Etanercept is Effective and Halts Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Final Results from a German Non-interventional Study (PRERA).

INTRODUCTION: Etanercept (ETN) has been shown to slow radiographic progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in clinical trials. This real-world, non-interventional study assessed radiographic progression in patients with RA or PsA treated with ETN for ≤ 36 months in outpatient care in Germany (NCT01623752). METHODS: Patients with RA or PsA attended ≤ 10 visits across two study phases (phase 1: seven visits, baseline to month 18; phase 2: three visits until month 36). Radiographs were taken at baseline (Rx1), months 12-18 (Rx2), and/or months 30-36 (Rx3). Historic radiographs (Rx0) taken 12-48 months pre-baseline were also evaluated (if available). The primary endpoint was the change in modified total Sharp score (mTSS). The erosion score (ES) and joint space narrowing score (JSN) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 1821 patients were enrolled (RA: n = 1378; PsA: n = 440). In patients with Rx1 and Rx2 (RA: n = 511; PsA: n = 167), the mean mTSS remained stable for both disease groups, and the annualized median change in mTSS was 0. In patients with Rx0, Rx1, and Rx2 (RA: n = 180; PsA: n = 47), annualized radiographic progression in mTSS, ES, and JSN was larger in the pre-ETN treatment phase than during ETN treatment in both disease groups. The percentage of patients with radiographic non-progression was higher during ETN treatment versus pre-ETN. Improvement in clinical disease activity and patient-reported outcomes was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first real-world, non-interventional study to report systematically collected radiographic data in a large cohort of patients with RA or PsA under treatment with a biologic. In patients with available radiographic data, mean radiographic progression was lower and the proportion of patients without progression was greater during ETN treatment than in the pre-ETN period.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are diseases in which inflammation can lead to damage in the joints. X-ray images can show whether the disease gets worse; this is called radiographic progression. Etanercept is a drug that acts on the body's immune system and can reduce inflammation in the joints. In clinical studies, radiographic progression was slower in people with RA or PsA who received etanercept compared with people who received another drug called methotrexate. In this study, we wanted to know how radiographic progression changes in people in Germany who receive etanercept as part of their routine treatment. A total of 1378 people with RA and 440 people with PsA received etanercept for up to 36 months. We observed little to no radiographic progression for most people during the study. Radiographic progression was worse before people started taking etanercept. More people had no radiographic progression while taking etanercept compared with before they started treatment. The proportion of people who responded to treatment with etanercept as measured by the number of painful joints increased throughout the study. Overall, people felt that their health improved after they started taking etanercept.This was the first large study in which we investigated how radiographic progression changes when people with RA or PsA start taking etanercept as part of their routine treatment. We observed a slowing or halting of radiographic progression in most people and an improvement in their overall health.

The Efficacy of Short-Term Bridging Strategies With High- and Low-Dose Prednisolone on Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Active Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: In active early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), glucocorticoids are often used for bridging, due to the delayed action of methotrexate. This study was undertaken to compare the effect of 3 bridging strategies, including high-dose and low-dose prednisolone, on radiographic and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Adult RA patients from 1 rheumatology hospital and 23 rheumatology practices who presented with moderate/high disease activity were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 60 mg prednisolone (high-dose prednisolone [HDP]) or 10 mg prednisolone (low-dose prednisolone [LDP]) daily (tapered to 0 mg within 12 weeks) or placebo. The 12-week intervention period was followed by 40 weeks of therapy at the physicians' discretion. The primary outcome measure was radiographic change at 1 year measured using the total modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS). Disease activity was assessed with the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). RESULTS: Of 395 randomized patients (HDP, n = 132; LDP, n = 131; placebo, n = 132), 375 (95%) remained in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Mean ± SD changes in SHS scores in the 3 groups after 1 year were comparable: mean ± SD 1.0 ± 2.0 units in the HDP group, 1.1 ± 2.2 units in the LDP group, and 1.1 ± 1.5 units in the placebo group. The primary analysis showed no superiority of HDP compared to placebo (estimated difference of the mean change -0.04 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.5, 0.4]). At week 12, the mean DAS28-ESR differed: -0.6 (95% CI -1.0, -0.2) for HDP versus placebo; -0.8 (95% CI -1.2, -0.5) for LDP versus placebo. At week 52, there was no significant difference in DAS28-ESR between the 3 groups (range 2.6-2.8). Serious adverse events occurred similarly often. CONCLUSION: Short-term glucocorticoid bridging therapy at a high dose showed no benefit with regard to progression of radiographic damage at 1 year.

