Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 64(7): 369-374, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28089318

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have demonstrated the difference in the verbal rating scale with regard to obstructed labour and induced labour, so that obstructed labour and foetal macrosomia have been related to a greater sensation of pain during labour, particularly in the first stage. Even the epidural analgesia is linked to the need for instrumented or caesarean section due to foetal obstruction. The goal of the study is to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in normal versus obstructed labour. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty pregnant women were included in an observational, analytical, longitudinal and prospective study, that was performed in the Obstetrics Department of the Hospital Universitario Dexeus. All the nulliparous or multiparous over 36 weeks of pregnancy, after 3cm of cervical dilatation in spontaneous or induced labor were included. All the patients were given epidural analgesia according to protocol. RESULTS: The basic descriptive methods were used for the univariate statistical analysis of the sample and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison of means between both groups. The correlations between variables were studied by means of the Spearman coefficient of correlation. The differences regarded as statistically significant are those whose P<.05. CONCLUSION: In our population there were no statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in normal versus obstructed labour. Patients who got epidural analgesia and had obstructed labors have the same degree of verbal rating scale as patients that do not had obstructed labors (P>.05).


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Parto Obstétrico , Distocia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 54(2): 125-7, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17390694

RESUMO

Beriberi is a disease caused by thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency. Peripheral and central nerve involvement causes psychosis and memory loss as well as cardiocirculatory effects. We report the case of a 35-year-old woman 8 weeks pregnant who came to the emergency department after bouts of nausea and vomiting over a period of 6 days, with intolerance of both solids and liquids. The initial diagnosis of gastroenteritis was later changed to hyperemesis gravidarum. Episodes of vomiting and nausea continued 48 hours after admission, accompanied by vertical nystagmus, ataxia, and diminished osteotendinous reflexes. Evaluation of the clinical picture confirmed vitamin B1 deficiency, leading to a diagnosis of Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Symptoms improved with thiamine therapy but did not entirely disappear. The patient was admitted for elective cesarean section at 37 weeks' gestation. Examination revealed neurological involvement (horizontal and vertical nystagmus) and general anesthesia was therefore chosen to assure adequate hemodynamic control given the possibility of cardiocirculatory alteration.


Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica , Beriberi , Cesárea , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA