Impact of high-intensity interval training on cardiac structure and function after COVID-19: an investigator-blinded randomized controlled trial.

A large proportion of patients suffer from a persistent reduction in cardiorespiratory fitness after recovery from COVID-19, of which the effects on the heart may potentially be reversed through the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT). In the present study, we hypothesized that HIIT would increase left ventricular mass (LVM) and improve functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals previously hospitalized for COVID-19. In this investigator-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 12 wk of supervised HIIT (4 × 4 min, three times a week) was compared with standard care (control) in individuals recently discharged from hospital due to COVID-19. LVM was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI, primary outcome), whereas the pulmonary diffusing capacity (DLCOc, secondary outcome) was examined by the single-breath method. Functional status and HRQoL were assessed by Post-COVID-19 functional scale (PCFS) and King's brief interstitial lung disease (KBILD) questionnaire, respectively. A total of 28 participants were included (age 57 ± 10, 9 females; HIIT: 58 ± 11, 4 females; standard care: 57 ± 9, 5 females), LVM increased in the HIIT vs. standard care group with a between-group difference of 6.8 [mean, 95%CI: 0.8; 12.8] g; P = 0.029. There were no between-group differences in DLCOc or any other lung function metric, which gradually resolved in both groups. Descriptively, PCFS suggested fewer functional limitations in the HIIT group. KBILD improved similarly in the two groups. HIIT is an efficacious exercise intervention for increasing LVM in individuals previously hospitalized for COVID-19.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this randomized clinical trial on individuals previously hospitalized for COVID-19, a 12 wk supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) scheme was found to increase left ventricular mass, whereas pulmonary diffusing capacity was unaffected. The findings indicate that HIIT is an efficacious exercise intervention for targeting the heart after COVID-19.

Protective potential of high-intensity interval training on cardiac structure and function after COVID-19: protocol and statistical analysis plan for an investigator-blinded randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is associated with a marked systemic inflammatory response with concomitant cardiac injury and remodelling, but it is currently unknown whether the latter is reversible. Given that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a powerful stimulus to improve cardiorespiratory fitness while also eliciting marked anti-inflammatory effects, it may be an important countermeasure of reducing cardiopulmonary morbidity following COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 40 COVID-19 survivors who have been discharged from hospital will be included in this investigator-blinded randomised study with a 12-week HIIT intervention. Patients will be 1:1 block-randomised by sex to either a supervised HIIT exercise group or standard care (control group). The main hypothesis is that a 12-week HIIT scheme is a safe way to improve loss of cardiac mass and associated cardiorespiratory fitness, despite hypothesised limited HIIT-induced changes in conventional lung function indices per se. Ultimately, we hypothesise that the HIIT scheme will reduce post-COVID-19 symptoms and improve quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee at the Capital Region of Denmark (H-20033733, including amendments 75068 and 75799) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04647734, pre-results). The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, including cases of positive, negative and inconclusive results.Trial registration number NCT04549337.

Fidelity, tolerability and safety of acute high-intensity interval training after hospitalisation for COVID-19: a randomised cross-over trial.

OBJECTIVES: Many patients with COVID-19 suffer from persistent symptoms, many of which may potentially be reversed by high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Yet, the safety and tolerability of HIIT after COVID-19 is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the fidelity, tolerability and safety of three different HIIT protocols in individuals that had recently been hospitalised due to COVID-19. METHODS: The study was a randomised cross-over trial. We compared three supervised HIIT protocols (4×4, 6×1, 10-20-30) in 10 individuals recently discharged after hospitalisation for severe COVID-19. Each HIIT protocol had a duration of 38 min and was performed with a 1-week washout between them. Outcomes included adverse events, exercise training intensity and tolerability assessed by the Likert scale (1-10). RESULTS: All 10 participants aged 61 (mean, SD 8) years (5 males) completed all three HIIT protocols with no adverse events. High intensities were achieved in all three protocols, although they differed in terms of time spent with a heart rate ≥85% of maximum (mean (SD); 4×4: 13.7 (6.4) min; 10-20-30: 12.1 (3.8) min; 6×1: 6.1 (5.6) min; p=0.03). The three protocols were all well tolerated with similar Likert scale scores (mean (SD); 4×4: 8 (2), 10-20-30: 8 (2), 6×1: 9 (2), p=0.72). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that recently hospitalised individuals for severe COVID-19 may safely tolerate acute bouts of supervised HIIT as per protocol. This warrants future studies testing the potential of regular HIIT as a rehabilitation strategy in this context.

