Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Radiol ; 71(9): 889-95, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27210245

RESUMO

AIM: To examine the interpretive performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as an adjunct to digital mammography (DM) compared to DM alone in a series of invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) and to assess whether DBT can be used to characterise ILC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multi-reader study was conducted of 83 mammographic examinations of women with 107 newly diagnosed ILCs ascertained at histology. Consenting women underwent both DM and DBT acquisitions. Twelve radiologists, with varying mammography experience, interpreted DM images alone, reporting lesion location, mammographic features, and malignancy probability using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 1-5; they then reviewed DBT images in addition to DM, and reported the same parameters. Statistical analyses compared sensitivity, false-positive rates (FPR), and interpretive performance using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC), for reading with DM versus DM plus DBT. RESULTS: Multi-reader pooled ROC analysis for DM plus DBT yielded AUC=0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.91), which was significantly higher (p<0.0001) than DM alone with AUC=0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.86). DBT plus DM significantly increased pooled sensitivity (85%) compared to DM alone (70%; p<0.0001). FPR did not vary significantly with the addition of DBT to DM. Interpreting with DBT (compared to DM alone) increased the correct identification of ILCs depicted as architectural distortions (84% versus 65%, respectively) or as masses (89% versus 70%), increasing interpretive performance for both experienced and less-experienced readers; larger gains in AUC were shown for less-experienced radiologists. Multifocal and/or multicentric and bilateral disease was more frequently identified on DM with DBT. CONCLUSION: Adding DBT to DM significantly improved the accuracy of mammographic interpretation for ILCs and contributed to characterising disease extent.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Mamografia/métodos , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/métodos , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
2.
Radiol Med ; 118(3): 401-14, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22872454

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the relative risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer (BC) in women treated with radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease (HD) and analysed the imaging features of these breast neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 women who had all undergone radiotherapy between 1980 and 2010 (median age, 36.6 years). Women aged ≤30 years were screened with clinical breast examination, ultrasound (US) and, if necessary, mammography; women >30 years had clinical breast examination, US and mammography. Three women underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as well. RESULTS: Mammography detected seven invasive breast cancers in 6/54 women (11.1%). Median age at diagnosis was 26.1 years for HD and 42.4 for breast cancer. Breast cancer was diagnosed following a median latent period from radiotherapy of 15.1 years. Mean radiation dose was 37.6 Gy in women who developed breast cancer and 31.3 Gy in the other women. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, women who were exposed to radiation for HD had a 6.2-fold higher risk of developing breast cancer than the general population. In consideration of the young age and high breast density, women aged ≤30 years should be monitored by US and MR imaging; women aged >30 years should be monitored by US, mammography and, when necessary, MR imaging.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Doença de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Feminino , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/terapia , Doses de Radiação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
3.
Radiol Med ; 116(3): 477-88, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21225359

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The authors sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB) in comparison with diagnostic surgical excision for characterisation of nonpalpable breast lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories R3 and R4. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2008, we conducted 602 stereotactic, 11-gauge, VACB procedures on 243 nonpalpable breast lesions categorised as BI-RADS R3, 346 categorised as BI-RADS R4 and 13 categorised as BI-RADS R5. We calculated the diagnostic accuracy and cost savings of VACB by subtracting the cost of the stereotactic biopsy from that of the diagnostic surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 56% of the lesions were benign and required no further assessment. Lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) (23.6%) were debated at multidisciplinary meetings, and diagnostic surgical biopsy was recommended for 83.1% of them. All malignant lesions (B4 and B5) underwent surgical excision. VACB had a sensitivity of 94.9%, specificity of 98.3% and diagnostic accuracy of 97.7%. The cost savings per VACB procedure were 464.00 euro; by obviating 335 surgical biopsies, the overall cost savings was 155,440.00 euro over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: VACB proved to have high diagnostic accuracy for characterising abnormalities at low to intermediate risk of malignancy and obviated surgical excision in about half of the cases, allowing for considerable cost savings.


Assuntos
Biópsia por Agulha/economia , Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Calcinose/patologia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vácuo
4.
Radiol Med ; 115(4): 551-62, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20177990

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonoelastography in differentiating and characterising nodular breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 nodular lesions diagnosed on mammography and/or ultrasonography in 110 women (mean age 51.27 years) were evaluated with sonoelastography and classified according to elasticity score (S1-S5). Needle biopsy was performed in 104/120 cases, whereas 16/120 were sent for follow-up. Sensitivity and specificity of sonoelastography were determined by taking biopsy findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: Biopsy yielded the following results: 66 benign, three equivocal and 35 malignant lesions. Sensitivity and specificity of sonoelastography were, respectively, 88.5% and 92.7%. All nodules with an elasticity score of 5 were malignant, and those with a score

Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha Fina , Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia Mamária , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA