Evaluation and Treatment of Entrapped Peripheral Nerve Catheters: A Case Report and Review.

Methods to remove retained peripheral nerve catheters range from non-invasive techniques to open surgical procedures. This study reviews two cases requiring surgical intervention for catheter remnant removal after catheter breakage and presents a systematic review describing the diagnosis and treatment of retained perineural catheters. While still very rare, our case report and systematic review demonstrate that retained nerve catheters can occur as the result of kinking or knotting, but also from catheter breakage. We recommend risk mitigation strategies for providers placing or caring for patients with regional nerve catheters.

A Practical Guide to Implementing Holistic Review during Surgery Resident Selection.

Provider workforce diversity is a key component of improving healthcare quality and addressing healthcare disparities. Furthermore, the traditional approach of "score-centered" application metrics do not consistently correlate with meeting milestones in surgery, nor do they adequately predict a surgical resident's clinical strength and operative abilities. We present here an adaptable process by which surgical residency programs can identify their values and incorporate holistic review into their resident selection process to improve resident selection and physician workforce diversity.

Strength in Numbers: A SWOT Analysis of Plastic Surgery.

Background: Plastic surgeons comprise the minority of practicing surgeons, with an even smaller minority practicing in an academic setting. As the practice of medicine and the systems in which we operate continue to evolve, it is essential that plastic surgeons have a say in the changing landscape. This study conducted a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of plastic surgery to identify unifying strengths and common threats. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons' Winter Meeting attendees on three separate occasions preceding the meeting. Respondents were asked to provide demographic information and to identify the top three strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT analysis) for the specialty. Subgroup analyses were performed based on demographic characteristics. Results: A total of 187 responses were received from meeting attendees, representing an 89.0% response rate. Most respondents were non-Hispanic (78.6%), White (66.8%), women (59.5%), and faculty/independent physicians (65.8%). The most identified strength in plastic surgery was our problem-solving abilities (62.0%). The most identified weakness was poor public perception of plastic surgery (54.0%). The most identified opportunity was demonstration of value to health systems (67.9%), and the most identified threat was scope of practice creep by other specialties (78.1%). The SWOT analysis identified lack of surgeon diversity as a key weakness, improvement of surgeon diversity as a key opportunity, and lack of diversity among plastic surgeons as a key threat to the specialty. Conclusion: Only through a diverse but united front can we effectively use our strengths to face our threats and employ opportunities to overcome our weaknesses.

Deconstructing the Excellent Plastic Surgeon: A Survey of Key Attributes.

Background: Most plastic surgeons practice in nonacademic settings, leaving a small subset of academic plastic surgeons with the responsibility of selecting the future generation of plastic surgeons without representation from a majority of our field. This raises questions as to whether the academic attributes valued during residency selection are valid predictive markers of who will become an excellent plastic surgeon. A survey was conducted of both academic and nonacademic plastic surgeons, as well as trainees, to determine what traits are considered most essential to being an excellent plastic surgeon. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed before the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons 10th Annual Winter Meeting. Demographics and information regarding the respondents' training and academic status were collected. Respondents were asked to select five traits that they considered most important to be an excellent plastic surgeon from a list of 20 preselected traits. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to perform subgroup analyses. Results: A total of 187 responses were received from meeting attendees, representing an 89.0% response rate. Overall, the five values endorsed as most important for a plastic surgeon were being technically sound (53%), collaborative (48%), ethical (44%), compassionate (37%), and emotionally intelligent (33%). However, the emphasis placed on these different attributes differed significantly amongst different demographic groups. Conclusion: It is important that we use methods such as holistic review when evaluating plastic surgery applicants to ensure our selection process is congruent with the traits we value.

A SWOT Analysis of Hot Topics in Plastic Surgery Resident Education: Consensus From the ACAPS 10th Annual Winter Meeting.

