Multi-organ immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors and their downstream implications: a retrospective multicohort study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding co-occurrence patterns and prognostic implications of immune-related adverse events is crucial for immunotherapy management. However, previous studies have been limited by sample size and generalisability. In this study, we leveraged a multi-institutional cohort and a population-level database to investigate co-occurrence patterns of and survival outcomes after multi-organ immune-related adverse events among recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we identified individuals who received immune checkpoint inhibitors between May 31, 2015, and June 29, 2022, from the Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA, USA; MGBD cohort), and between April 30, 2010, and Oct 11, 2021, from the independent US population-based TriNetX network. We identified recipients from all datasets using medication codes and names of seven common immune checkpoint inhibitors, and patients were excluded from our analysis if they had incomplete information (eg, diagnosis and medication records) or if they initiated immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after Oct 11, 2021. Eligible patients from the MGBD cohort were then propensity score matched with recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitors from the TriNetX database (1:2) based on demographic, cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitor characteristics to facilitate cohort comparability. We applied immune-related adverse event identification rules to identify patients who did and did not have immune-related adverse events in the matched cohorts. To reduce the likelihood of false positives, patients diagnosed with suspected immune-related adverse events within 3 months after chemotherapy were excluded. We performed pairwise correlation analyses, non-negative matrix factorisation, and hierarchical clustering to identify co-occurrence patterns in the MGBD cohort. We conducted landmark overall survival analyses for patient clusters based on predominant immune-related adverse event factors and calculated accompanying hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, focusing on the 6-month landmark time for primary analyses. We validated our findings using the TriNetX cohort. FINDINGS: We identified 15 246 recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitors from MGBD and 50 503 from TriNetX, of whom 13 086 from MGBD and 26 172 from TriNetX were included in our propensity score-matched cohort. Median follow-up durations were 317 days (IQR 113-712) in patients from MGBD and 249 days (91-616) in patients from TriNetX. After applying immune-related adverse event identification rules, 8704 recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitors were retained from MGBD, of whom 3284 (37·7%) had and 5420 (62·3%) did not have immune-related adverse events, and 18 162 recipients were retained from TriNetX, of whom 5538 (30·5%) had and 12 624 (69·5%) did not have immune-related adverse events. In both cohorts, positive pairwise correlations of immune-related adverse events were commonly observed. Co-occurring immune-related adverse events were decomposed into seven factors across organs, revealing seven distinct patient clusters (endocrine, cutaneous, respiratory, gastrointestinal, hepatic, musculoskeletal, and neurological). In the MGBD cohort, the patient clusters that predominantly had endocrine (HR 0·53 [95% CI 0·40-0·70], p<0·0001) and cutaneous (0·61 [0·46-0·81], p=0·0007) immune-related adverse events had favourable overall survival outcomes at the 6-month landmark timepoint, while the other clusters either had unfavourable (respiratory: 1·60 [1·25-2·03], p=0·0001) or neutral survival outcomes (gastrointestinal: 0·86 [0·67-1·10], p=0·23; musculoskeletal: 0·97 [0·78-1·21], p=0·78; hepatic: 1·20 [0·91-1·59], p=0·19; and neurological: 1·30 [0·97-1·74], p=0·074). Similar results were found in the TriNetX cohort (endocrine: HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60-0·93], p=0·0078; cutaneous: 0·62 [0·48-0·82], p=0·0007; respiratory: 1·21 [1·00-1·46], p=0·044), except for the neurological cluster having unfavourable (rather than neutral) survival outcomes (1·30 [1·06-1·59], p=0·013). INTERPRETATION: Reliably identifying the immune-related adverse event cluster to which a patient belongs can provide valuable clinical information for prognosticating outcomes of immunotherapy. These insights can be leveraged to counsel patients on the clinical impact of their individual constellation of immune-related adverse events and ultimately develop more personalised surveillance and mitigation strategies. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Stage II Melanoma-Further Risk Stratification is Needed.

This Viewpoint reviews the evidence for immune checkpoint inhibitor use in the adjuvant setting, discusses the individual and societal risks, benefits, and costs associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, and highlights the need for more targeted patient selection approaches.

Development and validation of time-to-event models to predict metastatic recurrence of localized cutaneous melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The recent expansion of immunotherapy for stage IIB/IIC melanoma highlights a growing clinical need to identify patients at high risk of metastatic recurrence and, therefore, most likely to benefit from this therapeutic modality. OBJECTIVE: To develop time-to-event risk prediction models for melanoma metastatic recurrence. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I/II primary cutaneous melanoma between 2000 and 2020 at Mass General Brigham and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were included. Melanoma recurrence date and type were determined by chart review. Thirty clinicopathologic factors were extracted from electronic health records. Three types of time-to-event machine-learning models were evaluated internally and externally in the distant versus locoregional/nonrecurrence prediction. RESULTS: This study included 954 melanomas (155 distant, 163 locoregional, and 636 1:2 matched nonrecurrences). Distant recurrences were associated with worse survival compared to locoregional/nonrecurrences (HR: 6.21, P < .001) and to locoregional recurrences only (HR: 5.79, P < .001). The Gradient Boosting Survival model achieved the best performance (concordance index: 0.816; time-dependent AUC: 0.842; Brier score: 0.103) in the external validation. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature and cohort from one geography. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that time-to-event machine-learning models can reliably predict the metastatic recurrence from localized melanoma and help identify high-risk patients who are most likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

Pre-Existing Inflammatory Disease Predicts Cutaneous Immunotherapy Toxicity Development: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.

