Investigation of the Impact of Wellinks on the Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Interventional Research Study.

BACKGROUND: Wellinks is a remote disease management solution that provides novel chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the satisfaction, engagement, and clinical outcomes of Wellinks participants. This study also investigated the cadence of health coaching for patients with COPD. METHODS: A 24-week interventional study was conducted by Wellinks and the COPD Foundation in 2022. Adults with COPD were recruited by the COPD Foundation in the United States and determined to be eligible if they had phone and internet access, owned a smartphone, and were not currently participating in pulmonary rehabilitation. All study participants provided written informed consent. The Wellinks solution included remote health coaching, pulmonary rehabilitation, and group education; participants were provided the Wellinks app and smart spirometry and pulse oximetry devices. Participants were offered 6 coaching sessions in the first 12 weeks. For the second 12-week period, participants either reduced frequency or discontinued coaching; all other components of the Wellinks solution remained unchanged. The COPD Self-Efficacy Scale, Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, pulmonary function, pulse oximetry, and patient-reported healthcare resource utilization were the clinical outcome measures. Nonclinical outcomes included engagement and satisfaction with Wellinks and net promoter score. RESULTS: In total, 141 adults consented and completed Wellinks onboarding; 84.4% (n=119) of whom remained engaged throughout the 24-week study. Participants had a mean age of 70 (SD 7.8; range 48-88) years, and 55.7% (n=78) were female. Most participants (n=119, 84.4%) completed all 6 coaching sessions during the first 12-week period. Compliance with spirometer and pulse oximeter use was 82.3% and 89.4%, respectively, at week 1 but waned over the study period to 8.5% and 9.2%, respectively, at the end of the study. Participants indicated a high degree of satisfaction with Wellinks, with 95.5% (n=85) and 91% (n=81) of participants indicating that they agreed or strongly agreed that the educational content and health coaching, respectively, were valuable. At the end of the study, the net promoter score was +64 and +55 in the coaching continuation and discontinuation arms, respectively. A significant improvement from baseline to end of the study was observed in the COPD Self-Efficacy Scale total score (P<.001) and domain scores (P<.001 for each domain). In total, 35.1% (n=27) of participants improved by at least 1 category of change on the 5-point Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale from baseline to week 24. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the feasibility of using a remote model of care delivery to support people living with COPD. The insights gained in this study have allowed for further refinement and personalization of the Wellinks care model. Findings related to the combined use of technology and personal care delivery should be considered by others developing remote disease management tools. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05259280; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05259280.

An Integrated, Multimodal, Digital Health Solution for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects millions of Americans and has a high economic impact partially due to frequent emergency room visits and hospitalizations. Advances in digital health have made it possible to collect data remotely from multiple devices to assist in managing chronic diseases such as COPD. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, we evaluated the ability of patients with COPD to use the Wellinks mHealth platform to collect information from multiple modalities important to the management of COPD. We also assessed patient satisfaction and engagement with the platform. METHODS: A single-site, observational, prospective pilot study (N=19) was conducted using the Wellinks platform in adults with COPD. All patients were aged over 30 years at screening, owned an iPhone, and were currently undergoing a treatment regimen that included nebulized therapy. Enrolled patients received a study kit consisting of the Flyp nebulizer, Smart One spirometer, the Nonin pulse oximeter, plus the Wellinks mHealth app, and training for all devices. For 8 weeks, participants were to enter daily symptoms and medication use manually; spirometry, nebulizer, and pulse oximeter data were automatically recorded. Data were sent to the attending physician in a monthly report. Patient satisfaction was measured via a 5-point scale and the Net Promoter Score (NPS) captured in interviews at the end of the observation period. RESULTS: Average age of the patients was 79.6 (range 65-95) years. Participants (10 female; 9 male) had an average FEV1% (forced expiratory volume in 1 second as % of predicted for the patient) of 56.2% of predicted (range 23%-113%) and FEV1/forced vital capacity of 65%. COPD severity, as assessed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification, was mild in 2 patients, moderate in 6, and severe/very severe in 11; 9 patients were on home oxygen. During this 8-week study, average use of the spirometer was 2.5 times/week, and the pulse oximeter 4.2 times/week. Medication use was manually documented 9.0 times/week, nebulizer use 1.9 times/week, and symptoms recorded 1.2 times/week on average. The correlation coefficients of home to office measurements for peak flow and FEV1 were high (r=0.94 and 0.96, respectively). Patients found the app valuable (13/16, 81%) and easy to use (15/16, 94%). The NPS was 59. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that our cohort of patients with COPD engaged with the Wellinks mHealth platform avidly and consistently over the 8-week period, and that patient satisfaction was high, as indicated by the satisfaction survey and the NPS of 59. In this small, selected sample, patients were both willing to use the technology and capable of doing so successfully regardless of disease severity, age, or gender. The Wellinks mHealth platform was considered useful and valuable by patients, and can assist clinicians in improved, timely decision making for better COPD management.

The effect of vilazodone on sexual function during the treatment of major depressive disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction is common in major depressive disorder (MDD), and many serotonergic antidepressants adversely affect sexual function. Vilazodone, a novel serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A partial agonist approved for MDD, exerts its effects at the 5-HT transporter and at both presynaptic and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. This mechanism may limit sexual dysfunction. AIM: To summarize effects of vilazodone (40 mg/day, with food) on sexual function in adults with MDD. METHODS: Data sources were three Phase III studies: two 8-week, placebo-controlled studies (NCT00285376 and NCT00683592) and a 52-week open-label study (NCT00644358). Sexual function was assessed by analyzing changes from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) using validated measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Arizona Sexual Experience Scale or Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire. RESULTS: Population included 869 patients (vilazodone, 436; placebo, 433) from placebo-controlled studies and 599 patients from the open-label study. Sexual dysfunction prevalence was high (50%, men; 68%, women) before treatment and declined during treatment in vilazodone and placebo groups, indicating improvement on average. At EOT, stable/improved sexual function was observed in ≥91% of patients in placebo-controlled studies; treatment group differences in sexual dysfunction at EOT were not statistically significant for either sex. Differences vs. placebo in changes from baseline of sexual function scores were small and were generally not statistically significant; effect sizes (Cohen's D) were generally of low magnitude. In the placebo-controlled studies, 8.0% of vilazodone-treated patients and 0.9% of placebo-treated patients reported ≥1 sexual-function-related treatment-emergent adverse event (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Half of men and two thirds of women with MDD had sexual dysfunction at baseline; sexual function improved on average in both vilazodone and placebo groups. Results suggest that vilazodone may have a small adverse impact on sexual function in adults with MDD relative to the high prevalence of sexual dysfunction at baseline.