Background: With the aim of facilitating a critical self-reflection on how to align plastic surgery education with making excellent plastic surgeons, a rotating small-group session followed by live interactive audience polling was used to perform a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis at the 10th Annual American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons Winter Meeting. Methods: The final day of the conference included a 3-hour session of rotating small groups followed by live interactive audience polls discussing the following six relevant educational topics: the Plastic Surgery Common Application and resident selection, aesthetic surgery education, leadership development and business education, embedded fellowships and focused training, mentorship, and faculty retention. Results: A total of 60 individuals participated in the activity. A SWOT analysis was successfully performed for each educational topic, and a minimum of four opportunities were identified per topic to help guide future endeavors. Examples of opportunities include releasing recommendations for the implementation of holistic review; developing formal guidelines for aesthetic surgery education in residency via collaboration between ACAPS, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and The Aesthetic Society; creating extended focused elective rotations; integrating business education into formal curricula for all training levels; enforcing transparency regarding position expectations and offerings including salary, call schedule, and current challenges; and more. Conclusion: The results of this study will help guide future initiatives by the ACAPS to improve resident education and academic retention.

Do Computerized Tomography Scans Change Management in Carpometacarpal Dislocations and Fracture-Dislocations?

BACKGROUND: Concomitant carpal injuries with dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the carpometacarpal joints (CMCD/FD) are often hard to see on plain radiographs, making advanced imaging a useful diagnostic adjunct. We aim to: (1) characterize bony injury patterns with CMCD/FD; and (2) determine the frequency that preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans change surgical management. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent operative fixation of CMCD/FD from 2006 to 2021. X-ray and CT scan diagnoses were reviewed and correlated to intraoperative findings and procedures performed. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the frequency in which CT scans changed management and the frequency of new intraoperative diagnoses. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were identified. All patients had a preoperative x-ray, and 27 patients (36%) additionally had a CT scan. Patients who sustained high-velocity trauma were significantly more likely to obtain a CT scan than patients with low-velocity trauma (P = .019); however, the number of additional diagnoses was not significantly associated with trauma velocity (P = .35). Computed tomography scans significantly increased the number of diagnoses (P < .001) and changed operative management in 58% of cases. Six of the 48 patients (12.5%) that did not receive a CT scan had new intraoperative diagnoses, which changed the procedure for five of these patients. New intraoperative diagnoses were identified significantly more when patients did not have a CT scan (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining a CT scan in CMCD/FD patients changed the patient's diagnosis at a significant rate and changed operative management roughly half of the time. The authors recommend routine CT scans be obtained in patients with CMCD/FD.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Selected Speakers at Plastic Surgery Conferences.

Disparities in representation amongst academic physicians continue to persist at multiple levels, including the resident selection process and faculty career advancement. This study aimed to evaluate the racial and ethnic representation amongst plastic surgeons who are selected to speak at national and regional plastic surgery conferences. Methods: The researchers evaluated selected speakers at 12 plastic surgery annual meetings over 7 years (2014-2020). Racial and ethnic distribution in selected speakers at conferences were compared with those of medical school graduates, plastic surgery residents, and practicing plastic surgeons. Results: There were a total of 79 meetings, with 8931 total speaking opportunities and 1276 unique speakers. The percentage of individuals underrepresented in medicine (UIM) is 15.2% in matriculating medical students, 8.9% in active PRS residents, 8.3% in practicing PRS physicians, and 4.7% in invited conference speakers. Within racial/ethnic groups of invited speakers, there was no significant difference in either the average number of fellowships completed or average number of plastic surgery publications (P = 0.44 and 0.39, respectively). No individual UIM speaker had more than 20 speaking opportunities over these 7 years, compared with 17.0% in non-UIM speakers. Conclusion: Given the results of the study, the researchers conclude that racial minorities are disproportionately underrepresented as selected speakers at plastic surgery conferences, despite similarities in qualifications such as fellowship training, publication number, and years since board certification.

The West Coast Plastic Surgery Mentorship Program: Successes, Failures, and Future Growth.

BACKGROUND: Students who are underrepresented in medicine experience limited access to mentorship throughout medical school and when applying to plastic surgery residency. This study describes the creation, growth, and results of the multi-institutional West Coast Plastic Surgery Mentorship Program (WCPSMP), specifically reflecting on barriers to implementation and room for future improvement. METHODS: Students were eligible to apply to the plastic surgery mentorship program if they were first-, second-, or third-year medical students in a US medical school interested in plastic surgery. Preference was given to students who are (1) underrepresented-in-medicine racial/ethnic minorities; (2) first generation, low income; (3) lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer; and/or (4) without a home integrated plastic surgery program. Preprogram and postprogram surveys were analyzed. RESULTS: The 2021-2022 cycle of the WCPSMP included 30 resident mentors and 30 resident mentees, with a 1:1 mentor-to-mentee relationship. The second annual Mentor-Mentee Day was hosted on June 25, 2022, in San Diego, California, with attendance from 18 mentees. There was a 63% response rate in the presurvey and postsurvey. Most students endorsed gaining didactic skills, technical skills, and networking, but only a few gained research opportunities. CONCLUSION: The WCPSMP is a promising venue to offer underrepresented medical students valuable resident mentorship, as well as acquire surgical knowledge and skills. Further development of the program includes implementing a curriculum for residents on how to be an effective mentor and offering more research opportunities.

Virtual Subinternships in the COVID Era: Lessons Learned from Three Institutional Experiences.

After the cessation of all in-person visiting rotations during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, many programs developed virtual rotations as an alternative for the recruitment and education of prospective applicants. In this study, we developed a consortium of three institutions each with a unique virtual subinternship and prospectively surveyed participating students in order to reflect and improve upon future rotations. All students participating in virtual subinternships at three institutions were administered the same pre subinternship and post subinternship electronic surveys. Subinternship curricula were developed independently at each respective institution. Fifty-two students completed both surveys, for an overall response rate of 77.6%. Students' primary objectives were to evaluate their fit with the program (94.2%), interact with residents (94.2%), gain faculty mentorship (88.5%), and improve didactic knowledge (82.7%). Postrotation surveys revealed that over 73% of students reported having met all of these objectives over the course of the rotation. On average, students ranked programs 5% higher overall after the rotation (P = 0.024). Postrotation results showed that the majority (71.2%) of students perceived the virtual subinternship as slightly less valuable than in-person subinternships but that all students would participate in a virtual subinternship again. Student objectives can be successfully met using the virtual format for subinternships. The virtual format is also effective in enhancing the overall perception of a program and its residents. Although students still prefer in-person subinternships, our results suggest that virtual rotations are more accessible and very capable of meeting student goals.

Racial/Ethnic and Gender Disparities Over the Last Decade Within Microsurgery and Craniofacial Fellowship Training.

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic and gender disparities persist in plastic surgery at nearly all levels of training, becoming more pronounced at each stage. Recent studies have demonstrated that the proportion of female plastic surgery residents has increased to nearly 40%, yet only 11% of full professors of plastic surgery are female. Other studies have identified severe declines in underrepresented minority plastic surgery representation between plastic surgery residents and academicians with only 1.6% of Black/African American and 4.9% of Hispanic/Latinx full professors of plastic surgery. Often, residents seek fellowship for advanced training before seeking an academic professorship. This study aims to describe the racial/ethnic and gender representation of microsurgery and craniofacial fellows. METHODS: Names and photos of graduated fellows for the past 10 years (2012-2021) were extracted from microsurgery and craniofacial fellowship Web sites. Using a 2-person evaluation method, race/ethnicity and gender were primarily determined by photographic and surname and verified, when possible, through online confirmation methods (articles, social media). Distributions were analyzed with descriptive statistics and compared with the US population. RESULTS: Among 30 microsurgery fellowships, 180 graduated fellows (52.7%) were identified, resulting in 66 female fellows (36.7%) and the following racial/ethnic distribution: 113 (62.8%) White, 49 (27.2%) Asian, 12 (6.7%) Hispanic/Latinx, and 6 (3.3%) Black/African American. Among 31 craniofacial fellowships, 136 graduated fellows (45.0%) were identified, resulting in 38 female fellows (27.9%) and the following racial/ethnic distribution: 75 (55.1%) White, 45 (33.1%) Asian, 8 (5.9%) Hispanic/Latinx, and 8 (5.9%) Black/African American. The intersection between race/ethnicity and gender revealed the most disproportionately low representation among Black women. Relative to the US population, Hispanic/Latinx (0.31-fold) and Black/African American (0.48-fold) fellows were underrepresented, White (0.90-fold) fellows were nearly equally represented, and Asian (5.42-fold) fellows are overrepresented relative to the US population. Furthermore, despite pursuing fellowships at a greater rate, Asian and Black fellows are not reaching adequate representation among academic plastic surgeons. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that female racial/ethnic minorities are disproportionately underrepresented among microsurgery and craniofacial fellowships. Efforts should be made to improve the recruitment of fellows of underrepresented backgrounds and thus improve the pipeline into academic careers.

Impact of ACAPS Coordinated Interview Release Policy: Applicant and Program Attitudes, Adherence, and Interview Trends.

BACKGROUND: The authors studied the impact of a new, coordinated interview release date for integrated plastic surgery residencies. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of all 2020 integrated plastic surgery residencies and applicants was performed. Voluntary, anonymous surveys were administered following implementation of the interview policy. RESULTS: Program response rates were 55.6% for the initial survey and 57.1% for the follow-up survey. Programs released an average of 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8 to 2.4) rounds of interview invitations and invited 39.0 (95% CI, 35.3 to 42.6) applicants to interview. Policy adherence was high (91.1%). Most programs believed the interview policy was an improvement for applicants (46.5% yes; 9.1% no) and programs (41.9% yes; 27.0% no). Median rank of matched candidates was 13, and 55.1% of programs matched candidates within the top quartile of their rank list. The average candidate applied to 72 programs, attended 11 interviews, and ranked 12 programs. Interview distribution was bimodal, with peaks at six and 15 total interview invitations. Applicants within the top fifth, tenth, and fifteenth percentile for total interview invites disproportionately accounted for 15.3%, 26.6%, and 36.5%, respectively, of all invitations received. Survey data suggested applicant satisfaction with travel planning, improved scheduling, and cost savings following implementation of the interview policy. Applicants were somewhat dissatisfied with interview distribution. CONCLUSIONS: A coordinated interview release date is facile to adopt and does not adversely impact program interview trends or match rates. Applicants benefit from improved scheduling, travel planning, and cost savings; however, interview distribution continues to favor top-tier candidates.

Plastic Surgery Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Mentorship Program and Workshop: A Single Institution's Experience.

SUMMARY: Several minority groups and students without home plastic surgery programs remain underrepresented in plastic surgery. To address these barriers, our division created the Plastic Surgery Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Mentorship Program and Workshop. Students meeting at least one of the following eligibility criteria were invited in fall of 2020: medical student in years 1 though 3 or a research year who is (1) underrepresented in medicine, including African American, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American, Pacific Islander; (2) lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ); (3) first-generation low-income; or (4) does not have a plastic surgery residency program associated with their medical school. Students participated in quarterly meetings with their resident mentor and the annual hands-on workshop. The workshop was held on March 20, 2020, with both virtual and in-person participants. It included various didactic lectures, a suture laboratory, a resident panel, a social lunch hour, and extremity and head cadaver dissections with fracture plating. Twenty-four students attended the workshop. The course was rated 9.4 of 10 by students. The top met goals were gaining didactic plastic surgery knowledge (100%), exposure to a plastic surgery residency program (100%), resources to help overcome minority-specific barriers (96%), and technical skills such as suturing (96%). At the conclusion of the workshop, students had a significant increase in confidence in various aspects of plastic surgery knowledge and technical skills. The Plastic Surgery Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Mentorship Program and Workshop demonstrated preliminary success in providing support for students underrepresented in medicine and students without home programs.

