Participants' baseline characteristics and feedback of the nature-based social intervention "friends in nature" among lonely older adults in assisted living facilities in finland: a randomised controlled trial of the RECETAS EU-project.

BACKGROUND: Loneliness is common among older adults in institutional settings. It leads to adverse effects on health and wellbeing, for which nature contact with peers in turn may have positive impact. However, the effects of nature engagement among older adults have not been studied in randomised controlled trials (RCT). The "Friends in Nature" (FIN) group intervention RCT for lonely older adults in Helsinki assisted living facilities (ALFs) aims to explore the effects of peer-related nature experiences on loneliness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In this study we aim describe the participants' baseline characteristics of the RCT, feasibility of FIN intervention and intervention participants' feedback on the FIN. METHODS: Lonely participants were recruited from 22 ALFs in Helsinki area, Finland, and randomised into two groups: 1) nature-based social intervention once a week for nine weeks (n = 162) and 2) usual care (n = 157). Demographics, diagnoses and medication use were retrieved from medical records, and baseline cognition, functioning, HRQoL, loneliness and psychological wellbeing were assessed. Primary trial outcomes will be participants' loneliness (De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale) and HRQoL (15D). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 83 years, 73% were female and mean Minimental State Examination of 21 points. The participants were living with multiple co-morbidities and/or disabilities. The intervention and control groups were comparable at baseline. The adherence with intervention was moderate, with a mean attendance of 6.8 out of the nine sessions. Of the participants, 14% refused, fell ill or were deceased, and therefore, participated three sessions or less. General subjective alleviation of loneliness was achieved in 57% of the intervention participants. Of the respondents, 96% would have recommended a respective group intervention to other older adults. Intervention participants appreciated their nature excursions and experiences. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully randomised 319 lonely residents in assisted living facilities into a trial about the effects of nature experiences in a group-format. The feedback from participants was favourable. The trial will provide important information about possibilities of alleviating loneliness with peer-related nature-based experiences in frail residents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05507684. Registration 19/08/2022.

Comparing Loneliness, Social Inactivity, and Social Isolation: Associations with Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality among Home-Dwelling Older Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation are intertwined concepts. When assessed separately, they indicate poor well-being, adverse health effects, and increased mortality. Studies exploring overlapping and comparing the prognosis of these concepts are scarce. We investigated (1) overlapping of concepts of loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation, (2) characteristics of groups: group 0 (not lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated), group 1 (lonely), group 2 (not lonely but socially inactive and/or socially isolated), and (3) the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychological well-being (PWB), and 3.6-year mortality of these groups. METHODS: The home-dwelling older adults (n = 989; 75 y+) of the Helsinki Aging Study in 2019-2022 completing all required questionnaires were assessed. Group 0 included 494, group 1 included 280, and group 2 included 215 participants. Variables studied were demographics, diagnoses, mobility, physical functioning (Barthel index), and cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination). Outcomes were HRQoL (15D) and PWB. Mortality was retrieved from central registers. RESULTS: Half of the sample was lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated, but only 2% were simultaneously lonely, socially inactive, and socially isolated. Of lonely participants, 38% were also socially inactive and/or socially isolated. The lonely participants were significantly more often widowed or lived alone and had the lowest HRQoL and poorest PWB compared with the other groups. After adjustments (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index), mortality did not statistically differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Loneliness is an independent determinant of poor HRQoL and PWB, and it should be considered separately from social inactivity and social isolation.

Nature-based social interventions to address loneliness among vulnerable populations: a common study protocol for three related randomized controlled trials in Barcelona, Helsinki, and Prague within the RECETAS European project.

BACKGROUND: The negative effects of loneliness on population health and wellbeing requires interventions that transcend the medical system and leverage social, cultural, and public health system resources. Group-based social interventions are a potential method to alleviate loneliness. Moreover, nature, as part of our social and health infrastructure, may be an important part of the solutions that are needed to address loneliness. The RECETAS European project H2020 (Re-imagining Environments for Connection and Engagement: Testing Actions for Social Prescribing in Natural Spaces) is an international research project aiming to develop and test the effectiveness of nature-based social interventions to reduce loneliness and increase health-related quality of life. METHODS: This article describes the three related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that will be implemented: the RECETAS-BCN Trial in Barcelona (Spain) is targeting people 18+ from low socio-economic urban areas; the RECETAS-PRG Trial in Prague (Czech Republic) is addressing community-dwelling older adults over 60 years of age, and the RECETAS-HLSNK trial is reaching older people in assisted living facilities. Each trial will recruit 316 adults suffering from loneliness at least sometimes and randomize them to nature-based social interventions called "Friends in Nature" or to the control group. "Friends in Nature" uses modifications of the "Circle of Friends" methodology based on group processes of peer support and empowerment but including activities in nature. Participants will be assessed at baseline, at post-intervention (3 months), and at 6- and 12-month follow-up after baseline. Primary outcomes are the health-related quality-of-life according to 15D measure and The De Jong Gierveld 11-item loneliness scale. Secondary outcomes are health and psychosocial variables tailored to the specific target population. Nature exposure will be collected throughout the intervention period. Process evaluation will explore context, implementation, and mechanism of impact. Additionally, health economic evaluations will be performed. DISCUSSION: The three RECETAS trials will explore the effectiveness of nature-based social interventions among lonely people from various ages, social, economic, and cultural backgrounds. RECETAS meets the growing need of solid evidence for programs addressing loneliness by harnessing the beneficial impact of nature on enhancing wellbeing and social connections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Barcelona (Spain) trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05488496. Registered 29 July 2022. Prague (Czech Republic) trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05522140. Registered August 25, 2022. Helsinki (Finland) trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05507684. Registered August 12, 2022.