The efficacy profile of vilazodone, a novel antidepressant for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Vilazodone is a novel serotonin reuptake inhibitor and serotonin 1A receptor partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). This evaluation presents side-by-side efficacy data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, short-term 8-week trials (referred to as randomized controlled trial [RCT]-1 [N = 410] and RCT-2 [N = 481]); efficacy data for demographic and clinical subgroups (derived from pooled RCT data); and effectiveness data from a 52-week, open-label, long-term study (N = 616). The objective is to summarize the efficacy profile of vilazodone at its approved dose of 40 mg/day. METHODS: The main assessment in individual pivotal trials and pooled subgroup analyses was the change from baseline to end of treatment (EOT, 8 weeks) in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Mixed-effects repeated-measures analyses were conducted in the placebo-controlled trials. Effectiveness analyses in the long-term study included mean MADRS score change over time. RESULTS: Vilazodone-treated patients in both short-term studies showed greater improvement from baseline to EOT in mean MADRS scores than placebo-treated patients (least-squares mean [LSM] treatment difference: -3.2 [p = 0.001], RCT-1; -2.5 [p = 0.009], RCT-2). Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement mean scores at EOT reflected greater improvement with vilazodone compared with placebo in both studies (LSM treatment difference: -0.4 [p = 0.001], RCT-1; -0.3 [p = 0.004], RCT-2). MADRS response rates were significantly greater among patients receiving vilazodone versus those receiving placebo (RCT-1: 40.4% versus 28.1%, respectively [p = 0.007]; RCT-2: 43.7% versus 30.3%, respectively [p = 0.002]). The greater efficacy of vilazodone versus placebo was consistent for the majority of demographic and MDD characteristic subgroups. In the long-term study, the mean MADRS score improved from 29.9 (baseline) to 11.4 (week 8), 8.2 (week 24), and 7.1 (week 52). CONCLUSION: Vilazodone 40 mg/day resulted in clinically meaningful, statistically significant improvement in MDD symptoms in two placebo-controlled, 8-week studies. Findings are supported by subgroup analysis and open-label, long-term effectiveness data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized controlled trial 1: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00285376, http://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00285376 ; randomized controlled trial 2: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00683592, http://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00683592 ; open-label, long-term study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00644358, http://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00644358 .

A 1-year, open-label study assessing the safety and tolerability of vilazodone in patients with major depressive disorder.

Vilazodone, a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT(1A) receptor partial agonist, was efficacious in two 8-week placebo-controlled studies in adults with major depressive disorder. This open-label, multicenter study assessed the long-term safety of vilazodone. Adult patients with a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score of 18 or greater received vilazodone according to a fixed-titration schedule to reach a dose of 40 mg/d continued up to 1 year. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, clinical chemistry, electrocardiograms, and the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire. Effectiveness was assessed with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impressions scales. The safety population comprised 599 patients; 254 patients completed 1 year of treatment. The most frequent AEs were diarrhea (35.7%), nausea (31.6%), and headache (20.0%); greater than 90% of these AEs were mild or moderate. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation in more than 1% of patients were nausea (1.3%) and diarrhea (1.2%). There were no clinically important changes in physical examinations, electrocardiograms, or clinical chemistries. Mean weight increased by 1.7 kg (observed cases). Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire mean scores (observed cases) improved throughout treatment for both males and females. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale mean scores were 29.9 at baseline, 11.4 at week 8, and 7.1 at week 52 (observed cases). Vilazodone 40 mg/d for 1 year was safe and well tolerated by adults with major depressive disorder.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week study of vilazodone, a serotonergic agent for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, and further establish the safety profile, of oral once-daily vilazodone, a potent and selective serotonin 1A receptor partial agonist and reuptake inhibitor, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week study (conducted March 2008-February 2009) enrolled 481 adults with DSM-IV-TR-defined MDD. Patients received vilazodone (titrated to 40 mg/d) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to end of treatment. Secondary efficacy measures included MADRS and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) response and change in HDRS-17, HDRS-21, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S), and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. The Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) was administered at baseline and week 8. RESULTS: Vilazodone-treated patients had significantly greater improvement (P = .009) according to the MADRS than placebo patients (intent-to-treat; least-squares mean changes: -13.3, -10.8). MADRS response rates were significantly higher with vilazodone than placebo (44% vs 30%, P = .002). Remission rates for vilazodone were not significantly different based on the MADRS (vilazodone, 27.3% vs placebo, 20.3%; P = .066) or HDRS-17 (vilazodone, 24.2% vs placebo, 17.7%; P = .088). Vilazodone-treated patients had significantly greater improvements from baseline in HDRS-17 (P = .026), HDRS-21 (P = .029), HARS (P = .037), CGI-S (P = .004), and CGI-I (P = .004) scores than placebo patients. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were 5.1% (vilazodone) and 1.7% (placebo). The most common adverse events (vilazodone vs placebo) were diarrhea (31% vs 11%), nausea (26% vs 6%), and headache (13% vs 10%). Treatment-related effects on sexual function as measured by the CSFQ were small and similar to placebo. Effects on weight were no different from placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Vilazodone 40 mg/d was well tolerated and effective in adult patients with MDD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00683592.