Glabellar Botulinum Toxin Injection Improves Depression Scores: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Preliminary evidence suggests that glabellar onabotulinumtoxinA injections improve depression scores with few side effects compared to current first-line antidepressant medications. The authors' review reports on these studies, hypothesizing that glabellar onabotulinumtoxinA injections can be an alternative safe and effective treatment for depression. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relevant literature was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in August of 2020 using the keywords ["botox" OR "botulinum"] AND ["mood" OR "depression"] for articles published between 1980 and 2020. Prospective studies and randomized controlled trials on the use of glabellar onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the primary purpose of treating depression were considered. The primary endpoint for the meta-analysis was the mean difference in primary depression scores after treatment, along with a second endpoint of the standardized mean difference in depression scores among treated patients including all nine studies. RESULTS: Of the 499 reviewed articles, nine studies were included that reported improvement in mean depression scores from baseline. All five randomized controlled trials reported an improvement in mean depression scores at 6 weeks after treatment, with a weighted average change of -8.39 points ( p < 0.0001). The aggregate standardized mean difference from baseline to the primary endpoint across all nine prospective studies was -1.61 SD ( p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis and systematic review of the included studies provide support for an antidepressant effect of glabellar onabotulinumtoxinA injections.

Virtual Surgical Subinternships: Course Objectives and a Proposed Curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic, patient care and medical education have faced many significant changes. The Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgery officially recommended halting all student rotations and interviews for the year. This change has unfortunately fallen squarely at the onset of a vital season for education and recruitment of plastic surgery subinterns. This article presents a curriculum for a single institution's virtual surgical subinternship to help inspire ideas and inspiration for programs developing their own virtual subinternships. METHODS: The goals for the virtual surgical subinternship are focused on student preparation for residency and remain similar to those outlined by the core competencies for in-person rotations. The first virtual subinternship in plastic surgery modeled after the curriculum presented was offered as a 2-week course starting May of 2020. RESULTS: The components of the curriculum include a self-study syllabus, virtual case reviews, virtual suture laboratory, educational teleconferences, participation in research, and mentorship meetings. The 2-week course has approximately 25 hours of conferences and teaching, involving direct interaction with residents and faculty, and approximately 15 hours of self-directed learning. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this was the first virtual subinternship offered for rising fourth-year medical students. They strongly encourage other residency training programs to offer similar virtual learning opportunities for medical students, particularly for those without access to a home plastic surgery training program. The curriculum presented in this article is simply to provide ideas, inspiration, and a potential framework for programs wishing to create similar virtual learning opportunities.

Standardized Letters of Recommendation in Plastic Surgery: The Impact of Gender and Race.

BACKGROUND: In the last few decades, standardized letters of recommendation have seen increasing popularity among various medical specialties and have been shown to demonstrate score inflation and gender bias in some select specialties. Through analysis of standardized letter of recommendation scoring patterns, this study evaluated the impact of race and gender on performance in standardized letters of recommendation and provides suggestions for programs to optimally interpret standardized letters of recommendation and minimize bias when writing letters of recommendation. METHODS: Available standardized letters of recommendation were those from interviewed applicants to the integrated plastic surgery program between 2015 and 2018 (82 total applicants) and all applicants in the year of 2019 (241 total applicants). Various standardized letters of recommendation component scores were analyzed by demographics of both applicants and letter writers, including descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, t testing, and Fleiss kappa for interrater reliability using SPSS software (IBM, Armonk, N.Y.). RESULTS: No scoring category had an average score below the eighty-fifth percentile. Male letter writers scored male applicants significantly higher in Overall, Conscientiousness, Self-Initiative, and Academic Performance components, whereas female letter writers scored female applicants higher in Communication and Overall components. In the 2019 cohort, applicants of a minority race received lower scores on average in nine out of 10 categories, a difference that was significant in the Team Player category. CONCLUSIONS: Score inflation pervades standardized letters of recommendation scoring in plastic surgery. Work must be done by letter writers to help mitigate racial and gender biases that influence recommendations for resident selection in plastic surgery.

Prevalence of Workforce Diversity Research Among Surgical Specialties in the United States: How Does Plastic Surgery Compare?

