells, suggesting that these cells were not sensitive to FasL-induced apoptosis. The expression of c-FLIP, an inhibitor of the Fas pathway, has been associated with tumor development, progression, and resistance to chemotherapy. We therefore evaluated the expression of c-FLIP in OS patient tumor specimens and human xenograft lung metastases. METHODS: OS patient tissues, which included both primary and metastatic lesions, were evaluated for the expression of c-FLIP. In addition, tumors from human OS xenografts were examined for c-FLIP expression. RESULTS: c-FLIP expression was significantly higher in the lung metastases than in the primary tumors. CONCLUSION(S): c-FLIP may play an important role in the metastatic potential of OS to the lung. Inhibition of c-FLIP may be a future therapeutic target.