Aramchol in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a chronic liver disease without an approved therapy, is associated with lipotoxicity and insulin resistance and is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Aramchol, a partial inhibitor of hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) improved steatohepatitis and fibrosis in rodents and reduced steatosis in an early clinical trial. ARREST, a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial randomized 247 patients with NASH (n = 101, n = 98 and n = 48 in the Aramchol 400 mg, 600 mg and placebo arms, respectively; NCT02279524 ). The primary end point was a decrease in hepatic triglycerides by magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 52 weeks with a dose of 600 mg of Aramchol. Key secondary end points included liver histology and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Aramchol 600 mg produced a placebo-corrected decrease in liver triglycerides without meeting the prespecified significance (-3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.4 to 0.2, P = 0.066), precluding further formal statistical analysis. NASH resolution without worsening fibrosis was achieved in 16.7% (13 out of 78) of Aramchol 600 mg versus 5% (2 out of 40) of the placebo arm (odds ratio (OR) = 4.74, 95% CI = 0.99 to 22.7) and fibrosis improvement by ≥1 stage without worsening NASH in 29.5% versus 17.5% (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 0.7 to 5.0), respectively. The placebo-corrected decrease in ALT for 600 mg was -29.1 IU l-1 (95% CI = -41.6 to -16.5). Early termination due to adverse events (AEs) was <5%, and Aramchol 600 and 400 mg were safe, well tolerated and without imbalance in serious or severe AEs between arms. Although the primary end point of a reduction in liver fat did not meet the prespecified significance level with Aramchol 600 mg, the observed safety and changes in liver histology and enzymes provide a rationale for SCD1 modulation as a promising therapy for NASH and fibrosis and are being evaluated in an ongoing phase 3 program.

Temporal trends, clinical patterns and outcomes of NAFLD-related HCC in patients undergoing liver resection over a 20-year period.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. NAFLD-HCC often occurs in noncirrhotic liver raising important surveillance issues. AIM: To determine the temporal trends for prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of NAFLD-HCC in patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: Consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC who underwent liver resection over a 20-year period (1995-2014). NAFLD was diagnosed based on past or present exposure to obesity or diabetes without other causes of chronic liver disease. RESULTS: A total of 323 HCC patients were included, 12% with NAFLD. From 1995-1999 to 2010-2014, the prevalence of NAFLD-HCC increased from 2.6% to 19.5%, respectively, P = .003, and followed the temporal trends in the prevalence of metabolic risk factors (28% vs 52%, P = .017), while hepatitis C-HCC decreased (from 43.6% to 19.5%, P = .003). NAFLD-HCC occurred more frequently in the absence of bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis (63% of cases, P < .001 compared to other aetiologies). Within the NAFLD group, tumour characteristics were similar between F0-F2 and F3-F4 patients, except for a higher proportion of single nodules (95% vs 54%, P < .01). A total of 53% patients had tumour recurrence and 40% died. NAFLD-HCC had similar time to recurrence and survival as HCCs of other aetiologies. Satellite nodules, tumour size, microvascular invasion and male sex but not the aetiology were independently associated with recurrence. CONCLUSION: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increased substantially over the past 20 years among resectable HCCs. It is now the leading cause of HCC occuring without/or with only minimal fibrosis. NAFLD patients are older, with larger tumours while survival and recurrence rates are as severe as in other aetiologies.

Diagnostic performance of FibroTest, SteatoTest and ActiTest in patients with NAFLD using the SAF score as histological reference.

