RESUMO
Introduction: Introduction: malnutrition is a very frequent problem in oncology patients and may have serious repercussions. Adequate nutritional management is cost-effective in terms of health and survival in this population, but it requires multidisciplinary coordination, specific training, and continuous follow-up. Objective: to validate the applicability and efficacy of a multidisciplinary nutritional support protocol in oncology patients. Methods: a multidisciplinary nutritional protocol was developed for oncology patients, with guidelines for screening and assessment of malnutrition, treatment, re-evaluation, and management of side effects, as well as guidance on supplementation and eating patterns. The protocol would be implemented in various clinical centers, collecting data through a structured questionnaire, registering variables before and after implementation. Results: the protocol and its impact were implemented and evaluated in 39 centers. An improvement in nutritional care was observed, evidenced by an earlier initiation of nutritional assessment and an increase in the number of patients receiving adequate care following the protocol implementation. Problems related to inadequate malnutrition coding in the centers, limited resources, and the need for greater interdepartmental collaboration were identified. Conclusions: the conduct of this study provides insights into how the implementation of a multidisciplinary nutritional support protocol can improve the nutritional care received by patients and informs about the main obstacles to adequate implementation.
Introducción: Introducción: la desnutrición es un problema muy frecuente en el paciente oncológico y puede tener graves repercusiones. Un manejo nutricional adecuado es coste-efectivo en términos de salud y supervivencia en esta población, pero requiere de coordinación multidisciplinar, formación específica y seguimiento continuo. Objetivo: validar la aplicabilidad y eficacia de un protocolo multidisciplinar de soporte nutricional en pacientes oncológicos. Métodos: se desarrolló un protocolo nutricional multidisciplinar para pacientes oncológicos, con pautas para el cribado y valoración de la desnutrición, el tratamiento, la reevaluación y la gestión de los efectos secundarios, además de orientaciones sobre suplementación y patrones de alimentación. Se implementaría el protocolo en diversos centros clínicos, recogiendo datos a través de un cuestionario estructurado, registrando variables antes y después de la implementación. Resultados: se implementó y se valoraron el protocolo y su impacto en 39 centros. Se observó una mejoría en la atención nutricional, evidenciada por un inicio más precoz de la valoración nutricional y un aumento en el número de pacientes que recibían atención adecuada tras la implementación del protocolo. Se identificaron problemas relacionados con una inadecuada codificación de la desnutrición en los centros, recursos limitados y la necesidad de mayor colaboración interdepartamental. Conclusiones: la realización de este estudio ofrece información de cómo la implementación de un protocolo multidisciplinar de soporte nutricional puede contribuir a mejorar la atención nutricional que reciben los pacientes e informa de cuáles son los principales obstáculos para una implementación adecuada.
Assuntos
Desnutrição , Neoplasias , Avaliação Nutricional , Apoio Nutricional , Humanos , Espanha , Desnutrição/terapia , Desnutrição/diagnóstico , Desnutrição/etiologia , Apoio Nutricional/métodos , Apoio Nutricional/normas , Neoplasias/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Protocolos Clínicos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , IdosoRESUMO
We present the case of a 35-y-old woman with short bowel syndrome secondary to extensive intestinal resection with associated chronic kidney disease who was undergoing hemodialysis. This patient required permanent supplementation with intradialytic parenteral nutrition because of a high-output end-jejunostomy. The patient was a candidate for treatment with teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 2 analog, intending to increase intestinal absorption. A complete nutritional assessment was performed using bioelectrical impedance vector analysis. Teduglutide treatment was successful, and after a 1-y follow-up, the patient had considerably reduced end-jejunostomy output (reduction of 6 L/d) and an improved nutritional status (9.1 kg weight gain, 1.4 kg fat-free mass gain, and a 2.2-degree increase in bioimpedance phase angle). However, we have been unable to reduce intradialytic parenteral nutrition, which the patient requires thrice weekly. No significant secondary effects have occurred because of teduglutide administration. This may be the first reported use of teduglutide in a patient with short bowel syndrome undergoing hemodialysis who was monitored using bioelectrical impedance data during follow-up.