The Safety and Tolerability Profile of Vilazodone, A Novel Antidepressant for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Vilazodone is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). This report summarizes the safety and tolerability of vilazodone 40 mg/day during short- and long-term treatment of adult MDD. METHODS: Pooled data from two 8-week, double-blind studies of vilazodone (n = 436) vs placebo (n = 433) and data from one 52-week, open-label study (n = 616, vilazodone only) were analyzed. Patients aged 18-70 with DSM-IV-TR-defined MDD received vilazodone or placebo (8-week studies only) once daily, with food, titrated to 40 mg/day over 2 weeks. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and weight. RESULTS: The most common AEs in all studies were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. Vilazodone-associated AEs in the two 8-week studies, defined as an incidence rate of ≥5% in the vilazodone group and at least twice that for placebo, were diarrhea (28.0% vs 9.2%), nausea (23.4% vs 5.1%), and insomnia (6.0% vs 2.1%), with the majority reported as mild to moderate and <5% of those patients requiring concomitant (directed) treatment for these conditions. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 7.1% (vilazodone) and 3.2% (placebo) in the 8-week studies and 20.7% in the 52-week study. Vilazodone had no clinically significant effects on vital signs, laboratory tests, or electrocardiograms. CONCLUSION: Vilazodone 40 mg/day was well tolerated during short- and long-term MDD treatment in these trials. Safety profiles associated with 8- and 52-week exposure were consistent.

Candidate gene analysis identifies a polymorphism in HLA-DQB1 associated with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis.

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is considered to be the most efficacious drug to treat schizophrenia, although it is underutilized, partially due to a side effect of agranulocytosis. This analysis of 74 candidate genes was designed to identify an association between sequence variants and clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA). METHOD: Blood and medical history were collected for 33 CIA cases and 54 clozapine-treated controls enrolled between April 2002 and December 2003. Significant markers from 4 genes were then assessed in an independently collected case-control cohort (49 CIA cases, 78 controls). RESULTS: Sequence variants in 5 genes were found to be associated with CIA in the first cohort: HLA-DQB1, HLA-C, DRD1, NTSR1, and CSF2RB. Sequence variants in HLA-DQB1 were also found to be associated with CIA in the second cohort. After refinement analyses of sequence variants in HLA-DQB1, a single SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism), 6672G>C, was found to be associated with risk for CIA; the odds of CIA are 16.9 times greater in patients who carry this marker compared to those who do not. CONCLUSIONS: A sequence variant (6672G>C) in HLA-DQB1 is associated with increased risk for CIA. This marker identifies a subset of patients with an exceptionally high risk of CIA, 1,175% higher than the overall clozapine-treated population under the current blood-monitoring system. Assessing risk for CIA by testing for this and other genetic variants yet to be determined may be clinically useful when deciding whether to begin or continue treatment with clozapine.

