Fourteen years of pancreatic surgery for malignancy among ACS-NSQIP centers: Trends in major morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was established to help participating hospitals track and report surgical complications with the goal of improving surgical care. We sought to determine whether this has led to improvements in surgical outcomes for pancreatic malignancies. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic malignancies who underwent surgical resection were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2006-2019). Thirty-day postoperative major morbidity and mortality were analyzed by year. Major morbidity included organ and deep surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, cardiac event, pneumonia, acute renal failure, sepsis, and respiratory failure. RESULTS: Of the 28,888 patients identified, 51% were male, the median age was 68, 74.3% underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 25.7% underwent a distal pancreatectomy. Among patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy, there was a significant increase in major morbidity (annual percent change 0.77, P = .012) driven by increases in organ space surgical site infection (annual percent change 3.52, P < .001) and venous thromboembolism (annual percent change 4.72, P = .005). However, there was a decrease in postoperative mortality (annual percent change -4.58, P = .001). For distal pancreatectomy patients, there was no change in rates of overall major morbidity (annual percent change -1.35, P = .08) or mortality (annual percent change -3.21, P = .25). CONCLUSION: Although major morbidity and mortality have not significantly changed for distal pancreatectomy patients, mortality has steadily decreased for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, despite an increase in major morbidity. Whether this trend reflects a change in patient selection, an increase in detection of postoperative morbidities and/or an improvement in mitigation of these morbidities warrants further study.

Improving Surgical Informed Consent: Unanswered Questions.

Objective: This study reviews randomized clinical trials that have attempted to improve the process of informed consent. Consent should be guided by the ethical imperatives of autonomy, beneficence, and social justice. Summary Background: Informed consent is constantly evolving. Yet our review of the randomized trials done to improve the surgical informed consent process raises a number of questions: How does one define surgical informed consent? What interventions have been tried to measure and improve informed consent? Have the interventions in informed consent actually led to improvements? What efforts have been made to improve informed consent? And what steps can be taken to improve the process further? Methods: A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs)on informed consent identified 70 trials. Demographics, interventions, assessments, and a semi-quantitative summary of the findings were tabulated. The assessments done in the RCTs, show the surrogate for patient autonomy was comprehension; for beneficence, satisfaction and mental state (anxiety or depression); and, for social justice, language, literacy, learning needs, and cost. Results: There were 4 basic categories of interventions: printed matter; non-interactive audiovisual tools; interactive multimedia; and a smaller group defying easy description. Improvement was documented in 46 of the 65 trials that studied comprehension. Thirteen of 33 trials showed improved satisfaction. Three of 30 studies showed an increase in anxiety. Few studies tried to assess primary language or literacy, and none looked at learning needs or cost. Conclusions: No single study improved all 3 principles of informed consent. Validated interventions and assessments were associated with greater impact on outcomes. All 3 ethical principles should be assessed; autonomy (as comprehension), beneficence (as satisfaction, anxiety), and social justice. Not enough consideration has been given to social justice; appropriate language translation, standardized reading levels, assessment of learning needs, and cost to the individual are all important elements worthy of future study.

Informed Consent for Academic Surgeons: A Curriculum-Based Update.

Introduction: The principles of consent are evolving but remain an important part of the surgeon-patient relationship. The goal of this course was a concise, contemporary review of the principles of informed consent that would be favorably received by academic surgeons. Methods: The curriculum consisted of ethicohistorical and legal principles, current requirements, and new consent developments. An anonymous, voluntary evaluation tool was used to assess strengths and opportunities for improvement. A short postcourse quiz was developed to assess understanding. Results: Eighty-five percent of the surgery department faculty participated. Evaluations were overwhelmingly positive, all elements having weighted averages of greater than 4.5 on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Furthermore, a majority of respondents for the posttest got the answers correct for all five questions asked on the postcourse quiz. Discussion: A proper understanding of informed consent remains critically important in the practice of surgery. This short course updating surgeons on informed consent quantitatively confirms the favorable reception of this approach in terms of attendance and satisfaction, as well as understanding of the material.

Communication Skills Training for Surgical Inpatient Advanced Practice Providers in an Academic Health-Care System.