Hydroxychloroquine in patients with inflammatory and erosive osteoarthritis of the hands: results of the OA-TREAT study-a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, investigator-initiated trial.

OBJECTIVES: Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a condition characterised by cartilage degradation and frequently erosive changes. Analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used for symptomatic relief but are often poorly tolerated or contraindicated. Previous publications suggest hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a possible treatment for hand OA. The OA-TREAT study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of HCQ in patients with inflammatory and erosive hand OA (EOA). METHODS: OA-TREAT was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial. Patients with inflammatory and EOA, according to the ACR criteria, with radiographically erosive disease were randomised 1:1 to HCQ 200-400 mg/day or PBO for 52 weeks (W52). Both groups received stable standard therapy. The primary endpoint was Australian Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) for pain and hand disability at W52. RESULTS: 75 patients were randomised to HCQ and 78 to PBO. At W52, mean AUSCAN pain was 26.7 in HCQ and 26.5 in PBO patients (p=0.92). Hand disability measured by AUSCAN function (mean) was 48.1 in HCQ and 51.3 in PBO patients (p=0.36). Changes in radiographic scores did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between treatment groups. There were 7 serious adverse events in the HCQ and 15 in the PBO group. CONCLUSIONS: OA-TREAT is the first large randomised PBO controlled trial focusing on EOA. HCQ was no more effective than PBO for changes in pain, function and radiographic scores in the 52-week period. Overall safety findings were consistent with the known profile of HCQ.

A 4-year non-randomized comparative phase-IV study of early rheumatoid arthritis: integrative anthroposophic medicine for patients with preference against DMARDs versus conventional therapy including DMARDs for patients without preference.

BACKGROUND: While disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are a mainstay of therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), some patients with early RA refuse DMARDs. In anthroposophic medicine (AM), a treatment strategy for early RA without DMARDs has been developed. Preliminary data suggest that RA symptoms and inflammatory markers can be reduced under AM, without DMARDs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-one self-selected patients aged 16-70 years, starting treatment for RA of <3 years duration, without prior DMARD therapy, participated in a prospective, non-randomized, comparative Phase IV study. C-patients were treated in clinics offering conventional therapy including DMARDs, while A-patients had chosen treatment in anthroposophic clinics, without DMARDs. Both groups received corticosteroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Primary outcomes were intensity of RA symptoms measured by self-rating on visual analog scales, C-reactive protein, radiological progression, study withdrawals, serious adverse events (SAE), and adverse drug reactions in months 0-48. RESULTS: The groups were similar in most baseline characteristics, while A-patients had longer disease duration (mean 15.1 vs 10.8 months, p<0.0001), slightly more bone destruction, and a much higher proportion of women (94.6% vs 69.7%, p<0.0001). In months 0-12, corticosteroids were used by 45.7% and 81.6% (p<0.0001) and NSAIDs by 52.8% and 68.5% (p=0.0191) of A- and C-patients, respectively. During follow-up, both groups not only had marked reduction of RA symptoms and C-reactive protein, but also some radiological disease progression. Also, 6.2% of A-patients needed DMARDs. Apart from adverse drug reactions (50.4% and 69.7% of A- and C-patients, respectively, p=0.0020), none of the primary outcomes showed any significant between-group difference. CONCLUSION: Study results suggest that for most patients preferring anthroposophic treatment, satisfactory results can be achieved without use of DMARDs and with less use of corticosteroids and NSAIDs than in conventional care. LIMITATION: Because of the non-randomized study design, with A-patients choosing anthroposophic treatment, one cannot infer how this treatment would have worked for C-patients.

Response to methotrexate predicts long-term mortality of patients with rheumatoid arthritis independent of the degree of response: results of a re-evaluation 30 years after baseline.