The effects of different doses of exercise on pancreatic ß-cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: study protocol for and rationale behind the "DOSE-EX" multi-arm parallel-group randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle intervention, i.e. diet and physical activity, forms the basis for care of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current physical activity recommendation for T2D is aerobic training for 150 min/week of moderate to vigorous intensity, supplemented with resistance training 2-3 days/week, with no more than two consecutive days without physical activity. The rationale for the recommendations is based on studies showing a reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). This reduction is supposed to be caused by increased insulin sensitivity in muscle and adipose tissue, whereas knowledge about effects on abnormalities in the liver and pancreas are scarce, with the majority of evidence stemming from in vitro and animal studies. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of the volume of exercise training as an adjunct to dietary therapy in order to improve the pancreatic ß-cell function in T2D patients less than 7 years from diagnosis. The objective of this protocol for the DOSE-EX trial is to describe the scientific rationale in detail and to provide explicit information about study procedures and planned analyses. METHODS/DESIGN: In a parallel-group, 4-arm assessor-blinded randomised clinical trial, 80 patients with T2D will be randomly allocated (1:1:1:1, stratified by sex) to 16 weeks in either of the following groups: (1) no intervention (CON), (2) dietary intervention (DCON), (3) dietary intervention and supervised moderate volume exercise (MED), or (4) dietary intervention and supervised high volume exercise (HED). Enrolment was initiated December 15th, 2018, and will continue until N = 80 or December 1st, 2021. Primary outcome is pancreatic beta-cell function assessed as change in late-phase disposition index (DI) from baseline to follow-up assessed by hyperglycaemic clamp. Secondary outcomes include measures of cardiometabolic risk factors and the effect on subsequent complications related to T2D. The study was approved by The Scientific Ethical Committee at the Capital Region of Denmark (H-18038298). TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Effects of Different Doses of Exercise on Pancreatic ß-cell Function in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes (DOSE-EX), NCT03769883, registered 10 December 2018 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03769883 ). Any modification to the protocol, study design, and changes in written participant information will be approved by The Scientific Ethical Committee at the Capital Region of Denmark before effectuation. DISCUSSION: The data from this study will add knowledge to which volume of exercise training in combination with a dietary intervention is needed to improve ß-cell function in T2D. Secondarily, our results will elucidate mechanisms of physical activity mitigating the development of micro- and macrovascular complications correlated with T2D.

Cycling with blood flow restriction improves performance and muscle K+ regulation and alters the effect of anti-oxidant infusion in humans.

KEY POINTS: Training with blood flow restriction (BFR) is a well-recognized strategy for promoting muscle hypertrophy and strength. However, its potential to enhance muscle function during sustained, intense exercise remains largely unexplored. In the present study, we report that interval training with BFR augments improvements in performance and reduces net K+ release from contracting muscles during high-intensity exercise in active men. A better K+ regulation after BFR-training is associated with an elevated blood flow to exercising muscles and altered muscle anti-oxidant function, as indicated by a higher reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH:GSSG) ratio, compared to control, as well as an increased thigh net K+ release during intense exercise with concomitant anti-oxidant infusion. Training with BFR also invoked fibre type-specific adaptations in the abundance of Na+ ,K+ -ATPase isoforms (α1 , ß1 , phospholemman/FXYD1). Thus, BFR-training enhances performance and K+ regulation during intense exercise, which may be a result of adaptations in anti-oxidant function, blood flow and Na+ ,K+ -ATPase-isoform abundance at the fibre-type level. ABSTRACT: We examined whether blood flow restriction (BFR) augments training-induced improvements in K+ regulation and performance during intense exercise in men, and also whether these adaptations are associated with an altered muscle anti-oxidant function, blood flow and/or with fibre type-dependent changes in Na+ ,K+ -ATPase-isoform abundance. Ten recreationally-active men (25 ± 4 years, 49.7 ± 5.3 mL kg-1  min-1 ) performed 6 weeks of interval cycling, where one leg trained without BFR (control; CON-leg) and the other trained with BFR (BFR-leg, pressure: ∼180 mmHg). Before and after training, femoral arterial and venous K+ concentrations and artery blood flow were measured during single-leg knee-extensor exercise at 25% (Ex1) and 90% of thigh incremental peak power (Ex2) with i.v. infusion of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or placebo (saline) and a resting muscle biopsy was collected. After training, performance increased more in BFR-leg (23%) than in CON-leg (12%, P < 0.05), whereas K+ release during Ex2 was attenuated only from BFR-leg (P < 0.05). The muscle GSH:GSSG ratio at rest and blood flow during exercise was higher in BFR-leg than in CON-leg after training (P < 0.05). After training, NAC increased resting muscle GSH concentration and thigh net K+ release during Ex2 only in BFR-leg (P < 0.05), whereas the abundance of Na+ ,K+ -ATPase-isoform α1 in type II (51%), ß1 in type I (33%), and FXYD1 in type I (108%) and type II (60%) fibres was higher in BFR-leg than in CON-leg (P < 0.05). Thus, training with BFR elicited greater improvements in performance and reduced thigh K+ release during intense exercise, which were associated with adaptations in muscle anti-oxidant function, blood flow and Na+ ,K+ -ATPase-isoform abundance at the fibre-type level.