BACKGROUND: Good communication skills enhance the patient experience, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: A course was developed by an interdisciplinary team (surgeon, nurse practitioner, and nurse MBA) for advanced practice providers (APPs) working for the department of surgery-a mix of practice and hospital-employed professionals-to enhance communications skills in an inpatient setting. METHODS: Current concepts on provider-patient communication were discussed. Participants also asked to view and critique a video "provider-patient communication gone wrong" scenario. Lastly, participants were provided with techniques for improving provider-patient communication. The participants assessed the course. Provider communication scores were tracked from quarter 1, Fiscal Year 2014 to quarter 4 Fiscal Year 2017. RESULTS: Of 110 eligible APPs, 95 (86%) attended the course. The anonymous survey response rate was 90% (86/95). Participants expressed satisfaction with the course content confirmed by Likert score weighted averages of >4.6/5 in all 8 domains. Communication scores increased with time. CONCLUSION: An interdisciplinary course aimed at enhancing provider-patient communication skills was well-received by the APP participants. The course was part of ongoing system-wide efforts to improve patient experiences, satisfaction, and outcomes. Continuing education in communication continues to play a key role in improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Let's Be Reasonable: Surgical Informed Consent in the COVID-19 Era.

Mini-Abstract Our perspective on informed consent is that expanding the duty to disclose novel uncertainties (eg, the covid-19 pandemic) stretches the doctrine to almost limitless proportions. Instead, we argue for a more conventional view in which the informed consent process should remain focused on the proposed operation and its ramifications.

Surgical Consultation as Social Process: Implications for Shared Decision Making.

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study examines surgical consultation as a social process and assesses its alignment with assumptions of the shared decision-making (SDM) model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SDM stresses the importance of patient preferences and rigorous discussion of therapeutic risks/benefits based on these preferences. However, empirical studies have highlighted discrepancies between SDM and realities of surgical decision making. Qualitative research can inform understanding of the decision-making process and allow for granular assessment of the nature and causes of these discrepancies. METHODS: We observed consultations between 3 general surgeons and 45 patients considering undergoing 1 of 2 preference-sensitive elective operations: (1) hernia repair, or (2) cholecystectomy. These patients and surgeons also participated in semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: By the time of the consultation, patients and surgeons were predisposed toward certain decisions by preceding events occurring elsewhere. During the visit, surgeons had differential ability to arbitrate surgical intervention and construct the severity of patients' conditions. These upstream dynamics frequently displaced the centrality of the risk/benefit-based consent discussion. CONCLUSION: The influence of events preceding consultation suggests that decision-making models should account for broader spatiotemporal spans. Given surgeons' authority to define patients' conditions and control service provision, SDM may be premised on an overestimation of patients' power to alter the course of decision making once in a specialist's office. Considering the subordinate role of the risk/benefit discussion in many surgical decisions, it will be important to study if and how the social process of decision making is altered by SDM-oriented decision aids that foreground this discussion.

Overcoming adversity-a critical step toward career satisfaction and leadership in academic surgery.

The experiences of life are what shape us. This article relays stories of adversity and resiliency as experienced and told by members of our own surgical community at the Academic Surgical Congress in Las Vegas, NV in February 2017. We aim to express in words the lessons of each experience so that others can learn about life and leadership.

Taking the Initiative: Risk-Reduction Strategies and Decreased Malpractice Costs.

BACKGROUND: To heighten awareness of attending and resident surgeons regarding strategies for defense against malpractice claims, a series of risk reduction initiatives have been carried out in our Department of Surgery. We hypothesized that emphasis on certain aspects of risk might be associated with decreased malpractice costs. The relative impact of Department of Surgery initiatives was assessed when compared with malpractice experience for the rest of the Clinical Practices of the University of Pennsylvania (CPUP). STUDY DESIGN: Surgery and CPUP malpractice claims, indemnity, and expenses were obtained from the Office of General Counsel. Malpractice premium data were obtained from CPUP finance. The Department of Surgery was assessed in comparison with all other CPUP departments. Cost data (yearly indemnity and expenses), and malpractice premiums (total and per physician) were expressed as a percentage of the 5-year mean value preceding implementation of the initiative program. RESULTS: Surgery implemented 38 risk reduction initiatives. Faculty participated in 27 initiatives; house staff participated in 10 initiatives; and advanced practitioners in 1 initiative. Department of Surgery claims were significantly less than CPUP (74.07% vs 81.07%; p < 0.05). The mean yearly indemnity paid by the Department of Surgery was significantly less than that of the other CPUP departments (84.08% vs 122.14%; p < 0.05). Department of Surgery-paid expenses were also significantly less (83.17% vs 104.96%; p < 0.05), and surgical malpractice premiums declined from baseline, but remained significantly higher than CPUP premiums. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that educating surgeons on malpractice and risk reduction may play a role in decreasing malpractice costs. Additional extrinsic factors may also affect cost data. Emphasis on risk reduction appears to be cumulative and should be part of an ongoing program.