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgeons are not as diverse as expected in relation to the increasingly diverse patient and medical student population. The authors assess the state of diversity in 8 primary surgical specialties in the United States and evaluate trends in research interest in diversity over the past 30 years. METHODS: Articles regarding diversity in surgery from 1990 to 2020 were systematically reviewed. The Association of American Medical Colleges Physician Specialty Data Reports and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Data Resource Books provided resident/fellow and faculty data from 2011 to 2016. Trends were analyzed over time per specialty. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2020, a total of 199 publications related to diversity were identified among the various surgical specialties. Orthopedic surgery had significantly more publications per year compared with other specialties (P < 0.05). Every specialty demonstrated a significant increase in publications about diversity over time (P < 0.05). A majority of publications were related to sex rather than underrepresented in medicine topics. The proportion of female surgeons was significantly higher for plastic surgery than for orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery (P < 0.001). Plastic surgery exhibited the highest growth rate in female residents (+1.6% per year, P < 0.001). The proportion of underrepresented minorities composing surgical trainees has not significantly increased in any surgical specialty between 2011 and 2016 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although diversity representation in surgery has somewhat improved, the rate is too slow to match the growing diversity of the US population. Outcomes have been disparate between specialties and demonstrate greater increases in sex equality relative to ethnic/racial equality. Evidence-based interventions need to be developed and implemented.

Diversity and Inclusion: A Review of Effective Initiatives in Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery lacks women and racial minorities that are underrepresented in medicine (UIM). This systematic review evaluates interventions used to promote diversity in surgery. DESIGN: The PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies (1) describing interventions for increasing UIM and gender diversity, (2) within surgery, and (3) targeting any learner prior to residency. SETTING: Nine surgical specialties were searched: general, neurosurgery, plastics, orthopedics, otolaryngology, urology, cardiothoracic, vascular, and ophthalmology. RESULTS: Of the 982 studies identified, 16 were included. Awards, clerkships, and workshops were each described by three studies; awards funded research or travel to national meetings, clerkships referred to a third- or fourth-year rotation that provided exposure to surgery, and workshops were hands-on skills sessions for learners. Two studies proposed a holistic review of residency applications, which involves emphasizing an individual's attributes and life experiences rather than strictly academics. Two studies detailed a longitudinal mentoring program comprised of mentorship throughout medical school plus opportunities for research, lectures, and workshops. One study described a combination of interventions and the remaining 2 presented interventions that were characterized as "other." Longitudinal mentoring programs significantly increased the likelihood of women and UIM applying to surgical residency, while holistic review significantly increased the numbers of women and UIM being interviewed and ranked by residency programs. One award increased the number of female residents matriculating into surgical residency. Clerkships significantly increased the number of women applying to surgical residency. The mere mention of diversity initiatives on a program's website was associated with more female surgical residents, but not UIM residents. Workshops led to a higher, but not statistically significant, proportion of women applying to surgery. CONCLUSION: Holistic review and longitudinal mentoring programs are the most effective interventions for increasing UIM and female representation among surgical trainees.

Financial Decisions and Reopening a Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of California Plastic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic. As a response, the United States shut down public gatherings and businesses in an effort to quarantine. This included the stopping of elective operations, which greatly affected plastic surgeons and their practices during the initial shutdown. OBJECTIVES: We aim to study the early impact of COVID-19 on the financial implications and practice patterns of plastic surgeons in the state of California during the initial shutdown of elective surgery and provide guidelines for effective management during future crises. METHODS: A 20-question survey was sent using Qualtrics XM software to 851 surgeon members of the California Society of Plastic Surgeons. The survey was open from May 13, 2020, to May 29, 2020. Standard statistical analysis was completed to compare private practice and nonprivate practice plastic surgeons. RESULTS: We had a total of 140 respondents to our survey for a 16.5% response rate. The majority (77.1%) of the respondents were in a private practice setting. Private practice plastic surgeons reported a higher financial impact with a 79% reduction in financial income compared with nonprivate practice plastic surgeons at a 37% reduction (P < 0.0001). Additionally, private practice plastic surgeons demonstrated a higher reduction in case volume and were more likely to lay off or furlough staff, close their practice, and apply for loans (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our survey study showed that private practice plastic surgeons in the state of California faced the most financial hardship during the early shutdown of the COVID-19 pandemic. It serves as a valuable snapshot in our economic history and depicts the heavy financial impact of the stopping of elective surgery. Since the reopening of practices, new guidelines have been implemented to maintain safe elective surgery while the pandemic continues. Further follow-up studies on both the state and national level need to be completed to see the continued financial effects on private and nonprivate plastic surgery practices since the reopening and resumption of elective surgery.