Alternative uses of ustekinumab for non-indicated dermatological conditions: a systematic review.

Ustekinumab is approved for the treatment of psoriasis and Crohn's disease. Because many dermatological conditions are due to immune-mediated development, ustekinumab may be effective in other conditions. A systematic review of the off-label uses of ustekinumab, as well as on-label adverse effect, was performed, reporting on clinical improvement. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies regarding ustekinumab treatment of rativa (HS), lichen planus (LP), pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP), cutalopecia areata (AA), atopic dermatitis (AD), Bechet's disease, bullous pemphigoid (BP), hidradenitis suppuaneous sarcoidosis, cutaneous systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and vitiligo. Descriptive statistics were performed. 74 articles of 4596 screened were included, and reported on 212 patients receiving ustekinumab treatment. Across all studies, ustekinumab showed promise in treating patients: AA (10/12 patients; 83.3% improvement), AD (28/74 patients; 37.8% improvement), HS (42/52 patients; 80.8% improvement), and PRP (25/27 patients; 92.6% improvement), among others. Adverse events were noted with the use of ustekinumab, including development of AA (four patients), AD (three patients), and BP (four patients), among others. Ustekinumab can be a promising option for patients with dermatological conditions refractory to traditional therapies. Adverse events must be monitored in certain patients.

Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence.

In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical background of patients with HFmrEF is intermediate between that of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of demographics and comorbid conditions. However, the current evidence, stemming from observational studies and post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, suggests that patients with HFmrEF benefit from medications that target the neurohormonal axes, a pathophysiological behavior that resembles that of HFrEF. Use of ß-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan is reasonable in patients with HFmrEF, whereas evidence is currently scarce for other therapies. In clinical practice, patients with HFmrEF are treated more like HFrEF patients, potentially because of history of systolic dysfunction that has partially recovered. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function with contemporary noninvasive modalities, e.g., echocardiographic strain imaging, is promising for the selection of patients with HFmrEF who will benefit from neurohormonal antagonists and other HFrEF-targeted therapies.

Impact of Intravascular Brachytherapy on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular brachytherapy (VBT) is an established treatment for the management of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, whether VBT is associated with improved patient reported outcomes unknown. METHODS: We evaluated 51 consecutive patients undergoing VBT in one or more coronary arteries from January 2018 to September 2019. Data on baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes and adverse events were obtained. All patients completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire - 7 (SAQ-7) form before and after VBT at 1 month and 6 months. RESULTS: The mean age was 69 ± 9 years and 29 (57%) of patients were males. Procedural success was 94.1%. The mean summary SAQ-7 score improved significantly (53.2 ± 21 vs. 83 ± 19, p < .001) at 30-days. The median Quality of Life (QoL) component of SAQ-7 score was 31.3 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 18.8, 62.5) and improved to 82.5 (IQR: 62.5, 100), p < .001 at 30 days and 87.5 [IQR: 75, 100), p < .001 at last follow up. Likewise, the median angina frequency component of the SQL-7 score pre-VBT was 55 (IQR: 45, 80) and improved significantly to 90 (IQR: 60, 100) at 30-days, p < .001 and 100 [IQR: 68.8, 100], p = .02 at last follow up. Lastly, the median activity component of the SAQ-7 score improved from 83.3 (IQR: 60-100) to 100 (IQR: 83, 100), p = .01 at 30-days. Thus, results were evident as early as 1 month and sustained at median follow up of 17 months. CONCLUSION: VBT is associated with improvement in patient reported outcome measures at short term and long term follow up.

Serum ST2 and hospitalization rates in Caucasian and African American outpatients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the association between circulating suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) and recurrent hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) encounters in outpatients with heart failure (HF). In addition, data on ST2 in African American patients with HF are scarce. METHODS: We evaluated 307 outpatients with HF (age, 57 ±â€¯12 years; 64.2% men; 51.5% Caucasian, 45.6% African American; median ejection fraction, 35%; ischemic etiology, 41.4%). Median ST2 was 37.8 ng/mL (29.6-51.4). RESULTS: After a median of 3.1 years, there were 584 hospitalizations (224 for HF) and 335 ED visits (80 for HF). Patients (N = 176; 57.3%) with elevated (>35 ng/mL) ST2 had 2-fold higher hospitalization rates in adjusted models (rate ratio [RR] 1.97; 95% CI 1.38-2.82; P < 0.001), driven by 3.5-fold higher HF hospitalization rates (adjusted RR 3.56; 95% CI 1.69-7.49; P < 0.001). These associations persisted after adjusting for baseline B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Findings were similar for elevated ST2 and ED visit rates. Elevated ST2 was associated with the composite of death or HF hospitalization (109 patients; 3-year estimate: 35.4%); risk was 5-fold higher in the first 6 months but declined gradually. The higher hospitalization rates and composite endpoint risk associated with elevated ST2 was similar in African Americans and Caucasians. In landmark analyses in a subset of patients, 6-month (N = 112) and 12-month (N = 149) changes in ST2 levels from baseline added prognostic information. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated ST2 in outpatients with HF portends higher healthcare resources utilization and higher risk for accelerated disease progression, regardless of race, especially in the first 6 months.

Serial Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Outcomes in Outpatients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Limited data exist on the course of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) among outpatients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and its impact on outcomes. We evaluated 322 consecutive outpatients with confirmed HF, LVEF >40%, no previous LVEF ≤40%, and no specific cardiomyopathies or primary right-sided or valvular heart disease. Median age was 73 years (interquartile range: 63 to 82); 57.1% were women, 50.3% White, and 45.0% Black; median LVEF was 55% (50% to 60%); and 45.6% had coronary artery disease. After a median of 37 months (32 to 38) and 4.5 follow-up echocardiograms (4 to 6) per patient, 11.4% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2% to 17.7%) developed LVEF <40%. The average drop in LVEF among these patients was 19.4 units (95%CI 15.0 to 23.8) to an average LVEF of 30.3% (95%CI 27.4% to 33.2%). Baseline systolic blood pressure >130 mm Hg was associated with more LVEF decline. During follow-up, 50 patients died (3-year mortality 15.3%) and 67 additional patients were hospitalized for HF (3-year death plus HF hospitalization 35.6%). Development of LVEF <40% was subsequently followed by 5-fold higher mortality in time-updated models (adjusted HR 4.91; 95%CI 2.00 to 12.0; p = 0.001) and 3.5-fold higher rates of death or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 3.70; 95%CI 1.67 to 8.19; p = 0.001). Interval coronary events were infrequent (10%) among patients with deteriorated LVEF. The impact of LVEF changes on outcomes was similar in White and Black patients. In conclusion, a proportion of patients with HFpEF will develop reduced LVEF over time. These patients have worse prognosis subsequently.