Duodenal perforation as a complication of gastrostomy tube migration.

Gastrostomy tube placement is a routinely safe procedure; however, this report and its accompanying images highlight a rare but serious complication of tube migration - duodenal perforation.

Tipping the scales: educating surgeons about medical malpractice.

BACKGROUND: In Pennsylvania, medical malpractice premiums are a major cost to surgeons. Yet surgeons often have little if any education in the basics of tort litigation or how to manage their risk. This work describes one approach for educating academic faculty surgeons on current concepts of medical malpractice and provide some guidance on how to "tip the scales of justice"; or minimize the risks of being named in a malpractice claim. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The course had five parts: the basics of medical malpractice, the cost of malpractice insurance, current departmental claims experience, strategies for decreasing the risk of being named in a claim, and an overview of malpractice reforms. An anonymous seven question survey was cast in a five-point Likert scale format. A weighted average of 4.5 or above was considered satisfactory. Two free text questions asked about positive and negative aspects of the course. RESULTS: Eighty of 95 (84%) faculty attended either in person or by reviewing a web-based video. Quantitatively, five of seven questions had a weighted average of more than 4.5 (n = 48, response rate = 60%). Qualitatively, the course was reviewed very favorably. CONCLUSIONS: The high percentage of participation and overall survey results suggest that the course was successful. This course was one facet of an approach to decrease the risk of malpractice claims. Unique aspects of this course include an emphasis on state law, department-specific data, and strategies to minimize risk of future claims. Given the state-specific nature of malpractice claims and litigation, individual departments must particularize similar presentations.

Complications and Surveillance After Bariatric Surgery.

OPINION STATEMENT: Bariatric surgery represents a durable and safe treatment modality for morbid obesity. Bariatric surgery results in weight loss by one of two-and possibly both-primary mechanisms, reducing the amount of tolerable intake (restrictive) and reducing the amount of nutrients absorbed by bypassing absorptive intestine (malabsorptive). These procedures have consistently demonstrated superior resolution of obesity and many associated co-morbid conditions as compared to medical management. Beyond the periprocedural complications of surgery, there are longitudinal risks such as weight regain, anatomic complications, and micronutrient deficiencies. Complications related to the anatomic alteration after bariatric surgery include internal herniation, marginal ulcers, dumping syndrome, and gastric band-related complications. Physicians who take care of bariatric patients at any point in their post-operative care must be vigilant for these complications, as they may necessitate urgent intervention or re-operation. Micronutrient deficiencies, which commonly occur after malabsorptive procedures, may present with a wide range of symptoms-including neuropathies, anemia, poor wound healing, and hair loss, among others. Deficiencies of vitamins and minerals frequently result in the need for long-term supplementation and may necessitate intravenous repletion when severe. Bariatric surgery may also alter the absorption of commonly prescribed medications, including anti-psychotic medications.

Improving Communication Skills: A Course for Academic Medical Center Surgery Residents and Faculty.

OBJECTIVE: To improve physician/patient communication and familiarize surgeons with contemporary skills for and metrics assessing communication, courses were developed to provide academic general surgery residents and faculty with a toolkit of information, behaviors, and specific techniques. If academic faculty are expected to mentor residents in communication and residents are expected to learn good communication skills, then both should have the necessary education to accomplish such a goal. DESIGN: Didactic lectures introduced current concepts of physician-patient communication including information on better patient care, fewer malpractice suits, and the move toward transparency of communication metrics. Next, course participants viewed and critiqued "Surgi-Drama" videos, with actors simulating "before" and "after" physician-patient communication scenarios. Finally, participants were provided with a "toolkit" of techniques for improving physician-patient communication including "2-3-4"-a semiscripted short communication tool residents and other physicians can use in patient encounters-and a number of other acronymic approaches. RESULTS: Each participant was asked to complete an anonymous evaluation to assess course content satisfaction. Overall, 86% of residents participated (68/79), with a 52% response rate (35/68) for the evaluation tool. Overall, 88% of faculty participated (84/96), with an 84% response rate (71/84). Residents voiced satisfaction with all domains. For faculty, satisfaction was quantitatively confirmed (Likert score 4 or 5) in 4 of 7 domains, with the highest satisfaction in "communication of goals" and "understanding of the HCAHPS metric." The percentage of "top box" Doctor Communication Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores and national percentile ranking showed a sustained increase more than 1 and 2 years from the dates of the courses. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of communication skills is increasing in importance in the practice of surgery. A course in communication, as developed here, quantitatively confirms the effectiveness of this approach to teaching communication skills as well as identifying areas for improvement. Such a course was part of a plan to increase the percentage of "top box" HCAHPS scores and percentile rankings. Faculty can impart the skills gained from such a course to residents attempting to successfully navigate the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones and future careers as practicing surgeons.