The SLCO1B1*5 genetic variant is associated with statin-induced side effects.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with mild statin-induced side effects. BACKGROUND: Statin-induced side effects can interfere with therapy. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 enzymes impair statin metabolism; the reduced function SLCO1B1*5 allele impairs statin clearance and is associated with simvastatin-induced myopathy with creatine kinase (CK) elevation. METHODS: The STRENGTH (Statin Response Examined by Genetic Haplotype Markers) study was a pharmacogenetics study of statin efficacy and safety. Subjects (n = 509) were randomized to atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 10 mg followed by 80 mg, 80 mg, and 40 mg, respectively. We defined a composite adverse event (CAE) as discontinuation for any side effect, myalgia, or CK >3x upper limit of normal during follow-up. We sequenced CYP2D6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, and SLCO1B1 and tested 7 reduced function alleles for association with the CAE. RESULTS: The CAE occurred in 99 subjects (54 discontinuations, 49 myalgias, and 9 CK elevations). Sex was associated with CAE (percent female in CAE vs. no CAE groups, 66% vs. 50%, p < 0.01). SLCO1B1*5 was associated with CAE (percent with > or = 1 allele in CAE vs. no CAE groups, 37% vs. 25%, p = 0.03) and those with CAE with no significant CK elevation (p < or = 0.03). Furthermore, there was evidence for a gene-dose effect (percent with CAE in those with 0, 1, or 2 alleles: 19%, 27%, and 50%, trend p = 0.01). Finally, the CAE risk appeared to be greatest in those carriers assigned to simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: SLCO1B1*5 genotype and female sex were associated mild statin-induced side effects. These findings expand the results of a recent genome-wide association study of statin myopathy with CK >3x normal to milder, statin-induced, muscle side effects.

Evidence for efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone, a combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and partial 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT(1A)) receptor agonist, were evaluated in adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from February 2006 to May 2007. Patients aged 18 through 65 years with MDD (DSM-IV criteria) and a baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) score of >or= 22 were randomly assigned to vilazodone or placebo for 8 weeks. Vilazodone was titrated from 10 mg to 40 mg once a day over 2 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by mean change from baseline to week 8 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), HAM-D-17, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety. Response rates were determined at week 8 for the MADRS, HAM-D-17, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Data were analyzed using a modified last-observation-carried-forward method in the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample. The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) was also measured at baseline and week 8. RESULTS: Of 410 randomly assigned patients, 198 receiving vilazodone and 199 receiving placebo were included in the ITT population. The mean changes in MADRS and HAM-D-17 total scores from baseline to week 8 were significantly (p = .001 and p = .022, respectively) greater with vilazodone than with placebo. Significant (p < .05) improvements in MADRS and HAM-D-17 scores were noted at week 1, the earliest time point measured. Response rates were significantly higher with vilazodone than with placebo on the MADRS (p = .007), HAM-D-17 (p = .011), and CGI-I (p = .001). Treatment-emergent adverse events with vilazodone included diarrhea, nausea, and somnolence; most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. There were no clinically significant differences for either gender in ASEX scores at end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Vilazodone is effective for the treatment of MDD in adults, with symptom relief starting at 1 week, and is well tolerated at a dose of 40 mg/day. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00285376.

The role of pharmacogenetics in treating central nervous system disorders.

Symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) disorders include abnormalities in both physical and psychological domains. Many drugs indicated for the treatment of CNS disorders are fraught with side effects and/or poor efficacy which impact patients' quality of life and drives non-compliance. Moreover, for many CNS drugs such as antidepressants and antipsychotics, it takes time to determine whether a particular drug is efficacious in an individual patient. To optimize drug treatment for each patient, prescribing physicians often need to raise or lower doses, switch drug classes, or prescribe additional drugs to mitigate side effects, often in a "trial and error" fashion. Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing, particularly in the realm of CNS therapy, can reduce the unpredictability of this process. By determining a patient's genetic profile, individual therapy parameters may be predicted pre-treatment for drug efficacy, optimal drug dose, and the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The intent of this review is to highlight the power of PGx testing to predict the likelihood of ADRs and efficacy during the treatment of the following CNS disorders: epilepsy, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and depression.