BACKGROUND: Blood tests of liver injury are less well validated in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. AIMS: To improve the validation of three blood tests used in NAFLD patients, FibroTest for fibrosis staging, SteatoTest for steatosis grading and ActiTest for inflammation activity grading. METHODS: We pre-included new NAFLD patients with biopsy and blood tests from a single-centre cohort (FibroFrance) and from the multicentre FLIP consortium. Contemporaneous biopsies were blindly assessed using the new steatosis, activity and fibrosis (SAF) score, which provides a reliable and reproducible diagnosis and grading/staging of the three elementary features of NAFLD (steatosis, inflammatory activity) and fibrosis with reduced interobserver variability. We used nonbinary-ROC (NonBinAUROC) as the main endpoint to prevent spectrum effect and multiple testing. RESULTS: A total of 600 patients with reliable tests and biopsies were included. The mean NonBinAUROCs (95% CI) of tests were all significant (P < 0.0001): 0.878 (0.864-0.892) for FibroTest and fibrosis stages, 0.846 (0.830-0.862) for ActiTest and activity grades, and 0.822 (0.804-0.840) for SteatoTest and steatosis grades. FibroTest had a higher NonBinAUROC than BARD (0.836; 0.820-0.852; P = 0.0001), FIB4 (0.845; 0.829-0.861; P = 0.007) but not significantly different than the NAFLD score (0.866; 0.850-0.882; P = 0.26). FibroTest had a significant difference in median values between adjacent stage F2 and stage F1 contrarily to BARD, FIB4 and NAFLD scores (Bonferroni test P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NAFLD, SteatoTest, ActiTest and FibroTest are non-invasive tests that offer an alternative to biopsy, and they correlate with the simple grading/staging of the SAF scoring system across the three elementary features of NAFLD: steatosis, inflammatory activity and fibrosis.

Performance and limitations of steatosis biomarkers in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Several steatosis biomarkers are available with limited independent validation. AIM: To determine diagnostic value and limitations of several steatosis biomarkers using liver biopsy as reference standard in a large cohort of patients with suspected NAFLD. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-four consecutive liver biopsies were included. Histological steatosis was categorised as none (<5%), mild (5-33%), moderate (33-66%) and severe (>66%). Five steatosis biomarkers were measured: fatty liver index (FLI), NAFLD liver fat score (NAFLD-LFS), hepatic steatosis index (HSI), visceral adiposity index (VAI) and triglyceride × glucose (TyG) index. RESULTS: Steatosis grades prevalence was: none 5%, mild 39%, moderate 30% and severe 27%. Except for VAI, the steatosis biomarkers showed a linear trend across the steatosis grades. However, their correlation with the histological amount of steatosis was only weak-moderate. All steatosis biomarkers had an adequate diagnostic accuracy for the presence of steatosis: AUROCs for FLI, LFS, HSI, VAI and TyG were 0.83, 0.80, 0.81, 0.92 and 0.90. However, their ability to quantify steatosis was poor: none of them distinguished between moderate and severe steatosis and the AUROCs for predicting steatosis >33% were 0.65, 0.72, 0.65, 0.59 and 0.59 for FLI, LFS, HSI, VAI and TyG. Both fibrosis and inflammation significantly confounded the association between steatosis biomarkers and steatosis. The steatosis biomarkers were all correlated with HOMA-IR, independent from histological steatosis. CONCLUSIONS: All five steatosis biomarkers can diagnose steatosis and are correlated with insulin resistance. They are confounded by fibrosis and inflammation, and do not accurately quantify steatosis; this may limit their clinical utility. More research is needed to identify truly independent and quantitative markers of steatosis.

Prognostic value of liver fibrosis and steatosis biomarkers in type-2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia.

BACKGROUND: In cardiometabolic disorders, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is frequent and presumably associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular risk. AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest) and steatosis (SteatoTest) in patients with type-2 diabetes and/or dyslipidaemia. METHODS: A total of 2312 patients with type-2 diabetes and/or dyslipidaemia were included and prospectively followed up for 5-15 years. The cardiovascular Framingham-risk score was calculated; advanced fibrosis and severe steatosis, were defined by FibroTest >0.48 and SteatoTest >0.69, respectively, as previously established. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 12 years, 172 patients (7.4%) died. The leading causes of mortality were cancer (31%) and cardiovascular-related death (20%). The presence of advanced fibrosis [HR (95% CI)] [2.98 (95% CI 1.78-4.99); P < 0.0001] or severe steatosis [1.86 (1.34-2.58); P = 0.0002] was associated with an increased risk of mortality. In a multivariate Cox model adjusted for confounders: the presence of advanced fibrosis was associated with overall mortality [1.95 (1.12-3.41); P = 0.02]; advanced fibrosis at baseline [n = 50/677; 1.92 (1.04-3.55); P = 0.04] and progression to advanced fibrosis during follow-up [n = 16/127; 4.8 (1.5-14.9); P = 0.007] were predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with type-2 diabetes. In patients with a Framingham-risk score ≥20%, the presence of advanced fibrosis was predictive of cardiovascular events [2.24 (1.16-4.33); P < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: Liver biomarkers, such as FibroTest and SteatoTest, have prognostic values in patients with metabolic disorders. FibroTest has prognostic value for predicting overall survival in patients with type-2 diabetes and/or dyslipidaemia. In type-2 diabetes, FibroTest predicted cardiovascular events and improved the Framingham-risk score.

Cardiovascular risk, lipidemic phenotype and steatosis. A comparative analysis of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic liver disease due to varying etiology.

BACKGROUND: Liver regulates lipid metabolism in health and disease states. Nevertheless, the entity of cardiovascular risk (CVR) resulting from dysregulation of lipid metabolism secondary to liver disease is poorly characterized. AIM AND METHODS: To review, based on a PubMed literature search, the features and the determinants of serum lipid phenotype and its correlation with hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance (IR) and CVR across the wide spectrum of the most common chronic liver diseases due to different etiologies. RESULTS: Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is associated with steatosis, IR and a typical lipid profile. The relationship between alcohol intake, incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CVR describes a J-shaped curve. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and probably nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in particular, is associated with IR, atherogenic dyslipidemia and increased CVR independent of traditional risk factors. Moreover, NASH-cirrhosis and T2D contribute to increasing CVR in liver transplant recipients. HBV infection is generally free from IR, steatosis and CVR. HCV-associated dysmetabolic syndrome, featuring steatosis, hypocholesterolemia and IR, appears to be associated with substantially increased CVR. Hyperlipidemia is an almost universal finding in primary biliary cirrhosis, a condition typically spared from steatosis and associated with neither subclinical atherosclerosis nor excess CVR. Finally, little is known on CVR in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: CVR is increased in ALD, NAFLD and chronic HCV infection, all conditions featuring IR and steatosis. Therefore, irrespective of serum lipid phenotype, hepatic steatosis and IR may be major shared determinants in amplifying CVR in common liver disease due to varying etiology.

Progression from isolated steatosis to steatohepatitis and fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

In patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) isolated steatosis is considered a benign condition with no or minimal rate of progression, in contrast to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) which can progress to cirrhosis. We report on a series of six patients with isolated steatosis on an initial liver biopsy, and NASH on a follow-up biopsy performed five years after. All but one of the initial biopsies were longer than 15 mm. At follow-up, inflammation and ballooning were present in all patients and mild fibrosis in three. All patients had one or more features of metabolic syndrome at baseline. Progression to steatohepatitis occurred independent of aminotransferase changes. Five patients experienced an increase in one or several metabolic risk factors during follow-up: body mass index, triglyceride levels, arterial hypertension and/or the HOMA index. One patient did not exhibit progression but was still exposed to metabolic risks factors at the end of follow-up. This report demonstrates that isolated steatosis is not necessarily a benign, non-progressive condition. Current recommendations for the absence of hepatic monitoring in patients with isolated steatosis are not adequate. If metabolic risk factors persist or deteriorate during follow-up and/or non-invasive markers suggest disease progression, a control liver biopsy should be considered.

ActiTest accuracy for the assessment of histological activity grades in patients with chronic hepatitis C, an overview using Obuchowski measure.

BACKGROUND: ActiTest (AT) is a biomarker of liver necro-inflammatory histological activity validated in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV). AIM: The aim was to assess the accuracy of AT in comparison with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) the standard of care. METHODS: Methods used an integrated database of individual data and the new recommended Obuchowski measures. An updated "classical" meta-analysis of AT validation studies was also performed. The main end points were the area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) for the diagnosis of each histological activity grade defined using METAVIR scoring system. To avoid repeated tests and the spectrum effect of activity grades prevalence, the comparison of AT and ALT accuracies used the Obuchowski method. RESULTS: For the individual analysis, a total of 1250 patients were included and for the meta-analysis six studies (2017 patients) were included. The overall accuracy of AT for the diagnosis of any activity grade (Obuchowski measure=0.850) was significantly higher than the accuracy of ALT (Obuchowski measure=0.837; P=0.009). The updated standard meta-analysis confirmed the accuracy of AT (p<0.0001) both in independent AUROC=0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85) and in non independent studies AUROC=0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of AT for grading the necro-inflammatory activity of patients with HCV was significantly higher than ALT serum activity alone, the standard biomarker.

