Femoral Neck Fractures With Associated Ipsilateral Femoral Shaft Fractures in Young Adults <50 Years Old: A Multicenter Comparison of 80 Cases Versus Isolated Femoral Neck Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze patients, injury patterns, and treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients with FNFs associated with shaft fractures (assocFNFs) to improve clinical outcomes. The secondary goal was to compare this injury pattern to that of young patients with isolated FNFs (isolFNFs). DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort series. SETTING: Twenty-six North American level-1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Skeletally mature patients, <50 years old, treated with operative fixation of an FNF with or without an associated femoral shaft fracture. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The main outcome measurement was treatment failure defined as nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, or subsequent major revision surgery. Odds ratios for these modes of treatment were also calculated. RESULTS: Eighty assocFNFs and 412 isolFNFs evaluated in this study were different in terms of patients, injury patterns, and treatment strategy. Patients with assocFNFs were younger (33.3 ± 8.6 vs. 37.5 ± 8.7 years old, P < 0.001), greater in mean body mass index [BMI] (29.7 vs. 26.6, P < 0.001), and more frequently displaced (95% vs. 73%, P < 0.001), "vertically oriented" Pauwels type 3, P < 0.001 (84% vs. 43%) than for isolFNFs, with all P values < 0.001. AssocFNFs were more commonly repaired with an open reduction (74% vs. 46%, P < 0.001) and fixed-angle implants (59% vs. 39%) (P < 0.001). Importantly, treatment failures were less common for assocFNFs compared with isolFNFs (20% vs. 49%, P < 0.001) with lower rates of failed fixation/nonunion and malunion (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Odds of treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) = 0.270, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.48, P < 0.001], nonunion (OR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.10-0.57, P < 0.001), and malunion (OR = 0.920, 95% CI, 0.01-0.68, P = 0.002) were also lower for assocFNFs. Excellent or good reduction was achieved in 84.2% of assocFNFs reductions and 77.1% in isolFNFs (P = 0.052). AssocFNFs treated with fixed-angle devices performed very well, with only 13.0% failing treatment compared with 51.9% in isolFNFs treated with fixed-angle constructs (P = <0.001) and 33.3% in assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws (P = 0.034). This study also identified the so-called "shelf sign," a transverse ≥6-mm medial-caudal segment of the neck fracture (forming an acute angle with the vertical fracture line) in 54% of assocFNFs and only 9% of isolFNFs (P < 0.001). AssocFNFs with a shelf sign failed in only 5 of 41 (12%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: AssocFNFs in young patients are characterized by different patient factors, injury patterns, and treatments, than for isolFNFs, and have a relatively better prognosis despite the need for confounding treatment for the associated femoral shaft injury. Treatment failures among assocFNFs repaired with a fixed-angle device occurred at a lower rate compared with isolFNFs treated with any construct type and assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws. The radiographic "shelf sign" was found as a positive prognostic sign in more than half of assocFNFs and predicted a high rate of successful treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Editorial Commentary: Gracilis-Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Hamstring Graft Reconstruction Is Less Invasive Than Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft Harvest, and Shows No Clinical Difference in Outcomes With Grafts Greater Than 8 mm in Diameter.

Although patellar tendon grafts are most commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States, hamstring autograft is most commonly used worldwide. Hamstring advantages include easy, quick harvest; low morbidity; ease of rehabilitation (compared with patellar tendon grafts); and relatively less pain. Historically, both the semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis are harvested, but by doubling, tripling, or quadrupling the ST to achieve an 8-mm graft, the gracilis can be spared, resulting in less knee flexion weakness. However, recent research has shown no clinically important difference between ST and ST-gracilis patient outcomes.

The Effect of Radial Inclination on the Stage of Kienbock Disease at the Time of Initial Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Negative ulnar variance is a widely accepted risk factor for the development of Kienbock disease (KD). Variation in radial inclination has been proposed as a risk factor, but evidence thus far has been inconclusive. We aim to clarify the relationship between radial inclination and KD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all KD patients from a single institution from 2007 to 2021 was conducted. Radiographs were reviewed to measure anatomic parameters and stage of disease. An exploratory multinomial regression model was created to examine the association of patient age, radial height, ulnar variance, radial inclination, volar tilt, scapholunate angle, duration of symptoms prior to evaluation, history of wrist trauma, and diagnosis of diabetes with stage of disease. RESULTS: Fifty-seven cases of KD were identified, with a mean duration of disease of 33.3 months. A history of trauma to the wrist was common (53%) and significantly associated with stage of disease at initial presentation. Twenty-seven cases (47%) were stage IIIB or greater. The average initial radial inclination, radial height, and ulnar variance was 21.9°, 10.7 mm, and -1.23 mm, respectively. A multinominal logistic regression model revealed decreased initial radial inclination is associated with Lichtman stage IIIB or greater at the time of initial patient presentation. CONCLUSIONS: A correlation exists between decreased radial inclination and more advanced KD at presentation, suggesting this may be a risk factor for disease progression. This correlation is strengthened by our finding of decreased ulnar variance being associated with later stage at presentation, which is one of the most widely accepted proposed risk factors for development and progression of disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Implementation of a Preoperative Huddle at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: Medical errors resulting in patient harm still occur at an alarmingly high rate. Surgery is a high-risk area that can frequently result in patient harm if errors occur. There is a need for standardization of communication and processes to decrease errors. We sought to determine whether the implementation of a preoperative huddle at our hospital could standardize communication and decrease medical errors. METHODS: A unique preoperative huddle was developed and implemented at a level 1 trauma center. We reviewed data before and after the implementation of the preoperative huddle including patient surveys and comments, the percentage of on-time operating room (OR) starts, OR turnover times, and the number of sentinel events. RESULTS: After huddle implementation, we observed a trend of improvement in our patient survey results on patient's perception that the doctors/nurses explained the procedure understandably after huddle implementation. There was a statistically yet limited clinically significant increase in OR turnover time from 37 to 40 minutes (P < 0.001). There was also an increase in on-time OR starts from 37% to 45% (P < 0.001). We observed a decrease in the number of sentinel events, with only 1 occurring each year since implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative huddle was successfully implemented at a level 1 trauma hospital and helped standardize communication without significantly disrupting workflow. To our knowledge, this method of preoperative huddling has not been previously described in the literature.