Simulated disclosure of a medical error by residents: development of a course in specific communication skills.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery residents are expected to demonstrate the ability to communicate with patients, families, and the public in a wide array of settings on a wide variety of issues. One important setting in which residents may be required to communicate with patients is in the disclosure of medical error. This article details one approach to developing a course in the disclosure of medical errors by residents. DESIGN: Before the development of this course, residents had no education in the skills necessary to disclose medical errors to patients. Residents viewed a Web-based video didactic session and associated slide deck and then were filmed disclosing a wrong-site surgery to a standardized patient (SP). The filmed encounter was reviewed by faculty, who then along with the SP scored each encounter (5-point Likert scale) over 10 domains of physician-patient communication. The residents received individualized written critique, the numerical analysis of their individual scenario, and an opportunity to provide feedback over a number of domains. A mean score of 4.00 or greater was considered satisfactory. Faculty and SP assessments were compared with Student t test. SETTING: Residents were filmed in a one-on-one scenario in which they had to disclose a wrong-site surgery to a SP in a Simulation Center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 12 residents, shortly to enter the clinical postgraduate year 4, were invited to participate, as they will assume service leadership roles. All were finishing their laboratory experiences, and all accepted the invitation. RESULTS: Residents demonstrated satisfactory competence in 4 of the 10 domains assessed by the course faculty. There were significant differences in the perceptions of the faculty and SP in 5 domains. The residents found this didactic, simulated experience of value (Likert score ≥4 in 5 of 7 domains assessed in a feedback tool). Qualitative feedback from the residents confirmed the realistic feel of the encounter and other impressions. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to quantitatively demonstrate both competency and opportunities for improvement across a wide range of domains of interpersonal and communication skills. Residents are expected to communicate effectively with patients, families, and the public, as appropriate, across a broad range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. As academic surgeons, we must be mindful of our roles as teachers, mentors, and coaches by teaching good communication skills to our residents. Courses such as the one described here can help in improving physician-patient communication. The differing perspectives of faculty and SPs regarding resident performance warrants further study.

A pilot study investigating the efficacy of postoperative dietary counseling to improve outcomes after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is a powerful treatment of severe obesity. During the past several years, a greater appreciation for the need for multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes has developed, and a number of studies have been started to examine the role of postoperative interventions used in combination with surgery. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the hypothesis that the provision of postoperative dietary counseling, delivered by a registered dietitian, would lead to greater weight loss and more positive improvements in dietary intake and eating behavior compared with standard postoperative care. The study was performed at an academic medical center. METHODS: Eighty-four individuals who underwent bariatric surgery were randomly assigned to receive either dietary counseling or standard postoperative care for the first 4 months after surgery. The participants completed measures of macronutrient intake and eating behavior at baseline and 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: The patients who received dietary counseling achieved greater weight loss than those who received standard postoperative care that did not involve this counseling, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Patients in the dietary counseling arm did report significant changes in several eating behaviors believed to be important to successful long-term weight maintenance. CONCLUSION: The results of our pilot study provide some support for the efficacy of early postoperative dietary counseling to improve outcomes after bariatric surgery.

Implementation of designated bariatric surgery program leads to improved clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Emphasis on the development of designated programs for bariatric surgery as a method of quality improvement has increased; however, the data on the effect of these programs on the clinical outcome are insufficient. The aim of the present study was to consider the effect of the implementation of a bariatric clinical program on patient outcomes in a high-volume academic setting. METHODS: We implemented a focused bariatric clinical program to establish common clinical pathways and improve the critical clinical processes. To evaluate the effect of this program, we studied outcome and quality indicators, such as caseload, average length of stay (ALOS), and mortality, readmission, and complication rates during the 6-year period since the introduction of the program. RESULTS: From June 2000 to June 2006 (financial year 2001-2006), 1886 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures were performed at our institution, with 7 deaths (.37%). During this period, we observed a progressive decrease in the ALOS from 6.7 days in 2001 to 3.2 days in 2006, a significant reduction of the 30-day readmission rates from 15.7% in 2001 to 8.1% in 2006, and a reduction of the observed overall complication rate from 18.6% in 2001 to 4.8% in 2006. CONCLUSION: We observed a significant improvement in patient outcomes with the introduction of a designated bariatric surgery program. Additional studies of the validity of these quality indicators are needed to determine the true effect of these quality improvement programs.