[Predictors of asthenia in breast and prostate cancer patients undergoing curative radiotherapy]. / Facteurs de risque d'asthénie en cours de la radiothérapie des cancers du sein et de la prostate.

PURPOSE: Patients frequently report asthenia during radiation. The present study aimed at identifying the correlation between numerous clinical and tumoral factors and asthenia in breast and prostate cancer patients treated by curative radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute (France). All breast and prostate cancer patients undergoing curative radiotherapy during 2015 were screened (n=806). Patient's self-evaluation of asthenia and radiotherapy tolerance was assessed through verbal analogic scale (0/10 to 10/10). Data about toxicities, travel distance and travel time, tumor's characteristics, radiotherapy treatment planning, previous cancer therapies, were collected from medical records. RESULTS: 500 patients were included (350 in the breast cancer group and 150 in the prostate cancer group). In all, 86% of patients in the breast cancer group reported asthenia, with a 5/10 median score. In all, 54% of patients in the prostate cancer group reported asthenia, with a 2/10 median score. Univariate analysis showed correlation between asthenia and radiotherapy tolerance as well as tumor staging, in the prostate cancer group. No other correlation was evidenced. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy-related fatigue is a common side effect. This study showed that most of the factors related to patients or disease that are commonly used to explain fatigue during curative treatments, seem finally to be not correlated with asthenia.

Use of 4D-CT for radiotherapy planning and reality in France: Data from a national survey.

PURPOSE: Lung and some digestive tumours move during a respiratory cycle. Four-dimensional scanography (4D-CT) is commonly used in treatment planning to account for respiratory motion. Although many French radiotherapy centres are now equipped, there are no guidelines on this subject to date. We wanted to draw up a description of the use of the 4D-CT for the treatment planning in France. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We conducted a survey in all French radiotherapy centres between March and April 2017. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two were contacted. The participation rate was 88.37%. The use of the 4D-CT seems to be common and concerned planning for 15.28% of kidney and adrenal cancers, 19.72% of pancreatic cancers, 27.78% of oesophageal cancers and 73.24% of lung cancers in case of normofractionated treatments. The use of the 4D-CT was also widespread in the case of stereotactic body radiation therapy: with 61.11% in the case of pulmonary irradiation and 34.72% in the case of hepatic irradiation. Many centres declared they carried out several 4D-CT for treatment planning (29, 55% in case of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumours and 20% for liver tumours). Private centres tend to repeat 4D-CT more. CONCLUSION: Although the use of the 4D-CT appears to be developing, it remains very heterogeneous. To date, the repetition of the 4D-CT has been very poorly studied and could be the subject of clinical studies, allowing to define in which indications and for which populations there is a real benefit.

[Use of 4D-CT: Main technical aspects and clinical benefits]. / Utilisation de la scanographie quadridimensionnelle : principaux aspects techniques et intérêts cliniques.

The four-dimensional scannography, also called 4D-CT, was created in the early 2000s. This method enables the aquistion of CT-scans synchronised with the patient's breathing. It allows an anatomical observation depending on the time. Different systems have been marketed. They are commonly used in treatment planning. It allows to take into account respiratory motion, considering the changes of shape and position of the tumor and organs. In the age of new techniques and stereotactic irradiations, 4D-CT is a valuable tool for estimating the uncertainties associated with respiratory movements, This technique also presents some limitations, including artifacts. The quality of the examination can be degraded in some patients with irregular respiration. Here we propose a summary of this technique detailing its principle of operation, its advantages and its main limits.

[Physiopathology and pharmacological perspectives in the treatment of radiation enteritis]. / Physiopathologie et modulation pharmacologique de l'entérite radique.

The small intestine is an organ frequently exposed in abdominal and pelvic irradiations. Acute and late toxicity can sometimes be difficult to manage and can significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Currently there is no guideline on the management of acute and late side effects induced by therapeutic irradiation. The aim of this review is to summarize available data on the pathophysiology of radiation enteritis, and to highlight potential preventive strategies and principles of treatment of radiation enteritis.

[Medical prevention and treatment of radiation-induced urological and nephrological complications]. / Prévention médicale et traitement des complications urologiques et néphrologiques secondaires à la radiothérapie.

Abdominal and pelvic irradiations play a major place in the management of patients with cancer and present a risk of acute and late side effects. Radiation-induced lesions can affect kidney or urological structures. These side effects can have an impact in the quality of life of patients. The aim of this article is to describe the physiopathology, the symptomatology, and the principles of management of radiation-induced nephropathy, uretheritis, cystitis, and urethritis.

Harnessing drug/radiation interaction through daily routine practice: Leverage medical and methodological point of view (MORSE 02-17 study).

BACKGROUND: Safety profile of the interaction between anticancer drugs and radiation is a recurrent question. However, there are little data regarding the non-anticancer treatment (NACT)/radiation combinations. The aim of the present study was to investigate concomitant NACTs in patients undergoing radiotherapy in a French comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. All cancer patients undergoing a palliative or curative radiotherapy were consecutively screened for six weeks in 2016. Data on NACTs were collected. RESULTS: Out of 214 included patients, a NACT was concomitantly prescribed to 155 patients (72%), with a median number of 5 NACTs per patient (range: 1-12). The most prescribed drugs were anti-hypertensive drugs (101 patients, 47.2%), psychotropic drugs (n = 74, 34.6%), analgesics (n = 78, 36.4%), hypolipidemic drugs (n = 57, 26.6%), proton pump inhibitors (n = 46, 21.5%) and antiplatelet drugs (n = 38, 17.8%). Although 833 different molecules were reported, only 20 possible modifiers of cancer biological pathways (prescribed to 74 patients (34.5%)) were identified. Eight out of the 833 molecules (0.9%), belonging to six drug families, have been investigated in 28 ongoing or published clinical trials in combo with radiotherapy. They were prescribed to 63 patients (29.4%). CONCLUSION: Drug-radiation interaction remains a subject of major interest, not only for conventional anticancer drugs, but also for NACTs. New trial designs are thus required.

Navigating the highlights of phase III trials: a watchful eye on evidence-based radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based oncology. However, there is no exhaustive review describing the radiotherapy RTCs characteristics. The objective of the present study was to describe features of all phase III RCTs including at least a radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Requests were performed in the Medline database (via PubMed). The latest update was performed in April 2016, using the following MESH terms: 'clinical trials: phase III as topic', 'radiotherapy', 'brachytherapy', as keywords. RESULTS: A total of 454 phase III RCTs were identified. Studies were mainly based on open (92.1%) multicenter (77.5%) designs, analyzed in intend to treat (67.6%), aiming at proving superiority (91.6%) through overall survival assessment (46.5%). Most frequently studied malignancies were head and neck (21.8%), lung (14.3%) and prostate cancers (9.9%). Patients were mainly recruited with a locally advanced disease (73.7%). Median age was 59 years old. Out of 977 treatment arms, 889 arms experienced radiotherapy, mainly using 3D-conformal radiotherapy (288 arms, 32.4%). Intensity-modulated techniques were tested in 12 arms (1.3%). The intervention was a non-cytotoxic agent addition in 89 studies (19.6%), a radiation dose/fractionation modification in 74 studies (16.3%), a modification of chemotherapy regimen in 63 studies (13.9%), a chemotherapy addition in 63 studies (13.9%) and a radiotherapy addition in 53 trials (11.7%). With a median follow-up of 50 months, acute all-grade and grade 3-5 toxicities were reported in 49.6% and 69.4% of studies, respectively. Radiotherapy technique, follow-up and late toxicities were reported in 60.1%, 74%, and 31.1% of studies, respectively. CONCLUSION: Phase III randomized controlled trials featured severe limitations, since a third did not report radiotherapy technique, follow-up or late toxicities. The fast-paced technological evolution creates a discrepancy between literature and radiotherapy techniques performed in daily-routine, suggesting that phase III methodology needs to be reinvented.