Understanding Social Media: Opportunities for Cardiovascular Medicine.

Cardiology professionals have used social media platforms such as Twitter to gain exposure to new research, network with experts, share opinions, and engage in scientific debates. The power of social media to communicate openly, with wide-reaching access worldwide, and at a rate faster than ever before makes it a formidable force and voice. However, evolving individual and institutional use has resulted in uncertainty for all parties on how to optimally advance this newer digital frontier. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to: 1) introduce the basics of social media usage (with the focus on Twitter); 2) provide perspective on best social media practices in academic and clinical cardiovascular medicine; and 3) present a vision for social media and the future of cardiovascular medicine.

Update on the Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Acquired Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies.

Cardiomyopathies refer to a variety of myocardial disorders without underlying coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, hypertension, or congenital heart disease. Several imaging modalities are available, but cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has now established itself as a crucial imaging technique in the evaluation of several cardiomyopathies. It not only provides comprehensive information on structure and function, but also can perform tissue characterization, which helps in establishing the etiology of cardiomyopathy. CMR is also useful in establishing the diagnosis, providing guidance for endomyocardial biopsy, accurate quantification of function, volumes, and fibrosis, prognostic determination, risk stratification, and monitoring response to therapy. In this article, we review the current role of CMR in the evaluation of several acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies, particularly focusing on recent advances in knowledge. We also discuss in detail a select group of common acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies.

A regional pharmacoinvasive PCI strategy incorporating selected bleeding avoidance strategies.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacoinvasive therapy (PIT) is a potential treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who are not able to achieve primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) within guideline-recommended time limits. The risk for bleeding complications with PIT has not been studied in the setting of routine use of two selected bleeding avoidance strategies (BAS): bivalirudin and vascular closure devices. METHODS: We analyzed a contemporary multicenter registry (2009-2013) of consecutive patients undergoing PCI as part of a 10-hospital regional algorithm involving one PCI center and nine transfer centers: PIT for hospitals greater than 60 min (N=140), and primary PCI if less than 60-min travel time to the PCI center (N=346). We compared the risk for Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS) major bleeding among patients undergoing PIT versus primary PCI in the setting of routine use of selected BAS and determined the independent predictors of major bleeding in the entire cohort. RESULTS: The PIT patients had a median travel time of 103±49 min, were more frequently female, had a higher incidence of renal failure, and had a lower frequency of cardiogenic shock compared with the primary PCI group. BAS were routine and similar in both groups. Rates of death, stroke, and ischemic and major bleeding outcomes were similar between the two groups, and the length of stay was shorter in the PIT group. Multivariate logistic models indicated that two independent predictors of major bleeding were cardiac arrest [odds ratio (OR)=3.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-12.1, P=0.02] and bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor utilization (OR=3.29, 95% CI: 1.1-9.6, P=0.03). The PIT strategy in conjunction with selected BAS did not predict major bleeding (OR=2.1, 95% CI: 0.85-5.44, P=0.11). CONCLUSION: Bleeding and ischemia rates were similar between the PIT and primary PCI strategies in the setting of routine use of selected BAS; further study on a broader range of BAS including the radial approach may be warranted. Cardiac arrest and bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, but not PIT in conjunction with selected BAS, are independent predictors of bleeding risk in a regional ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction population.