[Hepatotoxicity of metastatic colorectal cancer chemotherapy: systematic review]. / Toxicité hépatique de la chimiothérapie du cancer colorectal métastatique: revue de la littérature.

AIM: Hepatic toxicity of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer and its complications after hepatic metastasis surgery are unclear. Studies reporting hepatic lesions after chemotherapy for colorectal cancer and published before July 2009 have been identified by searching the Medline database. Data concerning these hepatic lesions and outcome after surgery are resumed in this review. RESULTS: Studies concerning the link between hepatic steatosis and chemotherapy have contradictory results but steatosis is clearly associated to an increase of postoperative morbidity. Steatohepatitis, especially due to irinotecan, is associated with increased postoperative mortality. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, a severe form of vascular hepatic lesion, associated to oxaliplatin, seems to be linked with an increase of postoperative morbidity, but not mortality. Bevacizumab would not increase, when used in combination with oxaliplatin, the rate of postoperative complications. Some studies suggest a decrease of vascular hepatic lesions when bevacizumab is administered with chemotherapy. The literature concerning hepatic toxicity of anti-EGF-R antibody is freak. CONCLUSION: The fact that irinotecan may be linked to an increased risk of hepatic failure and postoperative death, which is not the case of oxaliplatine, must be taken in consideration in the choice of the preoperative chemotherapy before resection of hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Impact of interferon-alpha treatment on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: an overview of published trials.

BACKGROUND: The impact of interferon treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on fibrosis progression in comparison with its natural history has yet to be assessed in any large-scale randomized studies. The present report is a review of the evidence-based data published so far. METHODS: Studies were included if they had at least two repeated estimates of liver fibrosis per patient treated with interferon-alpha (whether pegylated or not). Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Altogether, 13 studies were included in the review, involving a total of 707 HBV patients treated with interferon-alpha-2a or -2b for 12-83 months. Only one study included pegylated interferon as monotherapy. A total of 787 untreated patients were also followed. Only one study used a non-invasive biomarker. There was a significant reduction in the fibrosis progression rate, with a risk reduction of 0.49 (95% CI: -0.64--0.34; chi(2)=119; degrees of freedom [DF]=6; P<0.0001), and significant heterogeneity (Cochran Q=81; P<0.0001). This significant impact was similar for both randomized (reduction of risk: -0.45; 95% CI: -0.64--0.26; P<0.0001) and not-randomized (controlled) studies (reduction of risk: -0.53; 95% CI: -0.79--0.28; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: According to these findings, the benefit of interferon treatment on fibrosis progression is clinically significant in patients with advanced fibrosis by the reduction of fibrosis progression to cirrhosis. Pegylated interferon now needs to be compared, in terms of benefit-risk factors, with the new generation of HBV treatments (such as entecavir and tenofovir), using non-invasive biomarkers.

[Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: 30 years research changed NASH]. / Stéatohépatite métabolique: 30 ans de recherches qui ont changé la NASH.

Since the first description of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 1980, much progress has been made towards its individualisation as a liver disease with potentially serious consequences. The identification of insulin resistance as a major determinant of steatogenesis and possibly of liver disease progression helped to identify a cause of this condition, which was amenable to therapeutic intervention and prompted screening for liver injury in patients with metabolic risk factors. The demonstration that steatohepatitis can coexist with other liver diseases with a detrimental effect on liver fibrosis helped this condition to be recognized as an independent hepatic disease no longer depending on exclusion of other chronic liver conditions. The robust increase in liver-related mortality, the fact that cirrhosis is a frequent and independent cause of death, as well as the significant decrease in overall mortality clearly showed the potential for severity of steatohepatitis. The data showing that steatohepatitis worsens insulin resistance and increases the risk for cardiovascular events and mortality forged the concept of extrahepatic complications of fat. Future research should focus on devising non-invasive strategies for screening of patients at risk, on understanding the natural history and risk factors of cirrhosis and hepatic carcinogenesis, and on optimizing therapeutic strategies integrating diet and lifestyle changes with targeted pharmacological agents.

Impact of adefovir dipivoxil on liver fibrosis and activity assessed with biochemical markers (FibroTest-ActiTest) in patients infected by hepatitis B virus.