Background: Relationships between pre-existing inflammatory diseases (pIDs) and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) have not been well-studied. This study is to investigate associations between pIDs and cirAEs among immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) recipients at the Mass General Brigham healthcare system. Methods: Electronic health records were reviewed to ascertain cirAE status. Patients' pID status was determined using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Cox proportional hazard, logistic regression, and linear regression models were performed. Results: Among 3607 ICI recipients, 1354 had pIDs, and 672 developed cirAEs. After covariate adjustments, patients with cutaneous pIDs (HR:1.56, p<0.001) or both cutaneous and non-cutaneous pIDs (HR:1.76, p<0.001) had increased cirAE risk in contrast to patients with non-cutaneous pIDs alone (HR:1.01, p=0.9). In adjusted ordinal logistic regression modeling, cutaneous pIDs (OR:1.55, p<0.0001) and the presence of both cutaneous pIDs and non-cutaneous pIDs (OR:1.71, p=0.002) were associated with increased cirAE severity. The time to cirAE onset was different between the cutaneous pID group and the non-cutaneous pID group (Mean: 98 vs. 146 days, p=0.021; Beta: -0.11, p=0.033). Conclusions: ICI recipients with cutaneous pIDs should have increased clinical monitoring due to their increased risk of cirAE development, severity, and earlier onset.

Transient Erythema Elevatum Diutinum Associated With HIV Viremia.

Erythema elevatum diutinum (EED) is a rare cutaneous small vessel vasculitis of unknown etiology. It is thought to be due to immune complex deposition in small vessels, resulting in complement fixation and subsequent inflammation. EED classically presents with asymptomatic, symmetric, red-brown to purple papules, plaques, and nodules overlying extensor surfaces with a lapsing-remitting course that typically resolves within five to 10 years. We discuss the case of a 47-year-old male with HIV and a new history of EED presenting after several days of missed antiretroviral medications and resolved with improved compliance with antiretroviral medications. A 47-year-old male presented with a four-week history of mildly tender violaceous plaques and nodules on the dorsal feet and posterior heels bilaterally. Medical history was significant for HIV that was well-controlled on antiretrovirals although the patient had missed two days of therapy. A punch biopsy of the lesion demonstrated leukocytoclastic vasculitis with dense dermal mixed infiltrate consisting of histiocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils. Laboratory findings revealed the presence of HIV RNA. Prior to the initiation of Dapsone therapy, the patient's eruption cleared entirely within a month solely by restarting his antiretroviral therapy, for which he continues to remain disease-free. EED is a rare, chronic leukocytoclastic vasculitis with a poorly understood etiology. Treatment is typically aimed at treating underlying systemic disease, however, treatment of EED with Dapsone is typically first-line.

Increased risk of cutaneous immune-related adverse events in patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A multi-hospital cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) may improve antitumor responses. However, the risk of developing cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) in patients treated with ICI and TVEC has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in cirAE development between patients treated with ICI alone and both ICI and TVEC (ICI + TVEC). METHODS: Patients with cutaneous malignancy receiving ICI with or without TVEC therapy at the Massachusetts General Brigham healthcare system were included. CirAE development, time from ICI initiation to cirAE, cirAE grade, cirAE morphology, and survival were analyzed. Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables were used. To account for immortal time bias, we performed adjusted time-varying Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: The rate of cirAE development was 32.3% and 38.7% for ICI only and ICI + TVEC, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, ICI + TVEC was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of cirAE development (hazard ratio: 2.03, P = .006) compared to patients receiving ICI therapy alone. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature and limited sample size from a tertiary-level academic center. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore potential opportunities for dermatologists and oncologists in counseling and monitoring patients.

The frequency of non-pathologically thin corneas in young healthy adults.

Purpose: Measurement of normal corneal thickness and corneal epithelial thickness is important in keratorefractive surgery, glaucoma, following extended contact lens wear, and in patients with corneal disease. Clinically, a central corneal thickness less than 500 µm is considered to be moderately-to-extremely thin. The purpose of this study was to compare biological differences in patients with clinically thin compared to normal corneal thickness values in healthy young adults using Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Patients and methods: In total, 168 eyes from 84 patients aged 19-38 years were scanned using an Avanti optical coherence tomographer. To eliminate circadian effects on corneal thickness, all patients were scanned within a 4-hour window. Corneal thickness was measured across the central 6 mm of the cornea. Total central corneal thickness, corneal epithelial thickness, and corneal stromal thickness were compared between males and females and tested for correlations with age, use of systemic hormones, degree of myopia, and corneal curvature. Results: The average central corneal thickness for males and females was 540.5±32.0 µm and 525.2±33.0 µm, respectively (P=0.020). Thirty-eight eyes had corneal thickness measurements below 500 µm; 12% (6 eyes) from males and 28% (16 eyes) from females (P=0.008). All women with corneas below 500 µm were bilaterally thin. This finding differed for men. Corneal thinning was not associated with age, use of systemic hormones, or degree of myopia. Females had steeper keratometry (K) readings (P=0.01 for flat K, P=0.002 for steep K) than males. No differences in layer offset values between normal thickness corneas and thin corneas were evident, suggesting that the reduced thickness was not pathological. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that a subpopulation of healthy young adults have non-pathologically thin corneas, well below 500 µm; and that these thinner corneas are more frequent in females. This underscores the importance of accurate corneal thickness measurements prior to keratorefractive surgery and when evaluating intraocular pressure in glaucoma.