Prevalence of early-onset atrial fibrillation in congenital long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the young (age <50 years) is 0.1%, or 1:1,000 persons. Mutations in KCNQ1-, KCNH2-, and KCNA5-encoded potassium channels and SCN5A-encoded sodium channels have been reported in familial AF. A mechanism of atrial torsade has been suggested to occur in patients with congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of AF in patients with congenital LQTS. METHODS: History of documented AF was sought from two independent cohorts. One cohort consisted of 252 consecutive patients (146 females and 106 males, average age at diagnosis 23 +/- 16 years, QTc 465 +/- 51 ms) with genetically proven LQTS seen at Mayo's LQTS Clinic. The second cohort consisted of 205 consecutive patients (133 females and 72 males, average age at testing 23 +/- 16 years, QTc 479 +/- 51 ms) with a positive FAMILION genetic test (PGxHealth) for LQTS. RESULTS: Early-onset AF was documented in 8 (1.7%) of 457 patients, including 6 (2.4%) of 252 patients seen at Mayo and 2 (1%) of 205 patients with a positive FAMILION test. Five (2.4%) of 211 patients with LQT1-susceptibility mutations had documented AF, compared to 0 of 174 patients with LQT2, 1 of 59 patients with LQT3, 1 of 1 patient with Andersen-Tawil syndrome, and 1 of 34 patients with multiple mutations. The average age at diagnosis of AF of the six patients evaluated at Mayo was 24.3 years (range 4-46 years). Early-onset AF (age <50 years) was significantly more common in patients with LQTS compared to population-based prevalence statistics (P <.001, relative risk 17.5). CONCLUSION: Compared to the background prevalence of 0.1%, early-onset AF was observed in almost 2% of patients with genetically proven LQTS and should be viewed as an uncommon but possible LQT-related dysrhythmia. Clinical complaints of palpitations warrant thorough assessment in patients with LQTS.

Pharmacogenetic predictors of statin-mediated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and dose response.

BACKGROUND: There is interindividual variation in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) lowering by statins and limited study into the genetic associations of the dose dependant LDLc lowering by statins. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred nine patients with hyperlipidemia were randomly assigned atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 10 mg (low-dose phase) followed by 80 mg, 80 mg, and 40 mg (high-dose phase), respectively. Thirty-one genes in statin, cholesterol, and lipoprotein metabolism were sequenced and 489 single nucleotide polymorphisms with minor allele frequencies >2% were tested for associations with percentage LDLc lowering at low doses using multivariable adjusted general linear regression. Significant associations from the analysis at low dose were then repeated at high-dose statins. At low doses, only 1 single nucleotide polymorphism met our experiment-wide significance level, ABCA1 rs12003906. Twenty-six subjects carried the minor allele of rs12003906, which was associated with an attenuated LDLc reduction (LDLc reduction in carriers versus noncarriers -24.1+/-2.6% versus -32.2+/-1.5%; P=0.0001). In addition, we replicated the association with the APOE epsilon3 allele and a reduced LDLc reduction. At high doses, carriers of the minor allele of ABCA1 rs12003906 and the APOE epsilon3 allele improved their LDLc reduction but continued to have a diminished LDLc reduction compared with noncarriers (-30.5+/-4.0% versus -42.0+/-2.4%; P=0.005) and (-38.5+/-1.9% versus -45.3+/-2.8%; P=0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An intronic single nucleotide polymorphism in ABCA1 and the APOE epsilon3 allele are associated with reduced LDLc lowering by statins and identify individuals who may be resistant to maximal LDLc lowering by statins.

Pharmacogenetic issues in thorough QT trials.

Drug-induced QT prolongation (DI-LQT), through its associated arrhythmias, is a leading cause of drugs being withdrawn from the market. As a consequence, the US FDA and other regulatory agencies are mandating that all new drugs go through a so-called 'Thorough QT' (TQT) study to evaluate the potential for 'QT liability', specifically the potential for a drug to cause a discernible increase in the QT interval. Several genetic factors that modulate the risk of DI-LQT have been discovered. These are genes responsible for the congenital long QT syndrome, drug metabolism genes (mainly CYP2D6 and CYP3A4), and genes in other regulatory pathways. Here, we briefly review the links between genetic variants and drug-induced QT risk, and propose approaches to consider for using pharmacogenetics in planning and analyzing TQT studies.