SUMMARY: The aim was to assess the utility of FibroTest-ActiTest (FT-AT) as noninvasive markers of histological changes in patients with chronic hepatitis. Patients with chronic hepatitis B (HBeAg+ and HBeAg-) randomized in two trials of adefovir (ADV) vs placebo, with available paired liver biopsies and FT-AT at baseline and after 48 weeks of treatment were included. The predictive value of FT-AT was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) for the diagnosis of bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis and moderate-severe necroinflammatory activity. The impact of treatment with ADV vs placebo was assessed on liver injury according to baseline stage and virological response at 48 weeks. The analysis of 924 estimates for the diagnosis of bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis and moderate or severe necroinflammatory activity yielded FT-AT AUROCs: 0.76 +/- 0.02 (standardized 0.81 +/- 0.02), 0.81 +/- 0.02 and 0.80 +/- 0.01, respectively. Similar impacts of ADV on liver fibrosis and activity were observed both with paired biopsy (fibrosis stage from 1.6 to 1.4, activity grade from 2.5 to 1.3) and paired biomarkers (FT from 0.44 to 0.40, AT from 0.62 to 0.25) (P < 0.0001). FibroTest-ActiTest provides a quantitative estimate of liver fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity in patients with chronic hepatitis B and may be an alternative to reduce the need for liver biopsy.

Methodological aspects of the interpretation of non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis: a 2008 update.

This review summarizes the methodological aspects of the interpretation of non-invasive biomarkers in liver fibrosis. A scoring system has been updated to better compare the quality of fibrosis biomarkers. Several methodological issues are related to the classical methodology using biopsy, as this is considered the gold standard. However, from evidence-based data, it appears that the methodology needs to change to prevent flawed conclusions among key opinion leaders as well as in obsolete guidelines. As waiting for the perfect biomarker for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis to come along is probably a waste of time, in the meantime, methods can be improved. The main proposals for improving the methodology are, to take into account the spectrum bias, to assess accuracy between adjacent stages, to compare biomarkers in the same patient, to assess the cause of failure among discordant cases and to use specific statistical methods adapted for imperfect gold standards.

[Adherence to pegylated combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Importance of the hepatologist, general practitioner, and nurse]. / Adhésion à la bithérapie pégylée au cours de l'hépatite chronique C. Importance du trio hépatologue, médecin généraliste, infirmière.

Adhesion to pegylated combination therapy is a key factor for therapeutic success in patients HCV infected. To optimize it, goals to reach are to limit dose reduction and premature discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events ; to improve the patient compliance to treatment, particularly during the first three months, particularly to ribavirin. Therapeutic education, management of psychiatric adverse events, epoetin alfa, have demonstrated their benefit in terms of sustained virologic response or quality of life. Preparing the treatment with the patient and a multi-disciplinary team, setting successive therapeutic goals with the predictive value of the early virologic response will promote adhesion to treatment. A hepatitis C training program for general practitioners (GP) allows an efficient follow-up of treated patients by a trio hepatologist - GP - nurse and a concrete implication of GP in the field of hepatitis C. Further developments are needed for : taking in account the patient quality of life during treatment to anticipate premature discontinuation, promotion of therapeutic education by specialized nurses, standardization of the diagnosis of depression during treatment, and regular updating of general practitioners on antiviral C treatment.

Histological progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a critical reassessment based on liver sampling variability.

BACKGROUND: In non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, histological lesions display a significant sampling variability that is ignored when interpreting histological progression during natural history or therapeutic interventions. AIM: To provide a method taking into account sampling variability when interpreting crude histological data, and to investigate how this alters the conclusions of available studies. METHODS: Natural history studies detailing histological progression and therapeutic trials were compared with the results of a previously published sampling variability study. RESULTS: Natural history studies showed an improvement in steatosis, which was significantly higher than expected from sampling variability (47% vs. 8%, P < 0.0001). In contrast, no study showed a change in activity grade or ballooning higher than that of sampling variability. There was only a marginal effect on fibrosis with no convincing demonstration of a worsening of fibrosis, a conclusion contrary to what individual studies have claimed. Some insulin sensitizing drugs and anti-obesity surgery significantly improved steatosis, while most did not significantly impact on fibrosis or activity. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling variability of liver biopsy is an overlooked confounding factor that should be considered systematically when interpreting histological progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.