OBJECTIVES: To assess if there is a correlation between the degree of response to treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and long-term mortality in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) established in Germany in the early eighties. METHODS: RA patients who had started MTX treatment between 1980 and 1987 were included. One year after baseline, the treatment response was evaluated. Responders were defined as patients with at least 20% decline in the swollen joint count (out of 32 joints) and the ESR with a prednisone dosage <5 mg/day. Thereafter, assessments were performed at 10, 18, and 30 years after baseline. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated, Cox regression and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 271 patients. In 2015, about 30 years after the initiation of MTX therapy, 185 patients (68%) were deceased, 52 (19%) lost to follow-up and 34 alive. The response after the first year of MTX treatment was the strongest predictor of survival with a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.65). However, even responders still had an SMR of 1.37 (95% CI 1.31-1.65), but this was much worse for non-responders who had an SMR of 4.22 (95% CI 3.13-5.56). Using Cox regression analysis no difference was detected between responders with more than 50% improvement (38% of all patients) and those with 20-50% improvement (28%). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive value of a response to one year of MTX therapy for long-term mortality of RA patients is independent of the degree of response.

Response to methotrexate predicts long-term patient-related outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.

This study was conducted to investigate the predictive value of the initial response to methotrexate (MTX) on long-term patient-related outcomes (PROs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). All RA patients starting MTX treatment between 1980 and 1987 in our department were enrolled in a prospective observational study. After an average of 18 years, patient-related outcomes were assessed in three dimensions according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Statistical analyses employed multivariable models with baseline values for age, gender, disease duration, rheumatoid factor positivity, disease activity, response to MTX after 1 year and continuous use of MTX as covariates. The 271 patients enrolled had a mean disease duration of 8.5 years, a mean number of swollen joints of 18 (out of 32), and a mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 55 mm/h. After 18 years, PRO was available in 89 patients (33 %). A clinical improvement of at least 20 % 1 year after the initiation of MTX was associated with a favourable outcome in all three dimensions of the ICF, independent of continuation of MTX (p < 0.05). The initial response to MTX is an independent predictor of PRO in RA as assessed after an average of 18 years.

Radiologic damage at baseline predicts patient-related outcomes 18 years after the initiation of methotrexate therapy in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the association of the degree of radiologic damage at baseline with long-term patient-related outcomes (PRO) in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This prospective observational single-centre study (Ratingen, Germany) included all RA patients starting treatment with methotrexate (MTX) between 1980 and 1987. Standardised clinical evaluations and radiographs of hands and feet were obtained at baseline and during the following years. About 18 years later, patients were invited for a re-assessment. PRO were assessed in three dimensions according to the International Classification of Functioning and Disability (ICF). Statistical analyses comprised multivariable models using baseline values for radiologic damage of hands and feet, age, gender, disease duration, rheumatoid factor positivity, measures of disease activity, and response to MTX as covariates. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean disease duration was 8.5 years. The disease was active with a mean number of swollen joints of 18 (out of 32) and a mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 55 mm/hour. Radiologic damage was present in 95% of the patients. After 18 years, patient-related outcomes could be assessed in 78/271 patients (29%). Among chosen covariates, only the degree of baseline radiologic damage as measured by the Ratingen score was predictive of all long-term PRO (p<0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort including patients with severe RA, baseline radiologic damage was a good long-term predictor of PRO related to all three ICF dimensions.

Hydroxychloroquine in patients with inflammatory and erosive osteoarthritis of the hands (OA TREAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a heterogeneous group of conditions with disturbed integrity of articular cartilage and changes in the underlying bone. The pathogenesis of OA is multifactorial and not just a disease of older people. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) typically used for the treatment of various rheumatic and dermatologic diseases. Three studies of HCQ in OA, including one abstract and one letter, are available and use a wide variety of outcome measures in small patient populations. Despite initial evidence for good efficacy of HCQ, there has been no randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial in a larger patient group. In the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), evidence-based recommendations for the management of hand OA, HCQ was not included as a therapeutic option because of the current lack of randomized clinical trials. METHODS/DESIGN: OA TREAT is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 510 subjects with inflammatory and erosive hand OA, according to the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), with recent X-ray will be recruited across outpatient sites, hospitals and universities in Germany. Patients are randomized 1:1 to active treatment (HCQ 200 to 400 mg per day) or placebo for 52 weeks. Both groups receive standard therapy (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID], coxibs) for OA treatment, taken steadily two weeks before enrollment and continued further afterwards. If disease activity increases, the dose of NSAID/coxibs can be increased according to the drug recommendation. The co-primary clinical endpoints are the changes in Australian-Canadian OA Index (AUSCAN, German version) dimensions for pain and hand disability at week 52. The co-primary radiographic endpoint is the radiographic progression from baseline to week 52. A multiple endpoint test and analysis of covariance will be used to compare changes between groups. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. DISCUSSION: The OA TREAT trial will examine the clinical and radiological efficacy and safety of HCQ as a treatment option for inflammatory and erosive OA over 12 months. OA TREAT focuses on erosive hand OA in contrast to other current studies on symptomatic hand OA, for example, HERO [Trials 14:64, 2013]. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46445413, date of registration: 05-10-2011.

Glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: In spite of its broad use since 1950 the role of low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) (up to 7.5 mg/day prednisone) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is still controversial. AREAS COVERED: Publications comparing disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) plus prednisolone with DMARD monotherapy were reviewed. Most studies reported greater clinical improvement and greater inhibition of damage progression in the prednisone group. These advantages had vanished after 6 - 12 months in most studies. EXPERT OPINION: Several limitations of the studies are discussed. Often the advantage of GC treatment was not clinically important. Long-term data are needed to evaluate the real benefit of GC treatment in relation to its toxicity. Knowing the potential toxicity 'bridging' GC treatment should be reserved for patients at high risk of damage progression; a reliable method to identify these patients is needed. The toxicity of low-dose GC treatment is often played down. The reporting is incomplete. The increased mortality ratio with GC treatment is rarely mentioned. High cumulative doses are a risk factor. A more comprehensive set of toxicity items is urgently needed. Problems of GC treatment are the 'drug addiction' of the patient and the difficulty to reduce or withdraw prednisone.

Improved radiological outcome of rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of early treatment with methotrexate in the era of biological drugs.

The objective of this study is to compare the radiological progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed in the 1980s with those of the late 1990s until 2005 and to evaluate prognostic factors. Ninety-two RA patients who were firstly seen in our clinic from 1997 to 2005 were identified. As a control group, 89 RA patients from 1986 to 1990 were matched for the criteria disease duration (mean, 22 ± 17 months), age, and number of x-ray controls. Radiological damage was measured by the Ratingen score (RS). The baseline RS of the 1997-2005 group was significantly lower (mean, 3.8 ± 8.7 vs 7.7 ± 13.0; p < 0.0001) and showed less radiological progression during follow-up than the 1986-1990 group (ΔRS/year of 0.95 ± 2.19 vs. 5.69 ± 8.43; p < 0.0001). In the later group, more patients (73 vs. 28%) had methotrexate (MTX). Twenty-one (23%) of the patients in the later group received biological drugs. However, the subgroup 1997-2000 (n = 29), before the approval of TNF-inhibitors, had already lower baseline RS in comparison to 1986-1990 (2.7 ± 4.9; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that early start of MTX (before or directly after first consultation) was a predictor of favorable outcome (p < 0.005), as were low erythrocyte sedimentation rate at baseline and belonging to the later group. In contrast, neither treatment with glucocorticoids or biological drugs nor the overall rate of MTX or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use was predictive. Radiological damage is markedly diminished in RA patients seen since mid of the 1990s. Early treatment with MTX seems to be the key factor for this improved prognosis.

Induction therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate for 24 weeks followed by methotrexate monotherapy up to week 48 versus methotrexate therapy alone for DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: HIT HARD, an investigator-initiated study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term effects of induction therapy with adalimumab (ADA) plus methotrexate (MTX) in comparison with placebo (PBO) plus MTX in DMARD-naïve patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active early RA (disease duration of ≤12 months) were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg ADA subcutaneously every other week (eow) plus MTX 15 mg/week subcutaneously or PBO plus MTX subcutaneously at 15 mg/week over 24 weeks. Thereafter, all patients received MTX monotherapy up to week 48. The primary outcome was the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at week 48. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients in remission (DAS28<2.6), ACR responses, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score and radiographic progression. RESULTS: 87 patients were assigned to ADA/MTX and 85 patients to PBO/MTX. At baseline, DAS28 was 6.2±0.8 in the ADA/MTX and 6.3±0.9 in the PBO/MTX groups. At week 24, treatment with ADA/MTX compared with PBO/MTX resulted in a greater reduction in DAS28 (3.0±1.2 vs 3.6±1.4; p=0.009) and other secondary outcomes such as DAS28 remission rate (47.9% vs 29.5%; p=0.021) and HAQ (0.49±0.6 vs 0.72±0.6; p=0.0014). At week 48, the difference in clinical outcomes between groups was not statistically significant (DAS28: 3.2±1.4 vs 3.4±1.6; p=0.41). Radiographic progression at week 48 was significantly greater in patients administered PBO/MTX (Sharp/van der Heijde score: ADA/MTX 2.6 vs PBO/MTX 6.4; p=0.03, Ratingen score: 1.7 vs 4.2; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A greater reduction in radiographic progression after initial combination therapy with ADA and MTX was seen at week 48, even after discontinuation of ADA treatment at week 24. This sustained effect was not found at the primary endpoint (DAS28 reduction).

Risk of incident or recurrent malignancies among patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to biologic therapy in the German biologics register RABBIT.

INTRODUCTION: We used the data of the German biologics register RABBIT, a nationwide prospective cohort study, to investigate the risk of new or recurrent malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving biologics compared to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: The analysis was based on patients with RA enrolled in RABBIT at the start of a biologic or conventional DMARD therapy between 01 May 2001 and 31 December 2006. Incidences of first or recurrent malignancies were analysed separately. A nested case-control design was used to investigate the risk of developing a first malignancy. Matching criteria were: age, gender, follow-up time, disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) at study entry, smoking status, and selected chronic co-morbid conditions (obstructive or other lung disease, kidney, liver or gastrointestinal disease, psoriasis). RESULTS: A prior malignancy was reported in 122 out of 5,120 patients. Fifty-eight of these patients had received anti-TNFalpha agents, 9 anakinra, and 55 conventional DMARDs at study entry. In 14 patients (ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha: eight, to anakinra: one) 15 recurrent cancers were observed. The average time period since the onset of the first malignancy was nine years. Crude recurrence rates per 1,000 patient-years (pyrs) were 45.5 for patients exposed to anti-TNFalpha agents, 32.3 for anakinra patients and 31.4 for patients exposed to DMARDs only (Incidence rate ratio anti-TNFalpha vs. DMARD = 1.4, P = 0.6.). In patients without prior cancer, 74 patients (70% female, mean age: 61.3) developed a first malignancy during the observation. This corresponds to an incidence rate (IR) of 6.0/1,000 pyrs. Forty-four of these patients were ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha treatment (IR = 5.1/1,000 pyrs). In a nested case-control study comparing cancer patients to cancer-free controls, 44 of the cancer patients and 44 of the cancer-free controls were ever exposed to anti-TNFalpha agents (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the overall incidence of malignancies in patients exposed or unexposed to anti-TNFalpha or anakinra treatment were found. The same applied to the risk of recurrent malignancies. However, in particular this last finding needs further validation in larger data sets.

An update on methotrexate.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Methotrexate (MTX) has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for about three decades now. MTX is one of the most effective and commonly used medicines to treat various forms of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions. MTX was shown to improve signs and symptoms of RA, disease activity and function, to a similar degree as the tumor necrosis factor blockers, and it inhibits radiographic progression to a smaller degree than the antitumor necrosis factor agents. MTX is considered as the anchor drug among the disease-modifying antirheumatic agents, and it is internationally accepted as the first choice in the management of RA. This review was performed on the basis of a PubMed literature search looking at all publications on MTX and arthritis in 2008. RECENT FINDINGS: MTX seems to even prolong the life span of patients who tolerate the drug and have clinical benefit from this therapy; this may partly be explained by beneficial effects on cardiovascular mortality. The reason for this may well be the suppression of inflammation, but direct atheroprotective effects of MTX may also play a role. MTX is used as monotherapy and in combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic agents or biologic agents such as the antitumor necrosis factor agents. The 'early' use of MTX within 5 years after disease onset is clearly associated with improved outcomes. The management of RA should include an early strong suppression of inflammation and continuously a tight control strategy. The pharmacodynamics and kinetics of MTX are still incompletely understood. SUMMARY: In this review, we especially cover the following themes: new clinical studies on the use of MTX in RA, the use of MTX in other rheumatic conditions, prediction of response to MTX, optimal dosage, MTX use in the elderly, the mechanism of action, the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacogenetics of MTX, the prevention of side effects, and the overall long-term safety.

Radiographic joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis is highly dependent on body mass index.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and radiographic joint damage (using the Ratingen Score [RS]) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study was carried out in 767 patients with early RA. Standard clinical data, RS, and BMI were evaluated at baseline and after 3 years. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed in rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive and RF-negative patients to determine the influence of BMI (<25 versus > or = 30 kg/m(2)) on considerable joint damage (RS > or = 7) after 3 years, adjusting for sex, age, disease duration, and disease activity (using the Disease Activity Scale in 28 joints [DAS28]). RESULTS: Patients of normal weight already had significantly more joint damage at study entry than obese patients (mean RS 4.5 versus 2.4; P = 0.004) and experienced significantly more progression than obese patients (RS 3.4 versus 1.3; P = 0.011). At 3 years, their RS score was twice as high as that of the obese patients (7.5 versus 3.7; P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analyses in both serologic groups revealed significantly higher odds of RS > or = 7 in RF-positive patients of normal weight than in RF-positive obese patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.3), but not in RF-negative patients. Male sex (OR 1.6), osteoporosis (OR 2.0), C-reactive protein levels >15 mg/liter versus <5 mg/liter (OR 2.6), and disease activity (DAS28 > or = 5.1 versus <3.2; OR 1.9) were independently associated with RS > or = 7. CONCLUSION: BMI provides a risk estimate of joint damage in RA patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate the association between BMI, RF, and joint damage in RA and the possible role of adipose tissue.

Expert agreement confirms that negative changes in hand and foot radiographs are a surrogate for repair in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that experts recognize repair of erosions and, if so, to determine which, if any, morphologic features permitted them to recognize the repair. We also tested whether scoring by a standard method detected repair. Seven experienced readers of radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis were presented with 64 sets of single joints-of-interest at two time points, randomized and blinded for the correct sequence. The readers assessed which joint was better, and recorded whether any of six specific features were seen. Two independent readers, experienced in scoring by the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method who were not on the expert panel, then scored the complete films that included the joint-of-interest. The panel agreed very well on which of two joints was better, and, even though they did not know the true sequence, the panel accurately assigned a sequence slightly better than chance alone (58%) but worse than their agreement on which image was 'better or worse' (78%). The readers therefore indirectly assigned repair by choosing the second film as the best. Putative repair features were seen in cases of both repair and progression, and were not discriminatory. Similar results were obtained when the experts were presented with the entire hand or foot containing the joint-of-interest. In the third repair exercise, two independent readers who scored whole hands and feet using a standard method found a mean negative score in 22/60 joints-of-interest. All 22 joints were also scored as repair by the panel. Repair was detected reliably by a majority of the panel on viewing paired images based on a better/worse decision and assigning sequence in a set of images that were blinded for sequence by an independent project manager. In this test set of images, repair was manifested by a reduction in the size of erosion in many cases. Size was one feature that aided the experts to detect repair but cannot be the only one; the experts had to find other features to determine whether a smaller erosion was the first in a sequence of radiographs in a patient with progressive damage or was the second film in a patient exhibiting repair. The change in size of erosion was also picked up by independent readers applying the van der Heijde-modified Sharp scoring method and was reflected in their scores.